[爆卦]Deniability 中文是什麼?優點缺點精華區懶人包

雖然這篇Deniability 中文鄉民發文沒有被收入到精華區:在Deniability 中文這個話題中,我們另外找到其它相關的精選爆讚文章

在 deniability產品中有3篇Facebook貼文,粉絲數超過3萬的網紅Zen大的時事點評,也在其Facebook貼文中提到, 跟一開始有人爆料後,我說的一樣。 人家沒再怕!...

 同時也有2部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過6萬的網紅粒方不插電,也在其Youtube影片中提到,遊戲購買連結: https://www.ruten.com.tw/item/show?22042658513851 歡迎再度來到桌遊秀!這次要來玩的是Among Us太空狼人殺的桌遊版 The Menace Among Us! 我們究竟能不能在達成目標的情況下存活呢? 快來看看吧! Among...

deniability 在 楊涵婷 ? Instagram 的最佳貼文

2020-05-11 14:13:30

【#紅娘娜娜:《把妹達人》書摘——孔雀理論】 如同雄孔雀尾部那又長又累贅的羽毛,是它生存能力的價值證明。當一個人打扮得引人側目時,我們會說他/她在扮孔雀(peacocking)。這樣能促使別人有興趣跟他/她互動。如果你扮孔雀,女孩子們會多看你幾眼,其他人則會竊笑並批評你。這表示你會承受比平時更強大...

  • deniability 在 Zen大的時事點評 Facebook 的精選貼文

    2020-10-29 08:03:29
    有 187 人按讚

    跟一開始有人爆料後,我說的一樣。

    人家沒再怕!

  • deniability 在 Eric's English Lounge Facebook 的精選貼文

    2020-08-03 10:41:30
    有 433 人按讚

    「收賄」、「白手套」英文怎麼說?
     
    Accept bribes? White gloves?
     
    ★★★★★★★★★★★★
     
    《中華民國刑法》
     
    Article 122

    A public official or an arbitrator who demands, agrees to accept, or accepts a bribe or other improper benefits for a breach of his official duties shall be sentenced to imprisonment for not less than three years but not more than ten years; in addition thereto, a fine of not more than two million yuan may be imposed.

    A breach of official duties shall be sentenced to life imprisonment or with imprisonment for not less than five years; in addition thereto, a fine not more than four million yuan may be imposed.
     
    1. public official 公務員
    2. arbitrator 仲裁人
    3. accept a bribe 收受賄賂*
    4. a breach of official duties 違背職務**
    5. be sentenced 判處
    6. imprisonment 監禁;關押
    7. a fine 罰金
    8. impose 強制實行
     
    第 122 條

    公務員或仲裁人對於違背職務之行為,要求、期約或收受賄賂或其他不正利益者,處三年以上十年以下有期徒刑,得併科二百萬元以下罰金。

    因而為違背職務之行為者,處無期徒刑或五年以上有期徒刑,得併科四百萬元以下罰金。

    全國法規資料庫: https://bit.ly/2Dk8Ia4

    *bribery: https://bit.ly/31bwsFj
    **breach: https://bit.ly/3k5qcHJ
     
    ★★★★★★★★★★★★
     
    那「白手套」呢?

    White gloves? Not really...
     
    The term "white-glove" is typically used as an adjective. It means providing a very high level of service, or involving a lot of care about small details:

    白手套(white-glove)通常用作形容詞。表示提供非常高的服務水準,或與諸多照護細節有關:

    ➣The cruise company does not want to risk alienating the other passengers who don't get the white-glove treatment.

    郵輪公司不想冒險讓其他未接受白手套待遇的乘客變得疏遠。

    ➣We know that when extra attention is required, our white-glove delivery service will not disappoint.
     
    當您有特殊要求,我們的白手套配送服務一定不會讓您失望。

    —Cambridge Dictionary

    https://bit.ly/3hZTw0r
     
    Wait…that doesn't fit our context!

    ★★★★★★★★★★★★
     
    According to the South China Morning Post, the expression “white gloves,” when used as a noun, was coined in Taiwan!

    “The innocuous-sounding euphemism ‘white gloves’ generally refers to a middleman or outfit that launders dirty or corrupt money under a seemingly legitimate front - dirty hands concealed by a pair of white gloves. The expression, coined by the Taiwanese, is catching up fast on the mainland as rampant corruption is exposed at all levels of the bureaucracy.”
     
    9. coin (v.) 創造(新詞或新的表達方式);首次使用(某一詞語)
    10. innocuous-sounding 聽起來無害的
    11. launder (v.) 洗(贓款) ; money laundering 洗錢
    12. legitimate front 合法的地帶; 僞裝(人或機構的)僞裝;假裝的樣子
    13. conceal 隱藏
    14. catch up 了解(或討論)最新情況
    15. rampant 猖獗的;蔓延的
    16. bureaucracy 官僚體制;官僚主義
     
    據《南華早報》的報導,「白手套」作為名詞的用法,首見於臺灣!

    「聽起來無害的委婉用語『白手套』通常是指中間人或公司,他們在看似合法的地帶清洗髒錢或賄款——髒手則藏於白手套當中。這種由臺灣人首創的表達方式,正在中國迅速傳開,因為猖獗的腐敗現象已於官僚體制的各個層面暴露出來。」

    詳見《SCMP》:https://bit.ly/3i2cqUA
     
    ★★★★★★★★★★★★
     
    我個人會用「middleman」或「go-between」。

    請注意,「middleman」是指批貨後轉售他人者,或協助他人安排商業交易者。該詞本身並不具有任何犯罪或不法行為等負面意涵(negative connotations),亦須有上下文才足以呈現「白手套」的概念。
     
    另一方面,「go-between」是在雙方無法見面或不想見面時,將消息從一人(或一個團隊)傳給另一人(或另一個團隊)的人。例如,聯合國代表將充當兩國領導人的中間人(或掮客)——「go-between」,而它的搭配你可以用「act/serve as a go-between」。「go-between」 的一個同義詞是「intermediary」。

    ❖再次提醒各位,若缺乏前後文,這些用語就不能完全代表「白手套」的涵義。底下我將舉出一些在腐敗情況中所使用的例子。
     
    ★★★★★★★★★★★★
     
    I. middleman
     
    "Many of these middlemen stay on the right side of the law, offering advice and connections. But others cross the line. They grease the palms of officials and local managers, and they put a buffer between the payoff and the client, offering plausible deniability if the authorities catch on."
     
    17. connections 社會關係;人際關係;可資利用的熟人
    18. cross the line(行為)越過界線
    19. grease (v.) 用油脂塗;給⋯⋯加潤滑油
    20. buffer 緩衝物;起緩衝作用的人
    21. payoff 賄款;遮口費
    22. plausible deniability 合理推諉
     
    「在這些中間人裡,有許多人站在法律這邊,提供建議與人脈。但其他人卻踰越了界線。他們成為官員與地方經理人的潤滑劑,並在賄款與委託人之間置入緩衝物,起到合理推諉的作用,以防當局上門。」
     
    詳見《紐約時報》:https://nyti.ms/39MMwkM

    ★★★★★★★★★★★★
     
    II. intermediary
     
    "For China’s elite, a 'white glove' is an intermediary who launders your money; they handle the dirty deeds, while you keep your hands clean. 'White gloves' are often well-connected Westerners, such as former top politician Bo Xilai’s two European fixers, British businessman Neil Heywood and French architect Patrick Devillers. Using a BVI shell company, the two men helped Bo’s wife Gu Kalai buy a 7 million euro French mansion and rack up rental fees on it."

    23. elite(社會)上層集團;掌權人物;出類拔萃的人;精英
    24. deed(尤指很壞或很好的)事情;行為
    25. well-connected 與顯貴人物有交情的;與有影響人士有來往的;很有背景的
    26. fixer 籌謀者;安排者(尤指精於用不正當手段來操辦事情的人)
    27. BVI (The British Virgin Islands) 英屬維京群島
    28. shell company 空殼公司
    29. fixer 安排者(尤指精於用不正當手段來操辦事情的人)
     
    『對中國的權貴來說,「白手套」是幫你洗錢的中間人;他們負責處理骯髒的事,讓你的雙手保持乾淨。「白手套」通常是與權貴有交情的西方人士,例如前副國級領導人薄熙來的兩個歐洲籌謀者——英國商人海伍德以及法國建築師德維利耶。兩人藉由一家英屬維京群島的空殼公司,幫助薄的妻子谷開來買下一座價值700萬歐元的法式豪宅,並大大提高了租金。』
     
    詳見《石英財經網》:https://bit.ly/30lFnEJ
     
    ★★★★★★★★★★★★
     
    III. go-between
     
    "The offence is similar to bribery with one important difference: trading in influence concerns the 'middleman', or the person that serves as the go-between the decision-maker and the party that seeks an improper advantage."
     
    30. offence (US offense) 犯罪行為;罪行
    31. bribery 賄賂
    32. trade in influence 斡旋賄賂;影響力交易
    33. serve(為⋯⋯)工作;(為⋯⋯)服務;盡職責
    34. improper advantage 不當利益
     
    『此一罪行與賄賂相似,但有一個重要的區別:斡旋賄賂係指「middleman」或人充當決策者與尋求不當利益方的中間人(掮客)——「go-between」』。
     
    詳見 Anti-Corruption Resource Center:https://www.u4.no/terms
     
    ★★★★★★★★★★★★
     
    歡迎在底下留言與我們分享更多相關字詞(例如:prosecutor、corruption charges、litigations⋯⋯)。

    圖片出處: Google Image

    ★★★★★★★★★★★★
     
    如果同學對於如何分析英文時事,以及如何進行批判性思考有興趣,歡迎加入我們的課程!

    🌎國際新聞英文-六步驟思考術 | 最後優惠倒數 ► https://bit.ly/3eTHIvH

    🌎國際新聞英文課程FAQ:https://wp.me/p44l9b-2lK

  • deniability 在 翻譯這檔事 Facebook 的最讚貼文

    2018-04-08 13:27:13
    有 46 人按讚

    《圍雞總動員》的等效英文片名

    響應分級制度,此文「18禁」,慎入 XD

    台灣電影片名的翻譯《圍雞總動員》,真是台灣之光,得美國脫口秀認證,如圖。(來源:https://forgetfulbc.blogspot.com/2018/04/movie.html)

    不過,脫口秀為了解釋台譯片名的意思,必須採取回譯(back-translation)策略,把中文片名譯回英文,讓觀眾體會片名為何如此好棒棒。必須說,節目所用的英文回譯 Operation: Chicken Container 挺失敗的,既不達意也達不到應有的幽默笑果。

    先看看這些字:
    block 封鎖,圍堵
    contain 1.裝入 2.圍堵,封鎖
    containment 圍堵,封鎖
    container 1a.容器 1b.貨櫃 2.圍堵者/物(??)

    container 不是好譯法,選錯字了,它給人的印象是小容器,或大貨櫃,不太會想到圍堵封鎖。看到chicken container,第一印象是 「裝一兩隻雞的小容器」或「裝滿雞隻的貨櫃」,不是「把雞圍住的東西」。何況,「圍雞」的重點在動作及目的,不在用具本身,而chicken container指的是用具,故重點不對。

    假如「圍雞總動員」是台灣原生原汁原味的中文片名,如果想把電影推銷到英語世界,讓英語觀眾看了片名立即得到等值等效的低俗幽默感,這英文片名應該是什麼呢?

    答案絕對不是Operation Chicken Container(原譯Operation之後沒必要用冒號),container不適當,原因已如上述,那chicken呢?這字也會讓英語觀眾霧煞煞。雖然英文海報有一隻公雞的黑影,但英語人士從它得來的雙關語感,是因為cock[註1]這字,不是chicken。Chicken絕對達不到效果。

    建議一個更等效更有力的英文片名:

    Operation Coop Up the Cocks
    (「把『雞雞』圍堵/封鎖起來」特別行動)

    這不僅表明了就是要用cock一字達到強烈聳人的低俗雙關趣味,但最棒的是,它讓你有臺階可下,有辦法否認(deniability)。如果遭衛道人士指責片名下流不雅,回答是:噢,是您多心,想歪了,這裡所用的動詞是coop up,只是把雞隻關進雞籠的意思!

    註1: cock是公雞的舊說法,今因有了更顯著的不雅俚語義,已少指公雞,此義只留存於一些固定、化石了的習語,如聖經〔before a cock crows, you shall deny Me three times.〕,或少數片語,如cock of the walk。

  • deniability 在 粒方不插電 Youtube 的最讚貼文

    2020-11-04 22:00:12

    遊戲購買連結: https://www.ruten.com.tw/item/show?22042658513851

    歡迎再度來到桌遊秀!這次要來玩的是Among Us太空狼人殺的桌遊版 The Menace Among Us!
    我們究竟能不能在達成目標的情況下存活呢? 快來看看吧!


    Among Us》是一款多人電子遊戲,由美國]遊戲工作室InnerSloth開發並於2018年6月15日發布。遊戲以太空為主題,玩家將扮演船員(Crewmate)或入侵者(Impostor)之一。船員的目標找出入侵者並完成任務,而入侵者的目標是殺死所有船員而不被發現。雖然遊戲於2018年發布,但鮮有問津,直到2020年因為眾多Twitch實況主和YouTuber遊玩才流行起來。為回應遊戲的熱度,遊戲開發者於2020年8月宣布將開發續作《Among Us 2》,但是一個月後(9月)宣布取消續作的開發,將重點轉移到改進原版遊戲上
    The Menace Among Us is a semi-cooperative game of intrigue and survival in deep space. Adrift and powerless, your crippled vessel is bleeding oxygen. As you effect repairs, every breath you take brings you one step closer to death. You must work together to restore power before the air runs out — but hidden among you, as loyal friends and crew members, are imposters who have infiltrated security and continue to sabotage the ship. Their only goal is to avoid detection and kill the crew, by force or by asphyxiation. Can you identify them in time and eliminate the threat? Or will succumb to the menace among us?

    The Menace Among Us is a 40 to 60-minute, asymmetrical card game for 4-8 players. Each player chooses an Agenda at random, either a loyal Crew member, a deadly Menace or the Coward, who’ll take any side just to survive. Your Agenda card sets a Team Goal and an Individual Goal, as well as outlines any special abilities and the card composition of your individual 13-card deck. Then, knowing your Agenda and Goals, you choose a Character who you believe will best help you achieve them or mask your true identity. Characters add 7 new cards to your deck, shuffle-building a unique combination of cards, as well as provide you two specialized Above Deck Actions.

    In this hidden traitor game, how you play your cards and abilities is far more important than the meta game aspects of accusations and denials. Cards are played face down and shuffled together as “Below Deck Actions.” Here, Menace players secretly sabotage the ship’s systems and attack crew members, who are trying to save the ship with their cards. If too few crew members risk going below deck to effect repairs, the ship’s Emergency Maintenance Assistant (EmMA) adds cards to the pile to help. However, the system has also been compromised and occasionally places damaging cards into the mix, providing plausible deniability to the Menace players. In contrast, Above Deck Actions are conducted in full view of the crew. Most of these abilities have costs, either in Energy or Oxygen, both resources the crew is trying to increase. So, while The Doctor has the ability to heal a crew member and remove a debilitating effect, a Menace player, who may be secretly in control of The Doctor, cares far more that it costs 2 Oxygen to perform the healing.

    At some point, someone’s behavior will raise suspicion. But, did they do so because they are trying to fulfill an Individual Goal – or are they a Menace? You can call a vote to expose their true nature. But if they are a loyal Crew member, you’ve just blown precious Oxygen in the effort to detain them. For that matter, was it a Menace player calling the vote in hopes of wasting the air on purpose?

    If the Crew can find and eliminate the Menace players – and raise the Energy to a safe threshold before the air runs out, they win. If the Menace can prevent this or kill the crew outright, their mission succeeds. Special commendations are awarded for surviving and for achieving your Individual Goal.


    娛樂百分百
    凹鳴狼人殺

  • deniability 在 粒方不插電 Youtube 的最佳貼文

    2020-07-24 20:30:15

    The Menace Among Us太空狼人殺桌遊版 這裡買: https://www.ruten.com.tw/item/show?22042658513851

    講到陣營遊戲 大部分的人想到的應該都是狼人殺、阿瓦隆,但你知道其實有很多比這幾個遊戲更好玩的陣營遊戲嗎? 快來看看吧!

    死亡寒冬
    CS Files犯罪現場
    威脅潛伏 The Menace Among Us (太空狼人殺)
    人類懲戒
    太空堡壘:卡拉狄加


    The Menace Among Us is a semi-cooperative game of intrigue and survival in deep space. Adrift and powerless, your crippled vessel is bleeding oxygen. As you effect repairs, every breath you take brings you one step closer to death. You must work together to restore power before the air runs out — but hidden among you, as loyal friends and crew members, are imposters who have infiltrated security and continue to sabotage the ship. Their only goal is to avoid detection and kill the crew, by force or by asphyxiation. Can you identify them in time and eliminate the threat? Or will succumb to the menace among us?

    The Menace Among Us is a 40 to 60-minute, asymmetrical card game for 4-8 players. Each player chooses an Agenda at random, either a loyal Crew member, a deadly Menace or the Coward, who’ll take any side just to survive. Your Agenda card sets a Team Goal and an Individual Goal, as well as outlines any special abilities and the card composition of your individual 13-card deck. Then, knowing your Agenda and Goals, you choose a Character who you believe will best help you achieve them or mask your true identity. Characters add 7 new cards to your deck, shuffle-building a unique combination of cards, as well as provide you two specialized Above Deck Actions.

    In this hidden traitor game, how you play your cards and abilities is far more important than the meta game aspects of accusations and denials. Cards are played face down and shuffled together as “Below Deck Actions.” Here, Menace players secretly sabotage the ship’s systems and attack crew members, who are trying to save the ship with their cards. If too few crew members risk going below deck to effect repairs, the ship’s Emergency Maintenance Assistant (EmMA) adds cards to the pile to help. However, the system has also been compromised and occasionally places damaging cards into the mix, providing plausible deniability to the Menace players. In contrast, Above Deck Actions are conducted in full view of the crew. Most of these abilities have costs, either in Energy or Oxygen, both resources the crew is trying to increase. So, while The Doctor has the ability to heal a crew member and remove a debilitating effect, a Menace player, who may be secretly in control of The Doctor, cares far more that it costs 2 Oxygen to perform the healing.

    At some point, someone’s behavior will raise suspicion. But, did they do so because they are trying to fulfill an Individual Goal – or are they a Menace? You can call a vote to expose their true nature. But if they are a loyal Crew member, you’ve just blown precious Oxygen in the effort to detain them. For that matter, was it a Menace player calling the vote in hopes of wasting the air on purpose?

    If the Crew can find and eliminate the Menace players – and raise the Energy to a safe threshold before the air runs out, they win. If the Menace can prevent this or kill the crew outright, their mission succeeds. Special commendations are awarded for surviving and for achieving your Individual Goal.



    娛樂百分百 狼人殺

你可能也想看看

搜尋相關網站