💥單腳動作控制訓練
“物理治療師的概念“
-
🏋🏻♂️ 深蹲,硬舉,健身房的訓練動作,大多都是雙腳踩在地上發力,很少會訓練到平衡,特別是單腳的平衡。作為物理治療師,常常會有人問我的訓練的菜單是什麼,好奇我的訓練是不是也是推拉腿循環,或是一天練胸一天練背
-
🎯 我訓練的方式是70%肌肥大,30%動...
💥單腳動作控制訓練
“物理治療師的概念“
-
🏋🏻♂️ 深蹲,硬舉,健身房的訓練動作,大多都是雙腳踩在地上發力,很少會訓練到平衡,特別是單腳的平衡。作為物理治療師,常常會有人問我的訓練的菜單是什麼,好奇我的訓練是不是也是推拉腿循環,或是一天練胸一天練背
-
🎯 我訓練的方式是70%肌肥大,30%動作訓練。我不太喜歡用功能性訓練這個字,功能性這字眼常常有誤導成份,好像是很新很厲害的東西,其實運動沒好壞之分,也不會因為這運動是功能性所以效果比別人好。那什麼是動作訓練,我的概念是,如果你訓練的目的是為了健康、外形好看,而不是為了要比賽,那訓練總不能只做固定式、單關節、單一運動平面的動作,還要包括日常生活的動作訓練,像走樓梯、拿重物、推東西,平衡訓練,單腳平衡訓練,動作鏈發動訓練。等等在英文都叫作”Prehab”,rehab是復健的意思,”p”就是”preventative”,或前置詞”pre”的意思,那”Prehab”就代表預防傷害的運動,也就是物理治療會做的治療運動
-
✅ 影片的訓練我選擇用Y-bell,做一個後跨步上推,接單腳羅馬尼亞硬舉,訓練左腳單腳的穩定性。我個人是覺得Y-bell沒壺鈴好用,看官網宣稱是啞鈴、壺鈴、藥球的合體。壺鈴的優點是重量在壺底,在擺盪的時候,壺鈴與身體的距離增加,更能感覺到壺鈴的重量。相反Y-bell沒錯是比較方便,中間的握把能當啞鈴,可是卻失去了壺底的重量
-
💯 趕快試試看做這個運動,訓練單腳的穩定性
—————————————————————————
💥 Single-leg movement
“How does a physio trains himself”
-
🏋🏻♂️ Single-leg movement is one of the most neglected type of exercises. Unlike deadlifts, squats, single-leg movements challenge proprioceptive feedback of your reflexes and rotational stability, and apart from muscle hypertrophy in my training program, it takes about 30% of my weekly routine
-
🎯 I use the word movement training rather than “functional” training. “Functional” gives a false image of something new, or better, than what we used to call deadlifts and squats
-
💯 What I call movement training is merely balance, proprioception, whole body exercises instead of just doing isolated, single-planar movements like bicep curls
-
✅ Here in this video is my first time using a Y-bell. Y-bell has the benefit of a grip handle like a dumbbell. But the downside is the weight of the equipment is not centered at the bottom like a kettlebell, which increases demand of body stabilization when the kettlebell is further away from the body
-
#jamesthephysio signing out
#physicaltherapy #exercise #physio #injury #recovery #fitness #taiwan #asia #performance #workout #movement #chiro #physiotherapy #rehab #dpt #prehab #workout #functionalfitness #strengthandconditioning #functionaltraining #personaltraining
#物理治療 #運動醫學 #動作訓練 #復健訓練
neglected意思 在 打臉名嘴 Facebook 的精選貼文
2020/5/4
>,我不知道為什麼,大概是因為我太喜歡大航海時代的那一段歷史。
我來拜訪原來應該在香港的銅鑼灣書店,以及林榮基老闆。
這個五月炎熱的晚上,
林老闆說。五四的精神沒有在台灣受到注目與奮起,對台灣的自由精神是可惜的。
剛過去的週末,看來書架被幾次清空的痕跡還在。書並沒有擺滿。櫃檯播放著類似演歌的音樂,夾雜著老闆的港腔中文歉歉地說明剛開幕還不能刷卡云云
書架上有講述自由主義的書、中國政治演進的書、台灣歷史與民主進程等等.....還有講電影講藝術以及蠻多本紅樓夢的相關書籍。
我挑了兩本我本來就有的書,一本是陳芳明老師的<<殖民地台灣 左翼政治運動史論>>。這一本是<<謝雪紅評傳>>之前老師重要的史論著作。當然謝雪紅評賺比較容易看因為就是一本好看的小說。還有一本是葵一寫的<
有一次跟前台南縣蘇縣長餐敘,他展現驚人的記憶力把那段歷史甚至新港文書講了一次。我回家發奮把書架上的書都重讀一遍,真是身心舒暢!
用藏青色的塑膠袋老闆把書裝給我,手指的邊縫還有紅色油漆的痕跡。我一看到腳指頭就蜷曲了起來。
“您在台灣一切都好嗎?”
“還好,慢慢習慣了,食物好吃。”
“好吃?”
“米,台灣的米好吃”
老闆發現我看到了紅色的痕跡,有點不好意思的把手拿開。
“不好意思,讓您來台灣受委屈”
“沒事,人沒事就好。沒有受傷....”
門外花圈已經有些花在零落,跟台北市相關的我看到了苗博雅議員。還有看到是蔡總統跟蘇院長。
“老闆謝謝,我會常來看您”
他拍拍我上臂跟我揮揮手
我回頭看到牆上的台灣獨立,想到開幕那天的聯合報照片。刻意把那四個字喀掉。
阿!其實在台灣生活的我們,都很理解啊。
然後堅持著各自的理想下去
neglected意思 在 Campus TV, HKUSU 香港大學學生會校園電視 Facebook 的精選貼文
【專題訪問 Interview Feature】2019年度香港大學學生會周年大選中央幹事會候選内閣蒼傲訪問(外務篇) | Interview with Prism, the Proposed Cabinet of Executive Committee, The Hong Kong University Students’ Union of Annual Election 2019 (External Affairs)
(Please scroll down for English version.)
中央幹事會候選內閣蒼傲就外務議題接受本台訪問,就不同外務議題立場,包括不反對政府取締民族黨的原因、相信政府DQ議員合法的理據、初一事件有黑幫介入的看法、及對法律制度有信心的理由等發表意見。
訪問節錄如下:
1. 你們的政治光譜/政治立場是甚麼?
我們認為用現有的名詞並不能表達我們莊的政治立場,因為例如本土、港獨等,第一他們並沒有清晰的界定,或是社會一致的定義,我們都認為不論是政治光譜或是政治立場我們作為香港人或是香港接受教育的人,其實我們的立場都會傾向由香港出發。但由香港出發去考慮香港利益時,我們都要考慮時間軸。時間軸的意思是,我們到底在考慮短期還是長期的利益。加上香港的地理位置、經濟結構其實都十分依賴世界上大部份的國家,不論金融、出口產業,所以在考慮香港利益同時,我們都應考慮鄰近國家的政策、議案的推出。所以如果要用幾個字去形容我們的政治立場,我們會選擇「國際視野,本土出發」八個字。前者是考想利益的角度,後者是執行的角度。
2. 你們是否支持香港獨立?
首先我們認為它可以被自由地討論,特別是在大學之內。至於是否贊成香港獨立方面,港獨並非香港現時可執行最好的決策,因為尚有很多的選擇可加以考慮及討論。另外我認為香港內部的問題都非常嚴峻,例如我們在政綱小册子上提到的外務議題,如學生自殺、高樓價、創新科技嚴重落後等問題。這些都是我們內部必須解決和面對的問題,所以我們會將那些內部問題列為最優先需要處理的問題。
3. 你們覺得香港獨立是否合法?
我們認為任何符合法例的討論都是可被接受的,所以我們認為只要某個人或團體在現時完善的法律制度下,加上沒有違反法律,就應可就不同議題提出想法。
4. 你們是否同意香港政府取締香港民族黨?
首先我們相信香港的法治仍然相當完善,所以就香港一套完整司法制度體系下做出的判決,我們並沒有太多質疑或反對。對於民族黨被政府取締或禁止,社會上有不同聲音,但我們相信我們應遵守絕大部分香港市民都認同是完善的法律體系下作出的任何決策。
5. 你們是否同意香港政府DQ議員?
其實我們由始至終都相信,而坊間一些調查機構都指出香港的法治制度在世界上都名列前茅,所以我們相信這套法治制度可以帶來公平的審訊,所以對於有部分議員被DQ,我們願意相信整個判決過程是公平的,並且有足夠理據去支持政府所作的判決,所以我們對這件事沒有任何特別意見。
6. 你們是否支持人大釋法?
每一個法律的訂立,其實都是由一小部分的精英去開始建構框架,然後隨社會的進步不斷完善。所以法律並非一本已經印刷好的書,而是容許我們不斷修改、去完善,就一些前人的不足作補完。人大釋法亦都如是,我相信重點是我們希望這法列在微調後能得到愈來愈多香港人的支持,這才是一個成功的新詮釋。
7. 你們是否同意一國兩制?
我們支持所有在香港回歸時所簽訂的條文,其中當然包括一國兩制。
8. 你們是否支持國歌法和23條立法?
因為爭議聲非常之多,所以我們不希望對任何未實施或未明文規定的法例作出過多評論。這是對該法案有所偏頗,該法案到最後還有很多相議的空間,所以我們認為政府應充分考慮各種聲音,從而推出一條為大部分港人所接受的法例。
9. 你們對違法達義有何看法?
香港作為擁有完善法律的城市,任何人都有表達訴求或是行動的權利。我們主張每人都有自由去決定自己的事、想表達的聲音,但每人都應為這些行為勇敢承擔相認的法律責任。當然我們更相信這套法律體系是完善和公平的。
10. 你們對初一事件有何看法?
對旺角騷動,很多報紙傳媒都報道了有不法份子甚至黑社會的介入,所以旺角騷動的那一批示威者是否單純為表達而表達的市民呢?
11. 你們是否同意政府以暴動罪控告參與者?
就對這幾名人士進行拘捕的行為,我們希望香港政府有真憑實據去支持,以及整個審訊過程認該要公平。我希望他們得到公平的審訊。
Campus TV has interviewed with Prism, the Proposed Cabinet of Executive Committee, The Hong Kong University Students’ Union, Session 2019, with regards to their treatment of external affairs. Prism has expressed their stance and opinions on various external issues, which include: their not opposing the Hong Kong government’s banning of the Hong Kong National Party, believing in the government’s legitimacy for the disqualification of legislators, believing in the involvement of gangs in the Mong Kok Incident of 2016, and expressing their confidence in the current legal system.
The interview excerpts are as follows:
1. Where do you stand on the political spectrum? / How would you define your political stance?
We believe the current word items are unable to express our Cabinet’s political stance. For example, if you consider the term localism or Hong Kong independence, these groups have not a clear boundary or universal definition given by the society. Whether it be the political spectrum or political stance, us who are Hong Kong-ers or who have been educated in Hong Kong, have a tendency to think from the standpoint of Hong Kong. If we consider the benefits from the standpoint of Hong Kong, we also need to consider the timeline. This (the timeline) means, that we should consider if these benefits are of short term or long term. Therefore, when considering Hong Kong’s benefits, we should also consider the policies and bills of neighbouring countries. Therefore, if we had to define our political stance in terms, it would be “international perspective that comes from a local standpoint”. The former is a consideration to the benefits, the latter is a consideration to the execution.
2. Do you support Hong Kong independence?
Firstly, we think this matter could be discussed freely, especially within the premises of the University. In terms of agreeing with Hong Kong independence, we think that Hong Kong independence is currently not the best option to be executed in Hong Kong, because there are still many other options to consider and discuss about. In addition, I think that Hong Kong’s internal affairs are very severe, like the external affairs that are mentioned in our campaign booklet, for example, students’ suicides, rising property prices, the severely outdated innovation and technology. These are problems that our internal department has to confront and resolve, therefore we put these internal affairs as our priority.
3. Do you think that Hong Kong independence is legal?
We believe any discussion that is in compliance with the law is acceptable. Therefore, we think that under the current, comprehensive legal system, with no breaching of the law, a person or group should be allowed to speak their thoughts on different issues.
4. Do you agree with Hong Kong government’s banning of the Hong Kong National Party?
Firstly, we believe that Hong Kong’s rule of law is still quite comprehensive. Therefore, we do not have much hesitation nor opposition for a judgment that is based on what we consider to be an intact judicial system of Hong Kong. In terms of the banning of the Hong Kong National Party, the society has different voices, but we believe we ought to obey the judgment that comes from what the majority of Hong Kong considers to be a comprehensive legal system.
5. Do you agree with Hong Kong government’s disqualification of legislators?
Actually, we have since the very beginning believed in Hong Kong’s rule of law as quite a frontrunner in the world; this has been backed by some survey organisations within the community too, so we believe that this rule of law can bring out a fair trial. Therefore, in regards to the disqualification of some legislators, we willingly believe that the entirety of the judgment process has been fair, with sufficient arguments to back up the government’s verdict. We do not express any special opinions towards this incident.
6. Do you support the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress’ Interpretation of the Basic Law (SCNPC's Interpretation of BL, or Interpretation of the Basic Law by the SCNPC)?
For the enactment of every legislation, it starts from a small portion of elites that begin to build its (the legislation’s) framework, it then continues to be improved as society grows. For this reason, the law is not a printed book, it allows us to continually amend, better, and complete items that are left neglected or faulted by predecessors. This applies for the SCNPC's Interpretation of BL, I believe the most important thing is, we hope to gain more Hong Kong-ers’ support under these fine-tunings (by the SCNPC's Interpretation of BL), we think this is what counts as a successful re-interpretation of the law.
7. Do you agree with the constitutional principle of “one country, two systems”?
We support all the terms that were signed in the Handover of Hong Kong, and this definitely includes the principle of “one country, two systems”.
8. Do you support the National Anthem Bill and the enactment of Article 23?
Due to the many controversies on this matter, we do not wish to comment on any legislation that has yet to be implemented or stipulated in explicit terms. This would be a prejudice on the said bill(s). These bills still have a lot of room for negotiation, so we believe the government should consider different voices, so as to introduce a legislation that is accepted by the majority of Hong Kong-ers.
9. What are your views on the idea of achieving justice by violating the law?
Hong Kong is a city with a comprehensive legal system; anyone has the right to express their own appeal or action. We advocate that everyone has the freedom to decide for their own deeds and express their own thoughts, but everyone should also be responsible to bear the consequences of their actions. Needless to say, we definitely believe that our legal system is perfect and fair.
10. What are your views on the Mong Kok Incident in 2016?
With regards to the Mong Kok unrest, many media sources have reported about the involvement of many illegal parties, and even that of gangs or triads. So, are the demonstrators in the Mong Kok unrest really with pure intentions to speak up, for the sake of expressing themselves as Hong Kong citizens?
11. Do you agree with the government’s decision to charge participants (of the Mong Kok Incident in 2016) with the offence of rioting?
With regards to the arrest of those participants, we hope that the Hong Kong government has had solid evidence to support (their arrest), and that the trial process has been fair. I hope they receive a fair trial.
___________________________________
二零一九年度香港大學學生會周年大選其他候選人包括候選常務秘書麥嘉晉、校園電視候選內閣、學苑候選編輯委員會及候選普選評議員。
2019年度周年大選中央諮詢大會將於一月二十一日至一月二十五日在中山廣場舉行,時間為下午十二時半至二時半。
Other candidates for the Annual Election 2019 include the Proposed General Secretary Mak Ka Chun Eugene, the Proposed Cabinet of Campus TV, the Proposed Editorial Board of Undergrad, and the Proposed Popularly Elected Union Councillor.
The Central Campaign for Annual Election 2019 will be held from the 21st to 25th of January at the Sun Yat-sen Place, from 12:30 to 14:30.