熱門Ptt文章

[爆卦]focusing中文是什麼？優點缺點精華區懶人包

雖然這篇focusing中文鄉民發文沒有被收入到精華區：在focusing中文這個話題中，我們另外找到其它相關的精選爆讚文章

在 focusing中文產品中有27篇Facebook貼文，粉絲數超過5,492的網紅Tony Capatch 柯龍，也在其Facebook貼文中提到， Outwork your haters ⚠️中文寫在下面⚠️ Let the fundamental core of your reaction from those people, to outwork and outperform every single one of them. Wha...

　同時也有9部Youtube影片，追蹤數超過11萬的網紅Lukas Engström，也在其Youtube影片中提到，In today's video we are focusing on the story about how a Taiwanese man slowed down his father's dementia with the help of cacao! Get NT$100 off your...

「focusing中文」的推薦目錄

focusing中文 在 Tony Capatch 柯龍 Instagram 的最讚貼文

2021-02-17 06:18:30

Outwork your haters ⚠️中文寫在下面⚠️ Let the fundamental core of your reaction from those people, to outwork and outperform every single one of them. Wha...

focusing中文 在 Kathy | Visual Content Creator Instagram 的精選貼文

2021-02-03 14:14:37

Look at them! Distraction at work is not my problem.（下面有中文版） 看看他們工作分心肯定不是我的問題啊😇 People always have many reasons to distract themselves, so here is the...

  • Tony Capatch 柯龍

    focusing中文 在 Tony Capatch 柯龍 Facebook 的最佳解答

    2021-02-05 19:29:29
    有 75 人按讚

    Outwork your haters ⚠️中文寫在下面⚠️

    Let the fundamental core of your reaction from those people, to outwork and outperform every single one of them.

    What do you do about the negative guy(s) who’s trying to bring you down?
    You could confront them, sure. But by doing that you join in their little game. In doing that, you give them satisfaction and they now know they go into your head.

    However, the preferred methodology for me in this situation is quite simple. And that is to ignore and outperform them.

    While you’re all over there, watching me and talking about me, I’m working. I’m working HARD. I’m taking things in my life to the next level.

    You keep gossiping and I’ll keep working
    You keep talking smack and I’ll keep working
    You keep focusing on everything and everyone else and I’ll keep working.
    And when you finally look around at where you are and where I’m at. You realize you have nothing left to talk smack about.

    You will lose and I will win. Period.
    -by @jockowillink

    @homie_homzilla and I both, as well as a few other people who I’m good with know what it’s like to be on the shit end of the stick. We both understand this.
    🔺You knock me down 7 times, I’m gonna stand up 8🔺

    Chin up, chest tall and proud brotha. Good things are coming.

    ◾️打敗那些Hater、看不起你的人◾️
    「你要保持你的初心，用你的行動表達自己，比那些人更勤勞、更超過那些人」。
    -
    你對那些試著貶低你、嘲笑你、讓你失望、給你負面情緒、看不起你的人怎麼辦？
    🥸
    當然可以直接面對槓起來，但這樣做，只會加入他們無聊的遊戲，讓他們稱心如意，他們會滿足看到你的挫敗，知道他們所說的已經打擊到你。
    -
    但，在這種情況下，我的解決方法非常簡單，那就是忽略和超越這些人。
    當你在那邊談論我、貶低我、嘲笑我、我的工作。 而我在努力工作，我正在將我生活中的事物、以及我的人生，推向全新的高度。
    -
    當你一直在講廢話，我會繼續工作；當你一直在蹉跎光陰，而我會繼續工作，
    你一直花時間專注在別人身上、攻擊別人、以打擊別人為樂，而我仍會繼續努力。
    當你終於環顧自己的四周及人生目標時，
    你的高度在哪裡，而我的高度在哪裡，
    你會意識到自己無話可說並且十分可笑。
    -
    你會輸，
    而我會贏。

    #motivation #motivationalquotes #keepgoing #strong #ironwill #willpower #mind #mindset #notdoneyet #success #haters #hatersgonnahate #strength #unbreakable #bodybuilding #body #台灣 #台北 #健美 #身材 #帥 #帥哥 #加油 #兄弟 #肌肉 #意志力 #heart #everyday #better #betterthanyesterday

  • Roger Chung 鍾一諾

    focusing中文 在 Roger Chung 鍾一諾 Facebook 的最佳解答

    2020-11-22 23:03:00
    有 43 人按讚

    今早為Asian Medical Students Association Hong Kong (AMSAHK)的新一屆執行委員會就職典禮作致詞分享嘉賓，題目為「疫情中的健康不公平」。
    感謝他們的熱情款待以及為整段致詞拍了影片。以下我附上致詞的英文原稿：

    It's been my honor to be invited to give the closing remarks for the Inauguration Ceremony for the incoming executive committee of the Asian Medical Students' Association Hong Kong (AMSAHK) this morning. A video has been taken for the remarks I made regarding health inequalities during the COVID-19 pandemic (big thanks to the student who withstood the soreness of her arm for holding the camera up for 15 minutes straight), and here's the transcript of the main body of the speech that goes with this video:

    //The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, continues to be rampant around the world since early 2020, resulting in more than 55 million cases and 1.3 million deaths worldwide as of today. (So no! It’s not a hoax for those conspiracy theorists out there!) A higher rate of incidence and deaths, as well as worse health-related quality of life have been widely observed in the socially disadvantaged groups, including people of lower socioeconomic position, older persons, migrants, ethnic minority and communities of color, etc. While epidemiologists and scientists around the world are dedicated in gathering scientific evidence on the specific causes and determinants of the health inequalities observed in different countries and regions, we can apply the Social Determinants of Health Conceptual Framework developed by the World Health Organization team led by the eminent Prof Sir Michael Marmot, world’s leading social epidemiologist, to understand and delineate these social determinants of health inequalities related to the COVID-19 pandemic.

    According to this framework, social determinants of health can be largely categorized into two types – 1) the lower stream, intermediary determinants, and 2) the upper stream, structural and macro-environmental determinants. For the COVID-19 pandemic, we realized that the lower stream factors may include material circumstances, such as people’s living and working conditions. For instance, the nature of the occupations of these people of lower socioeconomic position tends to require them to travel outside to work, i.e., they cannot work from home, which is a luxury for people who can afford to do it. This lack of choice in the location of occupation may expose them to greater risk of infection through more transportation and interactions with strangers. We have also seen infection clusters among crowded places like elderly homes, public housing estates, and boarding houses for foreign domestic helpers. Moreover, these socially disadvantaged people tend to have lower financial and social capital – it can be observed that they were more likely to be deprived of personal protective equipment like face masks and hand sanitizers, especially during the earlier days of the pandemic. On the other hand, the upper stream, structural determinants of health may include policies related to public health, education, macroeconomics, social protection and welfare, as well as our governance… and last, but not least, our culture and values. If the socioeconomic and political contexts are not favorable to the socially disadvantaged, their health and well-being will be disproportionately affected by the pandemic. Therefore, if we, as a society, espouse to address and reduce the problem of health inequalities, social determinants of health cannot be overlooked in devising and designing any public health-related strategies, measures and policies.

    Although a higher rate of incidence and deaths have been widely observed in the socially disadvantaged groups, especially in countries with severe COVID-19 outbreaks, this phenomenon seems to be less discussed and less covered by media in Hong Kong, where the disease incidence is relatively low when compared with other countries around the world. Before the resurgence of local cases in early July, local spread of COVID-19 was sporadic and most cases were imported. In the earlier days of the pandemic, most cases were primarily imported by travelers and return-students studying overseas, leading to a minor surge between mid-March and mid-April of 874 new cases. Most of these cases during Spring were people who could afford to travel and study abroad, and thus tended to be more well-off. Therefore, some would say the expected social gradient in health impact did not seem to exist in Hong Kong, but may I remind you that, it is only the case when we focus on COVID-19-specific incidence and mortality alone. But can we really deduce from this that COVID-19-related health inequality does not exist in Hong Kong? According to the Social Determinants of Health Framework mentioned earlier, the obvious answer is “No, of course not.” And here’s why…

    In addition to the direct disease burden, the COVID-19 outbreak and its associated containment measures (such as economic lockdown, mandatory social distancing, and change of work arrangements) could have unequal wider socioeconomic impacts on the general population, especially in regions with pervasive existing social inequalities. Given the limited resources and capacity of the socioeconomically disadvantaged to respond to emergency and adverse events, their general health and well-being are likely to be unduly and inordinately affected by the abrupt changes in their daily economic and social conditions, like job loss and insecurity, brought about by the COVID-19 outbreak and the corresponding containment and mitigation measures of which the main purpose was supposedly disease prevention and health protection at the first place. As such, focusing only on COVID-19 incidence or mortality as the outcomes of concern to address health inequalities may leave out important aspects of life that contributes significantly to people’s health. Recently, my research team and I collaborated with Sir Michael Marmot in a Hong Kong study, and found that the poor people in Hong Kong fared worse in every aspects of life than their richer counterparts in terms of economic activity, personal protective equipment, personal hygiene practice, as well as well-being and health after the COVID-19 outbreak. We also found that part of the observed health inequality can be attributed to the pandemic and its related containment measures via people’s concerns over their own and their families’ livelihood and economic activity. In other words, health inequalities were contributed by the pandemic even in a city where incidence is relatively low through other social determinants of health that directly concerned the livelihood and economic activity of the people. So in this study, we confirmed that focusing only on the incident and death cases as the outcomes of concern to address health inequalities is like a story half-told, and would severely truncate and distort the reality.

    Truth be told, health inequality does not only appear after the pandemic outbreak of COVID-19, it is a pre-existing condition in countries and regions around the world, including Hong Kong. My research over the years have consistently shown that people in lower socioeconomic position tend to have worse physical and mental health status. Nevertheless, precisely because health inequality is nothing new, there are always voices in our society trying to dismiss the problem, arguing that it is only natural to have wealth inequality in any capitalistic society. However, in reckoning with health inequalities, we need to go beyond just figuring out the disparities or differences in health status between the poor and the rich, and we need to raise an ethically relevant question: are these inequalities, disparities and differences remediable? Can they be fixed? Can we do something about them? If they are remediable, and we can do something about them but we haven’t, then we’d say these inequalities are ultimately unjust and unfair. In other words, a society that prides itself in pursuing justice must, and I say must, strive to address and reduce these unfair health inequalities. Borrowing the words from famed sociologist Judith Butler, “the virus alone does not discriminate,” but “social and economic inequality will make sure that it does.” With COVID-19, we learn that it is not only the individuals who are sick, but our society. And it’s time we do something about it.

    Thank you very much!//

    Please join me in congratulating the incoming executive committee of AMSAHK and giving them the best wishes for their future endeavor!

    Roger Chung, PhD
    Assistant Professor, CUHK JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, @CUHK Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong 香港中文大學 - CUHK
    Associate Director, CUHK Institute of Health Equity

  • Crossing Campus

    focusing中文 在 Crossing Campus Facebook 的最佳貼文

    2020-10-19 11:39:12
    有 1 人按讚

    【American view on US Politics】#中英對照​
    ​
    Focusing on the election again, people now also wondering: what went wrong with polling models in 2016, and can the same thing happen again in 2020?​
    ​
    《換日線》美籍作者 Mike 將以美國媒體 FiveThirtyEight 的民調模型為例，帶你了解民調背後的邏輯，並和你分享他的大選預測。而在接下來幾周，他也將與讀者們一起密切關注大選發展，歡迎留言「點播」你想了解的相關議題！​
    ​
    ▍中文版看這裡：美國總統大選：民調會不會（又）出錯？ >> https://bit.ly/3jZehL7

你可能也想看看

搜尋相關網站