熱門Ptt文章

[爆卦]Bridgehead是什麼？優點缺點精華區懶人包

雖然這篇Bridgehead鄉民發文沒有被收入到精華區：在Bridgehead這個話題中，我們另外找到其它相關的精選爆讚文章

在 bridgehead產品中有6篇Facebook貼文，粉絲數超過7萬的網紅Pure Storage，也在其Facebook貼文中提到， Wondering how to keep your hospital’s data infrastructure scalable and up to date from the cloud? See how this joint solution from Pure Storage, Bridg...

　同時也有1部Youtube影片，追蹤數超過8萬的網紅Kelsi May凱西莓，也在其Youtube影片中提到，IG: kaiximay FB: https://www.facebook.com/kaiximay/ 工作邀約: [email protected] 很開心這次可以參加愛趣雲林玩的活動！如果你也想跟著台灣好行去玩，可以參考以下的連結！ If you want to take Taiwan Trip'...

「bridgehead」的推薦目錄
  • Pure Storage

    bridgehead 在 Pure Storage Facebook 的精選貼文

    2020-12-17 23:00:02
    有 1 人按讚

    Wondering how to keep your hospital’s data infrastructure scalable and up to date from the cloud? See how this joint solution from Pure Storage, BridgeHead, and AWS can help you protect your MEDITECH environment. #AWSReinvent #Reinvent https://purefla.sh/3p06X41

  • 堅離地城：沈旭暉國際生活台 Simon's Glos World

    bridgehead 在 堅離地城：沈旭暉國際生活台 Simon's Glos World Facebook 的最佳解答

    2020-12-06 23:03:36
    有 443 人按讚

    【#TheDiplomat🌍】For Hong Kong people who still believe in democracy, all the options on the table seem to provide little more than the illusion of choice; the resulting powerlessness is perhaps the ultimate goal of birdcage democracy.

    If this pilot experiment succeeds in Hong Kong, this model could be replicated in other parts of China. Left-leaning leaders in democracies might be fooled into announcing the country’s successful democratization without realizing the distorted definition of democratic and liberal values. It would be the greatest irony if Hong Kong ceases to be a bridgehead for the West to import universal values into China and instead becomes a Chinese testing ground before the worldwide export of the “Chinese Model"......

    ⏺全文見Patreon
    https://www.patreon.com/posts/44603182
    ▶️香港不會再有以往的選舉：「獨裁者2.0」與俄羅斯「威權民主制」的啟示
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tfJdGlmBtMs

  • 小小人物做小事 - 高松傑Jacky

    bridgehead 在 小小人物做小事 - 高松傑Jacky Facebook 的最佳貼文

    2020-10-20 05:56:57
    有 15 人按讚


    我在《橙新聞》最新的英文評論文章😎😎😎

    https://apps.orangenews.hk/app/common/details_html…

    Opinion | US Secretary of State is violating the Law of Safeguarding National Security in Hong Kong

    HK Current

    20th of October 2020

    By Athena Kung

    On 14th of October 2020 [US time], a report was released by the United States (hereinafter refer to as "the US") Secretary of State (hereinafter referred to as "the said Report") under the so-called "Hong Kong Autonomy Act". During recent months, the US Government has been increasingly blatant in its interference in Hong Kong's affairs. Its petty actions included passing successive laws, pronouncing an executive order and imposing 'sanctions' against HKSAR Government's officials under the pretext of so-called "human rights", "democracy" and "autonomy".

    In short, the accusations against the HKSAR Government contained in the said Report are all groundless, unwarranted and irresponsible. All the comments in the said Report are really smearing and demonising The Law of the People's Republic of China on Safeguarding National Security in the HKSAR (hereinafter referred to as "National Security Law"). Being the highest organ of state power, the National People's Congress (hereinafter referred to as "the NPC") has lawfully authorized the Standing Committee of the NPC (hereinafter referred to as "the SCNPC") to formulate relevant laws on establishing the legal system and enforcement mechanisms for the HKSAR to safeguard the national security. Thus, the enactment of the National Security Law on 30th of June 2020 by the SCNPC is both lawful and constitutional.

    Before the implementation of the National Security Law, due to the fear towards the violence exercised by the rioters who supported HK independence, majority of the HK citizens did not dare to voice out their opinions whenever their views was against that of the rioters. Only the riots were able to enjoy the freedom of speech during the whole period of Black Power Anti-government Movement. However, since the National Security Law has come into effect, stability can be restored in the HKSAR step by step, whereas once again, HK citizens are able to enjoy their basic rights and freedoms in accordance with the law as before. All along, the US Government has embellished the violence and illegal acts exercised by the rioters who are wrongfully beautified as democracy warrior. The ulterior motives behind was US Government's great desire to build up a pro-American Government in HK by promoting Colour Revolution here. With the success of promoting HK Independence, the US may make use of HK as a Bridgehead to attack PRC whose Great Rejuvenation might then be hindered.

    Recently, US has also imposed certain "sanctions" on financial institutions and HKSAR Government officials, which is another concrete evidence proving the hegemony on the part of US. The US Government has been exerting pressure on financial institutions and HKSAR Government officials so as to threaten the officials not to pass any law or policies which the US Government dislike. By so doing, the US Secretary of State is clearly violating 2 areas of the National Security Law, including:
    (1) Secession under Article 20(1), namely participating in separating the HKSAR from the PRC by with a view to committing secession or undermining national unification whether or not by force or threat of force ; and
    (2) Subversion under Article 22(3), namely participating in seriously interfering in, disrupting, or undermining the performance of duties and functions in accordance with the law by the body of power of the HKSAR by force or threat of force or other unlawful means with a view to subverting the State.
    Is the National Security Law applicable to the US Secretary of State? The answer is positive. Under Article 38, the National Security Law shall apply to offences under this Law committed against the HKSAR from outside the Region by a person who is not a permanent resident of the Region.

    In addition, according to Article 55 of the National Security Law, it is appropriate for the national security case of the US Secretary of State to be taken up by the Office for Safeguarding National Security of the Central People's Government in the HKSAR (hereinafter referred to as "the Office"):
    "Article 55
    The Office for Safeguarding National Security of the Central People's Government in the HKSAR shall, upon approval by the Central People's Government of a request made by the Government of the HKSAR or by the Office itself, exercise jurisdiction over a case concerning offence endangering national security under this law, if:
    (1) the case is complex due to the involvement of a foreign country or external elements, thus making it difficult for the Region to exercise jurisdiction over the case ;
    (2) a serious situation occurs where the Government of the Region is unable to effectively enforce this law ; or
    (3) a major and imminent threat to national security has occurred."

    No doubt, with the involvement of the US Secretary of State who enjoys a high weight in the US Government in a national security case, the whole case would definitely become very complex as a result of existence of such an external element. After all, it would be extremely difficult for the HKSAR Government to exercise jurisdiction over the case, for instance, in the areas of collecting evidence and making necessary investigations. Under such circumstances, it is necessary for the Office to take up this case and exercise jurisdiction over it.

    The author is Barrister-at-law.

    The views don't necessarily reflect those of Orange News.

    責編：CK Li
    編輯：Jchow

你可能也想看看

搜尋相關網站