[爆卦]larvae魚是什麼?優點缺點精華區懶人包

雖然這篇larvae魚鄉民發文沒有被收入到精華區:在larvae魚這個話題中,我們另外找到其它相關的精選爆讚文章

在 larvae魚產品中有5篇Facebook貼文,粉絲數超過9,343的網紅跟著 小花 去旅行,也在其Facebook貼文中提到, 這是Sunfish( 曼波魚)寶寶,長度只有幾公釐(mm),圓滾滾的小寶寶,很難想象長大就是 翻車魚「曼波魚」世界上最重的硬骨魚類, 超萌的可愛模樣跟大家分享...

 同時也有1部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過7萬的網紅大飽礁水世界,也在其Youtube影片中提到,這次帶你來到高雄美濃,我們前進到黃蝶翠谷附近,高身鯝魚及三角姑陸續上鉤,還要嘗試有終極必殺餌之稱的”雞母蟲”來當釣餌,一塊來看看有沒有機會釣中超大鱸鰻囉!! Using rhinoceros beetle larvae for fishing #釣魚 #達人 -------------------...

  • larvae魚 在 跟著 小花 去旅行 Facebook 的最佳貼文

    2020-10-06 20:00:44
    有 81 人按讚

    這是Sunfish( 曼波魚)寶寶,長度只有幾公釐(mm),圓滾滾的小寶寶,很難想象長大就是
    翻車魚「曼波魚」世界上最重的硬骨魚類, 超萌的可愛模樣跟大家分享

  • larvae魚 在 通勤學英語 Facebook 的最讚貼文

    2019-05-30 08:30:00
    有 6 人按讚

    【#每日跟讀單元 601】「氣候崩壞」可能導致螃蟹和章魚失明

    摘要:
    The changes in the animals’ vision were striking. As soon as the oxygen levels dipped below what is typically found at the surface of the ocean, their eyesight declined - most notably in the rock crab and the squid larvae, which were almost completely blind by the time oxygen was at its lowest point - 20 percent of surface levels.
    這些動物的視力變化驚人。只要水中含氧量降至低於海水面一般溶氧量,牠們的視力就會下降—視力下降最顯著的是黃道蟹和烏賊幼仔,其置身於最低含氧量(海水面的20%)環境時幾乎全盲。

    15分鐘跟讀世界各地時事趣聞的錄音檔,一步步提升英語口說與聽力!

    想要收到每日通知?加入通勤學英語粉絲團並訂閱官網跟讀單元!

    官網: www.15mins.today
    更多跟讀文章: https://pse.is/E8BNC
    Apple Podcast收聽: https://pse.is/DLMCK
    Spotify收聽:https://pse.is/DQQHL
    Castbox收聽:https://castbox.fm/x/_jx9

    #15minstoday
    #英語即戰力
    http://sc.piee.pw/FRKCG

  • larvae魚 在 Bee Adventures 大冒險 Facebook 的最讚貼文

    2017-04-30 03:05:10
    有 34 人按讚


    塑膠微粒會造成魚類健康的科學研究論文被爆造假!
    ---
    2016年六月,一流期刊Science發表了一個震驚世界的論文。北歐Uppsala大學的Oona Lönnstedt 和Peter Eklöv 博士發現,魚的幼苗會把塑膠微粒當浮游生物吃食,並會損害健康影響生長造成毒素。此重大研究馬上讓各國禁止販售含塑膠微粒的產品。

    但瑞典中央論文道德審核會經過長達十個月的調查發現,這兩名海洋保育科學人士居然憑空捏造科學數據,甚至連研究都沒做完。不僅他們在研究基地待的時間其實比聲明的短,他們之前面對質疑時還曾撒謊說數據放在電腦裡後來電腦被偷了。論文現在正在進行正式撤銷程序,兩名科學家從此研究生涯不保。

    唉。雖然論文被撤銷也不代表塑膠微粒就沒壞影響,只是,這告訴我們,即便我們都急切的想要世界正視海洋保育,但嚴謹而真實的研究與報導,才是最重要的!散播不實資訊只會造成反效果!

    海洋保育科學,需要更多的正直心❤

    ---
    Research papers about plastic microbeads harming fishes are fabricated and will be retracted from Science Journal!
    ---
    June 2016, first tier journal, Science Journal, published a groundbreaking study. Drs. Oona Lönnstedt and Peter Eklöv from University of Uppsala found that fish larvae preferred ingesting microplastic than plankton, and their health and development are harmed and poisoned consequently. This impactful research paper soon caused the banning of microplastic-containing products to be sold in many countries.

    However, after 10 months of investigation conducted by the Sweden's central ethical review board, it has been revealed that these two ocean environmentalists fabricated scientific data, and they didn't even conduct most of the studies. They didn't stay in the research center long enough to conduct the experiments as they reported in the paper. They even claimed that the full data was stored in a computer which was later stolen. This research paper is in the process of being retracted and the research lives of these two scientists are at edge.

    Sigh. The fact that this paper is retracted doesn't mean microplastic is safe. However, this tells us that even though we all eagerly want the world to face the ocean conservation problems, truthful and meticulous research and reports are the most important things! Spreading fake information can only push things backward.

    Ocean conservation science needs more dignity❤

你可能也想看看

搜尋相關網站