今天來教大家如何善用「Google翻譯」！

其實很簡單，可以在Chrome瀏覽器上面安裝Google翻譯
https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/google-translate/aapbdbdomjkkjkaonfhkkikfgjllcleb?hl=zh-TW

在看日文網頁時，按下滑鼠右鍵「翻譯成中文」即可
應該蠻簡單又實用的！

雖然Google翻譯有時候語意怪怪的，但至少可以大致了解其原意，不至於太偏差！不懂日文的朋友也可以自行幫助判斷、杜絕假訊息！

試試看這網頁吧！
https://www.sankeibiz.jp/macro/news/210603/mca2106031334007-n1.htm

1. 我好像沒看到"為何會只給台灣124萬劑"這個問題?
2. 我好像沒看到"台灣政府沒想要很多"這件事?
3. 這新聞是6/3的會議，但直到6/3晚間我們才開始聽到日本要送台灣疫苗的消息，然後6/4就真的送過來台灣了！網路上有些謠言，把這段改得好像是6/4之後的事情一樣...邏輯上怎麼看都怪怪的。

所以請大家不要亂傳假訊息、亂帶風向了！謠言止於智者！

另外可以參考以下日本新聞影片
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vk2lL8gACyw
「台湾国内におきましては、７月以降ですね、国内での生産体制というのは、まだあのかなり整ってくると考えておりまして、当面の緊急のニーズというのが台湾にある、このような認識でおります」（茂木敏充外相）

311東日本大震災，台灣對日捐款高達200億日幣(那時候匯率還是0.35)，是全球捐助第一多的國家！日本感謝台灣這麼多年，應該不會說出"台灣為何只給200億?"、"日本政府只要200億"這種話吧？....不然我們聽了應該也會很傷心的.....

所以台灣人民的文明素養跟道德水準，真的還要靠大家努力共同提升！請大家少製造社會不必要的對立紛爭，多給台灣增強防疫力量吧！

#Guggenheim #灰度 #機構級鯨魚 #2330億美元資產
【重磅！兩千億美元級機構「古根漢信託」想買 Grayscale 比特幣信託，最高投4.5億鎂在GBTC】


🔰 共同基金古根漢信託（Guggenheim Trust Fund）週五（11/27）向美國證券交易委員會（SEC）更新的文件中表示，其發行的「總經機會基金」未來可能以加密基金 Grayscale 比特幣信託（GBTC）間接投資比特幣，而且最高將挹注資產價值的 10%。


-


#同場加映
① 這 11 間上市公司「已掌控3.2%」的比特幣總供應量（100億美元），這會是隱憂嗎？
https://pse.is/3a6wdv

② 百億對沖基金傳奇｜都鐸 · 瓊斯：比特幣將創歷史新高，就像1970年代的黃金
https://pse.is/38skvp

①+② 【劉禧深論】比特幣的三個基本面：正確看待比特幣的《投資價值》
https://pse.is/39ps9e


------------------------------------------------
🔰 年底大檔活動！台北金融博覽會 ║ 11/27 – 11/29
首次亮相「加密金融與區塊鏈主題館」／逛展抽黃金、跳島遊輪之旅、5000元等值以上比特幣
➢ https://pse.is/bttaipeifin
------------------------------------------------
✅ 即時新聞鎖定 #動區Telegram
https://t.me/blocktemponews
✅ 每日新聞精選訂閱 #LINE：
https://line.me/R/ti/p/%40kgx9780p
✅ 右轉動區 #千人投資討論群：
https://line.me/ti/g2/htySqS7SoKOuGGFx4Gn9dg

今早為Asian Medical Students Association Hong Kong (AMSAHK)的新一屆執行委員會就職典禮作致詞分享嘉賓，題目為「疫情中的健康不公平」。
感謝他們的熱情款待以及為整段致詞拍了影片。以下我附上致詞的英文原稿：

It's been my honor to be invited to give the closing remarks for the Inauguration Ceremony for the incoming executive committee of the Asian Medical Students' Association Hong Kong (AMSAHK) this morning. A video has been taken for the remarks I made regarding health inequalities during the COVID-19 pandemic (big thanks to the student who withstood the soreness of her arm for holding the camera up for 15 minutes straight), and here's the transcript of the main body of the speech that goes with this video:

//The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, continues to be rampant around the world since early 2020, resulting in more than 55 million cases and 1.3 million deaths worldwide as of today. (So no! It’s not a hoax for those conspiracy theorists out there!) A higher rate of incidence and deaths, as well as worse health-related quality of life have been widely observed in the socially disadvantaged groups, including people of lower socioeconomic position, older persons, migrants, ethnic minority and communities of color, etc. While epidemiologists and scientists around the world are dedicated in gathering scientific evidence on the specific causes and determinants of the health inequalities observed in different countries and regions, we can apply the Social Determinants of Health Conceptual Framework developed by the World Health Organization team led by the eminent Prof Sir Michael Marmot, world’s leading social epidemiologist, to understand and delineate these social determinants of health inequalities related to the COVID-19 pandemic.

According to this framework, social determinants of health can be largely categorized into two types – 1) the lower stream, intermediary determinants, and 2) the upper stream, structural and macro-environmental determinants. For the COVID-19 pandemic, we realized that the lower stream factors may include material circumstances, such as people’s living and working conditions. For instance, the nature of the occupations of these people of lower socioeconomic position tends to require them to travel outside to work, i.e., they cannot work from home, which is a luxury for people who can afford to do it. This lack of choice in the location of occupation may expose them to greater risk of infection through more transportation and interactions with strangers. We have also seen infection clusters among crowded places like elderly homes, public housing estates, and boarding houses for foreign domestic helpers. Moreover, these socially disadvantaged people tend to have lower financial and social capital – it can be observed that they were more likely to be deprived of personal protective equipment like face masks and hand sanitizers, especially during the earlier days of the pandemic. On the other hand, the upper stream, structural determinants of health may include policies related to public health, education, macroeconomics, social protection and welfare, as well as our governance… and last, but not least, our culture and values. If the socioeconomic and political contexts are not favorable to the socially disadvantaged, their health and well-being will be disproportionately affected by the pandemic. Therefore, if we, as a society, espouse to address and reduce the problem of health inequalities, social determinants of health cannot be overlooked in devising and designing any public health-related strategies, measures and policies.

Although a higher rate of incidence and deaths have been widely observed in the socially disadvantaged groups, especially in countries with severe COVID-19 outbreaks, this phenomenon seems to be less discussed and less covered by media in Hong Kong, where the disease incidence is relatively low when compared with other countries around the world. Before the resurgence of local cases in early July, local spread of COVID-19 was sporadic and most cases were imported. In the earlier days of the pandemic, most cases were primarily imported by travelers and return-students studying overseas, leading to a minor surge between mid-March and mid-April of 874 new cases. Most of these cases during Spring were people who could afford to travel and study abroad, and thus tended to be more well-off. Therefore, some would say the expected social gradient in health impact did not seem to exist in Hong Kong, but may I remind you that, it is only the case when we focus on COVID-19-specific incidence and mortality alone. But can we really deduce from this that COVID-19-related health inequality does not exist in Hong Kong? According to the Social Determinants of Health Framework mentioned earlier, the obvious answer is “No, of course not.” And here’s why…

In addition to the direct disease burden, the COVID-19 outbreak and its associated containment measures (such as economic lockdown, mandatory social distancing, and change of work arrangements) could have unequal wider socioeconomic impacts on the general population, especially in regions with pervasive existing social inequalities. Given the limited resources and capacity of the socioeconomically disadvantaged to respond to emergency and adverse events, their general health and well-being are likely to be unduly and inordinately affected by the abrupt changes in their daily economic and social conditions, like job loss and insecurity, brought about by the COVID-19 outbreak and the corresponding containment and mitigation measures of which the main purpose was supposedly disease prevention and health protection at the first place. As such, focusing only on COVID-19 incidence or mortality as the outcomes of concern to address health inequalities may leave out important aspects of life that contributes significantly to people’s health. Recently, my research team and I collaborated with Sir Michael Marmot in a Hong Kong study, and found that the poor people in Hong Kong fared worse in every aspects of life than their richer counterparts in terms of economic activity, personal protective equipment, personal hygiene practice, as well as well-being and health after the COVID-19 outbreak. We also found that part of the observed health inequality can be attributed to the pandemic and its related containment measures via people’s concerns over their own and their families’ livelihood and economic activity. In other words, health inequalities were contributed by the pandemic even in a city where incidence is relatively low through other social determinants of health that directly concerned the livelihood and economic activity of the people. So in this study, we confirmed that focusing only on the incident and death cases as the outcomes of concern to address health inequalities is like a story half-told, and would severely truncate and distort the reality.

Truth be told, health inequality does not only appear after the pandemic outbreak of COVID-19, it is a pre-existing condition in countries and regions around the world, including Hong Kong. My research over the years have consistently shown that people in lower socioeconomic position tend to have worse physical and mental health status. Nevertheless, precisely because health inequality is nothing new, there are always voices in our society trying to dismiss the problem, arguing that it is only natural to have wealth inequality in any capitalistic society. However, in reckoning with health inequalities, we need to go beyond just figuring out the disparities or differences in health status between the poor and the rich, and we need to raise an ethically relevant question: are these inequalities, disparities and differences remediable? Can they be fixed? Can we do something about them? If they are remediable, and we can do something about them but we haven’t, then we’d say these inequalities are ultimately unjust and unfair. In other words, a society that prides itself in pursuing justice must, and I say must, strive to address and reduce these unfair health inequalities. Borrowing the words from famed sociologist Judith Butler, “the virus alone does not discriminate,” but “social and economic inequality will make sure that it does.” With COVID-19, we learn that it is not only the individuals who are sick, but our society. And it’s time we do something about it.

Thank you very much!//

Please join me in congratulating the incoming executive committee of AMSAHK and giving them the best wishes for their future endeavor!

Roger Chung, PhD
Assistant Professor, CUHK JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, @CUHK Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong 香港中文大學 - CUHK
Associate Director, CUHK Institute of Health Equity

我很少會這麼說一個廠家,
他們願意改變環境並讓更多人可以進入攝影生態,
這是Mirage帶給我最大的快樂以及希望 !

產品連結我放這邊,
需要的自己看看:
Tilta Mirage
https://reurl.cc/WXrLbD

Vaxis VFX Filter
https://bit.ly/3ibM6cV


#評測

// Artlist 免費 60天 試用 //
https://bit.ly/2UiXCKR

// Artgrid 免費 60天 試用 //
https://bit.ly/3BaAX3U

// Epidemic Sound 免費 30天 試用 //
http://share.epidemicsound.com/CpNw8

► 我的器材 / My Gear
相機 / Camera:
- BMPCC 4K 6K 6K Pro
- Sony A7S3 A7M3 A6400

鏡頭 / Lenses:
- DZO Film Vespid Prime
- Sony SEL 1635GM
- Sony SEL 2470GM
- Sony SEL 20F18G
- Sony SEL 90M28G Macro
- Sony SEL 85GM
- Sony SEL 135GM
- Sigma 18-35 ART
- Sigma 50-100 ART

電動滑軌 / Sliders:
- Smartta SliderMini 2
- YC Onion HotDog Slider 3
- iFootage Shark Slider Nano

空拍機 / Drone:
- DJI Mavic 2 Pro
- DJI Mavic Air 2S

麥克風 / Mic:
- RODE VideoMic NTG
- RODE Wireless GO
- SHURE VP83F
- SHURE SM7B
- DEITY S-Mic 2
- DEITY S-Mic 2S
- DEITY HD-TX
- DEITY BP-TX
- DEITY Duo-RX

燈光 / Light:
- Aputure 60X 120DII 300DII 300X 600D Pro
- Aputure Amaran 100X 200X

三軸穩定器 / Gimbal:
- Feiyu AK4500
- DJI RS2

隔音棉 / Sound-absorbing:
- MayVoice 美聲

►商業合作
Email：cba024538@gmail.com

► 信件寄送地址
【中文】
22199 汐止社后郵局
第 78 號信箱
【英文】
P.O.BOX 78 Xizhi Shehou
New Taipei City 22199 Taiwan ( R.O.C.)

有個JKF小姊姊當助理…
就是有這種好處 !
要買色色東西的這邊喔：https://bit.ly/3BWPiBK

#Vlog

// Artlist 免費 60天 試用 //
https://bit.ly/2UiXCKR

// Artgrid 免費 60天 試用 //
https://bit.ly/3BaAX3U

// Epidemic Sound 免費 30天 試用 //
http://share.epidemicsound.com/CpNw8

► 我的器材 / My Gear
相機 / Camera:
- BMPCC 4K 6K 6K Pro
- Sony A7S3 A7M3 A6400

鏡頭 / Lenses:
- DZO Film Vespid Prime
- Sony SEL 1635GM
- Sony SEL 2470GM
- Sony SEL 20F18G
- Sony SEL 90M28G Macro
- Sony SEL 85GM
- Sony SEL 135GM
- Sigma 18-35 ART
- Sigma 50-100 ART

電動滑軌 / Sliders:
- Smartta SliderMini 2
- YC Onion HotDog Slider 3
- iFootage Shark Slider Nano

空拍機 / Drone:
- DJI Mavic 2 Pro
- DJI Mavic Air 2S

麥克風 / Mic:
- RODE VideoMic NTG
- RODE Wireless GO
- SHURE VP83F
- SHURE SM7B
- DEITY S-Mic 2
- DEITY S-Mic 2S
- DEITY HD-TX
- DEITY BP-TX
- DEITY Duo-RX

燈光 / Light:
- Aputure 60X 120DII 300DII 300X 600D Pro
- Aputure Amaran 100X 200X

三軸穩定器 / Gimbal:
- Feiyu AK4500
- DJI RS2

隔音棉 / Sound-absorbing:
- MayVoice 美聲

►商業合作
Email：cba024538@gmail.com

► 信件寄送地址
【中文】
22199 汐止社后郵局
第 78 號信箱
【英文】
P.O.BOX 78 Xizhi Shehou
New Taipei City 22199 Taiwan ( R.O.C.)

你們覺得Google看到這個，
會不會願意找我做Pixel 6啊 ?

#Shorts

// Artlist 免費 60天 試用 //
https://bit.ly/2UiXCKR

// Artgrid 免費 60天 試用 //
https://bit.ly/3BaAX3U

// Epidemic Sound 免費 30天 試用 //
http://share.epidemicsound.com/CpNw8

► 我的器材 / My Gear
相機 / Camera:
- BMPCC 4K 6K 6K Pro
- Sony A7S3 A7M3 A6400

鏡頭 / Lenses:
- DZO Film Vespid Prime
- Sony SEL 1635GM
- Sony SEL 2470GM
- Sony SEL 20F18G
- Sony SEL 90M28G Macro
- Sony SEL 85GM
- Sony SEL 135GM
- Sigma 18-35 ART
- Sigma 50-100 ART

電動滑軌 / Sliders:
- Smartta SliderMini 2
- YC Onion HotDog Slider 3
- iFootage Shark Slider Nano

空拍機 / Drone:
- DJI Mavic 2 Pro
- DJI Mavic Air 2S

麥克風 / Mic:
- RODE VideoMic NTG
- RODE Wireless GO
- SHURE VP83F
- SHURE SM7B
- DEITY S-Mic 2
- DEITY S-Mic 2S
- DEITY HD-TX
- DEITY BP-TX
- DEITY Duo-RX

燈光 / Light:
- Aputure 60X 120DII 300DII 300X 600D Pro
- Aputure Amaran 100X 200X

三軸穩定器 / Gimbal:
- Feiyu AK4500
- DJI RS2

隔音棉 / Sound-absorbing:
- MayVoice 美聲

►商業合作
Email：cba024538@gmail.com

► 信件寄送地址
【中文】
22199 汐止社后郵局
第 78 號信箱
【英文】
P.O.BOX 78 Xizhi Shehou
New Taipei City 22199 Taiwan ( R.O.C.)