雖然這篇Fallacies meaning鄉民發文沒有被收入到精華區：在Fallacies meaning這個話題中，我們另外找到其它相關的精選爆讚文章
在 fallacies產品中有22篇Facebook貼文，粉絲數超過23萬的網紅綠角財經筆記，也在其Facebook貼文中提到， 本文回顧2021九月綠角財經筆記的狀況。 2021九月，部落格最熱門的十篇文章分別是: 1. 綠角財經筆記總目錄 2. 台灣ETF完整列表與費用總整理(List of All ETFs in Taiwan，2021) 3. 《搞懂內分泌，練成你的易瘦體質》讀後感---真正直接而有效的減肥方法...
同時也有1部Youtube影片，追蹤數超過143的網紅Alfred Bleu，也在其Youtube影片中提到，「10個你和敵人一定都犯過的邏輯謬誤」 1. Sunk cost (沉沒成本) 2. Appeal to tradition (訴諸傳統) 3. Two wrongs make a right (積非成是) 4. Hasty generalization (輕率概化) 5. Ad hominem (...
「fallacies」的推薦目錄
fallacies 在 LeedsMayi Instagram 的最佳貼文
2021-09-24 09:18:55
今天來聊一下，什麼是 fallacy。 根據劍橋字典上的解釋，fallacy的意思是 an idea that a lot of people think is true but is in fact false。 Fallacies 的世界是多彩多姿的，不只有 formal fallacies...
fallacies 在 Ungku Ismail Aziz Instagram 的最讚貼文
2020-05-03 10:24:12
#NotaKepadaAku Please, janganlah bergaduh gaduh. Let's be better. Forgiving, forgetful of people's flaws and fallacies. Marilah berdoa, agar fasa ke...
fallacies 在 L e o n Instagram 的精選貼文
2020-04-28 11:47:45
🎄Gracious enough in teaching me to humble myself, come to His presence & learn from Him by seeing thru my theological fallacies into the Truth of His ...
-
fallacies 在 Alfred Bleu Youtube 的最讚貼文
2019-04-01 21:42:41「10個你和敵人一定都犯過的邏輯謬誤」
1. Sunk cost (沉沒成本)
2. Appeal to tradition (訴諸傳統)
3. Two wrongs make a right (積非成是)
4. Hasty generalization (輕率概化)
5. Ad hominem (訴諸 人身)
6. Strawman (稻草人論證)
7. False alternative (假兩難推理)
8. Questionable cause (因果謬誤)
9. Texas sharpshooter (德州神槍手謬誤)
10. Goal post moving (目標搬移)![post-title]()
fallacies 在 綠角財經筆記 Facebook 的最佳解答
本文回顧2021九月綠角財經筆記的狀況。
2021九月，部落格最熱門的十篇文章分別是:
1. 綠角財經筆記總目錄
2. 台灣ETF完整列表與費用總整理(List of All ETFs in Taiwan，2021)
3. 《搞懂內分泌，練成你的易瘦體質》讀後感---真正直接而有效的減肥方法
4. 綠角開課計畫(Greenhorn’s Investment Class)
5. 美國為何如此在意匯率操縱國(Currency Intervention)
6. 台灣ETF業者近年新標的發展方向(Niche Funds or Solution Funds?)
7. 《謬誤與真相》(Economic Facts and Fallacies)讀後感2---窮國就是需要援助?
8. 《懂語感，無痛學好任一種外語》讀後感---學習外語的正確方式與明確地圖
9. 公債與公司債殖利率現況分析—2021年九月(Treasury and Corporate Yield Curve)
10. 《當代財經大師的守錢致富課》(The Little Book of Safe Money) 綠角推薦序—自以為安全不等於真正的安全
九月發表的兩篇非財經書籍讀後感，《搞懂內分泌，練成你的易瘦體質》讀後感---真正直接而有效的減肥方法與《懂語感，無痛學好任一種外語》讀後感---學習外語的正確方式與明確地圖都成為前十大熱門文章。
這兩本書有兩個共通點，第一，都是實用主題。前者講體態控制，後者講外語學習。都是現代人很需要的技能。第二，它們講的都是正確與有效的方法。前者講述體重控制的真正有效作法。後者講學習外文的正確方向。
我自己很高興可以看到這兩本好書。
討論台灣ETF業界發展狀況的台灣ETF業者近年新標的發展方向也成為前十大熱門文章。國內業者在核心資產類別的ETF的追蹤能力都還有很大改善空間時，就把精力跟資源放在推出一支又一支的熱門主題ETF，恐非良好的發展方向。
九月財經新書的推薦序，《當代財經大師的守錢致富課》(The Little Book of Safe Money) 綠角推薦序—自以為安全不等於真正的安全，也成為前十大熱門文章。
fallacies 在 Apple Daily - English Edition Facebook 的最佳貼文
#Opinion by Alan Au Ka-lun 區家麟｜"John Lee lashed out at fake news and claimed that “the truth has been covered up by fallacies”. But who is going to head a “ministry of truth” in Hong Kong that decides what is right and what is false? Is it going to be Lee and Tang, or all the patriots at the Committee for Safeguarding National Security? Or will a truth review committee be created to demonstrate justice? Or is it going to be the mouthpiece of the Chinese Communist Party that will judge what is true?"
Read more: https://bit.ly/32I21rA
"保安局長李家超批評「假新聞」，又批評「真理被歪理掩蓋」。在香港，將會由誰來擔當裁斷真假的「真理部」？是李家超、鄧炳強？還是國安委全體愛國者？又或是成立一個「真相審查委員會」以示公正？還是由黨的喉舌界定真理？"
____________
📱Download the app:
http://onelink.to/appledailyapp
📰 Latest news:
http://appledaily.com/engnews/
🐤 Follow us on Twitter:
https://twitter.com/appledaily_hk
💪🏻 Subscribe and show your support:
https://bit.ly/2ZYKpHP
#AppleDailyENG
fallacies 在 李怡 Facebook 的精選貼文
See No Elephant, Only Conspiracies (Lee Yee)
Yesterday, Legislative Council (LegCo) member Eddie Chu Hoi-dick posted on his Facebook page that he originally shared my idea before changing his mind to support the primary election and eventually participated in it. His response was that the primary election is essential regardless of whether there will be a large-scale disqualification of candidates. He further said that the best defense against disqualification is not to fear it. One of the reasons for his continual support of the primary election, he continued, is to use it to establish a consensus of opposition that fundamentally opposes the National Security Law (NSL).
If that is the plan, then the NSL must be the main topic of discussion in the primary election forum. According to Tanya Chan, convener of the pan-democratic camp, different political parties can only respond either by support or objection to the NSL under the shadow of possible disqualification. Therefore, the forum topic must revolve around whether to oppose the NSL. However, should a candidate disapprove of the NSL if it is almost certain to guarantee disqualification? If the candidate is successfully elected into the Legislative Council, under the threat of the NSL, should the candidate or its party succumb to the NSL irrespective of the rights of Hongkongers or stand up to it? Only if the primary election focuses primarily on this topic, then it will be possible to fulfill Chu’s wish: to use the primary election to build a consensus of opposition that fundamentally opposes the NSL.
Having watched two primary election debates, the topic of NSL was only gently touched upon. In fact, many candidates did not mention sensitive topics that could lead to disqualification and put them in a dilemma. Most of them mentioned how they would unite and strive to win more than 35 seats which would put them in the majority, whether parliamentary resistance will be integrated with the fights on the street, whether they would oppose next year’s budget to force the Chief Executive to step down. There are also candidates who attacked the track records of the Democratic Party and the Hong Kong Association for Democracy and People's Livelihood (ADPL). The atmosphere of the forums did not bring about a sense of urgency on the NSL’s impending threat to our freedom and security, and its imminent destruction of “One Country, Two System.” The intention to initiate a consensus of opposition against NSL seems buoyant.
At the pan-democratic primary election forum, the NSL was like an elephant in the room, so obvious but unseen by the candidates. The NSL descends upon us, yet the LegCo primary election was unaffected and indifferent as though Hong Kong is just running a peaceful election where everyone fights for a seat in the LegCo and as though those who successfully win the primary election would be guaranteed a seat. Pro-democrats did not see the elephant in the room but they saw the whimsical conspiracies of other candidates.
Before Yuen Gongyi went to the United States to lobby for the rights and interests of Hongkongers, he posted on YouTube and unexpectedly gained mass popularity. He speaks bluntly, and his goals and all action plans are disclosed candidly online. Many netizens find his messages agreeable and admire him for standing up and taking action for Hongkongers. I rather think Yuen is quite a naive optimist, nevertheless I do agree with his fundamental ideologies. He previously criticized a pan-democrat which set off a conspiracy theory attack upon him within the pan-democrat discussion circle. They merely wondered from where he suddenly emerged and, like all conspiracy theories in the past, this was also based on no evidence. It got even more peculiar in recent days, when it has been theorize that his anti-CCP speeches were means to support the campaign of his slightly more, and evidently, pro-CCP son. Though they share the same blood, even the wildest imagination would not be linking the two’s political stances. All the more so when the son stated on radio that his father is a tragedy.
To the conspiracy of her father campaigning for the son, Erica Yuen responded with a laugh, and said, “We must vote out the conservative, old pan-democrats and the successors of these old pan-democratic directions. They’re extremely scary, can’t even take a single word of criticism, never admitting faults, and forever misjudging and falling behind situations. They only know how to spin their own fallacies and point fingers at fellow teammates.”
The financial columnist, Muddy Dirty Water, wrote on his Facebook page that, “This is simple economics, because they see Daddy Yuen as a competitor who has also robbed them of many interests.” “The pan-dem mechanism has been carrying out their international work and lobbying through crowdfunding, but Daddy Yuen funded his own flights, and used his own resources to secure the more influential people in the US, such as Bannon, which is unlike a simple newspaper ad. The pan-dem mechanism naturally can’t stand it.”
Seeing no elephant but only the seats; seeing no teammates but only conspiracies – perhaps this is just some slim pickings, but again, one rotten apple can spoil the whole bunch.