雖然這篇chancellor中文鄉民發文沒有被收入到精華區：在chancellor中文這個話題中，我們另外找到其它相關的精選爆讚文章
在 chancellor中文產品中有14篇Facebook貼文，粉絲數超過3萬的網紅Zen大的時事點評，也在其Facebook貼文中提到， 前幾天出版社來信告知，梅克爾傳即將上市，會有預購活動，我說這很棒，一定要推廣一下！ 不管你喜不喜歡梅克爾，他都是一代傳奇，影響歐陸乃至整個世界局甚多。 這本書值得對地緣政治與國際關係，乃至對德國戰後發展有興趣的朋友收藏！ 梅克爾傳：一場卓越的史詩之旅 https://www.books.co...
同時也有1部Youtube影片，追蹤數超過10萬的網紅Khalil Fong 方大同，也在其Youtube影片中提到，2013年4月8日，方大同出席香港中文大學多元文化節開幕禮，與中大校長沈祖堯教授一起分享他們的信仰和世界觀。 Khalil Fong and Prof Joseph Sung, the Vice Chancellor of Chinese University of Hong Kong, share...
「chancellor中文」的推薦目錄
- 關於chancellor中文 在 goodbyehkhellouk Instagram 的最佳解答
- 關於chancellor中文 在 ??????? ???? ???? ???? ?? Instagram 的最讚貼文
- 關於chancellor中文 在 InkSundae Instagram 的最佳貼文
- 關於chancellor中文 在 Zen大的時事點評 Facebook 的最佳解答
- 關於chancellor中文 在 Goodbye HK, Hello UK Facebook 的最讚貼文
- 關於chancellor中文 在 Charles Mok 莫乃光 Facebook 的最佳貼文
- 關於chancellor中文 在 Khalil Fong 方大同 Youtube 的最佳解答
chancellor中文 在 goodbyehkhellouk Instagram 的最佳解答
2021-09-17 16:14:15
新舊外交大臣嘅笑容 今日英國首相出席下議院例行答問大會（PMQ）之後，忽然宣布重組內閣，當中比較注目嘅係外交大臣Dominic Raab調任（降職）為司法大臣，兼任Lord Chancellor（中譯大法官，但個人覺得實際職能同中文意思唔多配合）與及代任首相（Deputy Prime Minist...
chancellor中文 在 ??????? ???? ???? ???? ?? Instagram 的最讚貼文
2020-05-09 09:38:47
You can barely find traces of protest when you step into the campus of CUHK. The campus, which was once full of anti-government posters and graffiti, ...
chancellor中文 在 InkSundae Instagram 的最佳貼文
2020-05-11 12:16:05
On 10 Oct, a student, who was arrested on 31 Aug, recalled her memory being sexual harassed by policemen, in the meeting with Vice-Chancellor of CUHK....
-
chancellor中文 在 Khalil Fong 方大同 Youtube 的最佳解答
2013-04-23 14:15:232013年4月8日，方大同出席香港中文大學多元文化節開幕禮，與中大校長沈祖堯教授一起分享他們的信仰和世界觀。
Khalil Fong and Prof Joseph Sung, the Vice Chancellor of Chinese University of Hong Kong, shared their faith and world views in the opening ceremony of the Diversity-in-Asia Fest on 8 April 2013.
方大同Facebook專頁 Khalil Fong Official Facebook page: www.facebook.com/soulboykhalilfong![post-title]()
chancellor中文 在 Zen大的時事點評 Facebook 的最佳解答
前幾天出版社來信告知，梅克爾傳即將上市，會有預購活動，我說這很棒，一定要推廣一下！
不管你喜不喜歡梅克爾，他都是一代傳奇，影響歐陸乃至整個世界局甚多。
這本書值得對地緣政治與國際關係，乃至對德國戰後發展有興趣的朋友收藏！
梅克爾傳：一場卓越的史詩之旅
https://www.books.com.tw/exep/assp.php/zenwang1976/products/0010904413?loc=P_0002_003&utm_source=zenwang1976&utm_medium=ap-books&utm_content=recommend&utm_campaign=ap-202109
chancellor中文 在 Goodbye HK, Hello UK Facebook 的最讚貼文
新舊外交大臣嘅笑容
今日英國首相出席下議院例行答問大會（PMQ）之後，忽然宣布重組內閣，當中比較注目嘅係外交大臣Dominic Raab調任（降職）為司法大臣，兼任Lord Chancellor（中譯大法官，但個人覺得實際職能同中文意思唔多配合）與及代任首相（Deputy Prime Minister），而原來嘅國際商務大臣Elizabeth Truss（Liz Truss）就升任為外交大臣。
另外，疫情期間被受批評嘅教育大臣Gavin Williamson解除職務，之前盛傳會被切換嘅內政大臣Priti Patel就繼續留任。除此之外，比較突然嘅係一路對肥波嘅路向同黨都非常一致，無乜差錯嘅文化傳訊大臣Oliver Dowden亦被撤換，換咗個更加右翼敢言嘅Nadine Dorries....
响討論華文傳媒視角好喜歡講嘅「新任外交大臣對中英關系有什麼影響」乜乜乜之前，首先要了解响議會數票數無人能敵嘅情況之下，點解肥波會選擇响呢個時候改組內閣....
剩係睇新舊外交大臣個笑容，就知唔係咁簡單啦？
Patreon too long don't read超長文：
英國政府改組內閣原因，新任外交大臣是誰
https://bit.ly/2YW7Z9r
#民主議會政治是很殘酷的
#為咗黨可以犧牲任何人
**************************************
📢乞食廣告：文字、時間與心血有價
🥣乞兒兜：
https://www.patreon.com/goodbyehkhellouk
**************************************
chancellor中文 在 Charles Mok 莫乃光 Facebook 的最佳貼文
【法政匯思就社會進一步動盪的聲明】
【Statement on Further Escalation of Social Unrest】
// 當體制構建不能保障市民應有的追索權，暴力兼「私了」必如落山流水跟著來，這已清晰可見。僅說無諾，何能「止暴制亂」？
// Where the system fails to provide proper recourse, vigilantism and violence proclaiming self-defence arise as simple cause and effect. Without any real commitment by the Government to de-escalate and defuse the political crisis, verbal condemnation and physical crackdown will do nothing to ‘stop violence and curb disorder’.
https://www.facebook.com/…/a.455221741311…/1474268236073377/
【法政匯思就社會進一步動盪的聲明】
【Statement on Further Escalation of Social Unrest】(Scroll for English)
1. 近日，警隊的行為就如國際特赦組織所言越見低劣。[1] 這皆因政府漠視其專家提供的建議，並以歇斯底里、毫無章法可言的策略回應持續的動盪。
2. 五個月來，政府持續容許以下情況發生，對警政問題及根本的政治危機藥石亂投：
a. 阻礙救護人員前往現場拯救傷者；[2]
b. 偏頗地處理強姦或酷刑對待被拘留人士的指控；[3]
c. 肆無忌憚地濫用武力；[4]
d. 以諸多藉口為警察的失控或報復行為辯解。[5]
3. 法政匯思強烈譴責警隊濫用武力，及其本末倒置、往往為社區添煩添亂的驅散示威者行動。警方在十一月十一日於香港中文大學（「中大」）、香港理工大學及香港大學等驅散非法集結及/或堵路行為的行動，指稱的事實根據惹人非議。[6] 在撰寫此聲明之時，警方甚至以催淚彈及橡膠子彈回應中大校長的善意，與學生發生激烈衝突，造成最少60人受傷及多人被捕。[7]
4. 歸根究底，現有的制度未能公正地調查涉及警務人員的刑事指控，乃是警民衝突的源頭。樂觀地看，這可能只是個別調查人員的疏忽；悲觀地看，這反映一種互相包庇的文化，可能已由員佐級警員到警務處處長、保安局局長甚至特首，滲透警隊及政府上下。無論是哪一個情況，這種警察橫行無忌的觀感已經令公眾對負責調查大部分罪行的警察的信任蕩然無存。這個缺口一開，刑事司法制度剩下非常有限的能力，處理失職警員。
5. 法政匯思繼續呼籲香港政府成立獨立調查委員會，調查包括六月份以來政府的治安管理手段。除了將肇事者繩之於法外，更重要的是全面檢閱香港警隊以達至結構上的改革。至今，特區政府對於這個明顯又實際的選擇不屑一顧，堅持讓一個缺乏監察權力的獨立監察警方處理投訴委員會（「監警會」）[8] 去調查警察投訴及內部調查科。這正正就是問題根源所在。
6. 監警會委派的國際專家組就這個問題發表《進展報告》。國際專家組與政府持相反意見。他們批評監警會在結構上欠缺全面調查權力，對監警會這一個輕型、監管式的體制是否能夠做出決定性的貢獻表示懷疑，更指出下一步的可能性諸如「委派一個享有所需權力的獨立調查機構以作更深程度及更廣泛的調查」，意味著一個獨立調查委員會。[9]
7. 對於近數星期暴力頻頻，政府沒有採取任何行動，只是堅拒示威者的訴求（包括成立獨立調查委員會），更稱他們為「人民的敵人」。[10] 警員們多月來非人化地濫稱示威者為「曱甴」。[11]
8. 法政匯思絕對不認同法外制裁。此立場於七月二十五日之聲明已表明。然而，當體制構建不能保障市民應有的追索權，暴力兼「私了」必如落山流水跟著來，這已清晰可見。僅說無諾，何能「止暴制亂」？
法政匯思
2019年11月15日
(PDF: https://tinyurl.com/tt2nzmr)
1. Police conduct has seen, in the words of Amnesty International, ‘another shocking low’ [1] in recent days as the Government ignored constructive feedback by its own experts and hysterically responded to the ongoing unrest without any rational strategy.
2. In particular, these allegations point to a wanton failure on the part of the Government to properly approach policing and the underlying political crisis, now in its 5th month:
a. Obstructing rescuers and ambulances from accessing the injured; [2]
b. Unfair handling of allegations of rape and torture in custody; [3]
c. Unapologetic excesses in its use of force; [4] and
d. Evasive defence of police officers acting impulsively or in retaliation. [5]
3. The Progressive Lawyers Group (the ‘PLG’) vehemently condemns the Police regarding their excessive use of force and dispersal operations which often create the chaos sought to be quelled. On 11 November, the police conducted operations in, amongst others, the Chinese University of Hong Kong (‘CUHK’), the Polytechnic University of Hong Kong and the University of Hong Kong to disperse unlawful assemblies and/or obstruction of traffic, [6] the factual basis of which has been doubted by many. As at the drafting of this Statement, as riot police responded to an olive branch by the CUHK Vice-Chancellor with tear gas and rubber bullets, severe clashes between students and riot police at CUHK are ongoing with at least 60 injured and dozens arrested. [7]
4. Nonetheless, the crux of the problem remains in the institutional failure to investigate criminal allegations involving police officers impartially. At best, it could be an omission by individual police officers in their execution of duty. At worst, it could be a culture that acquiesces and conceals wrongdoings affecting grassroot constables, the Commissioner of Police, the Secretary for Security and the Chief Executive alike. Whichever the case may be, this perception of impunity breaches the trust and confidence the public reposes in the police who are tasked with investigating most offences. With this link broken, there remains very limited recourse in the criminal justice system against rogue officers.
5. The PLG continues to call on the Hong Kong Government to appoint a Commission of Inquiry regarding, amongst others, the current approach to policing social unrest since June. Bringing wrongdoers to justice aside, the more important task is a holistic review on the Police Force and a roadmap to structural reforms. So far, the Government brushed aside this obvious and pragmatic option, insisting upon an inquiry by the Independent Police Complaints Council (‘IPCC’) [8] whose (lack of) oversight over the Complaints Against Police Office (‘CAPO’) is the very issue at the heart of the current saga.
6. Curiously, the International Expert Panel of the IPCC appointed for advice on that very inquiry seems to hold a contrary view. In their Position Statement Report of Progress, the experts pointed out ‘structural limitations in the scope and powers of the IPCC Inquiry’ and noted that ‘it remains to be seen whether a light touch, oversight body like the IPCC, can make sufficient progress to produce any decisive contribution…’ It also identified a possible next step such as ‘a deeper more comprehensive inquiry in a number of respects by an independent body with requisite powers’, alluding to a Commission of Inquiry. [9]
7. In response to the extraordinary brutalities these few weeks, the Government did nothing but maintain that it will not yield to the protesters’ demands (including an independent Commission of Inquiry) and call them ‘enemies of the people’. [10] It has not helped that the police have for months been blatantly using such a dehumanising term as ‘cockroaches’ to refer to protesters [11].
8. The PLG stands by our Statement on 25 July 2019 and does not encourage citizens to take justice into their own hands. However, it is obvious by now that where the system fails to provide proper recourse, vigilantism and violence proclaiming self-defence arise as simple cause and effect. Without any real commitment by the Government to de-escalate and defuse the political crisis, verbal condemnation and physical crackdown will do nothing to ‘stop violence and curb disorder’.
The Progressive Lawyers Group
15 November 2019
(PDF version: https://tinyurl.com/tt2nzmr)