熱門Ptt文章

[爆卦]Disavow是什麼？優點缺點精華區懶人包

雖然這篇Disavow鄉民發文沒有被收入到精華區：在Disavow這個話題中，我們另外找到其它相關的精選爆讚文章

在 disavow產品中有7篇Facebook貼文，粉絲數超過39萬的網紅Xiaxue，也在其Facebook貼文中提到， Reposting a snippet from my latest blog post, you can read the full article here: http://xiaxue.blogspot.com/2020/07/raeesah-khan-ge-2020-and-being-la...

　同時也有6部Youtube影片，追蹤數超過2萬的網紅Vincent Do，也在其Youtube影片中提到，#huongdanseoweb #huongdanseowebgtvseo #trienkhaiseo #hoidapseo #GTVSEO Các câu hỏi sẽ giải đáp trong video: 1. Hướng dẫn seo web: Quy trình làm SEO ch...

「disavow」的推薦目錄
  • Xiaxue

    disavow 在 Xiaxue Facebook 的精選貼文

    2020-07-08 06:13:14
    有 300 人按讚

    Reposting a snippet from my latest blog post, you can read the full article here: http://xiaxue.blogspot.com/2020/07/raeesah-khan-ge-2020-and-being-labeled.html?m=1

    I’m posting more about Raeesah Khan today.

    First, a disclaimer. I do not dislike the Worker’s Party.

    Of all the opposition parties, I think they are the best. I live in Aljunied grc, and they have done a great job so far. I agree with many of the policy suggestions in their manifesto.

    For example, redundancy insurance, abolishing the retirement age, or lowering the age of eligibility for BTO flats, which will help singles and our LGBTQ community to get housing just like married couples are.

    Previously I mentioned on my ig stories that Raeesah Khan is not suitable to be an MP.

    Today I am going to ask some very important questions which I hope both WP and Raeesah will answer.

    I refer to this tweet by Raeesah in the photos.

    It appears that she is saying her political views can be summed up by

    - Angela Davis’ political views
    - Intersectional feminism

    Many of you may not know about Angela Davis, but she is a far-left activist, who spent her life sympathising with some of the most oppressive communism regimes around.

    She literally calls herself a communist, and was a member of the Communism Party in USA. I think there is no need to explain how horrible communism is.

    And of course in order to make any non-communist country a communist state, it would involve total revolution, many lives, and replacing it with a totalitarian regime in charge of redistributing wealth back to its citizens.

    She is also a prison abolitionist, campaigning for prisons to completely be eradicated. Where to put the murderers, I can’t seem to find a good answer, because it seems she also is against the death penalty.

    Angela Davis was a member of the Black Panthers, a brutal communist, anti-semite organization. In 1970, Angela Davis bought the weapons that were used for a shootout during a trial of 3 black inmates accused of killing a white prison guard. All the black men and judge who was held hostage perished in the gunfight, and Davis fled the state. She was eventually caught.

    Even though she conspired to commit murder, the jury found her not guilty.

    In short, this woman is the antithesis to the Singapore that Mr Lee Kuan Yew wanted.

    This tweet of Raeesah Khan’s talking about Angela Davis was posted only a few weeks ago, but surprisingly enough, nobody is talking about it.

    Anyone who knows who Angela Davis is should be horror-filled that a candidate running for parliament is a fan of hers, and claims that the reading of her books represents her political views.

    Previously I mentioned Raeesah appears to be one of those radical leftists who seem hell bent on bringing the toxic, cancerous identity politics that America is so notorious for into Singapore.

    There are racial issues that minorities face in Singapore, of course there is. It is tough to be a minority in any country.

    But instead of discussing calmly and logically what new politics can be introduced to solve these problems or what laws need to change, proponents of Identity politics instead try to make a single race the enemy.

    When there are enemies, people unite. Political parties using this method will see themselves get votes if they manage to market themselves as the empathetic ones, even if the politics they impose do more evil than good in the long run.

    Society is then split into a them vs us, while tribalistic infighting ensue. If you disagree with this method of classifying victims by their skin colour (when in fact so many things determine a person’s privilege, such as looks, height, family wealth, health, both parents around etc etc), you are automatically seen as racist and the bad guy.

    Because nobody wants to seem morally corrupt or unsympathetic, they prop up this system.

    Instill this sentiment into citizens long enough and resentment builds. The ones constantly told they are being oppressed will start seeing oppression everywhere. They won’t even try to succeed in life, because they are told they are so oppressed they can never make it. They believe their oppressors owe them.

    Meanwhile, the majority race starts feeling angry at constantly being called oppressors. Or maybe they are poor and unhappy themselves, but see that resources for help are only made available for minorities but not them. If they were indeed racist before, this makes them even more racist.

    What eventually happens is civil war. We cannot have this poison in Singapore.

    Raeesah’s has apologised for her posts, but nobody needed to hear whether she is sorry she was being insensitive.

    What people need to know is:

    Does she still believe our courts are corrupt as she so insinuated? Does she still believe law enforcement unfairly target minorities? If not, what made her change her mind? Her statement does not address any of this.

    Worker’s Party claim they did not see those posts of Raeesah’s. Fair enough. But I do not believe they have done such terrible vetting that they have not seen her tweet about Angela Davis which was so recent.

    I wish to ask Raeesah Khan, DO YOU DISAVOW ANGELA DAVIS’ POLITICAL VIEWS?

    - Do you believe that Singapore, through a brutal revolution and death, can become a communist utopia?

    - Do you think that everyone in Singapore should not own private property and should have equal wealth, the very values communism epouses? If so, do you seek to redistribute your multi-millionaire dad's wealth to the poverty-stricken citizens of Singapore?

    - Do you agree that it is only with violence and death do we achieve true freedom?

    - Do you seek to abolish prisons in Singapore?

    - Do you believe in the ideologies of Karl Marx, or Valdamir Lenin?

    As for Worker’s Party, why did you field a candidate who holds extreme left-wing views?

    Do you agree with her ideologies and think it aligns with yours? DO YOU ENDORSE THESE FAR LEFT VIEWS??

    Please answer these questions. I write all these not because I am a PAP lackey, even though obviously people will say I am. Despite what you think, I believe it is healthy to have opposition seats in parliament.

    However, I absolutely do not want to see candidates such as Raeesah Khan in our parliament - she brings with her dangerous political views that can topple the peaceful society we built over the years and is completely against everything that Singapore stands for. As it is, the mindless youth of Singapore are already echoing her dangerous ideologies.

    I would rather any opposition joker win than her.

  • 浩爾譯世界

    disavow 在 浩爾譯世界 Facebook 的精選貼文

    2020-06-01 08:00:03
    有 178 人按讚

    【每日國際選讀】
    #文末挑戰多益選擇題📝
    人民火了！美國境內暴動為何蔓延？

    開啟「接收通知」和「搶先看」每天吸收雙語時事新知
    來讀華爾街日報獨家

    George Floyd’s Death: Minneapolis Mayor Urges Calm as Protests Spread Across U.S.
    喬治佛洛伊德之死：隨著抗爭在美蔓延，明尼亞波里斯市長呼籲群眾冷靜


    🔥City’s police precinct is abandoned on third night of unrest, with Mayor Frey explaining: ‘Brick and mortar is not as important as life’
    市警局於暴動第三晚遭棄置，隨後市長解釋：磚瓦水泥不如生命重要

    -precinct: 警察管轄區，此指市警局或分局
    -abandon: 丟棄、放棄

    🔥Seeking to quell increasingly violent protests over the death of George Floyd that have now spread to other cities across the U.S., Minneapolis’s mayor started Friday with an early morning public call for calm and disavowed a tweet by President Trump.
    試圖平息因喬治佛洛伊德之死而引起之日益劇烈的抗議活動，且抗議活動已蔓延至美國其他城市，明尼雅波里斯市市長週五一早公開呼籲保持冷靜，並針對川普總統的推文表示不認同。

    -quell: (尤指透過武力)制止、平息
    -disavow: 否認…有關；聲稱與…毫無關聯

    🐦Mr. Trump condemned violent protesters in Minneapolis in a pair of tweets sent overnight, and said he could deploy the National Guard to “bring the City under control.”
    川普總統於夜間發布的兩條推文中譴責當地的暴力抗議者，並表示他可能會部署國民兵來控制這座城市。

    -condemn: 譴責
    -deploy: 部署

    👨‍👨‍👧‍👧👨‍👩‍👦‍👦A large crowd of protesters in a plaza outside the Hennepin County Government Center Thursday evening waved signs and chanted demands for the arrest of the officers involved in Mr. Floyd’s death.
    週四晚間，大批抗議者在亨內平縣政府中心外的廣場上揮舞著標語，持續高呼逮捕與弗洛伊德之死有關的警察。

    chant: 持續覆誦
    involve in: 涉入…

    👨‍👨‍👧‍👧👨‍👩‍👦‍👦The gathering started peacefully but grew tense shortly after the crowd began marching through the streets of downtown, and anger grew as police responded in riot gear.
    抗議剛開始很平靜，但在群眾開始於市中心上街遊行後不久，氣氛變得緊張起來，當警察穿上防暴裝備做出反應時，人們的憤怒也隨之加劇。

    march: 遊行
    riot gear: 抗暴裝備，riot為暴動、騷亂，gear則泛指裝備

    未完待續...
    這次事件再次帶出了美國內部的各種問題，究竟當中還發生了什麼呢？

    ----

    ❓❓多益模擬題❓:
    He has been _____ by his boss because of being _______ the scandal of a celebrity.
    A. abandon, involve in
    B. giving up, involvement in
    C. abandoned, involved in

    【每日商業英文計畫，熱烈招生中！】
    華爾街日報訂閱超值方案 📰
    專屬 #臉書社團，浩爾 #每日語音導讀
    「留言+1」，就送你 #優惠碼 及 #導讀試聽！

  • Daphne Iking

    disavow 在 Daphne Iking Facebook 的最讚貼文

    2020-02-14 20:40:39
    有 11 人按讚

    A statement by Sisters in Islam with regards to the “bin Abdullah” issue.

    ———-

    14 February 2020

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

    “Bin Abdullah” Case: Uphold the Child’s Right to a Name, Identity and Family

    Sisters in Islam (SIS) views the Federal Court’s decision on the “bin Abdullah” case with mixed concerns. While we welcome the ruling by the Federal Court to remove “bin Abdullah” from a Johor-born Muslim child’s name from his birth certificate, however, we view with great distress and concern for disallowing the father’s name to be a part of the child’s name. Sisters in Islam had hoped for a decision that would have resolved this matter addressing the core issue of the stigmatisation of Muslim children born out of wedlock.

    SIS is grateful that Malaysia has religious leaders such as the Mufti of Penang and the Mufti of Perlis who have provided a compassionate approach to this issue so as to take into account the welfare and best interest of the child. We also support the Children’s Commissioner in SUHAKAM who had called for the Births and Deaths Registration Act 1957 to be amended and applied equally to Muslims and non-Muslims.

    The usage of “bin Abdullah” for Muslim children born out of wedlock carries a social stigma as “bin Abdullah” children are often ridiculed, attacked, bullied and targeted. The Federal Court’s decision for removing “bin Abdullah” from the child’s name and disallowing him to carry the father’s name will only lead to a new kind of stigmatisation of the child and other children in a similar situation. Also, it is now an open question as to what the child’s last name should be.

    The Islamic Family Law (State of Johor) Enactment 2003 only deals with the issue of paternity or nasab of a father over his child. The definition of a child born out of wedlock as well as the requirement to name these children “bin or binti Abdullah” are provided in two fatwas of the Majlis Fatwa Kebangsaan of JAKIM. Thus, it is clear that the naming as “bin Abdullah” is not prescribed by law but by a fatwa. Sisters in Islam has often criticised the far-reaching effects of a fatwa, which sometimes have even more overreaching consequences than the law itself.

    The application of a fatwa in such a manner should be scrutinised and subjected to proper consultation, checks and balances, especially when it has a severe impact on the life of a child.

    In Malaysia, states have issued their own fatwa on this matter. For example, the Perlis state government has gazetted a fatwa in 2013 that allows children born less than six months from the parents’ marriage date to carry the name of his/her father provided their parents and that the father acknowledges the child. However, the father does not have paternity rights over the child. The late Wahbah Zuhaili, a well-respected Islamic scholar, has stated that it is permissible for the child to be named after the father if he so agrees. This particular argument is in line with upholding the best interest of the child.

    Sisters in Islam has time and again called for greater balance in the promulgation of Islamic laws and fatwas. The most important tenets of Islam - justice, compassion, harmony must be the guiding factor. It is clear that this fatwa on children born out of wedlock causes harm and is not beneficial to the welfare and best interest of the child.

    ******
    Reference:

    Section 111 of the Islamic Family Law (State of Johor) Enactment 2003 provides: “Where a child is born to a woman who is married to a man more than six qamariah months from the date of the marriage or within four qamariah years after dissolution of the marriage either by the death of the man or by divorce, and the woman not having remarried, the nasab or paternity of the child is established in the man, but the man may, by way of li’an or imprecation, disavow or disclaim the child before the Court.”

    The definition of a child born out of wedlock is provided specifically under the fatwa. In this case, we quote the fatwa issued by the Fatwa Majlis Kebangsaan (JAKIM):

    Muzakarah Jawatankuasa Fatwa Majlis Kebangsaan Bagi Hal Ehwal Ugama Islam Malaysia Kali Ke-57 yang bersidang pada 10 Jun 2003 telah membincangkan mengenai Anak Tak Sah Taraf. Muzakarah telah memutuskan seperti berikut: Anak Tak Sah Taraf ialah:

    1. Anak yang dilahirkan di luar nikah sama ada akibat zina atau rogol dan dia bukan daripada persetubuhan syubhah atau bukan daripada anak perhambaan.

    2. Anak dilahirkan kurang dari 6 bulan 2 lahzah (saat) mengikut Takwim Qamariah daripada tarikh tamkin (setubuh). Anak tidak sah taraf tidak boleh dinasabkan kepada lelaki yang menyebabkan kelahirannya atau kepada sesiapa yang mengaku menjadi bapa kepada anak tersebut. Oleh itu mereka tidak boleh pusaka mempusakai, tidak menjadi mahram dan tidak boleh menjadi wali.
    This fatwa was preceded in 1981 by a fatwa that deals directly with the naming of a child born out of wedlock. Reference is made again tp the Majlis Fatwa Kebangsaan under JAKIM: Muzakarah Jawatankuasa Fatwa Majlis Kebangsaan Bagi Hal Ehwal Ugama Islam Malaysia Kali Ke-1 yang bersidang pada 28 - 29 Januari 1981 telah membincangkan Penamaan Anak Tak Sah Taraf (Anak Luar Nikah). Muzakarah telah memutuskan bahawa anak zina atau anak di luar nikah (anak tak sah taraf) sama ada diikuti dengan perkahwinan kedua pasangan ibu bapanya atau tidak hendaklah di bin atau di bintikan kepada Abdullah.

    ——-

    The video of mommy cat and her kittens is strictly for (adorable) illustration. We know the identity of the father and I’m proud to announce that all 4 young ones are healthy and still thriving. 💕💕💕💕

你可能也想看看

搜尋相關網站