你即將離開本站

並前往https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2022/21-869_c0nd.pdf

oral argument - SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

It banishes transformative meaning from the equation altogether, and by doing so, it violates 107's text, contradicts precedent, and undermines.

確定！ 回上一頁

查詢 「well then中文」的人也找了：

  1. Well then
    2.