究竟為什麼主球證 Marc Davis 完全不為所動，而 Devin Booker 能令其他兩位球證接力判罰技術犯規，在第三節趕他出場？🤔

"Devin Booker is the most disrespected player in our league!!! Simple as that." - LeBron James

今天我和 #蔡芳裕 負責湖人對太陽的直播！#阿勤講波 #NBAHK #DevinBooker #S2W #Sports2World #體通天下

來 不要再猜了 這是Twitter 封殺川普的公開全文 請你看完再下評論：

After close review of recent Tweets from the @realDonaldTrump account and the context around them — specifically how they are being received and interpreted on and off Twitter — we have permanently suspended the account due to the risk of further incitement of violence.

In the context of horrific events this week, we made it clear on Wednesday that additional violations of the Twitter Rules would potentially result in this very course of action. Our public interest framework <https://blog.twitter.com/en_us/topics/company/2019/worldleaders2019.html> exists to enable the public to hear from elected officials and world leaders directly. It is built on a principle that the people have a right to hold power to account in the open.

However, we made it clear going back years that these accounts are not above our rules entirely and cannot use Twitter to incite violence, among other things. We will continue to be transparent around our policies and their enforcement.

The below is a comprehensive analysis of our policy enforcement approach in this case.

Overview

On January 8, 2021, President Donald J. Trump Tweeted:

“The 75,000,000 great American Patriots who voted for me, AMERICA FIRST, and MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN, will have a GIANT VOICE long into the future. They will not be disrespected or treated unfairly in any way, shape or form!!!”

Shortly thereafter, the President Tweeted:

“To all of those who have asked, I will not be going to the Inauguration on January 20th.”

Due to the ongoing tensions in the United States, and an uptick in the global conversation in regards to the people who violently stormed the Capitol on January 6, 2021, these two Tweets must be read in the context of broader events in the country and the ways in which the President’s statements can be mobilized by different audiences, including to incite violence, as well as in the context of the pattern of behavior from this account in recent weeks. After assessing the language in these Tweets against our Glorification of Violence <https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/glorification-of-violence> policy, we have determined that these Tweets are in violation of the Glorification of Violence Policy and the user @realDonaldTrump should be immediately permanently suspended from the service.

Assessment

We assessed the two Tweets referenced above under our Glorification of Violence policy <https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/glorification-of-violence>, which aims to prevent the glorification of violence that could inspire others to replicate violent acts and determined that they were highly likely to encourage and inspire people to replicate the criminal acts that took place at the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021.

This determination is based on a number of factors, including:

President Trump’s statement that he will not be attending the Inauguration is being received by a number of his supporters as further confirmation that the election was not legitimate and is seen as him disavowing his previous claim made via two Tweets (1 <https://twitter.com/DanScavino/status/1347103015493361664>, 2 <https://twitter.com/DanScavino/status/1347103016311259136>) by his Deputy Chief of Staff, Dan Scavino, that there would be an “orderly transition” on January 20th.

The second Tweet may also serve as encouragement to those potentially considering violent acts that the Inauguration would be a “safe” target, as he will not be attending.

The use of the words “American Patriots” to describe some of his supporters is also being interpreted as support for those committing violent acts at the US Capitol.

The mention of his supporters having a “GIANT VOICE long into the future” and that “They will not be disrespected or treated unfairly in any way, shape or form!!!” is being interpreted as further indication that President Trump does not plan to facilitate an “orderly transition” and instead that he plans to continue to support, empower, and shield those who believe he won the election.

Plans for future armed protests have already begun proliferating on and off-Twitter, including a proposed secondary attack on the US Capitol and state capitol buildings on January 17, 2021.

As such, our determination is that the two Tweets above are likely to inspire others to replicate the violent acts that took place on January 6, 2021, and that there are multiple indicators that they are being received and understood as encouragement to do so.

推特在幾個小時前宣布永久註銷（permanently suspended）川普總統的帳號，這是一個有8800萬追蹤者的帳號。

8800萬是什麼概念？大約是四倍台灣的人口。

我的看法跟昨天一樣。我個人不贊成推特這個做法，因為這將加深美國社會的對立及緊張。

這不是所謂挺川或反川的問題，而是推特作為一個社群平台，能不能或該不該這樣做的問題。

社群媒體的存在意義，是強化訊息的傳遞，進而形塑社群的交流。所以要問的是，取消川普帳號的做法，是「強化」社群的連結還是「惡化」社群的連結？

我這樣講，拜託不要給我貼上廉價的川粉或川黑的標籤，這無助於公共理性討論。

美國《通訊規範法》（Communications Decency Act, CDA）第230條，絕對有值得討論的空間，這也是傳播學界應該思考的課題。我們又該如何思考「去平台化」（ deplatform）課題？

禁掉川普的臉書跟推特，只是讓他暫時沒有社群平台可以發布訊息。但支持川普的社會基礎（social base）仍然存在，他們會轉變成什麼形式存在這個社會上？這股能量，又會找到哪個出口？

根據推特的說法，川普最後這兩則推文違反了「美化暴力政策（The Glorification of Violence Policy）」。

讓我們來看看這兩則貼文的全文：

第一則：
"The 75,000,000 great American Patriots who voted for me, AMERICA FIRST, and MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN, will have a GIANT VOICE long into the future. They will not be disrespected or treated unfairly in any way, shape or form!!!"

推特說法：這則推文顯示川普無意推動有秩序的政權交接。

第二則：
To all of those who have asked, I will not be going to the Inauguration on January 20th."

推特說法：這則推文讓川普支持者解讀成，這場選舉並無正當性。

所以，這兩則貼文有沒有「美化暴力」？

這是一個主觀的判斷，而顯然，推特認為這兩則推文都「美化暴力」。

推特是私人公司，它也許有權決定這樣做，但推特要思考的是，這樣做對整體美國社會，是好還是不好？

#推特
#川普

UNDISPUTED - "Oh, LeBron still feels disrespected now?" Skip reacts to LeBron's latest comments

FIRST TAKE | Stephen A. on LeBron says "Devin Booker is the most disrespected player in our league"

UNDISPUTED - Chris Broussard SHOCKED LeBron calls Devin Booker "most disrespected" NBA player