//An activist detained under Hong Kong’s national security law is planning to apply to the High Court to lift restrictions on the media’s reporting of her bail hearing on Wednesday.

In a message published on Tuesday, Gwyneth Ho argued that laws banning the media from reporting details of bail hearings failed to protect the interests of the accused. The press should be allowed to freely report what happened during those hearings, she said.

“After the defendants under the national security law were arrested and remanded in custody, the reporting restrictions on bail hearings have turned the process into a ‘black box’, and has created widespread fears in society,” she wrote.

“The public has no way of knowing the contents of the bail hearings under the national security law, especially the evidence used by the prosecutors and the courts’ assessment of the defendants.”

Ho is among 47 democracy figures charged with conspiracy to commit subversion, which carries a maximum sentence of life in prison. They are accused of plotting to subvert state power via an informal primary poll held last July. Only 13 of the 47 have been granted bail since early March.

After being detained for more than six months, Ho will make her bail application at the High Court on Wednesday morning.

She publicised her arguments a day in advance, saying the reporting restrictions set out under section 9P of the Criminal Procedure Ordinance were originally meant to ensure that defendants received a fair trial. The law limits media coverage of bail hearings to basic information such as the defendant’s name, the court’s decision and bail conditions.

Those regulations backfired because the lack of transparency had caused the public to doubt whether the national security law had been fairly implemented, Ho wrote, adding that Hong Kong society was worried about arbitrary arrests based on flimsy evidence.

“In reality, the reporting restrictions benefit the Department of Justice, as it no longer needs to publicly explain the basis of the charges and various political accusations,” she wrote.

“The restrictions have clearly contravened the principle of public justice, and if the courts still refuse to lift them, the public will inevitably suspect that the courts accept this unfair situation.”

The open administration of justice was a fundamental principle of Hong Kong’s common law system, and courts should be scrutinised by the public and the press, Ho said, quoting the city’s former chief justice Denys Roberts.

Hong Kong courts have mostly kept reporting restrictions in place for bail applications under the national security law, though some judges have issued written rulings explaining their decision to grant or refuse bail, which are typically published after a delay.

Earlier on Tuesday, the court again denied the bail application of former pro-democracy lawmaker Gary Fan, a co-defendant in the subversion case. Like most of the 47, Fan has been in custody for months with no trial date lined up as yet.

By Holmes Chan//

毋忘五大訴求　公民抗命有理
—10‧20九龍遊行陳情書
（案件編號：DCCC 535/2020）

——————————————————
「毋忘初衷，活在愛和真實之中」
撐阿銘，即訂閱Patreon：
patreon.com/raphaelwong
—————————————————

胡法官雅文閣下：

　　2012年，我第一次站在法庭上承認違反「公安惡法」，述說對普選的盼望，批評公安惡法不義，並因公民抗命的緣故，甘心樂意接受刑罰。當年我說，如果小圈子選舉沒有被廢除，惡法沒有消失，我依然會一如故我，公民抗命，並且我相信將會有更多學生和市民加入這個行列。想不到時至今日，普選仍然遙遙無期，我亦再次被帶到法庭接受審判，但只是短短７年，已經有數十萬計的群眾公民抗命，反對暴政。今日，我承認違反「未經批准的政府」所訂立「未經批准的惡法」之下的「未經批准集結」罪，我不打算尋求法庭的憐憫，但請容許我佔用法庭些微時間陳情，讓法庭在判刑前有全面考慮。

暴力之濫觴

　　在整個反修例運動如火如荼之際，我正承擔另一宗公民抗命案件的刑責。雖然身在獄中，但仍然心繫手足。我在獄中電視機前見證6月9日、6月16日及8月18日三次百萬港人大遊行，幾多熱愛和平的港人冒天雨冒彈雨走上街頭，抗議不義惡法，今日關於10月20日的案件，亦是如此。可能有人會問，政府已在6月暫緩修例，更在9月正式撤回修例，我等仍然繼續示威，豈非無理取鬧？我相信法官閣下肯定聽過「遲來的正義並非正義」（Justice delayed is justice denied）這句格言。當過百萬群眾走上街頭，和平表達不滿的時候，林鄭政府沒有理睬，反而獨行獨斷，粗暴踐踏港人的意願，結果製造出後來連綿不絕的爭拗，甚至你死我活的對抗。經歷眾多衝突痛苦之後，所謂暫緩撤回，已經微不足道，我們只是更加清楚：沒有民主，就連基本人權都不會擁有！

　　在本案之中，雖然我們都沒有鼓動或作出暴力行為，但根據早前8‧18及10‧1兩宗案件，相信在控方及法庭眼中，案發當日的暴力事件仍然可以算在我們頭上，如此，我有必要問：如果香港有一個公平正義的普及選舉，人民可以在立法會直接否決他們不認可的法律，試問2019年的暴力衝突可以從何而來呢？如果我們眼見的暴力是如此十惡不赦，那麼我們又如何看待百萬人遊行後仍然堅持推行惡法的制度暴力呢？如果我們不能接受人民暴力反抗，那麼我們是否更加不能對更巨大更壓逼的制度暴力沈默不言？真正且經常發生的暴力，是漠視人民訴求的暴力，是踐踏人民意見的暴力，是剝奪人民表達權利的暴力。真正憎恨暴力，痛恨暴力的人，不可能一方面指摘暴力反抗，又容忍制度暴力。如果我需要承擔和平遊行引發出來的暴力事件的刑責，那麼誰應該承擔施政失敗所引發出來的社會騷亂的罪責呢？

社會之病根

　　對於法庭而言，可能2019年所發生的事情只是一場社會騷亂，務必追究違法者個人責任。然而，治亂治其本源，醫病醫其病根，我雖然公民抗命，刻意違法，控方把我帶上法庭，但我卻不應被理解為一個「犯罪個體」。2019年所發生的事情，並不是我一個人或我們這幾位被告可以促成，社會問題的癥結不是「犯罪份子」本身，而是「犯罪原因」。我明白「治亂世用重典」的道理，但如果「殺雞儆猴」是解決方法，就不會在2016年發生旺角騷亂及2017年上訴庭對示威者施以重刑後，2019年仍然會爆發出更大規模的暴力反抗。

如果不希望社會動亂，就必須正本清源，逐步落實「五大訴求」，從根本上改革，挽回民心。2019年反修例運動，其實只是2014年雨傘運動的延續而已，縱使法庭可能認為兩個運動皆是「一股歪風」所引起，但我必須澄清，兩個運動的核心就是追求民主普選，人民當家作主。在2019年11月24日區議會選舉這個最類近全民普選的選舉中，接近300萬人投票，民主派大勝，奪得17個區議會主導權，這就是整個反修例運動的民意，民意就是反對政府決策，反對制度暴力，反對推行惡法，不容爭辯，不辯自明。我們作為礦場裡的金絲雀，多次提醒政府撤回修法，並從根本上改革制度，而在10月20日的九龍遊行當然是反映民意的平台契機。如今，法庭對我們施加重刑，其實只不過是懲罰民意，將金絲雀困在鳥籠之內，甚至扼殺於鼓掌之中，窒礙表達自由。

堅持之重要

　　大運動過後的大鎮壓，使我們失去《蘋果日報》，失去教協，失去民陣，不少民主派領袖以及曾為運動付出的手足戰友都囚於獄中，不少曾經熱情投入運動的朋友亦因《國安法》的威脅轉為低調，新聞自由示威自由日漸萎縮，公民社會受到沈重打擊，我亦失去不少摯友，有感傷孤獨的時候，但我仍然相信，2019年香港人的信念，以及所展現人類的光輝持久未變。我不會忘記百萬人民冒雨捱熱抗拒暴政，抵制惡法，展現我們眾志成城；我不會忘記人潮紅海，讓道救護車，展現我們文明精神；我不會忘記年青志士直接行動反對苛政，捨身成仁，展現我們膽色勇氣；我不會忘記銀髮一族走上街頭保護年青人，展現我們彼此關懷；我不會忘記「五大訴求」，不會忘記2019年區議會選舉，展現我們有理有節。

　　法官閣下，我對於當日的所作所為，不感羞恥，毫無悔意。我能夠在出獄後與群眾同行一路，與戰友同繫一獄，實是莫大榮幸。若法治失去民主基石，將使法庭無奈地接受專制政權所訂立解釋的法律限制，隨時變成政治工具掃除異見，因此爭取民主普選，建設真正法治，追求公平正義，仍然是我的理想。在這條路上，如有必要，我仍然會公民抗命，正如終審法院海外非常任法官賀輔明（Lord Hoffmann）所言，發自良知的公民抗命有悠久及光榮的傳統，歷史將證明我們是正確的。我期望，曾與我一起遊行抗命的手足戰友要堅持信念，在艱難歲月裡毋忘初衷，活在愛和真實之中。

　　最後，如9年前一樣，我想借用美國民權領袖馬丁路德金牧師的一番話對我們的反對者說：「我們將以自己忍受苦難的能力，來較量你們製造苦難的能力。我們將用我們靈魂的力量，來抵禦你們物質的暴力。對我們做你們想做的事吧，我們仍然愛你們。我們不能憑良心服從你們不公正的法律，因為拒惡與為善一樣是道德責任。將我們送入監獄吧，我們仍然愛你們。」（We shall match your capacity to inflict suffering by our capacity to endure suffering. We shall meet your physical force with soul force. Do to us what you will, and we shall continue to love you. We cannot in all good conscience obey your unjust laws because noncooperation with evil is as much a moral obligation as is cooperation with good. Throw us in jail and we shall still love you.）

　　願慈愛的主耶穌賜我們平安，與我和我一家同在，與法官閣下同在，與香港人同在。沒有暴徒，只有暴政；五大訴求，缺一不可！願榮耀歸上帝，榮光歸人民！

第五被告
黃浩銘
二零二一年八月十九日

Lest we forget the five demands: civil disobedience is morally justified
- Statement on 10‧20 Kowloon Rally
(Case No.: DCCC 535/2020)

Your Honour Judge Woodcock

In 2012, I stood before the court and admitted to violating the "Public Security Evil Law". I expressed my hope for universal suffrage, criticized the evil law as unjust, and willingly accepted the penalty for civil disobedience. Back then, I said that if the small-circle election had not been abolished and the draconian law had not disappeared, I would still be as determined as I was, and I believe that more students and citizens would join this movement. Today, universal suffrage is still a long way off, and I have been brought before the court again for trial. But in just seven years, hundreds of thousands of people have already risen up in civil disobedience against tyranny. Today, I plead guilty to "unauthorised assembly" under an unapproved evil law enacted by an unauthorised government. I do not intend to seek the court's mercy, but please allow me to take up a little time in court to present my case so that the court can consider all aspects before sentencing me.

The roots of violence

At the time when the whole anti-extradition law movement was in full-swing, I was taking responsibility for another civil disobedience case. Although I was in prison, my heart was still with the people. I witnessed the three million-person rallies on 9 June, 16 June and 18 August on television in prison, when many peace-loving people took to the streets despite the rain and bullets, to protest against unjust laws. Some people may ask, "The Government has already suspended the legislative amendments in June and formally withdrew the bill in September, but we are still demonstrating, are we not being unreasonable?" I am sure your Honour has heard of the adage "Justice delayed is justice denied". When more than a million people took to the streets to express their discontent peacefully, the Lam administration ignored them and instead acted arbitrarily, brutally trampling on the wishes of the people of Hong Kong, resulting in endless arguments and even confrontations. After so many conflicts and painful experiences, the so-called moratorium is no longer meaningful. We only know better: without democracy, we cannot even have basic human rights!

In this case, although we did not instigate or commit acts of violence, I believe that in the eyes of the prosecution and the court, the violence on the day of the incident can still be counted against us, based on the August 18 and October 1 case. And now I must ask - If Hong Kong had a fair and just universal election, and the public could directly veto laws they did not approve of at the Legislative Council, then how could the violent clashes of 2019 have come about? If the violence we see is so heinous, how do we feel about the institutional violence that insists on the imposition of draconian laws even after millions of people have taken to the streets? If we cannot accept violent rebellion, how can we remain silent in the face of even greater and more oppressive institutional violence? The true and frequent violence is the kind of violence that ignores people's demands, that tramples on their opinions, that deprives them of their right to express themselves. People who truly hate violence and abhor it cannot accuse violent resistance on the one hand and tolerate institutional violence on the other. If I have to bear the criminal responsibility for the violence caused by the peaceful demonstration, then who should bear the criminal responsibility for the social unrest caused by failed administration?

The roots of society's problems

From a court's point of view, it may be that what happened in 2019 was just a series of social unrest, and that those who broke the law must be held personally accountable. What happened in 2019 was not something that I alone or the defendants could have made possible, and the crux of the social problem was not the 'criminals' but the 'causes of crime'. I understand the concept of " applying severe punishment to a troubled world", but if "decimation" was really the solution, there would not have been more violent rebellions in 2019 after the Mongkok "riot" in 2016 and the heavy sentences handed down to protesters by the Court of Appeal in 2017.

If we do not want social unrest, we must get to the root of the problem and implement the "five demands" step by step, so as to achieve fundamental reforms and win back the hearts of the people. 2019's anti-revision movement is indeed a continuation of 2014's Umbrella Movement, and even though the court may think that both movements are caused by a "perverse wind", I must clarify that the core of both movements is the pursuit of democracy and universal suffrage, and the people being the masters of their own house. In the District Council election on 24 November 2019, which is the closest thing to universal suffrage, nearly 3 million people voted, and the democratic camp won a huge victory, winning majority in 17 District Councils. As canaries in the monetary coal mine, we have repeatedly reminded the government to withdraw the extradition bill and fundamentally reform the system, and the march in Kowloon on 20 October was certainly an opportunity to reflect public opinion. Now, by imposing heavy penalties on us, the court is only punishing public opinion, trapping the canaries in a birdcage, or even stifling them in the palm of their hands, suffocating the freedom of expression.

The importance of persistence

As a result of the crackdown after the mass movement, we lost Apple Daily, the Hong Kong Professional Teachers' Union, and the Civil Human Rights Front. Many of our democratic leaders and comrades who had contributed to the movement were imprisoned, and many of our friends who had been passionately involved in the movement had been forced to lay low under the threat of the National Security Law. I still believe that the faith of Hong Kong people and the glory of humanity seen in 2019 will remain unchanged. I will never forget the millions of people who braved the rain and the heat to resist tyranny and evil laws, demonstrating our unity of purpose; I will never forget the crowds of people who gave way to ambulances, demonstrating our civility; I will never forget the young people who sacrificed their lives, demonstrating our courage and bravery; I will never forget the silver-haired who took to the streets to protect the youth, demonstrating our care for each other; I will never forget the "five demands" and the 2019 District Council election, demonstrating our rationality and decency.

Your Honour, I have nothing to be ashamed of and no remorse for what I did on that day. It is my great honour to be in prison with my comrades and to be able to walk with the public after my release. If the rule of law were to lose its democratic foundation, the courts would have no choice but to accept the legal restrictions set by the autocratic regime and become a political tool to eliminate dissent at any time. As Lord Hoffmann, a non-permanent overseas judge of the Court of Final Appeal, said, civil disobedience from the conscience has a long and honourable tradition, and history will prove us right. I hope that my comrades in arms who walked with me in protests will keep their faith and live in love and truth in the midst of this difficult time.

Finally, as I did nine years ago, I would like to say something to those who oppose us, borrowing the words of American civil rights leader Reverend Martin Luther King: "We shall match your capacity to inflict suffering by our capacity to endure suffering. We shall meet your physical force with soul force. Do to us what you will, and we shall continue to love you. We cannot in all good conscience obey your unjust laws because noncooperation with evil is as much a moral obligation as is cooperation with good. Throw us in jail and we shall still love you."

Peace be with me and my family, with Your Honour, and with the people of Hong Kong. There are no thugs, only tyranny; five demands, not one less! To god be the glory and to people be the glory!

The Fifth Defendant
Wong Ho Ming
19 August 2021

［天橋上的人］

星期五下午，港島頂級購物區繁忙非常。從金鐘廊走到太古廣場有一條行人天橋，巨型落地玻璃密封設計，讓行人可以遠眺整條金鐘道，俯瞰電車路的交通情況。在下午約4時，約一百人聚站在天橋的其中一邊，眼神同時望向遠處。路經這裡的有在附近工作的白領，和說英語的外籍人士。

在商場人潮裡，可以聽到這些對話：「何詩蓓真係好勁呀！」說的是這天早上代表香港出賽的游泳運動員，於今屆東京奧運已贏得第二面銀牌，是這天城中熱話，若包括早前勝出劍擊金牌的張家朗，香港運動員已在今屆奧運拿下了三面獎牌，是香港開埠以來最佳紀錄。

對於天橋上聚滿人，有不明所以的人走近，看到地上有人擺放了單張，「24歲的唐英傑 TONG Ying Kit is 24 years old，好人一生平安」，旁邊有唐早幾天因國安法入罪的中文資料，卻欠英語，有人用英語問：「What is this?」

這個城市，在狂喜和狂悲中搖擺。

從天橋上眺望遠處，正是連接太古廣場的最高法院。最高法院審訊案件，可判處刑期並不像區域法院有七年上限，嚴重案件都在這裡審訊。從高等法院進出的囚車，需要路經繁忙的金鐘道，但這天警方佈陣下，不但記者被隔到老遠，市民就更能只站在商場的天橋上遠眺。

從天橋位置到囚車出入位置，相隔約150米。以往「送囚車」的人們大喊或揮動手機燈，車內人看得見，這天，百多米外的眺望，只能遙記心意。

第一宗國安法審訊於周二(27日)判兩項罪名成立，三天後即今午宣佈刑期。判決有沒有罪的那天，法院來旁聽的記者人數，要比這天宣判刑期的更踴躍。那時全球記者關注「光時」口號是否入罪，這天判刑，記者人數略為減少。

然而，本地市民旁聽的意欲則沒有減退。早上八時已有中年女士來排隊拿旁聽票。最後，內庭及庭外直播票，公眾人士入場總人數約170人，出現「爆庭」現象。

其中，只有20名熱心市民能夠入到庭內。他們以中年人士為主。有人坐下來低聲互相提醒：「這個庭很細小，只能入二十人」「我們這個位置最接近唐英傑」「一會兒宣判時我們不要有太大的情緒反應以免影響家屬」「我已與唐的家人交換電話，希望將來可以探望，互相支持。」

市民拿的是紫色票，家屬拿的是白色票。然而，家屬票並不夠。
下午2時40分，市民及記者均入坐。家屬較遲到來，一名微胖紥馬尾的少女，拿着「市民票」向坐在較前的旁聽公眾低聲說：「我們是家屬，想坐在一起，可以跟你們交換座位嗎？」公眾隨即把最前的位置讓出，少女連連道謝。

長髮的唐英傑母親，穿着白色麻質套裝，腳踏平底鞋出現。她化了淡粧，做了粉色美甲，戴着紅色手鍊。她和幾名年輕女性親友一起，坐在最接近犯人欄的家屬席。

開庭前，年輕女孩不時拍拍唐母的肩，跟她談話時輕撫着唐母的背，或輕輕跟唐母牽手以示鼓勵。她們的座位距唐英傑約十呎，可以清楚跟唐交換眼神。

下午2時57分，唐英傑終於在懲教職員押送下出來。以往審訊時，唐會提早一點出來露面，可是，這天卻調校到距離開庭很短的時間才讓他出來，於是變相減少了唐可以與律師溝通的時間，或與家人對望的時刻。

法庭的時光，客觀上是一回事，主觀亦有另一種感受。

冗長的審訊，時間像特別漫長；但判決及判刑，又如電光火石。

身型壯碩的唐英傑，穿着十多日審訊的那套衣服出現。灰藍色西裝外套，黑色恤衫，髮型清爽但這天頭髮有點凌亂。甫步入犯人欄，唐先舉起左手跟律師打招呼，轉而望向母親及幾位年輕女性親友。

女性親友不時俯身，嘗試找角度能夠與唐保持眼神接觸。因為犯人欄的橫柵，與及防飛沫膠片的阻隔，令視線有所阻擋。女子們不時從座位做心心手勢，鼓勵唐。

律師趁開庭前的寶貴時間，拿了文件遞給唐，揭開防飛沫膠布跟他對話。唐亦把紙張交給律師。

唐英傑接過即時傳譯的耳機，把主機插向自己的西裝的左胸口袋，再把耳塞塞進左耳，再用手指托一托滑落的眼鏡。

不一會兒，一名駕駛着電動輪椅的中年婦人進來，被安置在家屬旁。她是一名熱心市民到來旁聽的市民，法庭未開始，她已經在拭淚。

3時04分， “Court！”的男聲喊出，三名法官步出坐在席上。法官杜麗冰用英語宣佈她不會詳細把判刑的原因詳細讀出，只挑選判刑重點來讀。

她以英語說出 “Six and a half years and eight years respectively for counts 1 and 2….”

判刑是否分期執行，還是同期？

杜官再說，如果當初唐選擇認罪，會是有減刑可能，但今次唐選擇不認罪。唐有幾次交通相關案底，於國安法判刑則不相關，會視他為「良好品格」。法庭亦表示同情唐的家庭狀況，作為唯一的經濟支柱，而其祖母亦有重病。但認為這些是「被告人應該在犯案前考慮的事」。

杜官指出，兩控罪雖然來自同一組事實（即開着插有「光時」旗的電單車衝過警方防線），但「兩罪是分開而明確的 (separate and distinct offences)」。

正當大家在疑惑究竟總刑期多長的時候，杜官又說會行使 “totality principle” (整體判刑原則)。

杜官最後交出一個數字，其中2年半刑期分期執行，總刑期9年。
杜官說，這刑期反映了「被告人的罪行嚴重性，社會人士對罪行的厭惡度，並達至阻嚇性」。

旁聽席上的人互相交換疑惑的眼神，大家對繁複的法庭英語不太聽得入耳，只關注總刑期多長。大家互相在電話上的筆記簿寫上數字，交換眼神。

唐英傑專心聽着耳機，翻譯員以廣東話給他解釋了自己未來命運。唐聽到這裡時，坐得腰板挺直，雙手放在膝上，偶爾用左手食指托一托鼻上的眼鏡，或飛快的揚一揚眉。

直至聽到總刑期後，唐才放鬆了一點點。當法官解釋要吊銷其駕駛執照達十年，唐英傑再向家屬席做心心手勢。
此時法官再談及充公證物的處理。

說時遲那時快，才20分鐘，又有人喊　“Court!”，判刑程序完畢，三名法官離席。旁聽席的人如夢初醒，等待了六、七個小時，為了見唐一面，時光就如此飛逝。「吓？咁快既？即係判幾多年？」旁聽席的人互相追問。

此時法庭有點混亂，坐在輪椅的女士大喊兩次：「抗爭無罪！」保安衝前阻止。唐英傑起身走向羈留室方向，亦即與家屬席最接近的時候。家屬都站起來靠向唐。

有人從旁聽席大喊：「重甲！撐住呀！」

「重甲」是唐英傑在反修例運動的綽號，他愛穿着保護裝備擔任義務救護員。

唐英傑在混亂中回了一句：「你哋都要撐住！」然後身影消失在法庭裡。年輕女親友互相擁抱，痛哭起來。

唐英傑的辯護律師團隊，走近家屬身邊解釋情況，再次確認判刑刑期。

判刑書長達15頁，在法庭外向記者派發，其中一段披露了唐英傑多封求情信內容。

「求情信中指，被告人是個思想單純，心地善良而且孝順父母的兒子，他供養妹妹到海外留學。」

「唐父形容，兒子容易被政治影響，亦受到『不良出版影響，令他做了錯事』。」

「唐的auntie形容，（唐英傑）『受到一些社會人士及傳媒的錯誤報導影響』。」

而判刑書亦有引述唐英傑自己向法庭親撰的求情信內容：「被告人表示感到後悔，現在明白政治看法是觀點與角度問題，最重要還是做人的品格。他亦表達到，希望社會把仇恨放下。」

(For the Defendant himself, he wrote to express his remorse, saying that he had now come to realise that political views are matters of perspectives and should not be more important than human decency. He also expressed the hope that the society might put aside hatred.)

เมื่อเหล่านักร้องดังมาสั่งอาหารตามสั่ง ในสไตล์และรูปแบบของตนเอง การสั่งของพวกเขาเหล่านั้นจะเป็นยังไง รอบผมขนมาหลายคนเลย ทั้ง แจ็กแปปโฮ, 4EVE, Bruno mars, LUSS, URBOYTJ, bamm, F.HERO Ft. Txrbo พร้อมแล้วไปดูกันเลยครับ
ขอขอบคุณเพลงต้นฉบับทุกเพลงด้วยนะครับ
อยากโดนช้อนแกง-แจ็กแปปโฮ ft.ป๋าเพชร [official MV]-Prod. By YOSHI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TJCnvEB2xJk

F.HERO Ft. Txrbo - จำเลยรัก (Defendant Of Love) (Prod. By BenLUSS & Txrbo) [Official MV]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PSEcZas-QZg

4EVE - วัดปะหล่ะ? (TEST ME) (Prod. by URBOYTJ) - Summer Video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zj4dW3_2mgo

Bruno Mars, Anderson .Paak, Silk Sonic - Leave the Door Open [Official Video]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=adLGHcj_fmA

bamm - โดนเทแต่เท่อยู่ (2cool2care) OFFICIAL M/V
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=257FubyZh_Y

LUSS - หยอก หยอก【Official Music Video】
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eUIx-4qu_5I

URBOYTJ - ซุปเปอร์ไซย่า (SUPER SAIYAN) FT. MAIYARAP - OFFICIAL VISUALIZER
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h6R1JcE-AU4

#BieTheSka #สั่งข้าว #บี้เดอะสกา

กดติดตามคลิปใหม่ของพวกเรา มาใหม่ทุกวันอังคาร ศุกร์ อาทิตย์ ครับ
http://goo.gl/GQoaaP

ร่วมส่งคำแนะนำความสนุกอยากให้พี่บี้ไปทำอะไรคลิกลิงก์ได้ที่
Google Forms ►https://forms.gle/Uo3kVH1ivYFCTAK88

*** เป็นเพื่อนกันและติดตามข่าวสารช่องทางของผม ***
Facebook ► https://www.facebook.com/BieTheSka
IG ► BieTheSka
Twitter ► BieTheSka
Line Sticker ► https://line.me/S/sticker/6175

*** ซื้อสินค้าของพวกเราสวยๆน่าสะสม The Ska Shop ***
Facebook ► https://www.facebook.com/theskashop
Website► https://www.theskashop.com


*** หรืออยากเกาะติดแบบ Exclusive กับครอบครัวเดอะสกาฟิล์มติดตามได้ที่ ***
Facebook ► https://www.facebook.com/theskafilm
IG ► TheSkaFilm
Website ► http://www.theskafilm.com

สโลแกนของพวกเรา
“รู้มั้ยเวลาเพื่อนๆยิ้ม ผมอ่ะโคตรมีความสุขเลย^^"

ติดต่องานสปอนเซอร์ ผลิตวีดีโอโฆษณา อีเว้นท์
TheSkaFilm@gmail.com
090-919-4567

#TheSkaFilm #BieTheSka #บี้เดอะสกา

♨ อธิบายการเล่น กด ? 0:22
♨ รอบที่ 1 กด ? 2:25
♨ รอบที่ 2 ( บอก ขึ้น ลง ) กด ? 7:05
♨ คอร์ดง่ายในคลิป กด ? 11:38

? รักช่องน้าจร รบกวนดูโฆษณา เพื่อสนุนช่อง ด้วยนะครับผม ?

? กดข้าม ? ภาพคอร์ด ?
? ❌เอาไว้กดข้าม❌ แต่ๆๆ เพื่อนๆต้องดูทั้งหมดก่อนนะครับ งั้นเพื่อนๆจะไม่เข้าใจครับผม


? ภาพ คอร์ด ง่าย ??
? ?https://www.facebook.com/jornukuleleguitar/photos/a.618637374849468/3789715047741669/ ??
? ? https://najornchiangmaieasyguitarchord.blogspot.com/2021/02/fhero-ft-txrbo.html ??



????????????????????

? เพลงต้นฉบับ เพราะๆ ครับ ? " F.HERO Ft. Txrbo - จำเลยรัก (Defendant Of Love) (Prod. By BenLUSS & Txrbo) [Official MV] " ต้นฉบับ
? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PSEcZas-QZg


? ขออนุญาตนำมาสอน เพื่อเป็นวิทยาทานแก่ เพื่อนๆที่ชอบเล่นกีต้าร์ แต่ไม่มีคนสอนด้วยครับผม ??

?? ขอให้ท่านเจ้าของเพลง มีความรุ่งเรือง ทางด้านการดนตรี และ มีความสุขมากๆ ครับผม ??

? ขอเป็นตัวแทนเพื่อนๆ ที่หัดเล่นกีต้าร์ กราบขอบพระคุณ ที่ทำเพลงดีๆ มาให้เรา ได้ฟัง ได้เล่น ครับ ??

? หากเจ้าของเพลงเห็นว่า ละเมิดลิขสิทธิ์ หรือ เหตุผลใดๆก็ตาม
เม้น ไว้ในความคิดเห็น หรือแจ้งที่ [email protected] ได้นะครับ ยินดีจะลบคลิปให้ทันที ครับ


???????????????????


❎?❎?❎?❎?❎?❎


? ชอบ ชอบ ชอบ ก็ กด ???

? Like Youtube ? Subscribe ? กดกระดิ่ง ? Like Fanpage ? ด้วยนะครับ

❌(^_^) ?Subscribe กดกระดิ่ง? Youtube❌

❌(^_^) ?Like น้าจร Facebook Fanpage ❌

เพื่อติดตาม ข่าวสาร พูดคุย กันนะครับผม

? https://m.facebook.com/jornukulelegui...


_______________________


? ? รักช่องน้าจร เห็นว่าช่องนี้ มีประโยชน์ ?
? สามารถ ช่วยสนันสนุนช่อง ?
?ได้ที่ ? เลขบัญชี 4244088359
: ชื่อบัญชี : ณฤตจ์ มหาไม้ ธ.กรุงเทพ ????
____________________________

#จำเลยรัก #สอนกีต้าร์คอร์ดง่าย #น้าจรเชียงใหม่

ไม่รู้จะพิมพ์อะไรดี แต่อยากขอบคุณที่แวะมาฟังเสียงผมบ่อยๆนะครับ
ขอบคุณเพลงเพราะๆต้นฉบับจากพี่กอล์ฟด้วยครับพี่

IG @flukiemusiclism
SHOW BOOKING/ติดต่องาน: 080-651-9789 (คุณครีม)
Fanpage : https://www.facebook.com/FlukieMusiclism
Facebook : https://www.facebook.com/flukieonfire​​

---------------

Original song : จำเลยรัก - F.HERO Ft. Txrbo
All vocal by Flukie
Beat by Zixs

------------

#จำเลยรัก