今天介紹這個字：mandatory

mandatory 意思是「依法強制的」。

比方：
Face masks will be mandatory again starting Dec. 1 in most indoor places.
從12月1日開始，在大多數室內場所將再度強制必須戴口罩。

【給自己一個機會紅起來】❤️
Give Yourself A Chance To Shine

如果說宇宙的力量可以分為五種，那那五種力量就是金、木、水、火和土了。

世界萬物萬事都能以這五行去分類，而每個人的八字就是這五行的獨特混合體。這混合體遇到外在人事物的五行力量時，就會產生不同的吉凶禍福局面。

我個人經驗是，就算有著同樣八字的雙胞胎，也不會有一模一樣的命運，因為面相有細微之分，姓名的字義、音韻、筆畫和含義也會有不同的靈動力，影響著雙胞胎的命運。

看命，關鍵就在於找出自己需要的五行是什麼。這很考經驗，不是把八字裡的五行加減乘除一番就能斷出。如果這第一步搞錯，全盤的分析就會錯得一塌糊塗了。

在捉準需要的五行後，再來就是引導客人如何在衣食住行方面去補運，進而趨吉避凶。坦白說，如果客人不照著做，其實來看命也沒什麼意思。

知道未來好或不好，然後就聽天由命嗎？那豈不是只是花錢，來聽我說出你人生電視連續劇的劇透而已嗎？

我見了那麼多客人後，自己有個感想。如果人生一切都很安好，但自己就是開心不起來，這樣活著如行屍走肉，太痛苦了。

在批八字時，我都會告訴客人該用什麼顏色來旺自己。不要小看色彩學，每個顏色都有它們的五行。我也多次以色彩學，幫助一些客人應徵成功，在疫情期間依然能奏效。

但在七彩繽紛的顏色當中，只要我一提到紅色，客人們的反應普遍都很大。

什麼？那麼亮啊？
我的老婆說看不慣我穿這色！
那不是天天過年嗎？
我以前的命理師也是這麼說，
但我就是沒有做。

我的答案：你穿了幾十年這樣的顏色，也不見得你好。想命好一點，何不試一下我說的顏色？

紅能分出深淺、濃淡、明暗和不同的色度。沒有人叫你每天穿得像紅包似的。你每天穿黑，也不見得你像包青天那般的黑白分明。

附上A小姐和B先生「走紅」後的個別見證。

寫這電郵見證的B先生，在九月與我做了個後續諮詢。我遠遠看到他時，就已在想，怎麼身上絲毫沒有改變，而且還一副苦瓜臉？

他說，當初我三月見他時，他剛買了一堆衣服。顏色雖不利他，但他不捨得丟，而且老婆也不支持他穿紅色。公司裡的人也都是穿暗色的。

我說，那些新衣你也穿了幾個月了，可以拿去捐給有需要的人，佈施也不算浪費。老婆固然好意，但命是你自己的，你痛苦只有你自己知。

對待自己的命運，我們應該持有科學家的研究精神。你不去做這個實驗，你永遠不會知道我說的到底對不對。做這個實驗不難，不妨叫你的太太給你一個機會去改變。

換衣服顏色而已，又不是叫你換老婆。😂

與其內心糾結直到頭腦打結，我永遠選擇踏出第一步試一下。Never try, never know.

我一生人經歷了那麼多起起落落，老實告訴大家，命好起來時，心豁然開朗時，那種感覺真的很爽。不信，你試一下。

————————————

If the energies in the Universe can be categorised, they would come in the 5 forms of Metal, Wood, Water, Fire and Earth.

All manifestations, be it things or events, in this world falls under these 5 elements, and each and every one of our Bazi is the combination of these 5 elements. The interaction between these elements in our Bazi and those in our circumstances will result in myriad of happenings, good fortunes or otherwise.

My personal experience tells me that even though 2 person may have exactly the same Bazi, but their destinies may turn out different. Reasons being the discrepancy in their facial features, the meanings, tonality, character strokes and essence of their names.

The crux of reading your own destiny lies in uncovering which of the 5 elements is or are mandatory for you. This calls for plenty of practical experience. It is not simply doing simple math of plus, minus, multiply and divide. If this first step is wrong, the whole deck of cards will surely collapse.

After deciphering the correct element, the next step is do guide the client on how to use it to boost their energies in all aspects, from external clothing and living environment to what they eat so as to attract good tidings and ward off misfortunes. Frankly, if the client is uncooperative, the whole of point of Bazi analysis would have been lost.

To know how your future will unfold but behave like a sitting duck? That’s just like buying a movie ticket to watch a preview of your life drama, isnt it?

I had this thought after seeing so many clients: if one’s life is seemingly smooth sailing but one remains unhappy, such zombie-like existence is very painful.

During a typical Bazi analysis session, I would always recommend the client certain colours favourable to him or her to boost the luck. Never underestimate the power of colours. Each colour has its own elemental nature. I have used this successfully several times to help clients succeed at their job interviews, even during this pandemic period.

However as soon as I mentioned the red colour, reactions from my clients tended to be bigger than usual.

Why?
Such a bright colour?
My wife said she’s not used to me in this colour!
That’s like Chinese New Year everyday!
The previous master I consulted said so too, but I did not heed the advice.

My answer: if you have been wearing your same old colours for the past many years and getting not much favours from Lady Luck, why not give my suggestion a try?

There are many tones and shades of Red. Nobody is asking you to dress like a big red ang bao (red packet) everyday. Dressing black everyday doesn’t make you Justice Bao either.

Attached are testimonies from Miss A and Mr B after they went red.

Mr B. came to me in September for a follow-up consultation. When I saw him from afar, I was thinking why there wasn’t any sign of change in him. He even sported a sour face.

He told me that after seeing me in March, he had just bought some clothes in colours that were unfavourable to him. He couldn’t bear to throw them away, and his wife didn’t really support him wearing red either. He said his colleagues were all wearing darker colours.

I told him that those clothes he bought had already served him for several months and he could donate them away. That would not constitute wastage. His wife may have good intentions but your destiny is your own business and only you know your sufferings.

We ought to treat our destiny with the spirit of a scientist. If you don’t experiment, you will never know if my methods work. This experiment is a simple one, ask your wife to support you this once.

It’s only changing the colour of your clothes, not asking to change your wife. 😂

Rather than getting oneself in knots, I will always choose to take the first step. Never try, never know.

My life’s journey has been that of ups and downs. Frankly speaking, when the winds begin blowing in your sails, and lift your spirit, those emotions are exhilarating. Don’t believe me? Try it out yourself.

(16:25) 周年辯論題目引起爭議

評議會第九次緊急會議於九月二十七日晚上召開，議程中討論有關周年辯論（Annual Debate）的事宜，最終辯題定為「香港大學本科生課程應增設必修體育科」。（Mandatory Physical Education shall be introduced to the undergraduate curriculum of the University of Hong Kong）

負責周年辯論事宜的普選評議員原擬定了三條題目，包括「香港應全面取消公營交通工具優先座」、「香港大學應加強非本地生融合政策」，以及「香港大學中文學院應以粵語作優先教學語言」。普選評議員（三）蘇穎宜在會上表示辯題應該與大學生生活有關係，並需具討論空間及較有爭議性。

文學院學生會代表黃政鍀認為辯題應該較為廣泛，並牽涉較多基本會員，關於粵語作教學語言的問題只對部分同學，如文學院及教育學院的同學比較切身，而且文學院學生會將於本週四舉行與此辯題有關的諮詢論壇，恐怕內容會有重疊。其後學生會會長孫曉嵐提出「學生會會歌普通話版應予以廢除」的辯題。孫認為目前英文版本會歌的歌詞意思能吻合「一致」（Unity）的意義及學生會的宗旨，但普通話歌詞則未能做到相同效果，並指周年辯論這個場合能令同學更認識學生會。利希慎堂學生會代表黃凱晴表示她的堂友不會對學生會會歌的辯題有興趣；施德堂學生會代表宣大安則認為此場合能令基本會員瞭解學生會歷史及發展。

學苑總編輯顧博謙提出「香港大學應增設必修體育課程」的辯題供評議員考慮。校園電視主席黃穎軒亦稱辯題有值得討論的空間，因其他院校亦有相關課程。評議會最後就辯題作意向表達投票（preference showing），「香港大學本科生課程應增設必修體育科」的辯題以24票大比數獲通過。

辯題被質疑缺乏公共性 會後引起爭議

會後有基本會員認為增設體育課的討論缺乏公共性，亦不是急切需要討論的題目。普選評議員（三）蘇穎宜回應指周年辯論是難得的全校性活動，因此希望題目能夠更貼近同學日常校園生活，以吸引更多人加入討論。她重申非常重視校政及政治議題，絕對會以同學的利益為大前題與學校溝通，並指政治議題都十分值得討論，因此普選評議員合共提出了三條題目，其他評議員提出另外兩條題目，包括「學生會會歌普通話版應予以廢除」及「香港大學本科生課程應增設必修體育科」，五條題目中都具備社會、校務及政治方面等元素。

顧博謙會後在個人Facebook表示應為是次議決負上最大責任 [1]。他指基於「普選評議員提出的三條議題不能說服人認為適合周年辯論」，至其後孫曉嵐提出的「學生會會歌普通話版應予以廢除」的辯題，大部份評議員都對其持負面看法，因此形容會議進入膠著情況。他表示當時認為周年辯論只有兩小時，每人很難就某些複雜的議題深入辯論，以及估計 說服評議員支持有關會歌的辯題有難度，再加上會議進入膠著狀態，因此參考上年度有關「核心課程」的辯題，便提出有關必修體育課的辯題，稱希望能集思廣益，但他並未有就辯題的爭議性、分歧點及意義等作出評論。他表示「一條辯題在沒有權衡或討論其本身利弊的情況下，通過是沒有獲得足夠資訊 （not well informed） 的。」他坦言自己看輕了周年辯論的意義，並表示在會上提出此辯題，是一個未經深思熟慮的決定。

黃穎軒其後亦在個人Facebook表示認同「學生會會歌普通話版應予以廢除」是較為合適的議題 [2]。但會上有評議員指出會歌的存廢理應由全民投票去決定，而周年辯論的表決對有可能出現的全民投票造成壓力，因此不宜在周年辯論中討論。他稱當時認為如果周年辯論中獲得通過，但日後全民投票中予以否決，同樣將為學生會形成尷尬局面，因此最後意向表達（Preference showing）並沒有投票予該辯題。黃是唯一一位評議員曾就此辯題發言，表示香港部份大學皆有體育科，而港大應否設立必修體育課程為存在討論空間。最後他坦言自己在會議前準備不足，會議期間亦沒有全面考慮每條辯題的優劣。

[1]：學苑總編輯顧博謙Facebook回應 https://www.facebook.com/bokhim.ku/posts/1120301628018727
[2]：校園電視主席黃穎軒Facebook回應
https://www.facebook.com/hinwong0117/posts/10154153014784398