履歷表(RESUME / C.V.)
謝謝大家!謝謝大家!謝謝大家!(很重要所以說三次)最近的文章得到大家很熱烈的回應!當然也讓老師多了不少學生。😃😃😃所以AirFrankie在備課及北中南教書百忙之中還是挪出時間分享更多的心得給大家。
教寫航空履歷表已經十多年了,早期所有報考都是紙本履歷表,所以每...
履歷表(RESUME / C.V.)
謝謝大家!謝謝大家!謝謝大家!(很重要所以說三次)最近的文章得到大家很熱烈的回應!當然也讓老師多了不少學生。😃😃😃所以AirFrankie在備課及北中南教書百忙之中還是挪出時間分享更多的心得給大家。
教寫航空履歷表已經十多年了,早期所有報考都是紙本履歷表,所以每次都教授5-6種格式。8*19cm是華航專用格式,15*16cm是華信航空格式等。
一般來說履歷表分兩種?一種是航空公司的制式履歷表(很重要),另外一種是個人履歷表(通常是初試時使用)。 #航空公司制式履歷表:通常是拿來在複試時詢問問題用的,所以內容很重要。所有內容都會成為面試問題。所以AirFrankie老師都會要求學生傳履歷表給老師,幫每位同學抓題及想回答。下次再跟大家聊更多這些相關問題。
#個人履歷表:很多同學都不知道該怎麼寫才好?雖然網路輕鬆找到很多範例?但都不是主考官想看的。今天AirFrankie老師要來教大家寫出外商航空面試官想看的履歷表。
1. 展現妳的品味—乾淨、整齊、重視、正式 白色A4紙、80-90磅、Times New Roman及新細明或標楷體、12 號字、黑色墨水。建議一切「不過三」,也就是一份履歷最多三種大小的字體,每一個學位或成就下不要有超過三個項目符號,然後最多用三種強調方式,粗體、斜體、或是畫線。
2. 精簡—每十年一頁 因為大部分是航空初試用的,所以AirFrankie老師建議一張A4紙為限
3. KEEP IT LOGICAL 內容是以三大部分組合。
WORK EXPERIENCE (畢業兩年以上放在教育之前)
EDUCATION (應屆畢業請放在工作之前)
SKILL AND INTEREST (讓考官快速認識自己)
4. 不要寫Objective跟個人身家資料
#履歷表內容應包括
1. Personal Data:中文姓名羅馬拼音及英文名,手機號碼及E-mail
2. Education Background : 最高學歷,研讀時間(開始至結束日期),及主修,可以敘述學習內容(尤其應屆學生)再加一個Training courses after school with license or certificate更好
3. Work Experience / Employment : 工作單位、在職時間(開始至結束日期)、你的貢獻/工作內容(非常重要)。
4. Professional Qualities :有何其他專長都可以寫,但是地勤一定要寫中英文輸入及電腦文書軟體
5. Languages : 會講哪些語言?及程度?EX:Mandarin (Native), English(Good)如果考外商?英文程度一定寫Good以上,但別寫多益成績。
7. School clubs / Social Clubs / Volunteer experience(應屆同學如果沒有工作經驗可以寫)
8. Why you can be an outstanding crew / Staff of this airline company ? 50-100字,最重要的!必寫!必寫!必寫!過去在教外商履歷表時,每間航空都要求寫這個。
工作內容的撰寫非常重要!從這邊可以看出你是否適合這份工作?你具備什麼才能?寫法應該是用什麼態度來完成這份工作?
EX:
WORKING EXPERIENCE------------------------------------------------------ Mr. Brown CAFE, Taichung Taiwan (waitress) Nov 2013-ON THE ● offer customize service to customers
● recommend meal and special drink to them according to their taste
● keep best quality of drink and coffee efficiently
TAICHUNG LIN HOTEL, Taichung Taiwan (internship) Jul 2013-Aug 2013 ● greet and engage with customers in warm and friendly manner
● provide oriented service to meet every customer’s needs
● chat with customers to get closer with them and remember every tenants and VIPs
● pay attention to every detail to maintein the environment clean and tidy
WHY SHOULD I QUALIFY FOR BEING A FLIGHT
qualify中文 在 Jessica & Jayden 姊姊弟弟看世界 Facebook 的最佳貼文
#LittleNipper
English below
好驕傲,她完成了一件我們都沒完成的事,中文在英文下面唷!
We are very proud of Jessica’s efforts today to qualify for the Dicky Beach Nippers (Junior) Surf Life Saving Club today. It began with an assessment at the local swimming pool where she had to swim 50m and float on her back for a minute. Then we had to go down to Dicky Beach for an open water ocean swim. The water was extremely choppy and rough and she had to swim out to a buoy about 50m out and back unassisted. Despite never having done that before, she braved the water with waves crashing over her the whole way and completed the swim. It was a massive effort to overcome her doubts and fears. She broke down a little after the swim but it’s a huge step forward in her self belief and now she gets a unique opportunity to be a part of the surf lifesaving community here on the Sunshine Coast.
Unfortunately Jayden got NYQ (Not Yet Qualified) on his swimming assessment but he had fun and is sure to give it another go soon!
我們今天在高爾夫球課後,直奔去考Nipper,拔拔和媽媽都好驕傲,因為她完成了一項我們都沒有達成的事!
Little Nipper是Surf Club會訓練的小小海灘救生員,要加入他們成為學員,每個年齡層都有不同的測試,不滿9歲的姐姐要做泳池自由式50公尺,仰浮1分鐘,然後才可以去海邊測第二階段的實地測驗,要在海水裡游50公尺!
今天的浪很大,基本上走出去就會被打回來,姐姐是在游不出、游不回來的狀態下完成的,因為浪大,游出去一點,就被打回來3點,游回來一點,就被捲回去3點,她從來沒有做過這樣的事,但她還是認真努力並且克服自己的恐懼勇敢的完成了!
媽媽幫她錄影的7分鐘裡不停的為她禱告,同一個時間也不盡感動的流淚,心裏不盡讚嘆「妳好棒呀!」
我和爸爸都驚訝她可以這麼如魚得水,我們從來都知道她的水性很好,但卻不知道她真的游這麼好,我們第一次看她這樣認真的游泳,心情為她而激動,也因為她而充滿感動!
雖然結束離開現場的她在放鬆後,玻璃心有碎了一會兒,哭了一會兒,她覺得游泳在海裡好辛苦,怕自己沒做好,但在爸媽和陪考官的安撫下,一下子後又恢復了自信,因為考官說,你說你游的不好,但妳真的很會游,厲害耶!
Good Job Jessica!
我們真的很為妳感到無比的驕傲💪
接下來的旅程我相信會是很豐富和精彩的,妳一定會很享受陽光海岸帶給妳美好,而Nipper的環境,一定會添加更多美麗的色彩在妳的人生的,加油、加油,我的大寶貝,You are awesome ❤️
Max Murphy
Puffy Murphy
qualify中文 在 多糖教室 毛小孩教育訓練 Facebook 的最佳貼文
一封給國家地理頻道「Dog: Impossible」節目負責人的公開信:
An open letter to the leadership team of Nat Geo Wild Dog Impossible:
Translate: Yu-Hwa Su 翻譯: 蘇昱華
Proof: Yen Ke 校對: 葛雁
The International Association of Animal Behavior Consultants (IAABC) applauds National Geographic’s mission to offer intelligent, relevant and captivating non-fiction entertainment. This is a crucial objective, especially as an introduction to children and viewers largely relying on television for their scientific information.
國際動物行為諮詢師協會(IAABC)對於國家地理頻道致力於提供電視觀眾正確知識與科學內容表示讚賞。這是一個非常重要的目標,特別是對依賴電視得到這些知識的兒童與其他觀眾們來說。
However, your stated mission is in direct conflict with your show Dog: Impossible. In fact, the irresponsible treatment of the dogs and people on this show flies in the face of all best practices in animal training and behavior. Rather than promoting science and scientifically-proven methodology, Dog: Impossible sacrifices learning science for more dramatic television.
然而,貴頻道所提供的節目「Dog: Impossible」卻與貴頻道「提供正確的科學知識」的一貫立場衝突。節目中對犬隻以及飼主的不負責處理方式與應有的動物訓練及行為操作的準則相違背。「Dog: Impossible」並沒有提倡科學以及經科學驗證的方法,這節目犧牲了對科學的學習,轉而追求吸睛的電視節目效果。
Matt Beisner appears to have no credentials or education in training and behavior, yet he refers to himself as a behaviorist. His claim that “energy is the one language that every animal on the planet speaks” makes clear he is not one.
Matt Beisner並沒有動物訓練或行為學的相關學習經歷與證照,卻宣稱自己是一位行為學家。從他的主張:「能量是地球上所有動物都會使用的共通語言」,便能明白他並不是行為學家。
His statement, “You don’t need tricks, you don’t need treats, you don’t need force,” shows just how unaware of his own actions he is. His misuse of scientific terminology leads viewers to believe they are learning demonstrated, safe and accepted strategies in helping their dogs. In fact, Mr. Beisner is forcing these dogs from start to finish of each episode. His own “tricks” are that of over-stressing dogs until they’re in a state referred to in psychology and science as “learned helplessness.”
他主張「你不需要技巧、零食、或蠻力 (去訓練狗)」,這顯示出他對於自己的所做所為一無所知。他對科學術語的濫用也會誤導觀眾,讓觀眾以為他們正在學習經證實有效而且安全可接受的方法來幫助狗狗。但這位訓練師在每一集節目上從頭到尾都是在逼迫這些狗,而他所擁有的「技巧」,就是讓狗進入過度緊迫的狀態,直到牠們進入心理學和科學上所指的「習得無助」(learned helplessness)狀態。
Learned helplessness occurs when a subject endures repeated aversive stimuli beyond their control. Originally thought to show a subject's acceptance of their powerlessness, for more than half a century it’s been known instead to be the emotional “shutting down” of the subject. Anxiety, clinical depression, and related mental illnesses are common consequences of this technique in humans.
「習得無助」發生在動物沒有任何控制權,且重複地被施加嫌惡刺激的時候。最初,人們認為習得無助狀態意味著動物「接受」了自身無法改變、無能為力的情形,超過半個世紀以來,人們認為這是動物情緒「關機(shutting down)」的表現。在人類身上,習得無助的常見結果包含焦慮、憂鬱症、以及相關的心理疾病。
Allow us to note some aspects of the trailer and his shows, but first, to point out a few well-documented and commonly understood aspects of dog behavior so that we may better make our points understood.
在我們解釋為何我們認為此節目的預告片與內容不適當之前,我們希望先闡述一些正確的犬隻行為常識,以便您能更理解我們的觀點。
Canine body language indicating stress and severe stress:
顯示出壓力以及嚴重緊迫的犬隻肢體語言:
Compressed bodies
Dry, raspy panting
Wide, open eyes with dilated pupils
Heavy drooling
“Whipping” head and body back, pushing off a handler in order to get away
Growling
Fighting
Biting
縮緊身體
急促的喘氣
睜大雙眼、散瞳
大量流口水
甩頭、用前爪推抱著狗的人以退後、試圖掙脫
低吼
打架
開咬
Eleven seconds into the trailer, Mr. Beisner rubs his hands together, smiling, and says, “This is going to be gnarly.” All professionals know from that statement what the series will spotlight: A poorly (if at all) educated non-professional pushing dogs way beyond therapeutic limits, in the name of “results.”
在預告片11秒的地方,Beisner先生搓手並笑著說「等一下會很精采喔」。所有專業人士都知道這句話代表這個節目的亮點將會是:一名缺乏適當教育的訓練師,逼迫狗到超過其能承受的極限,並把這樣的結果稱為是良好的改善。
Flooding, the term for inundating a subject with their fears, phobias and triggers, is ethically questionable at best, cruel and unnecessary, always. There's also a common danger of spontaneous recovery of the phobia. This is because flooding doesn't replace the fear-response with a different response, it just replaces it with no response. “No response” is simply suppression, not cure.
「洪水法」,指的是故意將動物置於恐慌或恐懼的觸發刺激情境,這樣的方法不道德、殘忍、而且沒必要。另外,恐懼的自發性回復(spontaneous recovery)也是洪水法常見的風險,這是因為洪水法並沒有將害怕的反應重新制約成其他不同的情緒行為,它只是讓動物沒有反應。「沒有反應」只是壓抑,動物並沒有因此感到不害怕或恐慌。
Throughout the trailer dogs are flooded with aversive stimuli such as other dogs, people and equipment, something an ethical professional would not, and could not do per any answerable guidelines of animal training and behavior care.
在整個預告片中,狗狗被迫接受各種嫌惡刺激的洪水法訓練,例如其他狗、其他人類和物品,這是具有道德的專業訓練人員不會做的,任何負責任的動物訓練及行為照護準則也不會如此建議。
Systematic desensitization and counterconditioning, gradual exposure to the feared object, and replacement of a negative emotional association with a more pleasant one, are the recommended techniques used to treat such fear and aggression cases, per all legitimate veterinary, training and behavior organizations.
系統性減敏與反制約,也就是逐步與少量的讓狗接觸其本來會害怕的事物,並且將引發的少量負面情緒與其非常喜愛的事物配對給予,是用來處理恐懼及攻擊案例的建議方法,也是每個好的獸醫師、訓練及行為機構會推薦的方法。
Beisner’s statement that “We know at the Zen Yard that dogs help other dogs come out of their shell and face their fear and get past their aggression” isn’t just scientifically unsupportable, his words ring hollow during the very scene playing while he says those words: Beisner restraining one dog, while his co-host pulls a leashed dog to the first in a completely unnatural gesture perhaps intended to either mimic natural dog greeting (it doesn’t) or to flood the heavily drooling dog who is unable to move or get away. The dogs end up in a fight. They have been set up to fail, and the outcome is inevitable.
Beisner宣稱「我們在Zen Yard(他的訓練中心)知道狗會去幫助其他狗融入外界、面對牠們的恐懼並且克服攻擊行為」,這句話不只是缺乏科學支持,在影片中他講出這句話時搭配的畫面,亦表現出他的說詞缺乏支持:Beisner限制了第一隻狗的行動,由節目的共同主持人以牽繩將另一隻狗以一個完全不自然的姿勢拉到第一隻狗身邊,他們可能是在試著模仿狗狗自然的社交打招呼行為(但並不是),或使用洪水法訓練那隻狂流口水(顯示牠很緊張)並且無法逃脫的狗。最終兩隻狗打起來,訓練師製造的這個情境,讓失敗的結果無可避免。
In the trailer, the assistant host, Stefanie DiOrio, states, “Nervousness can easily turn to fear which can lead to aggression.” This is an accurate statement, which is why it’s so confusing that the entire show would be predicated on pushing dogs to the very edge of survivable stress and into predictable aggression, doubling down on the issues that their owners are struggling with.
在預告片中,節目的共同主持人Stefanie DiOrio說「緊張不安很容易變成真正的恐懼,並且導致攻擊行為」,這句話是正確的,但也讓人更加困惑為何整個節目的走向都在將狗推向牠們所能承受壓力的極限、觸發根本可預測的攻擊行為、並使飼主所面對的問題加倍惡化。
We know that the dramatic changes in behavior, from stressed and wildly aggressive to “calm” dogs, make for compelling TV. To an average pet owner it looks like these dogs are making huge improvements. All clients just want their dog to “Stop being aggressive.” However, we also know that behavior suppression is not the same as behavior modification, that a stressed and shut-down dog is a more dangerous animal than one who is actively showing aggression, and that the long-term prognosis of this kind of intervention is poor for both the client and their dog.
我們知道行為上戲劇性的變化,從一隻緊迫且兇猛攻擊的狗轉變成“冷靜”的狗,這個過程代表了高收視率,在不十分了解行為學的飼主眼中看來,這些狗狗似乎有巨大的進步。飼主都只是希望他們的狗「不要再有攻擊性」,然而我們也知道單純抑制攻擊行為的出現,並不是真正的行為改善技術。舉例來說一隻高壓力但看似沒有反應的狗,遠比一隻會表現出攻擊性的狗要危險許多 (譯註: 因為這樣的狗可能會沒有徵兆地開咬),因此這種抑制攻擊行為的訓練法,以長遠來看對飼主以及狗狗都是有害的。
It is also worth pointing out that, like his predecessor, Mr Beisner’s assessment of cause for much of the issues he’s asked to address is simple, made especially clear in episode 4 where he not only saves a dog, he “saves a marriage:” Women are unable to effectively lead, must be stronger, must change their ways.
另一個值得注意的事是Beisner先生,如同他在同一個頻道的前輩,西薩,對導致問題的原因評估也過於簡化,例如第四集中他聲稱他不只拯救了狗狗,他還「拯救了這段婚姻」,因為女主人無法有效的領導狗狗,因此她必須更堅強,必須改變他們之間的相處模式。
Misogyny, it seems, cures dog behavior problems. Real exploration and explanation regarding the antecedents and consequences around behaviors are ignored in favor of client blaming.
這段貶抑女性的解釋,看起來似乎能改善犬隻的行為問題,然而關於行為問題真正的前因後果卻被指責客戶所取代,並沒有真正的被探討與解釋。
The clients on the show represent thousands of clients throughout the US and beyond with whom we work every day, helping them to help their dogs. Far from being dogs “other people won’t work with,” the dogs on your show are exactly the clients and dogs that IAABC Certified Dog Behavior Consultants, as well as all members of the American College of Veterinary Behaviorists, Certified Applied Animal Behaviorists, and other certified behavior specialists see and successfully work with every day.
節目中所出現的客戶正代表了我們日常工作中所會幫助的人們與他們的狗,呈現的就是我們在美國跟其他國家的上千位客戶。節目中所出現的這些有著行為問題的狗絕對不是「其他訓練師都不想要處理的狗狗」,事實上這些客戶與狗正是IAABC認證的狗行為諮詢師、美國獸醫行為學家、認證的應用動物行為學家或是其他受認證的行為學專家,每天工作的日常。
We do so using the best practices of our field (see https://m.iaabc.org/about/ethics/), adopted by the leading behavior and training organizations, without psychologically or physically harming the animals we work with.
我們在這個領域也使用最嚴謹的訓練師專業道德守則(英文版參見https://m.iaabc.org/about/ethics/,中文版參見https://reurl.cc/72eVkl),這個守則受領先的行為及訓練機構所採用,使訓練師與行為諮詢師在工作時,不對我們經手的動物造成生理或心理上的傷害。
The IAABC urges Nat Geo WILD to stop promoting this public miseducation. The tactics employed in the name of entertainment are unnecessarily harsh and potentially dangerous to the public, and they teach yet another generation of Nat Geo watchers absolutely incorrect and harmful practices.
IAABC呼籲國家地理頻道(Nat Geo WILD)停止傳播此系列誤導公眾的資訊。以娛樂包裝節目的策略對於觀眾是不必要的粗糙而且有潛在風險的,甚至是向頻道的年輕一代觀眾灌輸完全不正確且有害的做法。
It remains a mystery why your network is so intent on harming dogs. After years of Cesar Milan, to now bring in a man equally unskilled, who equates terrified, angry or entrapped dogs to his own addiction history is remarkable. Are we really satisfied conflating ego with compassion, self-focus with an understanding of animal behavior? Is this the “science” your mission stands for?
我們仍然不知為何貴頻道這麼多年來如此堅持持續傷害狗的這些作為。在西薩 (Cesar Milan) 的節目播映多年之後,現在又引進一個同樣缺乏正確訓練技巧,以自身藥物成癮困擾歷史去錯誤的同理恐懼或憤怒的狗的人。我們能接受一個膨脹自我,而非真正擁有同情心、適當自我聚焦、了解動物行為的「專業人士」嗎?這就是貴節目所宣稱的「科學」立場嗎?
The damage Nat Geo is doing to dogs by choosing this type of programming is astounding. We can only assume that the producers are unaware of this, as it’s hard to imagine such harm and cruelty would be deliberate.
國家地理頻道選擇製作這類節目對於狗狗的傷害甚鉅,我們只能假定節目製作人並沒有意識到這點,因為我們難以想像會有人故意去做這樣有害且殘忍的事情。
Would you show a reality program on heart surgery with a photogenic “self-taught” practitioner, simply stating the star was not a doctor before showing him mutilating a real patient?
想問貴節目是否會採用一個上鏡的“自學”外科醫生錄製心臟手術的實境節目,告知觀眾他並非真正的醫生,然後播放他對病患動刀的畫面?
I leave you with the clearest image of suffering and abuse from your trailer: the Aussie, stressed to the breaking point, thick ropes of drool streaming from its mouth, being choked by a slip lead to compensate for the host’s inability to even effectively muzzle a dog. This dog is at the point of collapse. This dog is being tortured, and that is not hysteria. That is an assessment by any educated measure.
作為結尾,我希望指出貴節目預告片中明確顯示出狗狗受苦或受虐的畫面:那隻澳洲牧羊犬已經瀕臨壓力的極限,您可以看到口水掛在其嘴邊 (大量口水為壓力徵兆),口罩因為沒有確實的配戴而滑脫,導致牠被勒到快要窒息,已在崩潰邊緣。具備專業與適當教育的人員指出,這隻狗因在節目上被虐待而情緒崩潰,並非其本身歇斯底里。
Please stop this cruel and dangerous programming. To do otherwise is to support that self-taught heart surgery and all the consequences it would bring; that this show is currently bringing to families struggling with their dogs.
Professionals refer to Cesar Milan’s influence on dog training as “job security” because so many dogs ruined or made far worse by his teachings are brought to us by well-intentioned, often weeping owners desperate for real help. Often it is too late.
請停止這系列殘酷且危險的節目。否則貴節目就等同於支持前面舉例的自學的心臟外科「醫師」進行手術一樣,這些危險的後果正由觀眾與他們的狗承擔。專業訓犬人士將西薩米蘭對訓犬的影響戲稱為「工作保障」,因為太多飼主使用了他教授的技巧後,狗狗的狀況變得更糟,而哭著迫切尋找真正的協助,此時通常都為時已晚。
We do not want more work due to this same phenomenon.
我們不想要因為這個節目帶來類似影響而接到更多工作。
We’d be happy to provide you with any education and resources you need to inform your producers about what would qualify as responsible, effective, safe and thoughtful work with the same “red zone” dogs you sell so well.
但我們很樂意提供貴頻道任何需要的教育與資源,讓您們的節目製作人對訓犬工作應有的品質有所理解,例如負責、有效、安全,並且理解到對於在節目中出現的這些「危險」犬隻,事實上有更合理的訓練方法。
Thank you for your consideration.
謝謝您的閱讀與理解。
Marjie Alonso
Executive Director, IAABC
For the Board of Directors
Marjie Alonso
IAABC執行長
代表董事會發言
qualify中文 在 插班生 The Freshman Facebook 的最佳解答
[班長] 很開心為 innisfree Eco Hankie Campaign 2019 演唱中文版主題曲!
Adapted from MINSU’s ”I Like Me”, we are excited to share our version of the song《喜歡這樣的我》! 插班生也在這隻特別影片中展現了讓人“帕帕”的舞蹈細胞,快來看!
希望大家《喜歡這樣的我》!歌曲循環(播放)之餘,也要記得資源循環利用哦!♻
#IPlayGreenILikeMe #愛護自己愛護地球 #BeEcoFriendly #UseEcoHankie #EcoHankie2019 #PlayGreen #innisfreesingapore innisfree Singapore #innisfree #插班生 #TheFreshman #ChaBanSheng #CBS
Sing, dance, jump and PlayGreen! From 17 to 23 June 2019, watch 插班生 the Freshman's version of the 2019 Eco-Hankie Campaign theme song,《喜歡這樣的我》, and stand a chance to win an innisfree gift bundle (worth S$80)! 2 winners only. Follow these steps to participate in the innisfree x @chabansheng Eco-Hankie Contest:
1. Watch 插班生 the Freshman’s Eco-Hankie Music Video《喜歡這樣的我》on Instagram here: http://bit.ly/2KRUfn0
2. Share the post along with your favourite lyrics from the song and Eco-Hankie GIFs on Instagram Story.
3. Don’t forget to tag @innisfreesingapore!
Remember to ensure that you are following @innisfreesingapore on Instagram to qualify. Only entries from public profiles will be considered.
Find out more on our Instagram Story Highlight here: http://bit.ly/2XrPrIu
♬ Original Song: 'I Like Me' by Minsu
♬ Translated & Adapted by The Freshman 插班生
#PlayGreen with #innisfreesingapore #EcoHankie2019 #IPlayGreenILikeMe