[爆卦]probably not用法是什麼?優點缺點精華區懶人包

為什麼這篇probably not用法鄉民發文收入到精華區:因為在probably not用法這個討論話題中,有許多相關的文章在討論,這篇最有參考價值!作者reko076 (Apostol好難)看板GMAT標題Re: [SC. ] OG SC D39時...


※ 引述《astu85008 (涼麵)》之銘言:
: 問題請教
: According to scholars, the earliest writing was probably not a direct
: rendering of speech, but [was more likely to begin as] a separate and distinct
: symbolic system of communication, and only later merged with spoken language.
: (A) was more likely to begin as
: (B) more than likely began as
: (C) more than likely beginning from
: (D) it was more than likely begun from
: (E) it was more likely that it began
: (A)
: 是否只錯在more...than 的用法呢?
: (B)
: 有說法解釋,but......communication,整句視為插入句,
: 所以沒有not A but B的平衡關係,請問如何準確看出是插入句或強迫平衡呢?
: (D)(E)
: it用法重複主句主詞是否是笨拙?
: 感謝!

這題考的是句意的平行,而不完全是文法上的平行

the earliest writing
(1) was NOT a direct rendering of speech
(2) began as
(3) later merged with

not (1) but ( (2) and (3) )

not...but... 和 ...and... 的平行應該隔開會比較清楚
而且 began 和 merge 平行,才會比較通順 看我上面 ( (2) and (3) ) 多加一組括號
另外,這題的"likely"是副詞用法。並非形容詞的 be likely to
所以 more than likely 要同時寫上去,符合慣用及比較原則。
more than likely 意思就是比 likely (=probably) 的機率更高

(D) (E) 不能選的理由不只有因為笨拙(你是想說 redundancy 冗贅 嗎?)

(D) 用被動式跟 merged 不平行
(E) 沒有than (而且比D還笨拙)

the earliest writing 當主詞
(E) 用 it was more likely that it began
非常的騙字數 主詞都是 the earliest writing 幹嘛還要一個虛主詞重新寫一次句子

(E)選項的贅詞之多就好像下面這個句子
I am not a teacher, but it is more than likely that I am your friend.

這題算是有點難度的題目,希望這樣的說明能讓你比較清楚唷~

--
Klaus 一戰740(V38 Q51 IR7)
Blog https://klausmath.wordpress.com/
FB https://www.facebook.com/KlausMath/
E-mail [email protected]
GMAT 數學全套線上課程(基礎、核心、進階、閱讀)
OG詳解 弱點診斷 備考諮詢 雞精滋補 歡迎來信洽詢

--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 49.217.129.93
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/GMAT/M.1499005975.A.C5E.html
※ 編輯: reko076 (49.217.129.93), 07/02/2017 22:40:13
ADUPI: 推 Klaus 沒想到老ㄙ也略懂SC 07/04 03:38
Birou: 推 Klaus 竟然也懂 SC 07/04 03:49

你可能也想看看

搜尋相關網站