雖然這篇Spurious meaning鄉民發文沒有被收入到精華區：在Spurious meaning這個話題中，我們另外找到其它相關的精選爆讚文章
在 spurious產品中有15篇Facebook貼文，粉絲數超過52的網紅Benny Price Fitness，也在其Facebook貼文中提到， Today we issued graduation emails to those in the first two intakes of RTS Malaysia Level 1. When we were reviewing the results of Intake 1 Mark said ...
同時也有10000部Youtube影片，追蹤數超過2,910的網紅コバにゃんチャンネル，也在其Youtube影片中提到，...
「spurious」的推薦目錄
- 關於spurious 在 Coach Benny Price Instagram 的精選貼文
- 關於spurious 在 T H A N U J A Instagram 的最佳貼文
- 關於spurious 在 Benny Price Fitness Facebook 的最佳貼文
- 關於spurious 在 Facebook 的最讚貼文
- 關於spurious 在 Goodbye HK, Hello UK Facebook 的最佳解答
- 關於spurious 在 コバにゃんチャンネル Youtube 的最佳貼文
- 關於spurious 在 大象中醫 Youtube 的精選貼文
- 關於spurious 在 大象中醫 Youtube 的最讚貼文
spurious 在 Coach Benny Price Instagram 的精選貼文
2021-05-30 08:37:12
Today we issued graduation emails to those in the first two intakes of RTS Malaysia Level 1. When we were reviewing the results of Intake 1 Mark said ...
spurious 在 T H A N U J A Instagram 的最佳貼文
2020-09-07 18:37:26
Get you a man who loves & devises spurious military missions with you,99 roses & and an I love you balloon💋❤️🌹🎂🎈...
-
spurious 在 コバにゃんチャンネル Youtube 的最佳貼文
2021-10-01 13:19:08![post-title]()
-
spurious 在 大象中醫 Youtube 的精選貼文
2021-10-01 13:10:45![post-title]()
-
spurious 在 大象中醫 Youtube 的最讚貼文
2021-10-01 13:09:56![post-title]()
spurious 在 Benny Price Fitness Facebook 的最佳貼文
Today we issued graduation emails to those in the first two intakes of RTS Malaysia Level 1.
When we were reviewing the results of Intake 1 Mark said to me “either I’ve made the questions too easy or you’re teaching this too well!”
-
It’s probably more the latter than the former. This course isn’t about the exam, because:
- if you’ve got a solid professional background,
- if you take notes carefully during class
- if you ensure you understand the concepts I put across at the time
... it’s not too hard. The hard bit is that we don’t just teach you a syllabus to pass an exam.
-
A lot of certifications exist and are acquired so the certifiers can sell coaches a cert which the coach can use to make money. They make the information appear conclusive, as if it’s all one needs to know to coach. A materialistic product sold for a materialistic outcome.
-
Why do we have an exam then?
- Attendees have a sense of a achievement from passing it
- they take notes more furiously knowing they’re getting tested
- it’s a good way to confirm they understood what we intended to teach.
-
It’s not about a syllabus. The reality is that this learning process goes on forever. Yes, there are the basic foundational facts that one needs to know to be a capable, responsible practitioner... but the rest of the never-ending educational journey requires thought processes and mindset. The goal is not having students come across every exam question and trying to recall a memorised answer. It’s about being able to think it through and come to a conclusion.
-
We’re here to prepare attendees for the real world, full of fanciful ideas borne out of creativity not science, and spurious claims by those who know outlandish statements get traction. It’s so good to know those attending are “getting it” so well.
-
Oh, and if you’re curious, if attendees don’t pass, that’s on me. Retakes are free every 2 months and I’ll spend as long as it takes and someone is willing to put in to get their understanding where it needs to be to think their way through the exam.
spurious 在 Facebook 的最讚貼文
“Results: We find that the 12th-order polynomial fit to the spectral passband utilised in the published study leads to spurious results. Following their recipe, five other >10 sigma lines can be produced in absorption or emission within 60 km/s from the PH3 1-0 transition frequency by suppressing the surrounding noise. Our independent analysis shows a feature near the PH3 frequency at a ~2 sigma level, below the common threshold for statistical significance. Since the spectral data have a non-Gaussian distribution, we consider a feature at such level as statistically unreliable that cannot be linked to a false positive probability.
Conclusions: We find that the published 267-GHz ALMA data provide no statistical evidence for phosphine in the atmosphere of Venus.”
spurious 在 Goodbye HK, Hello UK Facebook 的最佳解答
Dominic Raab接招！
屬於Inter-Parliamentary Alliance on China（對華政策跨國議會聯盟）嘅英國別有用心政客代表，以Ian Ducan Smith為首嘅十幾個上下議院議院跨黨派聯名出信比外交大臣Dominic Raab，要求英國外交部向因為國安法被捕嘅BNO持有人提供外交同法律支援。
理由好簡單，既然英國因為國安法面對前境不明，都願意承諾將BNO持有人嘅身份改變，响英國定居嘅之後都會成為英國公民。咁道德同法理上，點解唔支援嗰啲已被捕人士？
“With the majority of BN(O) passport holders residing in Hong Kong, we face the unsettling prospect of British nationals being routinely arrested based on spurious and politically motivated charges. In light of our clear legal and moral obligations to Hong Kong, this is not something we can allow to happen without offering assistance which is within our power to give.”
最多仲有個幾月，內政大臣就公報BNO Visa嘅詳細申請方法，呢班「別有用心」响呢個時候比個咁深嘅外交、國籍加法理嘅問題比外交大臣（仲要推到見報），呢招點拆好呢？
Patreon詳細伸延解釋：
https://bit.ly/33OPzpV
#論武功俗世中不知邊個高
Photo Source：Inter-Parliamentary Alliance on China/The Times
報導：
《The Times》
Dominic Raab urged to extend legal protection for Hongkongers
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/dominic-raab-urged-to-extend-legal-protection-for-hongkongers-smfvb39hp