熱門Ptt文章

[爆卦]Haphazard是什麼？優點缺點精華區懶人包

雖然這篇Haphazard鄉民發文沒有被收入到精華區：在Haphazard這個話題中，我們另外找到其它相關的精選爆讚文章

在 haphazard產品中有19篇Facebook貼文，粉絲數超過3萬的網紅AppWorks，也在其Facebook貼文中提到， 【Lesson #7 - Zoom in, zoom out】 For the last post in this mini-series of "7 lessons from 7 early-stage founders" I spoke with Jackson Aw, the founder ...

　同時也有3部Youtube影片，追蹤數超過11萬的網紅sowhan Q，也在其Youtube影片中提到，--加入: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC7iIGOn477JNYG7WcNDmStw/join --粉專: https://www.facebook.com/Sowhaner/ --實況: https://www.twitch.tv/sowhan/ --IG...

「haphazard」的推薦目錄
  • AppWorks

    haphazard 在 AppWorks Facebook 的最佳貼文

    2020-12-30 14:27:41
    有 7 人按讚

    【Lesson #7 - Zoom in, zoom out】
    For the last post in this mini-series of "7 lessons from 7 early-stage founders" I spoke with Jackson Aw, the founder & CEO of Mighty Jaxx (AW#20), the region's leading platform to purchase limited edition collectibles. With over 8 years of experience as an entrepreneur, Jackson touches upon the danger of short-term thinking, especially when it comes to decision making, while highlighting the importance for founders to both "zoom-in and zoom-out."

    ***

    As founders, we often speak of vision and long-term thinking, but seldom put it into practice. With the amount of years that I’ve spent in entrepreneurship, I’ve come to learn that every single decision you make eventually comes back around.

    Establishing distribution and finding channels to expand our products’ reach has been my core focus at Mighty Jaxx. A few years ago, I was looking to expand our company into Country X (anonymized for sensitivity purposes) in response to increasing inbound interest. Given the nature of the market, we needed to find a local partner but unfortunately none of the big fish wanted to work with us. Desperate for any way possible to get our foot in the door, I settled with the first partner that responded to our proposition.

    The deal was inked immediately, closing in just a few days with haphazard terms that recently came back to bite us in the butt. With 65% of our sales now coming from Country X, we far outgrew the original partnership and our partner was no longer suitable to handle our future growth. Unfortunately, the terms of the deal didn’t allow for any clean way to get out of the arrangement and we quickly found ourselves stuck between a rock and a hard place.

    Ultimately, money was used to resolve the issue. Looking back, I would have structured the deal more carefully, thinking at least 3 steps ahead and projecting multiple scenarios, particularly ones with more upside and optimism. But as a founder you tend to get caught up with the day to day fights, losing track of the bigger picture.

    How I approach decision making is worlds apart now. Anytime we’re doing new distribution deals, we’ll have 3 - 4 sessions with the C-level, collecting information from each department to provide a 360 of the company, sometimes taking upwards of 4 months. But, of course, execution speed is an important consideration for startups; that’s where Colin Powell’s principal comes in handy: pull the trigger on a decision when you have anywhere between 40% to 70% of the information available—nothing more, nothing less.

    Calling all founders targeting SEA, AI/IoT, or Blockchain/Defi, applications for AW#22 are open till January 4 -> https://bit.ly/3hrPQFE

  • 葉向嶼。小嶼

    haphazard 在 葉向嶼。小嶼 Facebook 的精選貼文

    2020-07-31 16:50:39
    有 252 人按讚

    「haphazard因不可預期，塑造了新意外，結果框架消失了」。
    -
    好喜歡這個創作主題，來自W+聯名000001 合作X 3D動畫藝術家 @dorairolg 黃海恩。
    人類喜歡依附著自定的框架活著，活成別人心目中的樣子、侷限自己，其實我們不需要標籤自己，拋開框架的世界如此寬廣，無限可能。

    Thanks WIND Salon
    hairstylist / Jarvis Lin

    orairolg 展期/2020.7.21-8.13
    開放時間/11:00-19:30
    地點/W+/​台北市忠孝東路三段217巷1弄15號 展場視覺設計 /loop_chenlung
    展場燈光 /燈光雜貨

    3D藝術家 3DArtist:Gloria Woñg
    主視覺動畫設計Animation:Design:Gloria Woñg/Loop chenlung
    策展團隊Curation team:Loop che

  • 堅離地城：沈旭暉國際生活台 Simon's Glos World

    haphazard 在 堅離地城：沈旭暉國際生活台 Simon's Glos World Facebook 的最佳解答

    2020-04-11 10:15:54
    有 2,363 人按讚

    【#譚德塞不能說的秘密】《華爾街日報》4月5日社論，講述台灣早在2019年12月31日已經通知世衛，台灣有證據相信武漢肺炎病毒是人傳人，但世衛高層卻選擇只發佈中國提供的消息(「沒有證據是人傳人」），最後證明是fake news。

    YouTube: 譚德塞被台灣死亡恐嚇？
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BxHbQmvD0L8

    World Health Coronavirus Disinformation
    By The Editorial Board, Wall Street Journal
    April 5, 2020 5:28 pm ET

    //The coronavirus pandemic will offer many lessons in what to do better to save more lives and do less economic harm the next time. But there's already one way to ensure future pandemics are less deadly: Reform or defund the World Health Organization (WHO).

    Last week Florida Senator Rick Scott called for a Congressional investigation into the United Nations agency's "role in helping Communist China cover up information regarding the threat of the Coronavirus." The rot at WHO goes beyond canoodling with Beijing, but that's a good place to start.

    The coronavirus outbreak began in Wuhan, China, sometime in the autumn, perhaps as early as November. It accelerated in December. Caixin Global reported that Chinese labs had sequenced the coronavirus genome by the end of December but were ordered by Chinese officials to destroy samples and not publish their findings. On Dec. 30 Dr. Li Wenliang warned Chinese doctors about the virus, and several days later local authorities accused him of lies that "severely disturbed the social order."

    Taiwanese officials warned WHO on Dec. 31 that they had seen evidence that the virus could be transmitted human-to-human. But the agency, bowing to Beijing, doesn't have a normal relationship with Taiwan. On Jan. 14 WHO tweeted, "Preliminary investigations conducted by the Chinese authorities have found no clear evidence of human-to-human transmission." The agency took another week to reverse that misinformation.

    On Jan. 22-23 a WHO emergency committee debated whether to declare Covid-19 a "public health emergency of international concern." The virus already had spread to several countries, and making such a declaration would have better prepared the world. It should have been an easy decision, despite Beijing's objections. Yet director-general Tedros Ghebreyesus declined and instead traveled to China.
    He finally made the declaration on Jan. 30—losing a week of precious time—and his rhetoric suggests the trip to Beijing was more about politics than public health. "The Chinese government is to be congratulated for the extraordinary measures it has taken," he said. "I left in absolutely no doubt about China's commitment to transparency."

    A University of Southampton study suggests the number of coronavirus cases could have been reduced by 95% had China moved to contain the virus three weeks sooner. Yet Dr. Tedros gushed that Beijing had set "a new standard for outbreak response." He also praised the speed with which China "sequenced the genome and shared it with WHO and the world." China didn't do so until Jan. 12.

    On Jan. 30 Dr. Tedros also said that "WHO doesn't recommend limiting trade and movement." President Trump ignored the advice and announced travel restrictions on China the following day, slowing the spread of the virus. U.S. progressive elites echoed WHO and criticized Mr. Trump. WHO didn't declare the coronavirus a pandemic until March 11.

    Not that any of this has prompted much soul-searching. Alluding to China, WHO official Michael Ryan said last week, "We need to be very careful also to not to be profiling certain parts of the world as being uncooperative." Beijing touted the remarks, as it has other WHO statements.
    ***

    This record is tragic but not surprising. Much of the blame for WHO's failures lies with Dr. Tedros, who is a politician, not a medical doctor. As a member of the left-wing Tigray People's Liberation Front, he rose through Ethiopia's autocratic government as health and foreign minister. After taking the director-general job in 2017, he tried to install Zimbabwe dictator Robert Mugabe as a WHO goodwill ambassador.
    China inevitably gains more international clout as its economy grows. But why does WHO seem so much more afraid of Beijing's ire than Washington's? Only 12% of WHO's assessed member-state contributions come from China. The U.S. contributes 22%. Americans at WHO generally are loyal to the institution, while Chinese appointees put Chinese interests first or they will suffer Beijing's wrath.
    China's influence over WHO has been organized and consistent, whereas the U.S. response has been haphazard. Washington needs a quarterback to lead the fight against Chinese dominance at WHO and other international organizations. Yet the State Department's Bureau of International Organization Affairs lacks a political appointee.
    The U.S. will have allies in an effort to reform WHO. A frustrated Japanese deputy prime minister called WHO the "Chinese Health Organization." British Prime Minister Boris Johnson reportedly is rethinking U.K.-China ties over China's lack of candor about the virus.

    ***
    Congress should investigate how WHO performed against the coronavirus and whether its judgments were corrupted by China's political influence. Of all international institutions, WHO should be the least political. Its core mission is to coordinate international efforts against epidemics and provide honest public-health guidance.

    If WHO is merely a politicized Maginot Line against pandemics, then it is worse than useless and should receive no more U.S. funding. And if foreign-policy elites want to know why so many Americans mistrust international institutions, WHO is it.//

你可能也想看看

搜尋相關網站