#文末有昨晚歌單

今天收到國外友人寄來這張限量單曲黑膠，才讓我想起來昨晚 #居家BTS派對房 暫別最終回應該要放一下這首的！

金屬天團 Metallica 的90年代經典同名專輯《Metallica (The Black Album)》發行屆滿30週年不但推出重發版本，還企劃了一張邀集50組音樂人參與的大陣仗合集《The Metallica Blacklist》。當中由法國指標electro音樂人 SebastiAn 把《Metallica (The Black Album)》專輯中兩首〈Don’t Tread On Me〉、〈Nothing Else Matters〉進行mashup合而為一的這首〈Don’t Tread on Else Matters〉，便會限量發行了這張單面12吋單曲黑膠！

所以今天也把當年兩大日牌Devilock跟Neighborhood翻完Metallica經典logo的單品、還有英國品牌KTZ翻玩不少經典金屬團logo的長褲找出來，做個全套的穿搭。

最後附上昨晚歌單如下：

1. UNKLE feat. Richard Ascroft/Lonely Soul
2. The Verve/Sonnet
3. Nulbarich/TOKYO
4. Steady & Co./春夏秋冬
5. Lauryn Hill/Doo Wop (That Thing)
6. Salt-N-Pepa/Shoop
7. Nujabes/Luv (Sic) (feat Shing02)
8. Digable Planets/Rebirth Of Slick (Cool Like Da
9. 蛋堡/關於小熊
10. UNKLE feat. Ian Brown/Be There
11. Janet Jackson/If(Extended Dance Mix)
12. Whitney Houston/Queen of the Night
13. Methods Of Mayhem/Get Naked
14. LMF/樂壇班霸
15. Primal Scream/Jailbird
16. Black Grape/Reverend Black Grape
17. Bill Medley & Jennifer Warnes/The Time Of My Life
18. Rip Slyme/樂園寶貝
19. The Cardigans/Carnival
20. Pavement/Cut Your Hair
21. Jesus Jones/International Bright Young Thing
22. East 17/House of Love (pedegree mix)
23. Marky Mark & The Funky Bunch featuring Loleatta Holloway/Good Vibrations
24. New Order/Bizarre Love Triangle (extended Dance Mix)
25. 米米 Club/君がいるだけで (Norihito Ogawa Disco Edit)
26. Lightning Seeds/Pure
27. Teenage Fanclub/Sparky's Dream
28. Rialto/Untouchable
29. Suede/Trash
30. Groove Armada/Superstylin
31. Roger Sanchez/Another Chance (Original Mix)
32. Blur/Girls & Boys
33. The Wands/世界が終わるまでは (TK450 Remix)
34. MAN WITH A MISSION/Remember Me

毋忘五大訴求　公民抗命有理
—10‧20九龍遊行陳情書
（案件編號：DCCC 535/2020）

——————————————————
「毋忘初衷，活在愛和真實之中」
撐阿銘，即訂閱Patreon：
patreon.com/raphaelwong
—————————————————

胡法官雅文閣下：

　　2012年，我第一次站在法庭上承認違反「公安惡法」，述說對普選的盼望，批評公安惡法不義，並因公民抗命的緣故，甘心樂意接受刑罰。當年我說，如果小圈子選舉沒有被廢除，惡法沒有消失，我依然會一如故我，公民抗命，並且我相信將會有更多學生和市民加入這個行列。想不到時至今日，普選仍然遙遙無期，我亦再次被帶到法庭接受審判，但只是短短７年，已經有數十萬計的群眾公民抗命，反對暴政。今日，我承認違反「未經批准的政府」所訂立「未經批准的惡法」之下的「未經批准集結」罪，我不打算尋求法庭的憐憫，但請容許我佔用法庭些微時間陳情，讓法庭在判刑前有全面考慮。

暴力之濫觴

　　在整個反修例運動如火如荼之際，我正承擔另一宗公民抗命案件的刑責。雖然身在獄中，但仍然心繫手足。我在獄中電視機前見證6月9日、6月16日及8月18日三次百萬港人大遊行，幾多熱愛和平的港人冒天雨冒彈雨走上街頭，抗議不義惡法，今日關於10月20日的案件，亦是如此。可能有人會問，政府已在6月暫緩修例，更在9月正式撤回修例，我等仍然繼續示威，豈非無理取鬧？我相信法官閣下肯定聽過「遲來的正義並非正義」（Justice delayed is justice denied）這句格言。當過百萬群眾走上街頭，和平表達不滿的時候，林鄭政府沒有理睬，反而獨行獨斷，粗暴踐踏港人的意願，結果製造出後來連綿不絕的爭拗，甚至你死我活的對抗。經歷眾多衝突痛苦之後，所謂暫緩撤回，已經微不足道，我們只是更加清楚：沒有民主，就連基本人權都不會擁有！

　　在本案之中，雖然我們都沒有鼓動或作出暴力行為，但根據早前8‧18及10‧1兩宗案件，相信在控方及法庭眼中，案發當日的暴力事件仍然可以算在我們頭上，如此，我有必要問：如果香港有一個公平正義的普及選舉，人民可以在立法會直接否決他們不認可的法律，試問2019年的暴力衝突可以從何而來呢？如果我們眼見的暴力是如此十惡不赦，那麼我們又如何看待百萬人遊行後仍然堅持推行惡法的制度暴力呢？如果我們不能接受人民暴力反抗，那麼我們是否更加不能對更巨大更壓逼的制度暴力沈默不言？真正且經常發生的暴力，是漠視人民訴求的暴力，是踐踏人民意見的暴力，是剝奪人民表達權利的暴力。真正憎恨暴力，痛恨暴力的人，不可能一方面指摘暴力反抗，又容忍制度暴力。如果我需要承擔和平遊行引發出來的暴力事件的刑責，那麼誰應該承擔施政失敗所引發出來的社會騷亂的罪責呢？

社會之病根

　　對於法庭而言，可能2019年所發生的事情只是一場社會騷亂，務必追究違法者個人責任。然而，治亂治其本源，醫病醫其病根，我雖然公民抗命，刻意違法，控方把我帶上法庭，但我卻不應被理解為一個「犯罪個體」。2019年所發生的事情，並不是我一個人或我們這幾位被告可以促成，社會問題的癥結不是「犯罪份子」本身，而是「犯罪原因」。我明白「治亂世用重典」的道理，但如果「殺雞儆猴」是解決方法，就不會在2016年發生旺角騷亂及2017年上訴庭對示威者施以重刑後，2019年仍然會爆發出更大規模的暴力反抗。

如果不希望社會動亂，就必須正本清源，逐步落實「五大訴求」，從根本上改革，挽回民心。2019年反修例運動，其實只是2014年雨傘運動的延續而已，縱使法庭可能認為兩個運動皆是「一股歪風」所引起，但我必須澄清，兩個運動的核心就是追求民主普選，人民當家作主。在2019年11月24日區議會選舉這個最類近全民普選的選舉中，接近300萬人投票，民主派大勝，奪得17個區議會主導權，這就是整個反修例運動的民意，民意就是反對政府決策，反對制度暴力，反對推行惡法，不容爭辯，不辯自明。我們作為礦場裡的金絲雀，多次提醒政府撤回修法，並從根本上改革制度，而在10月20日的九龍遊行當然是反映民意的平台契機。如今，法庭對我們施加重刑，其實只不過是懲罰民意，將金絲雀困在鳥籠之內，甚至扼殺於鼓掌之中，窒礙表達自由。

堅持之重要

　　大運動過後的大鎮壓，使我們失去《蘋果日報》，失去教協，失去民陣，不少民主派領袖以及曾為運動付出的手足戰友都囚於獄中，不少曾經熱情投入運動的朋友亦因《國安法》的威脅轉為低調，新聞自由示威自由日漸萎縮，公民社會受到沈重打擊，我亦失去不少摯友，有感傷孤獨的時候，但我仍然相信，2019年香港人的信念，以及所展現人類的光輝持久未變。我不會忘記百萬人民冒雨捱熱抗拒暴政，抵制惡法，展現我們眾志成城；我不會忘記人潮紅海，讓道救護車，展現我們文明精神；我不會忘記年青志士直接行動反對苛政，捨身成仁，展現我們膽色勇氣；我不會忘記銀髮一族走上街頭保護年青人，展現我們彼此關懷；我不會忘記「五大訴求」，不會忘記2019年區議會選舉，展現我們有理有節。

　　法官閣下，我對於當日的所作所為，不感羞恥，毫無悔意。我能夠在出獄後與群眾同行一路，與戰友同繫一獄，實是莫大榮幸。若法治失去民主基石，將使法庭無奈地接受專制政權所訂立解釋的法律限制，隨時變成政治工具掃除異見，因此爭取民主普選，建設真正法治，追求公平正義，仍然是我的理想。在這條路上，如有必要，我仍然會公民抗命，正如終審法院海外非常任法官賀輔明（Lord Hoffmann）所言，發自良知的公民抗命有悠久及光榮的傳統，歷史將證明我們是正確的。我期望，曾與我一起遊行抗命的手足戰友要堅持信念，在艱難歲月裡毋忘初衷，活在愛和真實之中。

　　最後，如9年前一樣，我想借用美國民權領袖馬丁路德金牧師的一番話對我們的反對者說：「我們將以自己忍受苦難的能力，來較量你們製造苦難的能力。我們將用我們靈魂的力量，來抵禦你們物質的暴力。對我們做你們想做的事吧，我們仍然愛你們。我們不能憑良心服從你們不公正的法律，因為拒惡與為善一樣是道德責任。將我們送入監獄吧，我們仍然愛你們。」（We shall match your capacity to inflict suffering by our capacity to endure suffering. We shall meet your physical force with soul force. Do to us what you will, and we shall continue to love you. We cannot in all good conscience obey your unjust laws because noncooperation with evil is as much a moral obligation as is cooperation with good. Throw us in jail and we shall still love you.）

　　願慈愛的主耶穌賜我們平安，與我和我一家同在，與法官閣下同在，與香港人同在。沒有暴徒，只有暴政；五大訴求，缺一不可！願榮耀歸上帝，榮光歸人民！

第五被告
黃浩銘
二零二一年八月十九日

Lest we forget the five demands: civil disobedience is morally justified
- Statement on 10‧20 Kowloon Rally
(Case No.: DCCC 535/2020)

Your Honour Judge Woodcock

In 2012, I stood before the court and admitted to violating the "Public Security Evil Law". I expressed my hope for universal suffrage, criticized the evil law as unjust, and willingly accepted the penalty for civil disobedience. Back then, I said that if the small-circle election had not been abolished and the draconian law had not disappeared, I would still be as determined as I was, and I believe that more students and citizens would join this movement. Today, universal suffrage is still a long way off, and I have been brought before the court again for trial. But in just seven years, hundreds of thousands of people have already risen up in civil disobedience against tyranny. Today, I plead guilty to "unauthorised assembly" under an unapproved evil law enacted by an unauthorised government. I do not intend to seek the court's mercy, but please allow me to take up a little time in court to present my case so that the court can consider all aspects before sentencing me.

The roots of violence

At the time when the whole anti-extradition law movement was in full-swing, I was taking responsibility for another civil disobedience case. Although I was in prison, my heart was still with the people. I witnessed the three million-person rallies on 9 June, 16 June and 18 August on television in prison, when many peace-loving people took to the streets despite the rain and bullets, to protest against unjust laws. Some people may ask, "The Government has already suspended the legislative amendments in June and formally withdrew the bill in September, but we are still demonstrating, are we not being unreasonable?" I am sure your Honour has heard of the adage "Justice delayed is justice denied". When more than a million people took to the streets to express their discontent peacefully, the Lam administration ignored them and instead acted arbitrarily, brutally trampling on the wishes of the people of Hong Kong, resulting in endless arguments and even confrontations. After so many conflicts and painful experiences, the so-called moratorium is no longer meaningful. We only know better: without democracy, we cannot even have basic human rights!

In this case, although we did not instigate or commit acts of violence, I believe that in the eyes of the prosecution and the court, the violence on the day of the incident can still be counted against us, based on the August 18 and October 1 case. And now I must ask - If Hong Kong had a fair and just universal election, and the public could directly veto laws they did not approve of at the Legislative Council, then how could the violent clashes of 2019 have come about? If the violence we see is so heinous, how do we feel about the institutional violence that insists on the imposition of draconian laws even after millions of people have taken to the streets? If we cannot accept violent rebellion, how can we remain silent in the face of even greater and more oppressive institutional violence? The true and frequent violence is the kind of violence that ignores people's demands, that tramples on their opinions, that deprives them of their right to express themselves. People who truly hate violence and abhor it cannot accuse violent resistance on the one hand and tolerate institutional violence on the other. If I have to bear the criminal responsibility for the violence caused by the peaceful demonstration, then who should bear the criminal responsibility for the social unrest caused by failed administration?

The roots of society's problems

From a court's point of view, it may be that what happened in 2019 was just a series of social unrest, and that those who broke the law must be held personally accountable. What happened in 2019 was not something that I alone or the defendants could have made possible, and the crux of the social problem was not the 'criminals' but the 'causes of crime'. I understand the concept of " applying severe punishment to a troubled world", but if "decimation" was really the solution, there would not have been more violent rebellions in 2019 after the Mongkok "riot" in 2016 and the heavy sentences handed down to protesters by the Court of Appeal in 2017.

If we do not want social unrest, we must get to the root of the problem and implement the "five demands" step by step, so as to achieve fundamental reforms and win back the hearts of the people. 2019's anti-revision movement is indeed a continuation of 2014's Umbrella Movement, and even though the court may think that both movements are caused by a "perverse wind", I must clarify that the core of both movements is the pursuit of democracy and universal suffrage, and the people being the masters of their own house. In the District Council election on 24 November 2019, which is the closest thing to universal suffrage, nearly 3 million people voted, and the democratic camp won a huge victory, winning majority in 17 District Councils. As canaries in the monetary coal mine, we have repeatedly reminded the government to withdraw the extradition bill and fundamentally reform the system, and the march in Kowloon on 20 October was certainly an opportunity to reflect public opinion. Now, by imposing heavy penalties on us, the court is only punishing public opinion, trapping the canaries in a birdcage, or even stifling them in the palm of their hands, suffocating the freedom of expression.

The importance of persistence

As a result of the crackdown after the mass movement, we lost Apple Daily, the Hong Kong Professional Teachers' Union, and the Civil Human Rights Front. Many of our democratic leaders and comrades who had contributed to the movement were imprisoned, and many of our friends who had been passionately involved in the movement had been forced to lay low under the threat of the National Security Law. I still believe that the faith of Hong Kong people and the glory of humanity seen in 2019 will remain unchanged. I will never forget the millions of people who braved the rain and the heat to resist tyranny and evil laws, demonstrating our unity of purpose; I will never forget the crowds of people who gave way to ambulances, demonstrating our civility; I will never forget the young people who sacrificed their lives, demonstrating our courage and bravery; I will never forget the silver-haired who took to the streets to protect the youth, demonstrating our care for each other; I will never forget the "five demands" and the 2019 District Council election, demonstrating our rationality and decency.

Your Honour, I have nothing to be ashamed of and no remorse for what I did on that day. It is my great honour to be in prison with my comrades and to be able to walk with the public after my release. If the rule of law were to lose its democratic foundation, the courts would have no choice but to accept the legal restrictions set by the autocratic regime and become a political tool to eliminate dissent at any time. As Lord Hoffmann, a non-permanent overseas judge of the Court of Final Appeal, said, civil disobedience from the conscience has a long and honourable tradition, and history will prove us right. I hope that my comrades in arms who walked with me in protests will keep their faith and live in love and truth in the midst of this difficult time.

Finally, as I did nine years ago, I would like to say something to those who oppose us, borrowing the words of American civil rights leader Reverend Martin Luther King: "We shall match your capacity to inflict suffering by our capacity to endure suffering. We shall meet your physical force with soul force. Do to us what you will, and we shall continue to love you. We cannot in all good conscience obey your unjust laws because noncooperation with evil is as much a moral obligation as is cooperation with good. Throw us in jail and we shall still love you."

Peace be with me and my family, with Your Honour, and with the people of Hong Kong. There are no thugs, only tyranny; five demands, not one less! To god be the glory and to people be the glory!

The Fifth Defendant
Wong Ho Ming
19 August 2021

【跳水耽誤了Tom Daley的編織設計大業？！】😄

英國跳水王子Tom Daley魅力從跳水台延伸到...編織！這幾天除了關心各項比賽，你也被Tom Daley在游泳賽事場館觀眾席上，趁著幫隊友加油空檔，專心織毛衣的樣子萌到嗎？！

Tom Daley已經為自己的金牌織了一個專屬的收藏袋，他把握時間趕工的Olympic Cardigan也已經完成！Tom Daley表示編織是能夠讓他紓壓、獲得平靜的休閒活動，也為這個嗜好開了專屬IG帳號 @madewithlovebytomdaley，記錄為自己與家人朋友編織各種樣式、圖案的針織服裝。

不只服裝，在他的編織IG帳號中，還可以看見年初（2021年）超紅迷因人物美國參議員桑德斯的編織娃娃作品，真的不禁讚嘆，在精實的運動員訓練外，Tom Daley還能將「休閒活動」發揮得這麼淋漓盡致！

大家可能多少也都有編織的經驗？小編的編織路僅只於用釘板輔助織出沒有圖案的圍巾😆 可以說是Tom Daley的第二專長的「編織」，出現在很早很早以前～

📖以下文字節錄自商周出版《立體剪裁全書》一書：
史上最早的針織物出自埃及人之手，雖說他們的針織風格其實比較接近魚網的織法，而不是我們今日所熟知的針織物。這種以珠串裝飾的魚網結構女裝穿起來像是亞麻製的類緊身連衣裙，會創造出凹凸有致的輪廓。

運用兩根棒針編織、製造布料的技術最早可能出現於公元一〇〇〇年前後。在這之前，類似結構織品的製造，使用的是單針。相關的證據散見於中世紀繪畫與倖存的十六、七世紀服裝，包括短外套、無邊帽和手套。

針織的機械化始於威廉‧李牧師（Reverend William Lee）在一五八九年發明了手搖織襪機。後繼機型的改良全都是以這台機器為基礎，直到十九世紀中期的工業革命方休。彼時，紡織業的角色舉足輕重。

第一位讓針織服裝真正普及、成為女性日常衣著的設計師，是革命性時尚偶像可可‧香奈兒。香奈兒在職業生涯早期就時常向其生活周遭的男人借來服裝，用它們展開設計工作。據說她實驗的第一批服裝當中，有一件是某個年輕馬夫隨手脫下的馬球衫（polo shirt）。她將它裁開，改製成適合自己穿的尺寸。

二次大戰後布料短缺極為嚴重，香奈兒獨具的匠心對她的事業大有幫助。她精心製作針織服裝，讓原本多用於內衣褲的針織物化身為摩登舒適的上衣、裙裝和短外套，這些服裝往往帶有鮮豔的條紋和印花。

在二十世紀下半葉，紗線和針織技術的進步，讓我們從那些老舊的馬球衫推進到可運用在襪子褲襪、泳衣泳帽、塑身瘦身衣物上的最先進布料，它們甚至具有吸濕排汗和調節體溫等令人驚豔的特性。

照片來源：Tom Daley部分- IG帳號 @madewithlovebytomdaley

#BeautiMode #編織 #TomDaley

同性婚が認められたニュージーランドの議会でウィリアムソン議員が行った大絶賛されたスピーチに日本語字幕をつけました。相手の不安をわかりやすい表現で取り除き感動の嵐を呼んだ伝説のスピーチです。性教育には人権教育も含まれます。自分と「違う」ことは決して恐れることではありませんね。


頑張って和訳してみましたけど、ちょっとヘンテコな表現があるかもしれないです。大目にみてくれーー！🙇‍♂️



英語全文

I've had a reverend in my local electorate say that the 'gay onslaught will start the day this bill is passed.'

So we are struggling to know what the gay onslaught will look like. We don't know if it will come down the Pakaranga highway as a series of troops or whether it will be a gas that flows the electorate and blocks us all in.

I also had a Catholic priest tell me that I was supporting an unnatural act.

I found that interesting coming from someone who has taken an oath of celibacy for his whole life. Celibacy... I haven't done it so I don't know what it's about.

I also had a leader tell me I would burn in the fires of hell for eternity and that was a bad mistake because I've got a degree in physics. I used the thermodynamic laws of physics.

I put in my body weight and my humidity and so on. I assumed the furnace to be at 5000 degrees and I will last for just on 2.1 seconds. It's hardly eternity. What do you think?

I also head some more disgusting claims about adoption. Well, I have got three fantastic adopted kids. I know how good adoption is, and I have found some of the claims just disgraceful.

I found some of the bullying tactics really evil. I gave up being scared of bullies when I was at primary school.

However, a huge amount of the opposition was from moderates, from people who were concerned, who were seriously worried, about what this bill might do to the fabric of our society.

I respect their concern. I respect their worry. They were worried about what it might do to their families and so on.

Let me repeat to them now that all we are doing with this bill is allowing two people who love each other to have that love recognised by way of marriage.

That is all we are doing. We are not declaring nuclear war on a foreign State. We are not bringing a virus in that could wipe out our agricultural sector forever.

We are allowing two people who love each other to have that recognised, and I cannot see what is wrong with that for neither love nor money.

I just cannot. I cannot understand why someone would be opposed. I understand why people do not like what it is that others do. That is fine. We are all in that category.
But

I give a promise to those people who are opposed to this bill right now. I give you a watertight guaranteed promise.
The sun will still rise tomorrow. Your teenage daughter will still argue back to you as if she knows everything.

Your mortgage will not grow. You will not have skin diseases or rashes or toads in your bed.

The world will just carry on.

So do not make this into a big deal.

This bill is fantastic for the people it affects, but for the rest of us, life will go on.

Finally, can I say that one of the messages I had was this bill was the cause of our drought.

Well, if any one you follow my Twitter account, you will see that in the Pakuranga electorate this morning, it was pouring with rain.

We had the most enormous big gay rainbow across my electorate. It has to be a sign. If you are a believer, it is certainly a sign.

Can I finish, for all those who are concerned about this, with a quote from the bible.

It is Deuteronomy. I thought Deuteronomy was a cat out of the musical 'Cats,' but never mind.

The quote is Deuteronomy 1:29.

'Be ye not afraid.'"

=======================================

チャンネル登録よろしくお願いします
http://www.youtube.com/channel/UCz09dV4Dn5BkoXzCryignDQ?sub_confirmation=1

=======================================
【SNS】

◆Instagram◆
https://www.instagram.com/mrgayjapanshogo/

◆Twitter◆
https://twitter.com/mrgayjapanshogo

看起來讓人超級期待的《沙丘》，有新一代大導演丹尼維勒納夫配上一大堆的超級大明星，絕對是2020年底的科幻大作。改編自法蘭克赫伯特(Frank Herbert)1965年同名科幻小說，揉合了宮廷鬥爭、商業陰謀、宗教預言、動作戰爭以及生態學的科幻經典。

羅比頻道訂閱者募集中👉 http://goo.gl/4YzOjF
我的IG帳號👉 robbie_ins

#沙丘 #dune #沙丘魔堡 #甜茶

近期影片：
《真實》影評 The Truth 【羅比】真實芳言/港譯 La vérité
https://youtu.be/-1l0dbJoRq0
十大練習社交距離電影 【電影專題】Top 10 Social Distancing Movies
https://youtu.be/o3zyJMUZ7cc
音速小子 影評 Sonic the Hedgehog 【羅比】 超音鼠大電影/港譯
https://youtu.be/FVfZXQIrRqs

導演：
丹尼維勒納夫 Denis Villeneuve
原著：
Frank Herbert
演員：
傑森摩莫亞 Jason Momoa 　............Duncan Idaho
蕾貝卡弗格森 Rebecca Ferguson 　............Lady Jessica
辛蒂亞 Zendaya 　............Chani (rumored)
提摩西夏勒梅 Timothee Chalamet 　............Paul Atreides
喬許布洛林 Josh Brolin 　............Gurney Halleck
奧斯卡伊薩克 Oscar Isaac 　............Duke Leto Atreides
哈維爾巴登 Javier Bardem 　............Stilgar
戴夫巴蒂斯塔 Dave Bautista 　............Glossu 'Beast' Rabban
史戴倫史柯斯嘉 Stellan Skarsgard 　............Baron Harkonnen
夏綠蒂蘭普琳 Charlotte Rampling 　............Reverend Mother Mohiam
David Dastmalchian 　............Piter De Vries
張震 Chen Chang 　............Dr. Yueh

On Taiwan Hashtag hosted by Ross Feingold, we discuss the release from
prison in Hong Kong of Chan Tong-kai 陳同佳, wanted in Taiwan for the
murder of Poon Hui-wing 潘曉穎. The now withdrawn Extradition Bill in Hong
Kong was originally proposed by the Hong Kong government to extradite
Chan to Taiwan in the absence of a bilateral extradition agreement.
Despite Chan’s apparent willingness to return to Taiwan, Hong Kong’s
government has rejected the conditions demanded by Taiwan’s government
which include the exchange of Chan’s testimony and other evidence that
Hong Kong police and prosecutors may have obtained from Chan. Taiwan has
also required that Chan and Reverend Peter Koon Ho-ming, who is willing
to accompany Chan to Taiwan, present themselves at Taiwan’s
representative office in Hong Kong for a visa interview, to confirm
Chan’s identity and due to Koon’s status as a Chinese People’s Political
Consultative Conference representative. Taiwan government statements
continue to evolve on whether Hong Kong has jurisdiction over Chan for
the murder charge. Unnecessary conditions by Taiwan? Unnecessary
politicization of the matter? Unnecessary delay of justice? Watch our
show for latest analysis.

✓ 快來加入《Taiwan Hashtag》Twitter（ID：@TaiwanHashtag）
✓ 點我加入《風傳媒》Line 好友（ID：@dyp8323m）　http://bit.ly/2hETgWE
✓ 點我訂閱《風傳媒》YouTube 頻道　http://bit.ly/2grkAJ6
✓ 點我追蹤《下班經濟學》IG頻道（ID：@worked_money） https://bit.ly/2WZ1Dnb

【Facebook粉絲團】
風傳媒►► https://www.facebook.com/stormmedia
風生活►► https://www.facebook.com/SMediaLife
下班經濟學►►https://www.facebook.com/workedmoney