熱門Ptt文章

[爆卦]Disclaim是什麼？優點缺點精華區懶人包

雖然這篇Disclaim鄉民發文沒有被收入到精華區：在Disclaim這個話題中，我們另外找到其它相關的精選爆讚文章

在 disclaim產品中有13篇Facebook貼文，粉絲數超過8,095的網紅Gaylen Kasai 小辣椒，也在其Facebook貼文中提到， This must been the first gathering/event I've attended since April? . 2020 has been different, it has taught me so many things. Gatherings, Celebratio...

　同時也有2部Youtube影片，追蹤數超過14萬的網紅RagaFinance財經台，也在其Youtube影片中提到，瑞信認股證/牛熊證特約：輪證錦囊 20200928 日期: 2020 年 09 月 28 日 (星期一) 主持: 羅尚沛 (Eugene) 嘉賓: 瑞信何啟聰 (Ivan) 美國媒體有報導指美國對中芯實施出口制裁，但美國商務部就未見有更新制裁名單，本來已經連跌多日既港股，會唔會因為呢個新既制...

「disclaim」的推薦目錄

disclaim 在 Ola | Wander With Ola Instagram 的最佳解答

2021-06-16 12:43:37

// Calling all content creators & consumers (so... basically everyone😄) on this platform 💕 There’s been quite a coverage about a brand that published...

  • Gaylen Kasai 小辣椒

    disclaim 在 Gaylen Kasai 小辣椒 Facebook 的最讚貼文

    2020-12-23 12:02:41
    有 42 人按讚

    This must been the first gathering/event I've attended since April?
    .
    2020 has been different, it has taught me so many things. Gatherings, Celebrations, Festivities & Travels will never be the same again. The life we once knew is gone, but its not all grey. We just gotta learn to adapt to the new normal and create new traditions for celebration, after all Its Christmas and Christmas is the season of joy, hope, love & peace.
    .
    Disclaimer: Mask were removed for 10 seconds for photo. Hahahaha 🤭 is this the new normal too to disclaim?
    .
    #christmas #love #live

  • disclaim 在 Facebook 的最佳貼文

    2020-11-28 21:28:49
    有 426 人按讚

    Serrini 唔小心解鎖去痴纏左 #中大出版社 @cuhkpress 大家快d去支持留言歡呼一下等d admin staff 知道我地嘅樹keykey 幾咁appealing

    原本我要求今年書展可以印人形foam board（再逼近我）比大家ling住d（買左嘅）書合照，不過今年書展都係無法實現，中大出版社呼口氣之餘都係擺脫唔到鑽石娛樂（唯）一（一個啊）姐樹Rini唔該💁🏻‍♀️大家記得留意我地exclusive宣布鑽石週末特別書籍優惠添呀，記得準備好搶購💎榮譽校友樹Rini（no offense if 真係有this title officially so let us disclaim that this is an unofficial self-proclamation) 真情鉅獻2020書海暢泳約會之唔知可摸以一分鐘掃貨（到時先真人問店長（正經boy樣子）等佢唔好意思say no 💁🏻‍♀️

    #讀多啲書
    #飲多啲水
    #食多啲er健康嘅食物
    #將來我地就係社會嘅棟樑啦

  • Daphne Iking

    disclaim 在 Daphne Iking Facebook 的最佳解答

    2020-02-14 20:40:39
    有 11 人按讚

    A statement by Sisters in Islam with regards to the “bin Abdullah” issue.

    ———-

    14 February 2020

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

    “Bin Abdullah” Case: Uphold the Child’s Right to a Name, Identity and Family

    Sisters in Islam (SIS) views the Federal Court’s decision on the “bin Abdullah” case with mixed concerns. While we welcome the ruling by the Federal Court to remove “bin Abdullah” from a Johor-born Muslim child’s name from his birth certificate, however, we view with great distress and concern for disallowing the father’s name to be a part of the child’s name. Sisters in Islam had hoped for a decision that would have resolved this matter addressing the core issue of the stigmatisation of Muslim children born out of wedlock.

    SIS is grateful that Malaysia has religious leaders such as the Mufti of Penang and the Mufti of Perlis who have provided a compassionate approach to this issue so as to take into account the welfare and best interest of the child. We also support the Children’s Commissioner in SUHAKAM who had called for the Births and Deaths Registration Act 1957 to be amended and applied equally to Muslims and non-Muslims.

    The usage of “bin Abdullah” for Muslim children born out of wedlock carries a social stigma as “bin Abdullah” children are often ridiculed, attacked, bullied and targeted. The Federal Court’s decision for removing “bin Abdullah” from the child’s name and disallowing him to carry the father’s name will only lead to a new kind of stigmatisation of the child and other children in a similar situation. Also, it is now an open question as to what the child’s last name should be.

    The Islamic Family Law (State of Johor) Enactment 2003 only deals with the issue of paternity or nasab of a father over his child. The definition of a child born out of wedlock as well as the requirement to name these children “bin or binti Abdullah” are provided in two fatwas of the Majlis Fatwa Kebangsaan of JAKIM. Thus, it is clear that the naming as “bin Abdullah” is not prescribed by law but by a fatwa. Sisters in Islam has often criticised the far-reaching effects of a fatwa, which sometimes have even more overreaching consequences than the law itself.

    The application of a fatwa in such a manner should be scrutinised and subjected to proper consultation, checks and balances, especially when it has a severe impact on the life of a child.

    In Malaysia, states have issued their own fatwa on this matter. For example, the Perlis state government has gazetted a fatwa in 2013 that allows children born less than six months from the parents’ marriage date to carry the name of his/her father provided their parents and that the father acknowledges the child. However, the father does not have paternity rights over the child. The late Wahbah Zuhaili, a well-respected Islamic scholar, has stated that it is permissible for the child to be named after the father if he so agrees. This particular argument is in line with upholding the best interest of the child.

    Sisters in Islam has time and again called for greater balance in the promulgation of Islamic laws and fatwas. The most important tenets of Islam - justice, compassion, harmony must be the guiding factor. It is clear that this fatwa on children born out of wedlock causes harm and is not beneficial to the welfare and best interest of the child.

    ******
    Reference:

    Section 111 of the Islamic Family Law (State of Johor) Enactment 2003 provides: “Where a child is born to a woman who is married to a man more than six qamariah months from the date of the marriage or within four qamariah years after dissolution of the marriage either by the death of the man or by divorce, and the woman not having remarried, the nasab or paternity of the child is established in the man, but the man may, by way of li’an or imprecation, disavow or disclaim the child before the Court.”

    The definition of a child born out of wedlock is provided specifically under the fatwa. In this case, we quote the fatwa issued by the Fatwa Majlis Kebangsaan (JAKIM):

    Muzakarah Jawatankuasa Fatwa Majlis Kebangsaan Bagi Hal Ehwal Ugama Islam Malaysia Kali Ke-57 yang bersidang pada 10 Jun 2003 telah membincangkan mengenai Anak Tak Sah Taraf. Muzakarah telah memutuskan seperti berikut: Anak Tak Sah Taraf ialah:

    1. Anak yang dilahirkan di luar nikah sama ada akibat zina atau rogol dan dia bukan daripada persetubuhan syubhah atau bukan daripada anak perhambaan.

    2. Anak dilahirkan kurang dari 6 bulan 2 lahzah (saat) mengikut Takwim Qamariah daripada tarikh tamkin (setubuh). Anak tidak sah taraf tidak boleh dinasabkan kepada lelaki yang menyebabkan kelahirannya atau kepada sesiapa yang mengaku menjadi bapa kepada anak tersebut. Oleh itu mereka tidak boleh pusaka mempusakai, tidak menjadi mahram dan tidak boleh menjadi wali.
    This fatwa was preceded in 1981 by a fatwa that deals directly with the naming of a child born out of wedlock. Reference is made again tp the Majlis Fatwa Kebangsaan under JAKIM: Muzakarah Jawatankuasa Fatwa Majlis Kebangsaan Bagi Hal Ehwal Ugama Islam Malaysia Kali Ke-1 yang bersidang pada 28 - 29 Januari 1981 telah membincangkan Penamaan Anak Tak Sah Taraf (Anak Luar Nikah). Muzakarah telah memutuskan bahawa anak zina atau anak di luar nikah (anak tak sah taraf) sama ada diikuti dengan perkahwinan kedua pasangan ibu bapanya atau tidak hendaklah di bin atau di bintikan kepada Abdullah.

    ——-

    The video of mommy cat and her kittens is strictly for (adorable) illustration. We know the identity of the father and I’m proud to announce that all 4 young ones are healthy and still thriving. 💕💕💕💕

你可能也想看看

搜尋相關網站