熱門Ptt文章

[爆卦]containment中文是什麼？優點缺點精華區懶人包

雖然這篇containment中文鄉民發文沒有被收入到精華區：在containment中文這個話題中，我們另外找到其它相關的精選爆讚文章

在 containment中文產品中有15篇Facebook貼文，粉絲數超過2萬的網紅國家衛生研究院-論壇，也在其Facebook貼文中提到， ➥【比較以個案與以群眾為基礎的兩種感控介入措施於台灣新冠肺炎防治的成效】： ■中文摘要 台灣是世界上少數未實施嚴格封城、學校停課但新冠疫情控制良好的國家。台灣研究團隊比較了兩種感控措施於疫情防治的成效。 ■目標 比較以個案(case-based)與以群眾(population-based)為基礎...

　同時也有7部Youtube影片，追蹤數超過12萬的網紅LuNaCy HOLLOW，也在其Youtube影片中提到，Welcome to LuNaCy's stream :DD Make yourself at home xD PC specs: ============ Intel I7-6700 HQ 2.6GHZ Geforce GTX 1060 6GB 16GB Ram ?If u wish to...

「containment中文」的推薦目錄

containment中文 在 Paige Shieh | 媽媽的保養系健身??‍♂️ Instagram 的最讚貼文

2020-05-03 21:23:02

先前在動態分享的一則針對新冠狀病毒的數據分析，有好幾位網友在陸續問我細節等等，我覺得整理成一篇文章，歡迎大家收藏、儲存或分享。 . 這是一篇來自網路媒體Medium由作者Thomas Pueyo所寫的Coronavirus: Why You Must Act Now（新冠狀病毒：為何你必須馬上行動）...

containment中文 在 輕煙飄過 Instagram 的最讚貼文

2020-05-02 15:44:08

(2019第四屆核電影影展)《全面圍核》--- 理性探討核廢幅射污染效應，積極規畫落實長遠全面防核! https://petermurphey.pixnet.net/blog/post/228557594 《核電影》由綠色公民行動聯盟發起策畫，是台灣第一個、也是唯一一個以「核能、能源與環境」議題為...

  • 國家衛生研究院-論壇

    containment中文 在 國家衛生研究院-論壇 Facebook 的最佳貼文

    2021-05-04 16:30:00
    有 30 人按讚

    ➥【比較以個案與以群眾為基礎的兩種感控介入措施於台灣新冠肺炎防治的成效】：
    ■中文摘要
    台灣是世界上少數未實施嚴格封城、學校停課但新冠疫情控制良好的國家。台灣研究團隊比較了兩種感控措施於疫情防治的成效。
    　
    ■目標
    比較以個案(case-based)與以群眾(population-based)為基礎的兩種感控介入措施於台灣新冠肺炎防治的成效。
    　
    ■方法
    使用隨機模型中的分支過程方法(stochastic branching process model)分析台灣159位COVID-19確診病患的疫調資料，比較以個案與以群眾為主的兩種感控措施於疫情防治的成效。前者包括找出個案、接觸者追蹤及親密接觸者隔離14天等隔離檢疫措施;後者包括維持社交距離及配戴口罩等。
    　
    ■結果
    (1)55%的感染傳播事件發生在尚未有明顯症狀的疾病症狀前期(pre-symptomatic)。
    (2)以個案為主的感控措施，可將R0由2.50降至1.53 (註)。
    (3)以群眾為主的感控措施，可將R0由2.50降至1.30。
    (4)以個案與以群眾為主的兩感控措施並行，可將R0由2.50降至0.85。
    　
    ■結論
    單獨使用個案介入措施或群眾介入措施都無法阻絕疫情傳播，需兩者並行才能有效控制疫情。此研究結果也說明了台灣...完整轉譯文章，詳連結：http://forum.nhri.org.tw/covid19/virus/j_translate/j2615/ ( 財團法人國家衛生研究院 吳綺容醫師摘要整理)
    　　
    📋 JAMA - 2021-04-06
    Comparison of Estimated Effectiveness of Case-Based and Population-Based Interventions on COVID-19 Containment in Taiwan
    ■ Author：Ta-Chou Ng, Hao-Yuan Cheng, Hsiao-Han Chang, et al.
    ■ Link：https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullarticle/2778395
    　　
    〈 國家衛生研究院-論壇 〉
    ➥ COVID-19學術資源-轉譯文章 - 2021/05/04
    衛生福利部
    疾病管制署 - 1922防疫達人
    疾病管制署

  • 媽媽監督核電廠聯盟

    containment中文 在 媽媽監督核電廠聯盟 Facebook 的最讚貼文

    2021-03-11 17:39:42
    有 21 人按讚

    福島核電廠驚見新汙染物 原能管制委員會警告 :「可能再次爆炸」！（03/10/2021 Newtalk 新頭殼）

    （黃奕慈 綜合報導）今（10日）日本原子能管制委員會發布報告表示，東京電力公司在福島第一核電站內部發現了新的污染場所，且嚴重程度遠超乎預期，因此原本廢爐拆除計劃可能需要重新考慮。令人驚訝的是，福島第一核電廠的1號和3號機組核反應堆壓力容器排出的部分氣體發生了倒流，「有可能再次引發爆炸。」

    根據《日本放送協會》今日報導指出，原子能管制委員會發布了一份「有關福島核事故的調查報告」，內容顯示出約7萬萬億貝克勒爾的輻射性物質可能附著在第一核電廠的2號和3號機組核反應堆的安全頂蓋上。

    日本原子能管制委員會表示，由於污染程度遠超預期，工作人員將無法按原計劃拆除安全頂蓋，需要和東京電力公司一起重新考慮廢爐拆除計劃。這份報告還指出，福島第一核電廠的1、3號機組的核反應堆壓力容器排出的部分氣體倒流，由於其中含有氫氣，「可能會再次引發爆炸，還會讓汙染範圍擴大。」

    此外，有一項最新的實驗顯示，如果福島第一核電廠的3號機組發生氫氣爆炸，還有可能會引燃核電廠內部的其他可燃氣體，導致連環爆炸。所以為了確保廢墟拆除工作的安全進行，東京電力公司表示將對設備進行更加詳細的檢測。

    在2011年3月11日，東日本大地震引發的大海嘯，襲擊了位在海邊的福島第一核電站，該核電廠的發電設備被水淹，導致冷卻系統失靈。在6個反應堆中的3個發生了熔毀。在接下來的幾天裡，1號和3號反應堆多次發生氫氣爆炸，並在環境中外洩了大量放射性物質。

    PS. 編按：日本NHK官網上 03/10 所刊載的相關報導全文如下：

    福島 NEWS WEB
    福島放送局 トップ

    原子力規制委が事故調査の報告書

    原子力規制委員会は、おととし再開した東京電力・福島第一原子力発電所の事故調査の報告書をまとめ、原子炉建屋の上部で激しい汚染が見つかるなどしたことから、今後の廃炉作業について東京電力と検討を進めるとしています。

    原子力規制委員会は、放射線量が下がった場所を中心に２年前から事故調査を再開し、その結果を１０日、報告書にまとめました。

    それによりますと、核燃料が溶け落ちるメルトダウンを起こした１号機から３号機の３基の原子炉にあった放射性物質のおよそ１割にあたるあわせて７京ベクレルが、２号機と３号機の建屋上部にあるシールドプラグと呼ばれるコンクリートの蓋に付着している可能性があることが新たにわかったということです。

    規制委員会は汚染が予想以上に激しく、仮に廃炉に向けて蓋を取り外す場合、人が近寄って安全に作業することが極めて困難になるとして、被ばく対策を含めて今後の廃炉作業の方法について東京電力と検討を進めるとしています。

    このほか、原子炉がある格納容器を守るため中の気体を外に放出する「ベント」という操作を試みた１号機と３号機では、気体の一部が配管を通じて建屋に逆流していたこともわかり、これにより建屋内の汚染を広げた可能性があると指摘しています。

    また、逆流した気体には水素も含まれていて、水素爆発につながったおそれもあるとして、今後、設備の検証などを進める必要があるとしています。

    水素爆発については映像を分析するなど初めて詳細な検証が行われ、３号機では最初の爆発に続き、水素とは別の可燃性ガスも混ざった爆発的な燃焼が連続して起きていた可能性が高いとしました。

    規制委員会は今後も調査を継続するとしています。

    NHK完整報導內容請見：
    https://www3.nhk.or.jp/lnews/fukushima/20210310/6050013761.html

    英文翻譯如下：
    The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has compiled a report on the accident investigation of the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station, which has been reopened, and found severe pollution at the top of the reactor building. We are going to proceed with the examination.

    The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has resumed accident investigations two years ago, mainly in areas where radiation levels have dropped, and summarized the results in a report on the 10th.

    According to this, about 10% of the radioactive materials in the three reactors of Units 1 to 3, which caused the meltdown of the nuclear fuel, totaling 7K Becquerel, were placed in the upper part of the buildings of Units 2 and 3. It is newly discovered that it may be attached to a concrete lid called a shield plug.

    The Regulatory Commission said that the pollution was more severe than expected, and if the lid was removed for decommissioning, it would be extremely difficult for people to approach and work safely. Will be discussed with TEPCO.

    In addition, at Units 1 and 3, which attempted an operation called "venting" to release the gas inside to protect the containment vessel where the reactor is located, part of the gas flowed back into the building through piping. It turns out that this may have spread the pollution inside the building.

    In addition, the backflow gas also contains hydrogen, which may have led to a hydrogen explosion, and it is necessary to proceed with verification of equipment in the future.

    Detailed verification of the hydrogen explosion was carried out for the first time, such as by analyzing the video, and it is possible that at Unit 3, following the first explosion, explosive combustion mixed with flammable gas other than hydrogen occurred continuously. Was high.

    The Regulatory Commission says it will continue to investigate.

    中文翻譯如下：

    核監管委員會已經對福島第一核電站的事故調查進行了彙編，該報告已經重新開放，並在反應堆頂部發現了嚴重污染，我們將繼續進行檢查。

    核監管委員會兩年前已恢復事故調查，主要是在輻射水平下降的地區，並在10日的報告中總結了結果。

    據此，導致1號至3號機組的三個反應堆中導致核燃料融化的約10％的放射性物質（總計7K Becquerel）被放置在2號和3號機組的建築物的上部。是新發現的，它可能會附在一個稱為屏蔽塞的混凝土蓋上。

    監管委員會說，污染比預期的還要嚴重，如果卸下蓋子進行退役，人們接近和安全工作將極為困難，將與東京電力公司進行討論。

    另外，在1號和3號機組中，嘗試進行“排氣（venting)”作業以釋放內部氣體以保護反應堆所在的安全殼，部分氣體通過管道回流到建築物中。可能已將污染散佈在建築物內部。

    此外，回流氣體中還包含氫氣，這可能導致氫氣爆炸，因此有必要在將來進行設備驗證。

    首次對氫氣爆炸進行了詳細的驗證，例如通過分析視頻，並且在第一次爆炸後的3號機組中，可能會連續發生爆炸混合了除氫氣以外的易燃氣體的爆炸燃燒。

    監管委員會表示將繼續調查。

    Newtalk新頭殼報導的完整內容請見：
    https://newtalk.tw/news/view/2021-03-10/547169

    ♡

  • Roger Chung 鍾一諾

    containment中文 在 Roger Chung 鍾一諾 Facebook 的精選貼文

    2020-11-22 23:03:00
    有 43 人按讚

    今早為Asian Medical Students Association Hong Kong (AMSAHK)的新一屆執行委員會就職典禮作致詞分享嘉賓，題目為「疫情中的健康不公平」。
    感謝他們的熱情款待以及為整段致詞拍了影片。以下我附上致詞的英文原稿：

    It's been my honor to be invited to give the closing remarks for the Inauguration Ceremony for the incoming executive committee of the Asian Medical Students' Association Hong Kong (AMSAHK) this morning. A video has been taken for the remarks I made regarding health inequalities during the COVID-19 pandemic (big thanks to the student who withstood the soreness of her arm for holding the camera up for 15 minutes straight), and here's the transcript of the main body of the speech that goes with this video:

    //The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, continues to be rampant around the world since early 2020, resulting in more than 55 million cases and 1.3 million deaths worldwide as of today. (So no! It’s not a hoax for those conspiracy theorists out there!) A higher rate of incidence and deaths, as well as worse health-related quality of life have been widely observed in the socially disadvantaged groups, including people of lower socioeconomic position, older persons, migrants, ethnic minority and communities of color, etc. While epidemiologists and scientists around the world are dedicated in gathering scientific evidence on the specific causes and determinants of the health inequalities observed in different countries and regions, we can apply the Social Determinants of Health Conceptual Framework developed by the World Health Organization team led by the eminent Prof Sir Michael Marmot, world’s leading social epidemiologist, to understand and delineate these social determinants of health inequalities related to the COVID-19 pandemic.

    According to this framework, social determinants of health can be largely categorized into two types – 1) the lower stream, intermediary determinants, and 2) the upper stream, structural and macro-environmental determinants. For the COVID-19 pandemic, we realized that the lower stream factors may include material circumstances, such as people’s living and working conditions. For instance, the nature of the occupations of these people of lower socioeconomic position tends to require them to travel outside to work, i.e., they cannot work from home, which is a luxury for people who can afford to do it. This lack of choice in the location of occupation may expose them to greater risk of infection through more transportation and interactions with strangers. We have also seen infection clusters among crowded places like elderly homes, public housing estates, and boarding houses for foreign domestic helpers. Moreover, these socially disadvantaged people tend to have lower financial and social capital – it can be observed that they were more likely to be deprived of personal protective equipment like face masks and hand sanitizers, especially during the earlier days of the pandemic. On the other hand, the upper stream, structural determinants of health may include policies related to public health, education, macroeconomics, social protection and welfare, as well as our governance… and last, but not least, our culture and values. If the socioeconomic and political contexts are not favorable to the socially disadvantaged, their health and well-being will be disproportionately affected by the pandemic. Therefore, if we, as a society, espouse to address and reduce the problem of health inequalities, social determinants of health cannot be overlooked in devising and designing any public health-related strategies, measures and policies.

    Although a higher rate of incidence and deaths have been widely observed in the socially disadvantaged groups, especially in countries with severe COVID-19 outbreaks, this phenomenon seems to be less discussed and less covered by media in Hong Kong, where the disease incidence is relatively low when compared with other countries around the world. Before the resurgence of local cases in early July, local spread of COVID-19 was sporadic and most cases were imported. In the earlier days of the pandemic, most cases were primarily imported by travelers and return-students studying overseas, leading to a minor surge between mid-March and mid-April of 874 new cases. Most of these cases during Spring were people who could afford to travel and study abroad, and thus tended to be more well-off. Therefore, some would say the expected social gradient in health impact did not seem to exist in Hong Kong, but may I remind you that, it is only the case when we focus on COVID-19-specific incidence and mortality alone. But can we really deduce from this that COVID-19-related health inequality does not exist in Hong Kong? According to the Social Determinants of Health Framework mentioned earlier, the obvious answer is “No, of course not.” And here’s why…

    In addition to the direct disease burden, the COVID-19 outbreak and its associated containment measures (such as economic lockdown, mandatory social distancing, and change of work arrangements) could have unequal wider socioeconomic impacts on the general population, especially in regions with pervasive existing social inequalities. Given the limited resources and capacity of the socioeconomically disadvantaged to respond to emergency and adverse events, their general health and well-being are likely to be unduly and inordinately affected by the abrupt changes in their daily economic and social conditions, like job loss and insecurity, brought about by the COVID-19 outbreak and the corresponding containment and mitigation measures of which the main purpose was supposedly disease prevention and health protection at the first place. As such, focusing only on COVID-19 incidence or mortality as the outcomes of concern to address health inequalities may leave out important aspects of life that contributes significantly to people’s health. Recently, my research team and I collaborated with Sir Michael Marmot in a Hong Kong study, and found that the poor people in Hong Kong fared worse in every aspects of life than their richer counterparts in terms of economic activity, personal protective equipment, personal hygiene practice, as well as well-being and health after the COVID-19 outbreak. We also found that part of the observed health inequality can be attributed to the pandemic and its related containment measures via people’s concerns over their own and their families’ livelihood and economic activity. In other words, health inequalities were contributed by the pandemic even in a city where incidence is relatively low through other social determinants of health that directly concerned the livelihood and economic activity of the people. So in this study, we confirmed that focusing only on the incident and death cases as the outcomes of concern to address health inequalities is like a story half-told, and would severely truncate and distort the reality.

    Truth be told, health inequality does not only appear after the pandemic outbreak of COVID-19, it is a pre-existing condition in countries and regions around the world, including Hong Kong. My research over the years have consistently shown that people in lower socioeconomic position tend to have worse physical and mental health status. Nevertheless, precisely because health inequality is nothing new, there are always voices in our society trying to dismiss the problem, arguing that it is only natural to have wealth inequality in any capitalistic society. However, in reckoning with health inequalities, we need to go beyond just figuring out the disparities or differences in health status between the poor and the rich, and we need to raise an ethically relevant question: are these inequalities, disparities and differences remediable? Can they be fixed? Can we do something about them? If they are remediable, and we can do something about them but we haven’t, then we’d say these inequalities are ultimately unjust and unfair. In other words, a society that prides itself in pursuing justice must, and I say must, strive to address and reduce these unfair health inequalities. Borrowing the words from famed sociologist Judith Butler, “the virus alone does not discriminate,” but “social and economic inequality will make sure that it does.” With COVID-19, we learn that it is not only the individuals who are sick, but our society. And it’s time we do something about it.

    Thank you very much!//

    Please join me in congratulating the incoming executive committee of AMSAHK and giving them the best wishes for their future endeavor!

    Roger Chung, PhD
    Assistant Professor, CUHK JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, @CUHK Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong 香港中文大學 - CUHK
    Associate Director, CUHK Institute of Health Equity

你可能也想看看

搜尋相關網站