熱門Ptt文章

[爆卦]有理數及無理數是什麼？優點缺點精華區懶人包

雖然這篇有理數及無理數鄉民發文沒有被收入到精華區：在有理數及無理數這個話題中，我們另外找到其它相關的精選爆讚文章

在 有理數及無理數產品中有123篇Facebook貼文，粉絲數超過22萬的網紅大人學，也在其Facebook貼文中提到， 【在職場，寫了Email卻得不到回信？有時候，對方其實在等你給他 #回信的理由】 對於經常要撰寫英文書信的職場人來說，無論是開發或者聯絡，你是否準確的表達，常常決定了對方是否要回覆，也決定了客戶是否認同你。 之前曾有一位負責幫公司申請國外專案資格認證的經理提問，他說一週前，他寫信給認證單位釐清某...

　同時也有27部Youtube影片，追蹤數超過36萬的網紅升旗易得道，也在其Youtube影片中提到，【11.18時事!】升旗易得道 2020年11月18日 主持: Tony Jaa 1.5 11.18【強姦有理？】兩名22歲警察涉強姦，律政司將介入案件，並控告受害女子煽動辱警！ ________________________________________________________ ...

「有理數及無理數」的推薦目錄

有理數及無理數 在 Yannis N Instagram 的最讚貼文

2021-09-10 22:35:05

今天的你終於下定決心失去我 我以前從來唔係一個急於拍拖既人 亦都唔係隨意開始新戀情既人 當初人人問我隔左成年，做咩唔拍拖 我話單身幾好，唔想拍拖住 從而認識到你 你用你可愛既外表，風趣既態度 勤力熱烈的聯絡，以及給我無數的諾言 我被你打動，被你真誠的打動 因為我看得見你努力趕上我的成長 只要我想要...

有理數及無理數 在 警長 Instagram 的精選貼文

2021-09-10 03:36:10

後疫情時代，不能一起遠行的時候、無法自在相聚的時候、在外地獨自打拼的時候，儘管讓自己忙碌生活，仍偶有那麼一絲情感流露，那是想回家團聚的念頭。 中秋，與家人一起看月亮、吃月餅、剝柚子，小時候不知道為什麼這樣做，只曉得這些習以為常的事叫做傳統，後來知道，那些沒有原因的關心、沒有理由的傳統，是因為彼此都...

有理數及無理數 在 ✨魔法少女の電影紹介所⁣｜電影｜戀愛｜性別 Instagram 的最讚貼文

2021-09-03 21:11:00

#院線介紹 《青春電幻物語》⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣ 這篇完成之前，我從不敢觀看他人的影評。 幾年前，在大學附近的漫畫影音出租店，盒緣上有點灰塵的這片光碟，輕易地侵略自己對事物所認知的一切。 每個人心中或多或少，都有一部不敢玷污、深怕自己的字詞會破壞其神性的作品，《青春電幻物語》對我來說就是這樣的存在。 ...

  • 大人學

    有理數及無理數 在 大人學 Facebook 的精選貼文

    2021-09-24 20:30:26
    有 95 人按讚

    【在職場，寫了Email卻得不到回信？有時候，對方其實在等你給他 #回信的理由】

    對於經常要撰寫英文書信的職場人來說，無論是開發或者聯絡，你是否準確的表達，常常決定了對方是否要回覆，也決定了客戶是否認同你。

    之前曾有一位負責幫公司申請國外專案資格認證的經理提問，他說一週前，他寫信給認證單位釐清某份文件是否也需要填寫，但對方遲遲沒有回覆，眼看申請認證的截止日期再過三天就要到了，到時認證要是沒拿到，公司就不能賣相關產品，造成公司財務損失...

    像經理這樣有求於人，卻又等不到回覆的情境，你我都不陌生。為什麼對方不趕快回信呢？明明這些要求都很簡單啊，明明我們只是要知道一個數據、拿到一份報告、確認一個流程而已，手指頭在鍵盤敲個幾下，就可以回信了不是嗎？為什麼都過了一週，卻還沒有消息呢？

    其實，我們在職場時常會收到一些「#無理要求」的email。這裡的無理並非無理取鬧，而是「#沒有理由(no reason)」，意思就是：有人會寫信請他提供數據、報告或幫忙處理一些事，但卻都沒解釋「為什麼」，看得他滿頭問號，覺得「我有義務做這些事嗎？」應該沒有很急吧？有時甚至遇到要求涉及機密，更讓他不知所措，乾脆統統不回，收件匣裡一堆信不知如何整理。

    這邊舉一個容易被已讀不回的句子：

    Could you please send me the latest figure by Jan 11?（可以請你在1月11之前寄給我報告嗎？）

    文法正確，但字面上因為少了「為什麼」的解釋，無法令人感受到回信的「急迫性」！

    這時只要善用 so that（如此一來），在句子後面補上應該要快點回覆的「理由」，例如，對方只要回信就能：解決什麼問題、達到什麼目的、完成什麼人的要求、趕上什麼時間點等，對收件者「明示」若不早點回信，可能會造成的影響是什麼。

    比方說：Could you please send back the latest figure by Jan 11 so that we can finish the test by its deadline?（請在1月11日之前寄回報告，如此一來我們才能在截止日期前完成測試。）

    看完 so that 之後的原因後，收件者就會「很清楚」知道若沒有即時回信是會有「代價」的，自然就會加速回信囉！

    所以，想要加速對方回信，其實很簡單！就是：給對方一個理由，告訴他「為什麼」這些數據、報告、事情「應該」要馬上處理。

    在英文聽說讀寫中，「寫Email」是唯一有機會「速成」的技巧！因為不用面對面即時回應，我們有充足的時間，可以利用平常蒐集的句型、結構、谷歌大神，還有其他各類工具來幫助我們。

    這門Joy老師的【商務Email的結構化寫作法】課程，非常強調 #即戰力，把所有壓箱寶一次交給大家，目標是讓大家隔天就能看出明顯的進步。
    >>https://bit.ly/38IxaxW

  • 投資旅遊寫作人 - 高Sir

    有理數及無理數 在 投資旅遊寫作人 - 高Sir Facebook 的最讚貼文

    2021-09-23 07:43:22
    有 32 人按讚

    🏦- 美聯儲局維持息率不變，下年或啟動加息，下年既事下年先算，年前前話會有機縮表減債，年底既事年底先算😂, 令人最擔心既長債到期冇錢還，下月既事又唔理住，咁單睇昨晚，美10年債息回落，2年債息推上，意味市場有理無理先推在短線推上，杜指應聲彈，最高升500點，收市埋彈升300 多，唯事實上，我較傾向昨晚杜指純屬技術性反彈，聯儲局符市場預期，但沒有令投資者增加任何實質信心的數據，還錢問題其實未解決，只係暫時市場選擇忘記，料反彈力好短暫要注意.
    .
    📈恒大（3333）話可如期付息，仲話會擔起社會責任，一下子恒大的ADR 彈高5成，今日港股恒大系會有花生🥜了，恒指假前偷步於23800 關反彈，向上計算24400 可達，但進一步見24580/24700 關兩阻力企得穩，才算展開較大反彈浪，同7,8月走勢不同，假如恒指由今刻開始反彈，形勢會較7,8月好，記得7,8月份恒指只是第一週上升，一直便告跌要待期結前3-5日才展反彈週期，不過，在市場一遍認為要all in 買貨之時，投資者應該要有戒心，而非後悔手頭上清倉.
    .
    💰-今日黑馬當然是恒大（3333）,一眾內銀也暫且舒口氣，建行（939）, 郵儲（1658）可睇睇，內險平保（2318）可能有個較大反彈，炒番升既話，入番海吉亞（6078）, 心動（2400）應該問題不大，前者睇番$62/$66, 後者$45/$48.
    .
    ☕☕☕
    .
    ..
    👉🏻👉🏻廣告時間👈🏻👈🏻👈🏻
    .
    1. 👉🏻⭐即時對答聊天室, 3日免費試！（注意:我只有秒投一個收費聊天室)
    .
    高sir聊天室（每日同戰友一齊作戰，齊上齊落! 港股、美股, 甚至六合彩同馬都一齊出擊💪🏻）
    .
    免費進入試用：
    https://link.stockviva.com/oeIL8Fd322
    .
    .
    2. 🔥👉🏻 入碼開戶, 攞盡證劵商各大優惠！
    .
    ⭐🗣2️⃣富途證劵----優惠碼🔥「SW7D5MMZ 」（1股aapl 價值過千！）
    .
    （要喺註冊後開戶前，即係未入錢之前，到「我的」->「活動中心」->「兌換中心」輸入兌換碼「SW7D5MMZ 」/或直接去呢個網址輸入碼

    👉🏻https://coupon.futunn.com/redeem
    （$100超市禮券 + 1股蘋果價值$1,000 + 港股買賣一世免佣)
    .
    .
    ⭐🗣3️⃣微牛證券優惠 - (送1手美股價值過千！ +美股免佣)
    按呢度:
    👉🏻https://act.webull.hk/actv2/invitation/hk/landing.html?inviteCode=i9z7MbECaV4y&inviteSource=wb_kol_us
    .
    .
    ⭐🗣 4️⃣IB (Interactive Brokers 開戶) - (Donki cupon + 免費串流報價!)
    👉🏻按呢度: https://bit.ly/3y5cbRy
    .
    .
    3. ⭐👉🏻秒投 - 每天發放投資資訊，助你賺取收益
    下載秒投App觀看超過 10000 篇帖子
    https://stockviva.com/post/y39p
    .
    .
    4. 👍🔥IG 同步更新：IG: https://www.instagram.com/yahoo_kosir/
    ---------------

    #高sir #投資 #理財 #股票 #高俊權 #窩輪 #ipo #富途優惠碼 #富途 #秒投 #美股 #短炒 #比特幣 #bitcoin #一世免佣 #開戶優惠 #富途開戶 #code #微牛 #wellbull #gme #加密幣 #騰訊 #TSLA #股災
    .
    **本帖不構成證劵, 金融產品或工具邀請, 招攬, 建議, 意見或任何保證. 有關開戶優惠均受條款及細則約束，詳細請瀏覽連結內容, 優惠受條款約束.
    .
    **以上帖文, 全屬撰文者個人評論, 投資涉及風險，此貼文內容謹供參考，不構成任何邀約或買賣建議。投資前請自行注意風險。, 對於任何用戶遭受的任何損失或損害，本人概不負上任何責任。
    .

  • 黃浩銘 Raphael Wong

    有理數及無理數 在 黃浩銘 Raphael Wong Facebook 的最佳解答

    2021-08-20 15:40:15
    有 1,769 人按讚

    毋忘五大訴求　公民抗命有理
    —10‧20九龍遊行陳情書
    （案件編號：DCCC 535/2020）

    ——————————————————
    「毋忘初衷，活在愛和真實之中」
    撐阿銘，即訂閱Patreon：
    patreon.com/raphaelwong
    —————————————————

    胡法官雅文閣下：

    　　2012年，我第一次站在法庭上承認違反「公安惡法」，述說對普選的盼望，批評公安惡法不義，並因公民抗命的緣故，甘心樂意接受刑罰。當年我說，如果小圈子選舉沒有被廢除，惡法沒有消失，我依然會一如故我，公民抗命，並且我相信將會有更多學生和市民加入這個行列。想不到時至今日，普選仍然遙遙無期，我亦再次被帶到法庭接受審判，但只是短短７年，已經有數十萬計的群眾公民抗命，反對暴政。今日，我承認違反「未經批准的政府」所訂立「未經批准的惡法」之下的「未經批准集結」罪，我不打算尋求法庭的憐憫，但請容許我佔用法庭些微時間陳情，讓法庭在判刑前有全面考慮。

    暴力之濫觴

    　　在整個反修例運動如火如荼之際，我正承擔另一宗公民抗命案件的刑責。雖然身在獄中，但仍然心繫手足。我在獄中電視機前見證6月9日、6月16日及8月18日三次百萬港人大遊行，幾多熱愛和平的港人冒天雨冒彈雨走上街頭，抗議不義惡法，今日關於10月20日的案件，亦是如此。可能有人會問，政府已在6月暫緩修例，更在9月正式撤回修例，我等仍然繼續示威，豈非無理取鬧？我相信法官閣下肯定聽過「遲來的正義並非正義」（Justice delayed is justice denied）這句格言。當過百萬群眾走上街頭，和平表達不滿的時候，林鄭政府沒有理睬，反而獨行獨斷，粗暴踐踏港人的意願，結果製造出後來連綿不絕的爭拗，甚至你死我活的對抗。經歷眾多衝突痛苦之後，所謂暫緩撤回，已經微不足道，我們只是更加清楚：沒有民主，就連基本人權都不會擁有！

    　　在本案之中，雖然我們都沒有鼓動或作出暴力行為，但根據早前8‧18及10‧1兩宗案件，相信在控方及法庭眼中，案發當日的暴力事件仍然可以算在我們頭上，如此，我有必要問：如果香港有一個公平正義的普及選舉，人民可以在立法會直接否決他們不認可的法律，試問2019年的暴力衝突可以從何而來呢？如果我們眼見的暴力是如此十惡不赦，那麼我們又如何看待百萬人遊行後仍然堅持推行惡法的制度暴力呢？如果我們不能接受人民暴力反抗，那麼我們是否更加不能對更巨大更壓逼的制度暴力沈默不言？真正且經常發生的暴力，是漠視人民訴求的暴力，是踐踏人民意見的暴力，是剝奪人民表達權利的暴力。真正憎恨暴力，痛恨暴力的人，不可能一方面指摘暴力反抗，又容忍制度暴力。如果我需要承擔和平遊行引發出來的暴力事件的刑責，那麼誰應該承擔施政失敗所引發出來的社會騷亂的罪責呢？

    社會之病根

    　　對於法庭而言，可能2019年所發生的事情只是一場社會騷亂，務必追究違法者個人責任。然而，治亂治其本源，醫病醫其病根，我雖然公民抗命，刻意違法，控方把我帶上法庭，但我卻不應被理解為一個「犯罪個體」。2019年所發生的事情，並不是我一個人或我們這幾位被告可以促成，社會問題的癥結不是「犯罪份子」本身，而是「犯罪原因」。我明白「治亂世用重典」的道理，但如果「殺雞儆猴」是解決方法，就不會在2016年發生旺角騷亂及2017年上訴庭對示威者施以重刑後，2019年仍然會爆發出更大規模的暴力反抗。

    如果不希望社會動亂，就必須正本清源，逐步落實「五大訴求」，從根本上改革，挽回民心。2019年反修例運動，其實只是2014年雨傘運動的延續而已，縱使法庭可能認為兩個運動皆是「一股歪風」所引起，但我必須澄清，兩個運動的核心就是追求民主普選，人民當家作主。在2019年11月24日區議會選舉這個最類近全民普選的選舉中，接近300萬人投票，民主派大勝，奪得17個區議會主導權，這就是整個反修例運動的民意，民意就是反對政府決策，反對制度暴力，反對推行惡法，不容爭辯，不辯自明。我們作為礦場裡的金絲雀，多次提醒政府撤回修法，並從根本上改革制度，而在10月20日的九龍遊行當然是反映民意的平台契機。如今，法庭對我們施加重刑，其實只不過是懲罰民意，將金絲雀困在鳥籠之內，甚至扼殺於鼓掌之中，窒礙表達自由。

    堅持之重要

    　　大運動過後的大鎮壓，使我們失去《蘋果日報》，失去教協，失去民陣，不少民主派領袖以及曾為運動付出的手足戰友都囚於獄中，不少曾經熱情投入運動的朋友亦因《國安法》的威脅轉為低調，新聞自由示威自由日漸萎縮，公民社會受到沈重打擊，我亦失去不少摯友，有感傷孤獨的時候，但我仍然相信，2019年香港人的信念，以及所展現人類的光輝持久未變。我不會忘記百萬人民冒雨捱熱抗拒暴政，抵制惡法，展現我們眾志成城；我不會忘記人潮紅海，讓道救護車，展現我們文明精神；我不會忘記年青志士直接行動反對苛政，捨身成仁，展現我們膽色勇氣；我不會忘記銀髮一族走上街頭保護年青人，展現我們彼此關懷；我不會忘記「五大訴求」，不會忘記2019年區議會選舉，展現我們有理有節。

    　　法官閣下，我對於當日的所作所為，不感羞恥，毫無悔意。我能夠在出獄後與群眾同行一路，與戰友同繫一獄，實是莫大榮幸。若法治失去民主基石，將使法庭無奈地接受專制政權所訂立解釋的法律限制，隨時變成政治工具掃除異見，因此爭取民主普選，建設真正法治，追求公平正義，仍然是我的理想。在這條路上，如有必要，我仍然會公民抗命，正如終審法院海外非常任法官賀輔明（Lord Hoffmann）所言，發自良知的公民抗命有悠久及光榮的傳統，歷史將證明我們是正確的。我期望，曾與我一起遊行抗命的手足戰友要堅持信念，在艱難歲月裡毋忘初衷，活在愛和真實之中。

    　　最後，如9年前一樣，我想借用美國民權領袖馬丁路德金牧師的一番話對我們的反對者說：「我們將以自己忍受苦難的能力，來較量你們製造苦難的能力。我們將用我們靈魂的力量，來抵禦你們物質的暴力。對我們做你們想做的事吧，我們仍然愛你們。我們不能憑良心服從你們不公正的法律，因為拒惡與為善一樣是道德責任。將我們送入監獄吧，我們仍然愛你們。」（We shall match your capacity to inflict suffering by our capacity to endure suffering. We shall meet your physical force with soul force. Do to us what you will, and we shall continue to love you. We cannot in all good conscience obey your unjust laws because noncooperation with evil is as much a moral obligation as is cooperation with good. Throw us in jail and we shall still love you.）

    　　願慈愛的主耶穌賜我們平安，與我和我一家同在，與法官閣下同在，與香港人同在。沒有暴徒，只有暴政；五大訴求，缺一不可！願榮耀歸上帝，榮光歸人民！

    第五被告
    黃浩銘
    二零二一年八月十九日

    Lest we forget the five demands: civil disobedience is morally justified
    - Statement on 10‧20 Kowloon Rally
    (Case No.: DCCC 535/2020)

    Your Honour Judge Woodcock

    In 2012, I stood before the court and admitted to violating the "Public Security Evil Law". I expressed my hope for universal suffrage, criticized the evil law as unjust, and willingly accepted the penalty for civil disobedience. Back then, I said that if the small-circle election had not been abolished and the draconian law had not disappeared, I would still be as determined as I was, and I believe that more students and citizens would join this movement. Today, universal suffrage is still a long way off, and I have been brought before the court again for trial. But in just seven years, hundreds of thousands of people have already risen up in civil disobedience against tyranny. Today, I plead guilty to "unauthorised assembly" under an unapproved evil law enacted by an unauthorised government. I do not intend to seek the court's mercy, but please allow me to take up a little time in court to present my case so that the court can consider all aspects before sentencing me.

    The roots of violence

    At the time when the whole anti-extradition law movement was in full-swing, I was taking responsibility for another civil disobedience case. Although I was in prison, my heart was still with the people. I witnessed the three million-person rallies on 9 June, 16 June and 18 August on television in prison, when many peace-loving people took to the streets despite the rain and bullets, to protest against unjust laws. Some people may ask, "The Government has already suspended the legislative amendments in June and formally withdrew the bill in September, but we are still demonstrating, are we not being unreasonable?" I am sure your Honour has heard of the adage "Justice delayed is justice denied". When more than a million people took to the streets to express their discontent peacefully, the Lam administration ignored them and instead acted arbitrarily, brutally trampling on the wishes of the people of Hong Kong, resulting in endless arguments and even confrontations. After so many conflicts and painful experiences, the so-called moratorium is no longer meaningful. We only know better: without democracy, we cannot even have basic human rights!

    In this case, although we did not instigate or commit acts of violence, I believe that in the eyes of the prosecution and the court, the violence on the day of the incident can still be counted against us, based on the August 18 and October 1 case. And now I must ask - If Hong Kong had a fair and just universal election, and the public could directly veto laws they did not approve of at the Legislative Council, then how could the violent clashes of 2019 have come about? If the violence we see is so heinous, how do we feel about the institutional violence that insists on the imposition of draconian laws even after millions of people have taken to the streets? If we cannot accept violent rebellion, how can we remain silent in the face of even greater and more oppressive institutional violence? The true and frequent violence is the kind of violence that ignores people's demands, that tramples on their opinions, that deprives them of their right to express themselves. People who truly hate violence and abhor it cannot accuse violent resistance on the one hand and tolerate institutional violence on the other. If I have to bear the criminal responsibility for the violence caused by the peaceful demonstration, then who should bear the criminal responsibility for the social unrest caused by failed administration?

    The roots of society's problems

    From a court's point of view, it may be that what happened in 2019 was just a series of social unrest, and that those who broke the law must be held personally accountable. What happened in 2019 was not something that I alone or the defendants could have made possible, and the crux of the social problem was not the 'criminals' but the 'causes of crime'. I understand the concept of " applying severe punishment to a troubled world", but if "decimation" was really the solution, there would not have been more violent rebellions in 2019 after the Mongkok "riot" in 2016 and the heavy sentences handed down to protesters by the Court of Appeal in 2017.

    If we do not want social unrest, we must get to the root of the problem and implement the "five demands" step by step, so as to achieve fundamental reforms and win back the hearts of the people. 2019's anti-revision movement is indeed a continuation of 2014's Umbrella Movement, and even though the court may think that both movements are caused by a "perverse wind", I must clarify that the core of both movements is the pursuit of democracy and universal suffrage, and the people being the masters of their own house. In the District Council election on 24 November 2019, which is the closest thing to universal suffrage, nearly 3 million people voted, and the democratic camp won a huge victory, winning majority in 17 District Councils. As canaries in the monetary coal mine, we have repeatedly reminded the government to withdraw the extradition bill and fundamentally reform the system, and the march in Kowloon on 20 October was certainly an opportunity to reflect public opinion. Now, by imposing heavy penalties on us, the court is only punishing public opinion, trapping the canaries in a birdcage, or even stifling them in the palm of their hands, suffocating the freedom of expression.

    The importance of persistence

    As a result of the crackdown after the mass movement, we lost Apple Daily, the Hong Kong Professional Teachers' Union, and the Civil Human Rights Front. Many of our democratic leaders and comrades who had contributed to the movement were imprisoned, and many of our friends who had been passionately involved in the movement had been forced to lay low under the threat of the National Security Law. I still believe that the faith of Hong Kong people and the glory of humanity seen in 2019 will remain unchanged. I will never forget the millions of people who braved the rain and the heat to resist tyranny and evil laws, demonstrating our unity of purpose; I will never forget the crowds of people who gave way to ambulances, demonstrating our civility; I will never forget the young people who sacrificed their lives, demonstrating our courage and bravery; I will never forget the silver-haired who took to the streets to protect the youth, demonstrating our care for each other; I will never forget the "five demands" and the 2019 District Council election, demonstrating our rationality and decency.

    Your Honour, I have nothing to be ashamed of and no remorse for what I did on that day. It is my great honour to be in prison with my comrades and to be able to walk with the public after my release. If the rule of law were to lose its democratic foundation, the courts would have no choice but to accept the legal restrictions set by the autocratic regime and become a political tool to eliminate dissent at any time. As Lord Hoffmann, a non-permanent overseas judge of the Court of Final Appeal, said, civil disobedience from the conscience has a long and honourable tradition, and history will prove us right. I hope that my comrades in arms who walked with me in protests will keep their faith and live in love and truth in the midst of this difficult time.

    Finally, as I did nine years ago, I would like to say something to those who oppose us, borrowing the words of American civil rights leader Reverend Martin Luther King: "We shall match your capacity to inflict suffering by our capacity to endure suffering. We shall meet your physical force with soul force. Do to us what you will, and we shall continue to love you. We cannot in all good conscience obey your unjust laws because noncooperation with evil is as much a moral obligation as is cooperation with good. Throw us in jail and we shall still love you."

    Peace be with me and my family, with Your Honour, and with the people of Hong Kong. There are no thugs, only tyranny; five demands, not one less! To god be the glory and to people be the glory!

    The Fifth Defendant
    Wong Ho Ming
    19 August 2021

你可能也想看看

搜尋相關網站