初二回娘家，
也要學英文👍🏼

今天送上 #俐媽新聞英文疫苗篇 part 2
—————————————————————
⭕️ 俐媽新聞英文 — COVID-19 疫苗篇Part 2:
💉 antibody (n.) 抗體
💉 Ig (abbr.) = immunoglobulin 免疫球蛋白
💉 Molecular Diagnosis 分子檢驗
💉 nasopharyngeal (a.) 鼻咽的
💉 spike protein 棘蛋白
💉 replicase 複製酶
💉 cold chain (ph.) 冷鏈
💉 placebo (n.) 安慰劑
💉 normal saline (ph.) 生理食鹽水
💉 viral vector (ph.) 病毒載體
💉 compulsory (a.) 強制的
💉 immune (a.) 免疫的
💉 allot (v.) 分配
💉 authorize (v.) 授權
💉 equivocate (v.) 說話模稜兩可；含糊其詞
——> equivocal (a.) 不確定的；曖昧的
💉 equitable (a.) 公平的；公正的
💉 reiterate (v.) 重申，反覆講
💉 procurement (n.) 取得；採購（常指軍火/鋼鐵）
💉 CDC 疾病管制署 Centers for Disease Control
💉 CECC 中央流行疫情指揮中心 Central Epidemic Command Center
💉 COVAX 全球新冠疫苗平台 COVID-19 Vaccines Global Access
————————————————————
新聞2021疫情平息，
牛轉乾坤！

以上感謝欒為學長整理提供🙏🏼
.
#俐媽新聞英文
#俐媽新聞英文疫苗篇
#台大明明新年送英文大餐

cautious/conscientious/fastidious/meticulous/scrupulous 謹慎的、一絲不苟的
Eg. Jason is very conscientious in doing his work, so his teammates have confidence in him.
Jason對於工作非常謹慎，組員們都很信任他。
.
inattentive/negligent/lax/sloppy 草率的、不專注的 (a.)
Eg. Lakers lost this game due to some players’ sloppy passes.
湖人因為一些球員草率的傳球而輸掉這場比賽。
.
ambiguous/equivocal/obscure/opaque 模糊的、模稜兩可的、不明確的 (a.)
Eg. Amy's reply to her teacher's questions was somewhat ambiguous.
Amy對老師提問的回答有點模糊不清。
.
confused/bewildered/baffled/befuddled/muddled/flustered 困惑的、慌張的、心煩意亂的 (a.)
Eg. My befuddled brain cannot remember any vocabulary.
我迷糊的腦袋記不下任何單字了。
.
universal/ubiquitous/omnipresent/pervasive/rife 到處遍在的、遍及各處的、無所不在的 (a.)
Eg. The influence of commercialism is pervasive in Daniel's books.
資本主義的影響在Daniel的作品中隨處可見。
.
今天的單字等級應該可以列為史上最高，畢竟今天是第101天，也算是全新的開始(吧😂😂😂，希望可以為大家帶來一些刺激。這些很多單字都是GRE等級的單字，小編最近也在準備這個考試，如果也在準備的粉絲歡迎來認親哈哈哈🤗🤗🤗
.
當然大家可以不需要把所有單字記下來，可以每組記下1-2個在作文時用到就非常足夠了，有些單字其實都是我們平常都有看過的單字再去做變化，像是punctilious和punctual都有相同的字首(punct,刺、戳)，大家可以透過這個去連想😜😜
.
總之，小編整理筆記之於也拿來和大家分享分享，如果覺得太難的同學也不用灰心，繼續穩紮穩打吧❗
.

Don’t get overawed (Lee Yee)

On the day that the National Security Law was passed by the National People’s Congress, I got a message of a friend from afar: “Are you secure?” I answered without even giving it a thought: ”No one is secure in a secure country.”

When maximal authority of a country is realized, individual rights are so minimal that no one is secure. Even in China where the plebs would answer with a big NO, are people in power secure? Was Liu Shaoqi, the late Chairman of the People’s Republic of China persecuted to death during the Cultural Revolution, secure? In the past 70 years, have most of the people in power of different levels been secure in view of the miseries they have encountered? Was and is Jiang Zemin, the former General Secretary of the Chinese Communist Party(CCP), secure? Is Xi Jinping secure?

The befalling of the National Security Law is likened to “the second handover of Hong Kong”. An online article points out “the difference between the first and second handover” is that “the people who resent the CCP in 2020 is countless times more than those in 1997, and in terms of reputation, conduct and calibre, the people who espouse the second handover in 2020 are not even comparable to those who espouse the first handover in 1997”. Another says that “Hong Kongers belonging to no country before handover used to live in peace and work with contentment”, and asks “where their homes are when they belong to a nation”? In China, even the movers and shakers evacuate their relatives by fair means or foul from their country to a strange place they call home in the West.

The Articles of the Hong Kong version of National Security Law was not announced until it took effect, so that Carrie Lam was unable to utter a word about the details of it on the day of implementation of the Law. Legislation as such is preposterous. The full text of it is awash with equivocal meanings of unfinished wordings, which is so jaw-dropping that even a layman would ask: What kind of legal document is that? Zhao Sile, a journalist from China, said online: “The Law is typically from China because the laws of China have always been ambiguous and ill-defined”. She continued, “How are they enforced? Arbitrary and flexible provisions are made by different administrative departments which then inflate in power unceasingly.”

Regarding the abovementioned, it is almost pointless to delve into every Article of it for clarifying under what circumstances does one offend and not offend the Law, and where the grey areas are. Take those dubbed the “four ringleaders of Hong Kong independence” and “gang of four that jeopardizes Hong Kong” by Chinese media as an example. While they are known to be opposed to Hong Kong independence and even anti-localist, and did not advocate the protest last year, China deems them to be guilty of all of the above by dismissing the actuality. Subsequently, some budding political groups disbanded in no time. However, if the CCP decides to recriminate, on no account can they escape. That being said, it is possible that China will sit on the issue of Hong Kong independence provisionally in an attempt to dilute the sanctions against it from overseas. With the arbitrariness and flexibility of laws of China and its enforcement, no one is secure, nor one is doomed to committing a crime. Falling into a trap is simply akin to running into a car accident.

Looking at the National Security Law, Hong Kongers, who are accustomed to living under the rule of law, will naturally get frightened and anxiety-ridden, and try to wash their hands of sensitive issues. They think they will stay secure by stopping short of slogans with content of “secession of state” or disbanding a political group. In reality, if the CCP wants to get you in trouble, it does not have to leverage the National Security Law. Manipulated by the CCP, the SAR government can do and will do whatever stipulated by the National Security Law. Is the Law retroactive? Wasn’t the disqualification sentence for Leung Chunghang and Yau Waiching, former Legislative Council members, retroactive? And the judge that brought in the verdict based on retroactivity was Andrew Cheung Kuinung, the next Chief Justice of the Court of Final Appeal to-be. Does it make sense to contemplate upon the situation differently before and after the enactment of the National Security Law?

Now that the CCP can do whatever it wants. Is the enactment of the National Security Law an unnecessary move? As Chinese officials said, the Law, like a sword dangling above Hong Kongers, is to get them overawed and frightened.

Scared? Surely. Yet, one should have been scared much earlier on. If one had been scared, one would have arranged for fleeing from Hong Kong. Those who choose to stay should not let fear take control of them.

I have always remembered what British writer Salman Rushdie wrote after September 11 attacks in 2001: “Amid the conflict between liberty and security, we should always opt to stand with liberty without remorse even though we make a wrong choice. How do we beat terrorism? Don’t get overawed and don’t let fear take control of you even though you are scared.”

The late U.S. President Franklin Roosevelt said, “The only thing we have to fear is fear itself.” If we let fear take control of us, we give up liberty.

YSLの新作、イリシット ヌードを全色紹介してみましたー！
めっちゃめちゃ可愛いイリシット ヌード。
とってもタイプなカラーが多くて、自分自身とてもワクワクしたー♡♡
もう、私のスタメンになってるよー！
２つの質感を楽しめるので好みのリップをぜひ見てみてねー！
今は店頭で試したりできないので、少しでも参考になってれば嬉しいです！

0:00 オープニング
0:59 再生目次
1:17 新作"ILLICIT NUDES"のコンセプト
2:47 リップ21本全色レビュー
　　　　　- COOL -
2:57 No.203 RESTRICTED PINK
5:52 No.202 INSURGENT RED
8:23 No.204 PRIVATE CARMINE
9:29 No.205 SECRET ROSEWOOD
　　　　　- PURE -
11:07 No.207 ILLEGAL ROSY NUDE
13:07 No.209 FURTIVE CARAMEL
14:40 No.210 NUDE OUT OF LINE
　　　　　- WARM -
15:58 No.213 NO TABOO CHILI
17:25 No.214 ILLICIT ORANGE
18:51 No.215 UNDISCLOSED CAMEL
20:12 No.211 TRANSGRESSIVE CACAO
22:23 No.212 EQUIVOCAL BROWN
24:30 お気に入りカラー紹介
25:37 エンディング

提供：イヴ・サンローラン


公式オンライン ブティック：https://bit.ly/3nT0t6H

 #イリシットヌード #粘膜ヌード #イヴサンローラン #YSLBEAUTY