[InnoVEX 2021線上展 每日之星!📣]

6Degrees - Reclaim Your Digital Life，以色列智慧醫療改革家! 💪

在醫療科技崛起的今天，技術面不斷突破。但我們仍該記得其中的核心 - 讓病人找回健康與生活! InnoVEX參展商 6 Degrees 來自以色列，他們以醫學及生活角度出發，發現身障者使用觸控裝置的需求、打造全新智慧手環!⚡ 能偵測手臂動作、轉為相關指令! 更有藍芽與軟體連結、隨插即用! 回歸初衷的醫療新創，InnoVEX邀你一起欣賞他們的故事! 👉https://bit.ly/3vGylY1

#tech #technology #cloud #startup #AI #IoT #business #trending #new #medical #health #heart #wear #disability

這次邀請到直播訪問的特別來賓是 Joyce。 Joyce 是加州臨床心理學家、同時也是紐約醫學院線上課程兼任教授，這次的直播聚焦在現代科技人的心理健康、看心理醫生的一些迷思、及如何幫助自我達到好的心理狀態。

Joyce 先在紐約哥倫比亞大學拿到心理諮商碩士， 再到伊利諾大學香檳分校取得教育心理學系心理諮商博士，在台灣與美國的許多醫院及心理諮商中心有豐富的臨床經驗，並曾於國立高雄師範大學諮商心理與復健諮商研究所、及亞洲大學心理系擔任專任助理教授。

矽谷作為全球科技中心，是世界人才嚮往的工作及居住地點，路上名牌名車充斥，大公司裡高薪聘請的名校碩博士一堆，看起來十分光鮮亮麗、令人心生嚮往，但現實是工作競爭激烈、生活壓力非常大。在這次直播中 Joyce 會分享她從心理醫生的角度來觀察，科技人不為人知的 "後巷真實人生" 中，心理可能有面臨什麼樣的通病或現象、可以怎麼自我照顧以達到良好的心理狀態。也會討論 如果真的有需要看心理醫生了， 公司會知道嗎？ 員工會不會因此被貼上標籤、被公司差別待遇？ 最後，會系統性的介紹一些心理諮詢的種類。 直播前及過程中也歡迎大家提問討論。

為了這次直播， Joyce 做了超級充分的準備， 她還特別準備了投影片來輔助說明！如果你聽完後和我一樣覺得受益良多， 歡迎追蹤 Dr. Joyce Sun - CA Psychologist. 心理學家在矽谷 的頁面， 如果你聽完覺得想利用公司的 EAP 或是醫療保險來找 Joyce 諮詢， 直播中有談到她的執照是可以看加州及佛羅里達州的居民，美國其他州要再確認，台灣可能不行，中國可以，因為最近肺炎，她的諮詢都改為線上對談， 她的個案有人還是想要見面談，所以她有一兩個空缺出來， 機會難得， 如果你有興趣， Joyce 的心理所網頁是: https://www.peacefulsunshine.com/

以下是直播訪問的一些內容大綱、搭配 Joyce 推薦的資源連結
---------------------------------------------------
矽谷灣區人的心理狀態
一般性常見的壓力:
Stress, anxiety, depression, self-esteem/ self-image, career confusion, relationships, parenting issues, kids/teens (佼佼者父母的失落與不願面對);

正式的診斷 :
bipolar, OCD, psychosomatic symptoms, and other diagnoses


矽谷的公司文化 v.s. 亞洲教育的特質 (12:50)
Make impact & creative v.s. Being helpful and obedient
跟別人比 & 老是看自己的不足
移動的終點線 (高中要前三志願、大學要國立、研究所要...)
健康的心電圖與不健康的心 (加上內向敏感，在乎別人的看法，不想被看到)
沒有很謙虛 = 自大討人厭
集體主義 v.s. 個人主義 (要聽話/要得到認可，結構跟明確方向才有安全感)


破碎的蛋黃哥 (自我認同與核心價值) (26:30)
我可以! 我不需要”幫助”
對自己
對孩子 (青少年自殺等，錯失早療的介入)


什麼狀態建議諮詢 (36:45)
治療/復原模式、平時自我照顧模式、個人成長探詢模式


防疫期間的自我照顧 (40:26)
與現實接軌 (專家建議、合理的準備、不要過度幻想)
固定的新聞時間
運動
興趣、嗜好
朋友們互相支持
正念練習
身體照護: 泡澡、按摩、伸展、深呼吸
五感練習
意象練習
珍惜、祈禱


看心理醫生的感覺？ 公司會知道嗎？ 會不會被 fire ? (51:20)
不會，confidentiality，甚至不可能知道你是否有看心理師
唯一的例外: 被送來做工作適任評估，但公司只能拿到 yes or no 的回答


矽谷科技人的特殊性困擾 (58:40)
登山攻頂者
靈肉分離者


加州心理師執照種類 (1:01:00)
博士: Licensed Psychologist
碩士:
Licensed Professional Clinical Counselor (LPCC)
Licensed Marriage and Firmly Therapist (LMFT)
Licensed Clinical Social Worker (LCSW)

精神科醫師 Psychiatrist: 開藥、部分的精神科醫生也提供心理諮商與治療


美國的心理服務資源 (1:04:00)
保險 (網絡內外)
EAP
公司的額外補助
disability/ unemployment
自費 (心理師搜尋網站 https://www.psychologytoday.com/us、低價網路諮商、open path)
社區資源 (冥想團體、正念中心、瑜珈 、breath work)


對策 (1:08:50)
平衡報導
肯定自己的每個小成就，內在歸因
不只是認知層面的肯定，還要情緒的回應
定義你專屬的蛋黃哥 (核心價值)
個性、優點、興趣、價值觀、哲學觀、可轉移性的技術、
他人對自己的整體印象等
用行為 (包括肢體語言/眼神) 改變感覺 fake it until you become it
Growth mindset v.s. fixed mindset

怎樣的心理治療才有效 (直播中沒時間講，但 Joyce 有準備的內容)
個案要負的責任
想改變的動機
準備度
願意分享的程度
回家功課的努力度
親朋好友的支持等

心理師的部分
專業認證或學有所長
感覺有安全感或至少不討厭
你的個性/思考模式與心理師採用的理論技術的相容性
你與心理師目標的一致性 (問題解決 v.s. 增加自我了解)


推薦的影片連結
TED Talk-Amy Cuddy: 肢體語言塑造你自己有中文字幕，尤其是 15:52 處的個人故事
https://youtu.be/v_vkoz1_nd8

婚姻及伴侶關係: Making Marriage Work | Dr. John Gottman，推薦 Gottman 的所有影片與書籍
https://youtu.be/AKTyPgwfPgg

推薦伴侶們讓關係更緊密的問題討論集- 201 Relationship Questions: The Couple's Guide to Building Trust and Emotional Intimacy:
Amazon 連結: https://amzn.to/2wHmzmY
博客來連結: http://bit.ly/2v4mlGn

醫者有社會責任去保障公眾健康，我們認為梁卓偉教授和陳家亮教授作為香港兩所醫學院院長責無旁貸。因此，我們呼籲所有醫護人員參與連署，懇請兩位院長履行社會使命發表聲明保障社會大眾的健康和人身安全。

連署連結: https://forms.gle/teMGNCiZPMYatVbh8
———————————————————————-
《致香港大學李嘉誠醫學院院長、中文大學醫學院院長的公開信》

梁教授、陳教授道鑒：

　　有鑑於在六月十二日、七月二日及二十一日，香港警察濫用武力以控制群眾。如此行徑實對公眾健康遺害無窮，我們一眾醫療人員對此極為關切。作為香港大學李嘉誠醫學院院長、中文大學醫學院院長，吾等懇請兩位院長細察香港警察控制群眾之手段，以保障公眾健康。

　　據多家本地及國際媒體報導，香港警察於六月十二日，發射多輪催淚彈、橡膠子彈及布袋彈，以驅散聚集在金鐘的示威者。報導提及，警方向示威者發射至少一百五十枚催淚彈，二十輪布袋彈以及數枚橡膠子彈，造成至少七十二人受傷。從多家媒體直播可見，橡膠子彈更直射一名教師眼球，創傷嚴重，對其視力之損害非同等閒。另外，警方亦曾以數枚催淚彈包抄示威者，堵塞其退路；而當示威者被逼退守至中信大廈，警方竟朝人群中央投以催淚彈，造成數以百計的市民受傷及呼吸困難，生死攸關，不容小覷。此外，警方向一名手無寸鐵的市民，近距離發射橡膠子彈，以致其下腹嚴重受傷，情況慘不忍睹。

　　據多份醫學期刊綜述──如《刺針》（Lancet）[1] 及英國醫學期刊（BMJ (Open)）[2]，橡膠子彈乃可致命武器。同時，橡膠子彈不易操控，準確性低，有引致重傷，乃至死亡之風險。多份期刊不約而同指出，橡膠子彈不適宜用於密集人群之管制。

　　然而，香港警察漠視上述已知風險，仍於七月二日及七月二十一日繼續使用此類武器。在七月二十一日，警察更於鄰近民居之地，向群眾發射多輪催淚彈及橡膠子彈，當中更殃及記者。此等武器之禍害影響深重，不單有損呼吸系統，更會導致燒傷、嚴重鈍物創傷及爆炸性創傷。據媒體報導，武器造成至少十四人受傷；更有市民懼於警方之搜捕行動，而未敢求醫，致使受傷數字難以估算。

　　人權醫療組織（Physicians for Human Rights）醫生哈爾（Dr Rohini Haar）在接受紐約時報訪問時指出，警方對市民使用不成比例的武力，實有濫用武力之嫌。早在二零一四年，潘冬平教授[3]亦對香港警察使用催淚氣體情況深表關注，擔心催淚氣體損害市民呼吸系統。可見，催淚彈、橡膠子彈及豆袋彈等武器危害不輕，對香港市民公眾健康的損害不容置疑。

　　兩大醫學學院一直致力培育杏林菁英，不遺餘力。一眾醫療人員亦謹承《希波克拉底誓詞》之教誨，不論病患身份職要，一直為全人類之福祉著想，嚴守不懈。學院循循善誘，吾等縷心刻骨。誓詞薪火相傳，代代不息；缺少對生命健康之尊重，醫療人員何以自立？故此，我們一眾醫療人員懇請院長，發表聲明，呼籲香港警察：

一、避免濫用催淚彈及任何類型子彈，以免導致人命傷亡及其他不可見之損傷。
二、在使用武力時，必須顧及市民安全，並保持專業克制。

　　醫療人員一直存仁心，行仁術；保護市民之健康，乃至生命，吾等責無旁貸。院長為學為醫，高風峻節，茍以吾等同心同德，捍衛市民之生命健康，必見杏林春暖。

　　謹祝
道安

一眾醫療人員謹上
———————————————————————


Dear Professor Leung and Professor Chan,

We are a group of healthcare professionals, some of us being also graduates from the Faculty of Medicine of the University of Hong Kong and the Chinese University of Hong Kong. We are writing to express our gravest concerns over the persistent and serious threats to the health of members of the public posed by weapons deployed in crowd control by the Hong Kong Police Force (HKPF) on 12 June, 2 July and 21 July. We hereby urge the Deans of the sole Faculties of Medicine in Hong Kong to take actions in censuring the HKPF and the Hong Kong Government against the serious health risks in their crowd-control tactics.

On 12 June, as reported by multiple local and international news agencies, the HKPF fired multiple rounds of tear gas, rubber bullets and bean-bag rounds to disperse protesters in Admiralty. Over 150 canisters of tear gas, 20 bean-bag rounds and several rubber bullets have admittedly been directed at protestors which resulted in at least 72 injuries. As evident in the live reports from various media sources, a teacher suffered traumatic ocular injury causing significant vision loss when his eye was hit by a rubber bullet; hundreds of citizens suffered various degrees of injuries and respiratory distress consequential upon the numerous tear gas canisters shot at Citic Tower in Admiralty where protesters were trapped in a life-threatening space filled with tear gas; an unarmed man sustained injury in his lower abdomen when a rubber bullet was directed at him in a short distance.

According to multiple studies and reviews from high impact factor medical journals, in particular the Lancet[1] and BMJ (Open)[2], rubber bullets can be lethal. Their notorious inaccuracy and risk of severe injury and death render them inappropriate and unsafe means of force in crowd control.

However, despite the known risks of these weapons, the HKPF tenaciously deployed them on citizens on 2 July and 21 July. On 21 July, 55 canisters of tear gas, 5 rubber bullet rounds and 24 sponge bullets were admittedly shot, some without immediate warning, at protestors and even at journalists notwithstanding the numerous residential buildings and citizens in the vicinity. The use of these weapons has left members of the public with at the very least, various types of injuries and further, burns, blunt force trauma and explosive injuries. 14 injuries have by far been reported where others did not present themselves to the hospital in fear of the risk of prosecution.

Dr Rohini Haar of Physicians for Human Rights had in a recent interview told the New York Times that the force used by the HKPF was disproportionate and excessive. In Hong Kong, Professor Ronnie Poon had as early as in 2014 expressed openly his earnest concern over both the short term and long term health risks in the use of tear gas in particular to one’s respiratory system when the HKPF first fired tear gas at Hong Kong citizens [3]. It is indisputable that these named weapons put the health of Hong Kong citizens at serious risks.

Doctors have striven to stand by the Hippocratic oath that they remain members of society, the identity of which comes before their profession, with special obligations to all fellow human beings. The two medical schools in Hong Kong have been established accordingly for the nurture of healthcare professionals to serve the public with benevolent hearts and minds. This is the time to honour our oath that human life should deserve the utmost respect and to maintain by all means such noble traditions of the medical profession.

We, as healthcare professionals, therefore implore the Deans of the only Faculties of Medicine in Hong Kong, in the service of humanity with conscience and dignity, to take the lead in safeguarding the public’s health and to issue a statement to urge the Hong Kong Police Force to:

(1) refrain from using tear gas and bullets in any form on protestors to prevent further bloodshed and severe non-reversible injuries; and

(2) exercise due restraint over the use of force when handling protests and at all times, put the safety of Hong Kong citizens at the highest priority.

Regards,
A group of healthcare professionals
———————————————————
Healthcare professionals have a social responsibility to safeguard the health of members of the public. We believe that, as Deans of the faculties of medicine in Hong Kong, Professor Leung and Professor Chan bear a paramount obligation in this regard. We appeal to all healthcare professionals to join us in this petition to urge the deans to issue a statement to honour their obligation to defend the public from health risks.
—————————————————————
Petition Link: https://forms.gle/teMGNCiZPMYatVbh8
——————————
參考資料/References
[1] Mahajna, A., Aboud, N., Harbaji, I., Agbaria, A., Lankovsky, Z., Michaelson, M., . . . Krausz, M. M. (2002). Blunt and penetrating injuries caused by rubber bullets during the Israeli-Arab conflict in October, 2000: A retrospective study. The Lancet, 359(9320), 1795-1800. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(02)08708-1

[2] Haar, R. J., Iacopino, V., Ranadive, N., Dandu, M., & Weiser, S. D. (2017, December 01). Death, injury and disability from kinetic impact projectiles in crowd-control settings: A systematic review

[3] Professor Ronnie Poon Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/138599119760/posts/10152753050039761?s=1014598371&sfns=mo

—————————————————————