熱門Ptt文章

[爆卦]Conservatively是什麼？優點缺點精華區懶人包

雖然這篇Conservatively鄉民發文沒有被收入到精華區：在Conservatively這個話題中，我們另外找到其它相關的精選爆讚文章

在 conservatively產品中有14篇Facebook貼文，粉絲數超過1萬的網紅阿堯投資筆記，也在其Facebook貼文中提到， John Huber 最新在 Graham and Doddsville 的訪談提到一點跟我在去年 12/31 總結的相似 “One of the mistakes that I've made over time is being too conservative, I think. Conse...

　同時也有1部Youtube影片，追蹤數超過8,220的網紅BingeHD，也在其Youtube影片中提到，This is a build meant to create a "conservatively" high amount of damage output on sylvanas. twitter.com/breakersc2 twitch.tv/breakersc2...

「conservatively」的推薦目錄
  • 阿堯投資筆記

    conservatively 在 阿堯投資筆記 Facebook 的最佳解答

    2021-02-19 20:07:46
    有 113 人按讚

    John Huber 最新在 Graham and Doddsville 的訪談提到一點跟我在去年 12/31 總結的相似

    “One of the mistakes that I've made over time is
    being too conservative, I think. Conservatism, for
    good reason, is considered a virtue in the value investing community. I'm a conservative investor by
    nature, but there are drawbacks to being too conservative. I just read a note by my friend, Rob Vinall who runs a firm called RV Capital. He made a great point –banks that are aggressive when underwriting loans end up going bust, but so do banks that are too conservative over time,because they’ll miss writing the loans that are most profitable, which is needed to pay for the inevitable
    mistakes. As investors, our goal should be accuracy when evaluating a business. You don't do yourself
    any favors by being overly conservative at the expense of being accurate... You should demand a margin of safety over an accurate assessment of the business and its value, but your goal should not be to conservatively analyze the business, your goal should be to accurately analyze the business...I've noticed that a lot of my mistakes have come from when I've been conservative at the expense of accuracy, and this has carried a heavy opportunity cost over the years.”

    價投的基因讓我們很保守，讓我們不太虧錢，但另一方面這個基因也限制了我們。我們的目標不是很保守的去評估公司，而是盡量正確的去評估公司。

    Pabrai 在訪談的時候拿 Google 為例，他說當時他把 Google 的 Other bet 都當零，就當白送。但這樣就讓他對價格的區間守得很死，換句話說就是太保守。

    平衡很重要，太保守、衝太快都不好

  • Katsura Sunshine

    conservatively 在 Katsura Sunshine Facebook 的精選貼文

    2020-05-12 17:33:57
    有 90 人按讚

    今日は、ちょっと地味に…
    Dressing conservatively today...

    #Rakugo
    #japanese
    #japaneseculture #japanesefashion
    #japanesetraditional
    #comedian
    #Leafs
    #slovenian #canadian
    #tradionalwear #kimono
    #broadway
    #instatheatre
    #newyork #playbill #theatre #rakugo #newworldstages
    #落語 #英語落語 #着物 #着物ライフ#ニューヨーク #ブロードウェイ #桂三輝 #浮世絵
    #ukiyo-e #nhkworld #rakugo
    #englishrakugo

  • AppWorks

    conservatively 在 AppWorks Facebook 的最佳貼文

    2019-11-06 10:58:51
    有 27 人按讚

    [Undressing the Big Verticals: Finding Disruption Strategies in Greater Southeast Asia]

    Huge businesses online and offline wear a facade of dominance. In a world where software and cloud storage is cheap compared to even five years ago, these facades are just facades.

    Any smart founder who can understand a niche market and its customers, can disrupt these businesses by offering a much better experience to a global set of users, simply by showing that the emperors wear no clothes.

    Take a look at the first photo. Each of the eight startup companies in the first image were taken out of the listings page (literally) of online classifieds business Craigslist, depicted in the second picture. This platform's offerings became so big and varied that it suffered from entropy.

    The markets tapped into by these startups are bigger than what Craigslist alone could utilize. Meaning that the gold threads Craigslist was wearing were really just a myth. As submarkets became exploitable, startup founders started picking them off.

    These two images offer great insights for founders in Greater Southeast Asia, where businesses are sometimes conservatively managed, and where conglomerates and gigantic industry players operate in large local markets.

    This is because the new companies do one niche thing very well dating; food; home-sharing, etc. In a mobile-use heavy market, people love these apps. The focused offerings and their ease of use make them fun to use, and they solve problems quickly and efficiently.

    Why does this happen? What should founders in GSEA do with this information?

    1. There are two reasons why this happens. First, big platforms trying to do everything for everyone will find it hard to manage all of the areas of the business. It's a result of organizational entropy. Consumers in a diverse global software environment will be easily distracted by new choices that big organizations cannot exploit in a fast way.

    It also happens because founders using cheaper and more agile software tools can find niche areas in big platforms that they can exploit much more quickly, and offer to consumers using a better user experience. They understand the needs of the niche customer better. They find ways to make it interesting and engaging.

    After all, swiping left and right on Tinder is actually really fun and an engaging use of time. Right?

    2. Founders in GSEA are working in a region where it should be relatively easy to find big industry players in the market and find ways of disrupting their existing dominance.

    In a region that is still relatively conservative in business compared to the rest of the world, and where large conglomerate players usually dominate the local markets, software disruption is primed and ready.

    If you would like to test out exploits and software platform ideas in niche areas dominated by big industry players in a gigantic market, check out our accelerator class #20.

    We are taking applications until December 16. Join here: http://bit.ly/AWdisrupt

    Image source: Platforms vs Verticals and the Next Great Unbundling by a16z -- https://a16z.com/2019/09/11/platforms-verticals-unbundling/

    Doug Crets
    Media and Communications, AppWorks Accelerator

你可能也想看看

搜尋相關網站