Wow!
今年三升一的孩子好認真！
一拿到小單字本就開背！
而且認真想記好詞性+衍生字+搭配詞，
很有鬥志喔👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼
俐媽收到不少學生傳訊，
詢問小單字本中英文詞性代號各代表什麽意思 ？
俐媽今天送上「英文詞性代號大全篇」～
—————————————————————
👁🗨 Part of ...
Wow!
今年三升一的孩子好認真！
一拿到小單字本就開背！
而且認真想記好詞性+衍生字+搭配詞，
很有鬥志喔👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼
俐媽收到不少學生傳訊，
詢問小單字本中英文詞性代號各代表什麽意思 ？
俐媽今天送上「英文詞性代號大全篇」～
—————————————————————
👁🗨 Part of Speech 詞性：
💙 Noun 名詞：
(n.C) = countable noun 可數名詞
(n.U) = uncountable noun 不可數名詞
(n.) = (n.U & n.C)不可數名詞或可數名詞
(n.S) / (sing)= singular noun單數名詞
(n.Pl) / (pl) = plural noun複數名詞
(n.C常Pl) = countable noun that is usually plural 可數名詞一般用複數
💜 Verb 動詞：
(vt.) = transitive verb 及物動詞
(vi.) = intransitive verb 不及物動詞
(v.) = both (vt. & vi.) 及物動詞或不及物動詞
❤️ Other Parts of Speech 其他詞性：
(a.) / (adj.) = adjective 形容詞
(adv.) = adverb 副詞
(prep.) = preposition 介詞
(conj.) = conjunction 連接詞
(intjn.)/(int.) = interjection 感嘆詞
(attrib) = attributive 修飾語
(poss) = possessive 所有格
(aux.) = auxiliary 助動詞
(pron.) = pronoun 代名詞
(art.) = article 冠詞
(det) = determiner 限定詞
💚 Supplements 補充：
(prefix) = 字首
(root) = 字根
(suffix) = 字尾
(ph.) / (phr) = phrase 片語
(abbr.) = abbreviation 縮寫
(p.p.) = past participle 過去分詞
(euph) = euphemism 委婉之詞
(lit) = literary 文學用語
(pass) = passive 被動
(fml) = formal 正式用法
(infml) = informal 非正式用法
(sl) = slang 俚語
(imper) = imperative 祈使語氣
(compar) = comparative 比較級
(superl) = superlative 最高級
(AmE) = American English 美式英文
(BrE) = British English 英式英文
(cap) = capital 大寫
(fig) = figurative 比喻
(neg) = negative 否定
💛 5 Basic Sentence Patterns 五大句型：
(S.) = subject 主詞
(O.) = object 受詞
(C.) = complement 補語
(D.O.) = direct object 直接受詞
(I.O.) = indirect object 間接受詞
💖 Others 其他：
& = and
esp = especially 尤其
e.g. = exempli gratia = for example 舉例
c.f. = confer = compare 比較
etc. = et cetera = and so on 等等
—————————————————————-
英模孩子也要認真背單字，
7/10英模班隆重開課唷🥳🥳🥳🥳
#俐媽英文教室
#俐媽英文教室詞性篇
#俐媽引導你們學英文
#三升一孩子有沒有在解題班群中發現驚喜呀🤩
#各版本單字導讀影片陸續上傳
#台大明明超前部署
#認明台大明明
#才有這樣包山包海的教材服務喔👍🏼
subject主詞 在 翻譯這檔事 Facebook 的精選貼文
這種逗號不如餵給熊貓吃掉吧！
范范真是「好範兒」，另一個事業巔峰就是為台灣大眾示範了好何謂言多必失。她日前顯然本想藉著撂英文顯示高尚以博得同情，哪知不自量力的低級英文一po出，成為負面示範，刺激全民探討英文、重拾學英文的樂趣。截圖是 Dub & Ko Language Services（來源：臉書）提供批改范瑋琪英文的範例，造成大轟動，雖然轟動的背後難免有政治立場煽風點火，但就學習語言來說，仍也是極佳的學習範例。祝這個抓緊時事脈動的英文改寫和翻譯服務事業蒸蒸日上。不過，有一個英文寫作規則必須指出。最後一句的改寫：
She who talks much, errs much.
這在今天已經不是好的英文，絕對會被英文編輯和老師視為錯誤。去掉逗點就好了。句子主詞與述詞之間的逗點，歷史上曾經出現，那是至少200年前的寫法，今日不宜，除非你是在直接引述古人的英語，否則請注意不得加逗號，無論主詞多麼長。
以下直接引述兩本權威用法指南供參：
一、Webster's Dictionary of English Usage (1989) 262頁
Comma between subject and predicate.
It is no longer cricket 〔按：n. 正人君子之舉；合度的行為〕 to separate the subject and predicate with punctuation. “How,” asks Simon 1980 rhetorically, “can one possibly separate the subject... from the predicate ... by a comma?” The comma between subject and predicate is an old convention that has fallen into disuse and disfavor. It was common in the 18th century:
What Methods they will take, is not for me to prescribe —Jonathan Swift, “A Proposal for Correcting, Improving and Ascertaining the English Tongue,” 1712
The words for all that, seem too low —Murray 1795
The first thing to be studied here, is grammatical propriety —Murray 1795
This comma is now universally frowned on and tends to be found only as a vice of comic-strip writers, advertisers, and others who are not on their guard. You should avoid the practice.
二、The Sense of Styles, Steven Pinker （有中譯本《寫作風格的意識》）
Still, a few common errors are so uncontroversial—the run-on sentence, the comma splice, the grocer's apostrophe, the comma between subject and predicate, the possessive it's—that they have become tantamount to the confession “I am illiterate,” and no writer should be caught making them. As I mentioned, the problem with these errors is not that they betray an absence of logical thinking but that they betray a history of inattention to the printed page. In the hope that an ability to distinguish the logical and illogical features of punctuation may help a reader master both, I'll say a few words about the design of the system, highlighting the major bugs that have been locked into it.
可是，有幾個常見錯誤不那麼具爭議性，像連寫句（兩個主句間沒有連接詞或誤用標點）、用逗號連接兩個完整句子、複數名詞誤加撇號、主詞和述語之間誤加逗號，以及屬格誤加撇號（例如it’s〔它的〕），假如連這些都用錯了，恐怕就稱不上是個讀書識字的人，任何作者不容許在這裡犯錯。像我曾說的，犯上這種錯誤，問題不在於欠缺邏輯思考，而是對書面文字的歷史漠不關心。我期望能把標點的邏輯與非邏輯元素分開，讓讀者兩者都能掌握；我會談一下標點系統的設計，指出隱藏在系統中的一些缺失。 （江先聲譯）
subject主詞 在 翻譯這檔事 Facebook 的精選貼文
這種逗號不如餵給熊貓吃掉吧！
范范真是「好範兒」，另一個事業巔峰就是為台灣大眾示範了好何謂言多必失。她日前顯然本想藉著撂英文顯示高尚以博得同情，哪知不自量力的低級英文一po出，成為負面示範，刺激全民探討英文、重拾學英文的樂趣。截圖是 Dub & Ko Language Services（來源：臉書）提供批改范瑋琪英文的範例，造成大轟動，雖然轟動的背後難免有政治立場煽風點火，但就學習語言來說，仍也是極佳的學習範例。祝這個抓緊時事脈動的英文改寫和翻譯服務事業蒸蒸日上。不過，有一個英文寫作規則必須指出。最後一句的改寫：
She who talks much, errs much.
這在今天已經不是好的英文，絕對會被英文編輯和老師視為錯誤。去掉逗點就好了。句子主詞與述詞之間的逗點，歷史上曾經出現，那是至少200年前的寫法，今日不宜，除非你是在直接引述古人的英語，否則請注意不得加逗號，無論主詞多麼長。
以下直接引述兩本權威用法指南供參：
一、Webster's Dictionary of English Usage (1989) 262頁
Comma between subject and predicate.
It is no longer cricket 〔按：n. 正人君子之舉；合度的行為〕 to separate the subject and predicate with punctuation. “How,” asks Simon 1980 rhetorically, “can one possibly separate the subject... from the predicate ... by a comma?” The comma between subject and predicate is an old convention that has fallen into disuse and disfavor. It was common in the 18th century:
What Methods they will take, is not for me to prescribe —Jonathan Swift, “A Proposal for Correcting, Improving and Ascertaining the English Tongue,” 1712
The words for all that, seem too low —Murray 1795
The first thing to be studied here, is grammatical propriety —Murray 1795
This comma is now universally frowned on and tends to be found only as a vice of comic-strip writers, advertisers, and others who are not on their guard. You should avoid the practice.
二、The Sense of Styles, Steven Pinker （有中譯本《寫作風格的意識》）
Still, a few common errors are so uncontroversial—the run-on sentence, the comma splice, the grocer's apostrophe, the comma between subject and predicate, the possessive it's—that they have become tantamount to the confession “I am illiterate,” and no writer should be caught making them. As I mentioned, the problem with these errors is not that they betray an absence of logical thinking but that they betray a history of inattention to the printed page. In the hope that an ability to distinguish the logical and illogical features of punctuation may help a reader master both, I'll say a few words about the design of the system, highlighting the major bugs that have been locked into it.
可是，有幾個常見錯誤不那麼具爭議性，像連寫句（兩個主句間沒有連接詞或誤用標點）、用逗號連接兩個完整句子、複數名詞誤加撇號、主詞和述語之間誤加逗號，以及屬格誤加撇號（例如it’s〔它的〕），假如連這些都用錯了，恐怕就稱不上是個讀書識字的人，任何作者不容許在這裡犯錯。像我曾說的，犯上這種錯誤，問題不在於欠缺邏輯思考，而是對書面文字的歷史漠不關心。我期望能把標點的邏輯與非邏輯元素分開，讓讀者兩者都能掌握；我會談一下標點系統的設計，指出隱藏在系統中的一些缺失。 （江先聲譯）
subject主詞 在 翻譯這檔事 Facebook 的最讚貼文
平克認證：主詞動詞緊密結合不容逗點小三介入
前文「修潤英文」說「主詞和動詞之間不可加逗號」，有位常用英文交談的網友說，這逗號加了應該也是innocuous mistake（無害的小錯），這使我決定再查證標準現代英語書寫規則。說「現代英語」很重要，因爲在幾百年前，包括美國憲法寫成的年代，作者在文章中隨意加逗號，包括主詞和動詞之間，是如喝水般容易，彷彿逗號不用錢。好啦，今天也一樣不用錢。
結果，我確認「主詞與述語（動詞開始的成分直至句尾）之間不得加逗號」是條鐵律。
有本名著《語言本能》被洪蘭蹂躪的Steven Pinker幾年前的新作The Sense of Style（寫作風格的意識），至少有三段文字描述Pinker對這條鐵律的看法，顯然對違犯此規則者毫不寬待。這本書我大力推薦，譯者是江先聲，但奉勸儘量讀英文版。江譯有不錯的亮點，也有不少令人皺眉的地方。以下他的翻譯一字未改。
// But in general the divisions between the major parts of a clause, such as subject and predicate, are comma-free zones, no matter how complex the syntax.
但一般來說，不管句法如何複雜，子句主要組成部分的分界線，像在主詞和述語之間，是容不下逗號的地帶。
But as we shall see in chapter 6, using a comma to separate a subject from its predicate or a verb from one of its complements is among the most grievous sins of mispunctuation.
可是我們在第6章會看到，用逗號來分開主詞和它的述語，或分開動詞和它其中一個補語，都是最罪無可恕的標點錯誤。
Though the comma which demarcates a supplementary phrase may be omitted when the pronunciation zips right through it, the converse is no longer true: a comma may not separate the elements of an integrated phrase (such as a subject and its predicate), no matter how badly its narrator may want to take a breath at that juncture.
雖然念起來一下就溜過的補述詞組，可把分隔的逗號省略，反過來的做法卻是不容許的：逗號不能分隔一個整合式詞組的各元素（譬如主詞和述語），不管說話人在那個連接點上如何亟需喘一口氣。//