熱門Ptt文章

[爆卦]Swarmed是什麼？優點缺點精華區懶人包

雖然這篇Swarmed鄉民發文沒有被收入到精華區：在Swarmed這個話題中，我們另外找到其它相關的精選爆讚文章

在 swarmed產品中有31篇Facebook貼文，粉絲數超過14萬的網紅Bernard Hiew，也在其Facebook貼文中提到， 𝐀𝐥𝐥𝐨𝐰 𝐦𝐞 𝐭𝐨 𝐜𝐥𝐚𝐫𝐢𝐟𝐲 My intention of this post is not to humiliate, nor degrade anyone. But rather hopefully through this experience of mine, it can ...

　同時也有4部Youtube影片，追蹤數超過162萬的網紅PDSKabushikiGaisha，也在其Youtube影片中提到，動画の評価よろぴく POPチャンネル↓ https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC1Ts0NBFxwhTRCjibVaPXdg/videos インスタPDS↓ https://www.instagram.com/pdssama/ PDS twitter https://...

「swarmed」的推薦目錄
  • Bernard Hiew

    swarmed 在 Bernard Hiew Facebook 的最佳貼文

    2021-07-02 17:40:46
    有 2,496 人按讚

    𝐀𝐥𝐥𝐨𝐰 𝐦𝐞 𝐭𝐨 𝐜𝐥𝐚𝐫𝐢𝐟𝐲

    My intention of this post is not to humiliate, nor degrade anyone. But rather hopefully through this experience of mine, it can help highlight, remind, educate all of us . -#respectimagerights

    Two nights ago, I got a dm from one of my Singapore fan asking if they are mis-using my photo. Let me just say that in my 15 years of being in the entertainment line, cases of misusing my picture, or any other celebrity’s picture has been countless. We continue to hope and pray that audience will not fall into trap.

    The fan showed me a screenshot of a sponsored ad of a property agency, with my family portrait that I took with a photographer friend. The copy didn’t mention my name, but claim that it was another person. I cleared with my photographer friend, and he said he didn’t allow anyone to use the picture nor sold copyright to anyone, and even encouraged me to pursue legal action.

    I immediately took the liberty to email the person, introducing myself with proof, and links to my Youtube Channel and FB page. Told him that I was notified of such case, highlighting the concern that his company that they were using my picture without copyright clearance, impersonating as another person with false information. And my main worry is that, people will fall into this false lie especially when Musang King Channel (our youtube channel) have a big portion of Singaporean fanbase.

    And we waited.

    The whole of next day, my DM was swarmed with messages from fans asking me about the same thing. But I thought I could give him some time.

    When night came, I was informed that he was still running the ad, get this, with multiple version.
    I thought it was getting out of hand.
    I decided to post story out clarify that we never work with this agency and asked my fans to help remind him to check his email.

    You can see part of his response below.

    “It is indeed a true story we are using and not any scam, however, our client Shi Xian has yet to send us a picture of his family, so we randomly took a picture off the internet as a temporary picture to launch our campaign during our digital marketing class, we sincerely do not know that the people in the picture that we used are public figures. “

    Basically he is saying his story is true, Shi Xian and Cheryl’s story is legit. But the legit couple who enjoyed their service haven’t given him the picture yet. So he “ngam ngam hou” use my picture temporarily because he has to launch his campaign. How he knew I was a public figure.

    I got stunned.
    The issue is not if I am a public figure or not.
    Using someone else’s picture without approval or copyright clearance is not ok.
    Regardless if you were caught or not.

    Stealing is wrong. Period.

    I wish you all the best.
    Please know the severity of the issue.
    I seriously hope that your company, and others will not repeat this ignorant mistake again.

    Big thank you to all the fans, artist friends, media for supporting image rights and caring for my situation.
    Hopefully we can use this to remind people around us to avoid scammers and from repeating the same mistake.

    决定发这篇文章，目的不在于让谁难堪，更不是为了贬低任何人，而是希望通过我这次亲身经历给大家提醒 - #尊重并提高肖像权保护意识。

    前两天收到新加坡粉丝的私讯，告知在一个新加坡房地产经纪公司的 FB Page 看到对方盗用了我的照片做广告，并发来了截图。
    这篇广告盗用了一位摄影师好友为我们一家三口拍的家庭照 ，广告文案未提及我的名字，反而套上了另一个主人翁的故事做营销。

    和摄影师好友确认过并无授权给对方使用照片后，我采取主动Email对方，附上我的身份证明并强调未经同意，盗窃别人肖像和身份进行商业用途是欺骗消费者的行为，广告文案也涉及误导性信息。

    在等待的同时，广告依然进行中且已经引起更多新加坡粉丝的回应。于是我呼吁粉丝一起留言，让对方尽快查收我的Email。终于等到对方来信，部分回应如下：

    “我们所提到的文案是真实服务过的客户案例，并不算诈骗，只是客户没来得及附上一家人的照片，我们就从网上随机下载了照片暂时使用应付广告上线，我们真的不知道抓到的照片这么巧是公众人物。”

    我当下傻眼了！踩到我底线的是，除了盗用我和家人的照片作为商业用途外，难道不是公众人物的照片就能随便使用吗？盗窃他人肖像就是不OK！

    虽然对方已经道歉和下架广告，还是希望通过我的这次经历，提醒大众：

    （1） 无论你盗用的照片是艺人还是素人，盗用照片就已经是不对的事情 ，这侵犯到肖像权，属于违法行为

    （2） 由于是公众人物的身份，大家看到广告后或许会更相信广告所讲的都是真的 ，相当于利用艺人背书 ，会让消费者更容易掉入商业圈套。网路行销当中有太多太多盗用照片或身份的诈骗案，大家一定要很小心、注意！做个精明消费者！

    在此，谢谢帮我去发声还有给予意见的粉丝、朋友和艺人朋友。
    希望大家互相提醒身边的人以免受骗或犯下同样的错误

  • swarmed 在 Facebook 的最佳貼文

    2021-03-30 14:09:37
    有 566 人按讚

    Actual birthday unedited cakes series 🥰🥰🥰 a sudden thought swarmed me this morning when I got up — 人生难得糊涂，真相不必太过清楚。Wanna try to loosen up a bit on some of those grips, and create less pain in the arse I know some of you are feeling 🤣 Thanks to all the birthday wishes and most of all friends families and fans who are still sticking around lifting my very flawed and sometimes twisted spirit and constantly creating space and opportunities for me to reflect within and struggle to become a better person every single day. Thanks for making me feel worthy of love ♥️ To another year of (carbon) footprint on earth!

    P/S: Made some very serious wishes I hope I will walk those steps to where I want to be and who I want to become — manifest manifest!!!

  • 李怡

    swarmed 在 李怡 Facebook 的最佳貼文

    2020-07-17 18:32:41
    有 306 人按讚

    The silent revolution (Lee Yee)

    Before democrats’ primaries, except for one or two Hong Kong government officials jibber-jabbering sporadically, major bureaucrats from Beijing and Hong Kong had been very reticent about it. But afterward, Hong Kong and Macau Affairs Office, the Liaison Office of the Central People's Government and Carrie Lam denounced in tandem that the primaries were a breach of the Basic Law, the National Security Law as well as the electoral law, yet without uttering which article of them. Why? Perhaps it was due to another wrongly projected scenario by the Chinese Communist Party. In view of the media being nonchalant about the primaries and Tai Yiuting being unconfident in drawing in one-tenth of the pro-democracy electorate(170 thousand voters), they had thought that citizens were apathetic towards the primaries. If that was what it all amounted to, there was nothing to worry about, and they would surely be glad to see it end in fiasco.

    Who would have thought that as many as 610 thousand voters who had kept a low profile would have swarmed the polling stations to take the whole world aback? Though the communist China and Hong Kong hastily took remedial actions right away, it was already too late. The primaries already shocked the world.

    A wise young man has called on me lately. He put forward a few questions, the first of which was: Which four among all major events in the past year including 6.9, 6.12, 6.16, 7.1, 7.21, 8.31, siege to the Chinese University of Hong Kong and Hong Kong Polytechnic University do you pick to best encapsulate the entire course of the movement?

    My answer was: Being a watcher and critic, I’m far from being able to encapsulate the entire movement, but since the start of the anti-extradition movement, there have been a lot of incidents boggling my mind, or more specifically getting me awakened, while changing my perceptual knowledge thoroughly.

    The first event is 6.12. Before that day, I had not believed the extradition amendment bill would be laid aside for the communist China and Hong Kong’s resolve was so decided and the pro-establishment faction, the majority in the Legislative Council, had declared support for it, not to mention the government proclaimed on the night right after the 6.9 one million people demonstration that the Second Reading debate on the bill would be resumed. I was concerned about the safety of the protesters who charged, and deemed the radical behaviors useless. Though I understood why the young people did so, I did not find the valiant attempts in the protests desirable. After 6.12, my conception has altered and the five appeals put forward since have been prevailing.

    The second event is 6.28. Nothing happened in Hong Kong that day when leaders of various countries converged for G20 summit in Osaka, Japan. Less than a week before, some young people had advocated crowdfunding 3 million dollars for advertising on front pages of influential newspapers in different languages all around the world. Fundraising aside, based on my half-a-century experience in news publication, it is hardly possible to pull it off. But they did it jaw-droppingly well beyond doubt. Even though the leaders of G20 did not react forthwith, the global attention being drawn to Hong Kong and the Hong Kong’s story being ushered into the international arena by the advertisement are indisputable facts. The thought-provoking courage of the young people reshaped my appraisal of the new generation of Hong Kong.

    The third event is 7.21+8.31. This two-in-one incident totally transmuted my impression on Hong Kong police. Citizens come into contact with police officers more than any civil servants. The complexion of the police is the complexion of the city. When police officers become public security officers, Hong Kong becomes a place I am no longer familiar with.

    The forth event is siege to the Chinese University of Hong Kong and Polytechnic University plus the District Council election. Before the District Council voting, young people had kept on charging valiantly with support from the public, and some citizens had complained about traffic inconvenience caused by the protests. When the day of election was nearing, the society was surprisingly peaceful. Would ordinary citizens, mostly self-absorbed, support the protest? In the end, the turnout and results of the election were dumb-founding. The misjudgement by communist China and Hong Kong became laughingstock. The Chinese officials in charge of Hong Kong affairs stepped down or got demoted.

    Every time my mind was boggled, I came at something in one way or another and was somehow awakened through self-reflection. Looking at the primaries of democrats under the threat of the National Security Law, I realized that Hong Kongers on the whole have completely mutated in the past year. All the events that all citizens can take part have been undergoing fundamental changes. Those who keep a low profile will creep into our view to take us aback.

    A silent revolution is ongoing. There is no turning back for Hong Kong. When Hong Kongers reminisce about the current “darkest hour” in future, they will find out that in fact that was the “best time”.

    (Lee Yee, a prominent political commentator in Hong Kong who embarked on a career of writing and subediting in 1956, has been contributing unremittingly political commentaries to the local press.)

你可能也想看看

搜尋相關網站