✨寫作必備工具
➡️右滑推薦的語料庫及使用方式
別忘記幫我☑️分享☑️珍藏☑️按讚
讓蘇蘇能夠幫助更多人🧡
⁡
🔍語料庫是透過大量文本分析單詞用法建立而成的資料庫，學習外文時常常會需要語料庫讓我們確認自己的理解是否也是外國人常用的用法，藉此避免掉中式英文的問題。當家教已經快要四年了，我從大一上就接了家教，在這三年多的日子當中輔導了數十位同學成功戰勝了「英文寫作」，我覺得一剛開始學生最需要擺脫的就是傳統教育下背單字只被「字」&「中文」的窘境。以下舉例：
例如：dilemma 兩難
困境：不知道動詞用什麼
正確：記憶dilemma 的collocations
正解：be caught in / be faced with / confront the moral dilemma 面臨兩難
⁡
💬除此之外，就是學生因為沒有培養閱讀習慣，長文讀得少，只在乎單詞、少有語境或者文句的刺激，以致於寫出來的句子很「怪」，這個怪的點可能源自於「邏輯」、「語用習慣」，其實真正解決方法還是多閱讀，但要有意識的讀，將文章看成許多語塊，以下舉例說明～
🟨Poorly run meetings do not just waste time, they jeopardise the ability to meet deadlines, adding to workers’ stress. Long meetings should have breaks, which the manager should take responsibility for enforcing. And any meeting should be 20 or 50 minutes long, rather than 30 minutes or an hour, to allow for a gap between sessions in an hourly schedule.
⁡
🟧換成語塊後：
Poorly run meetings do not just waste time, they jeopardise the ability to meet deadlines, adding to workers’ stress.
1️⃣jeopardize the ability to…讓…不能…
☑️jeopardize危及到
= put…in jeopardy
⁡
Long meetings should have breaks［, which the manager should take responsibility for enforcing. ］And any meeting should be 20 or 50 minutes long, rather than 30 minutes or an hour, {to allow for a gap between sessions in an hourly schedule.}
2️⃣切子句［ 標註 ]
🟡可練習切形容詞子句/名詞子句/副詞子句
3️⃣ … rather than … 而不是
4️⃣切不定詞片語
⁡
會議開得不好不僅浪費時間，還會影響員工按時完成任務的能力，增加員工的壓力。長時間的會議應該有休息時間，管理者應該負責執行。
⁡
🟥後記
中翻英是非常正常的事情，畢竟中文是我們的母語，我們熟悉這個語言模式已經十幾年，因此搞懂「中英文轉換不同的邏輯」是第一步，語料庫可以讓你更快理解這些邏輯思維！另外在讀雜誌的時候可以挑選一篇看著英文去翻譯成最通順的中文，練習如何翻譯之外，其實也可以讓自己更懂中英文排列上的不同。
⁡
⏬你寫作也遇到了什麼問題呢？留言告訴我⏬
⁡
#學測 #111學測 #英文筆記 #英文 #podcast

這種逗號不如餵給熊貓吃掉吧！

范范真是「好範兒」，另一個事業巔峰就是為台灣大眾示範了好何謂言多必失。她日前顯然本想藉著撂英文顯示高尚以博得同情，哪知不自量力的低級英文一po出，成為負面示範，刺激全民探討英文、重拾學英文的樂趣。截圖是 Dub & Ko Language Services（來源：臉書）提供批改范瑋琪英文的範例，造成大轟動，雖然轟動的背後難免有政治立場煽風點火，但就學習語言來說，仍也是極佳的學習範例。祝這個抓緊時事脈動的英文改寫和翻譯服務事業蒸蒸日上。不過，有一個英文寫作規則必須指出。最後一句的改寫：

She who talks much, errs much.

這在今天已經不是好的英文，絕對會被英文編輯和老師視為錯誤。去掉逗點就好了。句子主詞與述詞之間的逗點，歷史上曾經出現，那是至少200年前的寫法，今日不宜，除非你是在直接引述古人的英語，否則請注意不得加逗號，無論主詞多麼長。

以下直接引述兩本權威用法指南供參：

一、Webster's Dictionary of English Usage (1989) 262頁

Comma between subject and predicate.

It is no longer cricket 〔按：n. 正人君子之舉；合度的行為〕 to separate the subject and predicate with punctuation. “How,” asks Simon 1980 rhetorically, “can one possibly separate the subject... from the predicate ... by a comma?” The comma between subject and predicate is an old convention that has fallen into disuse and disfavor. It was common in the 18th century:

What Methods they will take, is not for me to prescribe —Jonathan Swift, “A Proposal for Correcting, Improving and Ascertaining the English Tongue,” 1712

The words for all that, seem too low —Murray 1795

The first thing to be studied here, is grammatical propriety —Murray 1795

This comma is now universally frowned on and tends to be found only as a vice of comic-strip writers, advertisers, and others who are not on their guard. You should avoid the practice.

二、The Sense of Styles, Steven Pinker （有中譯本《寫作風格的意識》）

Still, a few common errors are so uncontroversial—the run-on sentence, the comma splice, the grocer's apostrophe, the comma between subject and predicate, the possessive it's—that they have become tantamount to the confession “I am illiterate,” and no writer should be caught making them. As I mentioned, the problem with these errors is not that they betray an absence of logical thinking but that they betray a history of inattention to the printed page. In the hope that an ability to distinguish the logical and illogical features of punctuation may help a reader master both, I'll say a few words about the design of the system, highlighting the major bugs that have been locked into it.

可是，有幾個常見錯誤不那麼具爭議性，像連寫句（兩個主句間沒有連接詞或誤用標點）、用逗號連接兩個完整句子、複數名詞誤加撇號、主詞和述語之間誤加逗號，以及屬格誤加撇號（例如it’s〔它的〕），假如連這些都用錯了，恐怕就稱不上是個讀書識字的人，任何作者不容許在這裡犯錯。像我曾說的，犯上這種錯誤，問題不在於欠缺邏輯思考，而是對書面文字的歷史漠不關心。我期望能把標點的邏輯與非邏輯元素分開，讓讀者兩者都能掌握；我會談一下標點系統的設計，指出隱藏在系統中的一些缺失。 （江先聲譯）

這種逗號不如餵給熊貓吃掉吧！

范范真是「好範兒」，另一個事業巔峰就是為台灣大眾示範了好何謂言多必失。她日前顯然本想藉著撂英文顯示高尚以博得同情，哪知不自量力的低級英文一po出，成為負面示範，刺激全民探討英文、重拾學英文的樂趣。截圖是 Dub & Ko Language Services（來源：臉書）提供批改范瑋琪英文的範例，造成大轟動，雖然轟動的背後難免有政治立場煽風點火，但就學習語言來說，仍也是極佳的學習範例。祝這個抓緊時事脈動的英文改寫和翻譯服務事業蒸蒸日上。不過，有一個英文寫作規則必須指出。最後一句的改寫：

She who talks much, errs much.

這在今天已經不是好的英文，絕對會被英文編輯和老師視為錯誤。去掉逗點就好了。句子主詞與述詞之間的逗點，歷史上曾經出現，那是至少200年前的寫法，今日不宜，除非你是在直接引述古人的英語，否則請注意不得加逗號，無論主詞多麼長。

以下直接引述兩本權威用法指南供參：

一、Webster's Dictionary of English Usage (1989) 262頁

Comma between subject and predicate.

It is no longer cricket 〔按：n. 正人君子之舉；合度的行為〕 to separate the subject and predicate with punctuation. “How,” asks Simon 1980 rhetorically, “can one possibly separate the subject... from the predicate ... by a comma?” The comma between subject and predicate is an old convention that has fallen into disuse and disfavor. It was common in the 18th century:

What Methods they will take, is not for me to prescribe —Jonathan Swift, “A Proposal for Correcting, Improving and Ascertaining the English Tongue,” 1712

The words for all that, seem too low —Murray 1795

The first thing to be studied here, is grammatical propriety —Murray 1795

This comma is now universally frowned on and tends to be found only as a vice of comic-strip writers, advertisers, and others who are not on their guard. You should avoid the practice.

二、The Sense of Styles, Steven Pinker （有中譯本《寫作風格的意識》）

Still, a few common errors are so uncontroversial—the run-on sentence, the comma splice, the grocer's apostrophe, the comma between subject and predicate, the possessive it's—that they have become tantamount to the confession “I am illiterate,” and no writer should be caught making them. As I mentioned, the problem with these errors is not that they betray an absence of logical thinking but that they betray a history of inattention to the printed page. In the hope that an ability to distinguish the logical and illogical features of punctuation may help a reader master both, I'll say a few words about the design of the system, highlighting the major bugs that have been locked into it.

可是，有幾個常見錯誤不那麼具爭議性，像連寫句（兩個主句間沒有連接詞或誤用標點）、用逗號連接兩個完整句子、複數名詞誤加撇號、主詞和述語之間誤加逗號，以及屬格誤加撇號（例如it’s〔它的〕），假如連這些都用錯了，恐怕就稱不上是個讀書識字的人，任何作者不容許在這裡犯錯。像我曾說的，犯上這種錯誤，問題不在於欠缺邏輯思考，而是對書面文字的歷史漠不關心。我期望能把標點的邏輯與非邏輯元素分開，讓讀者兩者都能掌握；我會談一下標點系統的設計，指出隱藏在系統中的一些缺失。 （江先聲譯）

確診病例英文 confirmed case
Today we have 10 new confirmed cases. Two of them are local. The rest are from abroad.
今天我們有十個新的確診病例。其中兩個是本土。其他是境外移入。

名詞用法：(不含confirmed的用法)

imported case 境外移入個案
local case 本土個案
There are two imported cases today. The patients caught the virus in Italy before returning to their home country.
今天有兩個境外移入的個案。病人在回到國內(母國)之前已經在義大利感染到病毒。

There are three new local cases today. These patients had contact with people who traveled abroad.
今天有三個新的本土案例。這些病人有接觸到國外旅遊的人。

 請吉娜喝咖啡 (台灣)台幣300元，謝謝你
https://p.ecpay.com.tw/E0173

請吉娜喝咖啡 (國外)
http://www.paypal.me/ginainger

輕鬆背5000英文單字影片
如何快速背單字
https://youtu.be/wypSE6WTeBU

輕鬆背5000單字會員課程
打字背單字課程
http://www.wordsgo-members.com/

輕鬆背5000單字
基礎單字試用版本
http://www.wordsgo.com/2000w/2000menu.html

加入吉娜英文FB 粉絲頁
學習更多道地美式口語英文
https://www.facebook.com/wordsgo/

吉娜提供教學服務：
KK音標課程
基礎英文從頭學起
學好英文諮詢
請寫信到
webmaster@wordsgo.com

# 確診病例英文