第四集 (一連七集) 哈佛知識分享: What is strategy? How do you create value? 什麼是策略 ? 你如何創造價值?

一開始我講過:

"The first test of a strategy is whether your value proposition is different from your rivals. If you are trying to serve the same customers and meet the same needs and sell at the same relative price, then you don't have a strategy. " by Michael Porter

如果你嘅價值主張係同你嘅競爭對手一樣， 即係話你服務緊同一班顧客， 解決緊同一問題， 收緊差唔多價錢的話， 哈佛教授米高波特就講你係「人做你做」，你「無策略」 。

咁何謂一個好嘅策略 Good Strategy? 教授講要經得起五個 Tests:

A distinctive value proposition 獨特的價值主張

A tailored value chain 度身訂造的企業價值鏈

Trade-offs different from rivals 同競爭對手不同的「取捨」

Fit across value chain 成條企業價值鏈的活動要配合

Continuity over time 持續性、持續性，不能一時一樣

今集先再你講(1) 同 (2)。 (1) 何謂獨特的價值主張? 你先回答以下三條問題，睇下你同競爭對手有乜唔同。

Which customers are you serving? (What end users? What channels?) 你服務緊邊班客? 誰是最終顧客? 什麼渠道接觸他們?

Which needs are you going to meet? (What products、features、services?) 你想滿足他們什麼需求? 什麼產品、特徵 、服務?

What relative price? (Premium or discount?) 相比起競爭對手，你打算賣貴啲或平啲?

"The value proposition is the element of strategy that looks outward at customers, at the demand side of the business. The value chain focuses internally on operations. Strategy is fundamentally integrative, bringing the demand and supply sides together." by Michael Porter

策略入面的「價值主張」 是從由顧客的「需求」角度出發。 「企業價值鏈」反而是由內部的營運流程「供應」出發。 策略的基礎就係把「需求」及「供應」兩者整合在一起。

你要有好嘅策略，你就要第 (2) Have a tailored value chain 有一條度身訂造的企業價值鏈。由入貨、加工、包裝、市場推廣、 銷售 、出貨、至售後服務都要同競爭對手唔同， 都係度身訂做去服務你以上「價值主張」要服務的顧客。

Michael Porter 話做生意常犯嘅錯誤，亦都係最忌嘅就係 "Stuck in the middle" 「卡住喺中間」。即係平又唔係平過人， 靚又唔係靚過人， 服務嗰班客或者佢哋嘅需求又唔係特別嘅過人，咁你就乜唔係，「價值主張」無乜特別，好難突出。咁你可以點?

例如， 如果就咁開間租車公司，你點同業界巨頭 Hertz, Budget, Avis 打呢? 好容易就 "Stuck in the middle"， 因此絕大部分嘅租車公司你都唔會識，我亦都唔會提。 但美國有間獨特的租車公司，Zipcar， 佢同一般嘅租車公司好唔同。

Zipcar 唔係好似絕大部分嘅租車公司咁， target 區外客， 到咗某個城市要租車週圍走。佢係 target 平時市區內住，無養車， 但突然間想租車走一轉嘅人仕。佢唔係按「日租」，而係按「時租」， 你想去超級市場買一轉餸都可以租。

Zipcar冇話特定嘅租車中心， 而係啲車周街泊， 透過佢嘅Apps 你就知道架車泊咗係邊度及還車地點。 咁就更加方便同埋近你屋企。公司營運成本都平好多。

Zipcar 的車種經常畀人感覺係較 “Cool" ，比較型仔啲、環保啲。 佢唔會花好多錢大賣電視/戶外廣告，而係喺架車身上面貼住大大個公司 hip logo，變相周街免費流動廣告。

Zipcar 叫自己做 Car Sharing Company, not Car Rental Company。因為唔係個個人都租得，而只係付月費/年費的會員才能夠租。 依家月費每月7元美金或年費70元美金。咁佢就可以每次收費更平出租，但重複地賺你個月費年費。 佢想建立個形象就係 Car Sharing 遠遠環保過自己一個買架、保養、同埋棄置成架車。專攻年輕、活躍、較 "Green“ 的新一代。

Zipcar 仲有好多好多嘅特點講唔晒。總之就係，佢嘅 value proposition 價值主張 (Which Customers? Which Needs? What Relative Price?) 同所有其他租車公司巨頭都唔同， 成條嘅企業價值都係為咗個「價值主張」而去度身訂，同所有競爭對手都好唔同。

記住前幾集我同你講過，what's the right mind-set for competition? 你應該點諗競爭?

盡量得，你應該諗 Not be the the best, but be unique。 唔係要做到最好，而係做到最獨特。Zipcar is unique.

Not be number 1, but earn higher returns. 唔係要做到第一，而係要多啲回報，賺多啲錢! Zipcar 回報最高嘅係不斷重複收嘅月費年費，最穩定。

Not focus on market share, but focus on profits. 唔係要市佔率，係要利潤。Zipcar 賺錢。

Not serve the "best" customer with "best" product, but meet the diverse needs of target customers. 唔係要「最好」嘅產品，畀「最好」嘅客。而係用唔同嘅產品，滿足唔同顧客嘅需求。Zipcar 班客同其他租車公司好唔同。

Not compete by imitation, but compete by innovation. 唔係人做你做，而係要創新! Zipcar 肯定創新。

Not ZERO SUM game, but POSITIVE SUM. 唔係「零和遊戲」、互相廝殺， 而係大家從不同層面創造價值， 可以有好多個贏家。Zipcar 吸引咗一班平時唔係租開車嘅客， 佢做大咗個餅。

Zipcar 就係做到上 "Be Unique“ 嘅表表者。因此短短幾年間就可以係租車業界一支箭咁標上去，2000年係美國波士頓創立, 2013年就俾另一租車業界巨頭 Avis Budget Group 以美金5億收購了。2016年9月 Zipcar 公佈，全球9個國家，500個城市，擁有超過一百萬個會員。 一百萬個付費會員， 即使全部人唔租車，只係收月費年費都幾和味。 呢個就係我成日所講嘅做生意要做「農夫」，唔好做「獵人」，必須要客人係重複性購買， 你塊田先至會越嚟越大。

包括我自己在內，如果我純粹買賣舖， 根本我同其他商舖投資者無分別， 我錢又唔夠佢哋多，經驗又唔夠佢哋老到。 直接對撼，I have no strategy! 但我做「商舖基金」就完全唔同啦。班目標顧客、佢哋嘅需求、我所收嘅價錢，都完全唔同。 大家都係做「舖」，但我成條做「舖」嘅「企業價值鏈」， 由集資、買舖、 整理間舖、搵租客、諗計仔幫佢做多啲生意、至出售間舖、同售後服務， 都係同其他競爭對手唔同。亦都解釋咗點解， 即使社運/肺炎，我哋基金每季集資起碼6000港幣都季季爆額，近年全香港買賣街舖無人多過我哋， 我相信只要我哋專注係我哋條買舖的獨特嘅「企業價值鏈」，未來幾十年香港都唔會有人買賣舖多過我哋。

"Choices in the value proposition that limit what a company will do are essential to strategy because they create the opportunity to tailor activities in a way that best delivers that kind of value." by Michael Porter

「選擇」係重要嘅! 你公司就要選有乜嘢做，同更重要 - 有乜嘢唔做，咁你先至可以更加度身訂造地做好你成條「企業價值鏈」，去為你嘅「價值主張」創造最佳價值。

有興趣一齊研究下點做? 聽多啲 Michael Porter，就來我星期六嘅早餐會啦! 下集我再同你講 (3) Trade-offs different from rivals 同競爭對手，應該有什麼不同的「取捨」?

。。。。。

My hobby 《星期六早餐會》!

九月份早餐會 Topic: Applying "Michael Porter" to your business: How to compete and win!

哈佛分享: 如何應用「米高波特」於你盤生意? 點競爭? 點贏?

講起哈佛策略教授， 無人出名過 Michael Porter. 有幸我2017年在哈佛親身上過他教的課程， 今次早餐會同你分享，希望對你做生意亦有所啟發。

有興趣參加啦 😃 每次限四位 (包括我)。 人多傾唔到計。

9月份，逢星期六早上9時開始，約三小時。地點中環。

對象: 中小企老闆/創業者/公司管理層，連我限4位。

有興趣參加的話，請 whatsapp 你的名片給 Suki (我助手) (+852) 5566 1335。

我唔係靠呢行搵食，免費，我請食早餐 😉 Be friends ..... 有機會到時見你。李根興 Edwin

www.edwinlee.com.hk
www.bwfund.com

聯絡李根興 whatsapp (+852) 90361143

#michael_porter #競爭策略

毋忘五大訴求　公民抗命有理
—10‧20九龍遊行陳情書
（案件編號：DCCC 535/2020）

——————————————————
「毋忘初衷，活在愛和真實之中」
撐阿銘，即訂閱Patreon：
patreon.com/raphaelwong
—————————————————

胡法官雅文閣下：

　　2012年，我第一次站在法庭上承認違反「公安惡法」，述說對普選的盼望，批評公安惡法不義，並因公民抗命的緣故，甘心樂意接受刑罰。當年我說，如果小圈子選舉沒有被廢除，惡法沒有消失，我依然會一如故我，公民抗命，並且我相信將會有更多學生和市民加入這個行列。想不到時至今日，普選仍然遙遙無期，我亦再次被帶到法庭接受審判，但只是短短７年，已經有數十萬計的群眾公民抗命，反對暴政。今日，我承認違反「未經批准的政府」所訂立「未經批准的惡法」之下的「未經批准集結」罪，我不打算尋求法庭的憐憫，但請容許我佔用法庭些微時間陳情，讓法庭在判刑前有全面考慮。

暴力之濫觴

　　在整個反修例運動如火如荼之際，我正承擔另一宗公民抗命案件的刑責。雖然身在獄中，但仍然心繫手足。我在獄中電視機前見證6月9日、6月16日及8月18日三次百萬港人大遊行，幾多熱愛和平的港人冒天雨冒彈雨走上街頭，抗議不義惡法，今日關於10月20日的案件，亦是如此。可能有人會問，政府已在6月暫緩修例，更在9月正式撤回修例，我等仍然繼續示威，豈非無理取鬧？我相信法官閣下肯定聽過「遲來的正義並非正義」（Justice delayed is justice denied）這句格言。當過百萬群眾走上街頭，和平表達不滿的時候，林鄭政府沒有理睬，反而獨行獨斷，粗暴踐踏港人的意願，結果製造出後來連綿不絕的爭拗，甚至你死我活的對抗。經歷眾多衝突痛苦之後，所謂暫緩撤回，已經微不足道，我們只是更加清楚：沒有民主，就連基本人權都不會擁有！

　　在本案之中，雖然我們都沒有鼓動或作出暴力行為，但根據早前8‧18及10‧1兩宗案件，相信在控方及法庭眼中，案發當日的暴力事件仍然可以算在我們頭上，如此，我有必要問：如果香港有一個公平正義的普及選舉，人民可以在立法會直接否決他們不認可的法律，試問2019年的暴力衝突可以從何而來呢？如果我們眼見的暴力是如此十惡不赦，那麼我們又如何看待百萬人遊行後仍然堅持推行惡法的制度暴力呢？如果我們不能接受人民暴力反抗，那麼我們是否更加不能對更巨大更壓逼的制度暴力沈默不言？真正且經常發生的暴力，是漠視人民訴求的暴力，是踐踏人民意見的暴力，是剝奪人民表達權利的暴力。真正憎恨暴力，痛恨暴力的人，不可能一方面指摘暴力反抗，又容忍制度暴力。如果我需要承擔和平遊行引發出來的暴力事件的刑責，那麼誰應該承擔施政失敗所引發出來的社會騷亂的罪責呢？

社會之病根

　　對於法庭而言，可能2019年所發生的事情只是一場社會騷亂，務必追究違法者個人責任。然而，治亂治其本源，醫病醫其病根，我雖然公民抗命，刻意違法，控方把我帶上法庭，但我卻不應被理解為一個「犯罪個體」。2019年所發生的事情，並不是我一個人或我們這幾位被告可以促成，社會問題的癥結不是「犯罪份子」本身，而是「犯罪原因」。我明白「治亂世用重典」的道理，但如果「殺雞儆猴」是解決方法，就不會在2016年發生旺角騷亂及2017年上訴庭對示威者施以重刑後，2019年仍然會爆發出更大規模的暴力反抗。

如果不希望社會動亂，就必須正本清源，逐步落實「五大訴求」，從根本上改革，挽回民心。2019年反修例運動，其實只是2014年雨傘運動的延續而已，縱使法庭可能認為兩個運動皆是「一股歪風」所引起，但我必須澄清，兩個運動的核心就是追求民主普選，人民當家作主。在2019年11月24日區議會選舉這個最類近全民普選的選舉中，接近300萬人投票，民主派大勝，奪得17個區議會主導權，這就是整個反修例運動的民意，民意就是反對政府決策，反對制度暴力，反對推行惡法，不容爭辯，不辯自明。我們作為礦場裡的金絲雀，多次提醒政府撤回修法，並從根本上改革制度，而在10月20日的九龍遊行當然是反映民意的平台契機。如今，法庭對我們施加重刑，其實只不過是懲罰民意，將金絲雀困在鳥籠之內，甚至扼殺於鼓掌之中，窒礙表達自由。

堅持之重要

　　大運動過後的大鎮壓，使我們失去《蘋果日報》，失去教協，失去民陣，不少民主派領袖以及曾為運動付出的手足戰友都囚於獄中，不少曾經熱情投入運動的朋友亦因《國安法》的威脅轉為低調，新聞自由示威自由日漸萎縮，公民社會受到沈重打擊，我亦失去不少摯友，有感傷孤獨的時候，但我仍然相信，2019年香港人的信念，以及所展現人類的光輝持久未變。我不會忘記百萬人民冒雨捱熱抗拒暴政，抵制惡法，展現我們眾志成城；我不會忘記人潮紅海，讓道救護車，展現我們文明精神；我不會忘記年青志士直接行動反對苛政，捨身成仁，展現我們膽色勇氣；我不會忘記銀髮一族走上街頭保護年青人，展現我們彼此關懷；我不會忘記「五大訴求」，不會忘記2019年區議會選舉，展現我們有理有節。

　　法官閣下，我對於當日的所作所為，不感羞恥，毫無悔意。我能夠在出獄後與群眾同行一路，與戰友同繫一獄，實是莫大榮幸。若法治失去民主基石，將使法庭無奈地接受專制政權所訂立解釋的法律限制，隨時變成政治工具掃除異見，因此爭取民主普選，建設真正法治，追求公平正義，仍然是我的理想。在這條路上，如有必要，我仍然會公民抗命，正如終審法院海外非常任法官賀輔明（Lord Hoffmann）所言，發自良知的公民抗命有悠久及光榮的傳統，歷史將證明我們是正確的。我期望，曾與我一起遊行抗命的手足戰友要堅持信念，在艱難歲月裡毋忘初衷，活在愛和真實之中。

　　最後，如9年前一樣，我想借用美國民權領袖馬丁路德金牧師的一番話對我們的反對者說：「我們將以自己忍受苦難的能力，來較量你們製造苦難的能力。我們將用我們靈魂的力量，來抵禦你們物質的暴力。對我們做你們想做的事吧，我們仍然愛你們。我們不能憑良心服從你們不公正的法律，因為拒惡與為善一樣是道德責任。將我們送入監獄吧，我們仍然愛你們。」（We shall match your capacity to inflict suffering by our capacity to endure suffering. We shall meet your physical force with soul force. Do to us what you will, and we shall continue to love you. We cannot in all good conscience obey your unjust laws because noncooperation with evil is as much a moral obligation as is cooperation with good. Throw us in jail and we shall still love you.）

　　願慈愛的主耶穌賜我們平安，與我和我一家同在，與法官閣下同在，與香港人同在。沒有暴徒，只有暴政；五大訴求，缺一不可！願榮耀歸上帝，榮光歸人民！

第五被告
黃浩銘
二零二一年八月十九日

Lest we forget the five demands: civil disobedience is morally justified
- Statement on 10‧20 Kowloon Rally
(Case No.: DCCC 535/2020)

Your Honour Judge Woodcock

In 2012, I stood before the court and admitted to violating the "Public Security Evil Law". I expressed my hope for universal suffrage, criticized the evil law as unjust, and willingly accepted the penalty for civil disobedience. Back then, I said that if the small-circle election had not been abolished and the draconian law had not disappeared, I would still be as determined as I was, and I believe that more students and citizens would join this movement. Today, universal suffrage is still a long way off, and I have been brought before the court again for trial. But in just seven years, hundreds of thousands of people have already risen up in civil disobedience against tyranny. Today, I plead guilty to "unauthorised assembly" under an unapproved evil law enacted by an unauthorised government. I do not intend to seek the court's mercy, but please allow me to take up a little time in court to present my case so that the court can consider all aspects before sentencing me.

The roots of violence

At the time when the whole anti-extradition law movement was in full-swing, I was taking responsibility for another civil disobedience case. Although I was in prison, my heart was still with the people. I witnessed the three million-person rallies on 9 June, 16 June and 18 August on television in prison, when many peace-loving people took to the streets despite the rain and bullets, to protest against unjust laws. Some people may ask, "The Government has already suspended the legislative amendments in June and formally withdrew the bill in September, but we are still demonstrating, are we not being unreasonable?" I am sure your Honour has heard of the adage "Justice delayed is justice denied". When more than a million people took to the streets to express their discontent peacefully, the Lam administration ignored them and instead acted arbitrarily, brutally trampling on the wishes of the people of Hong Kong, resulting in endless arguments and even confrontations. After so many conflicts and painful experiences, the so-called moratorium is no longer meaningful. We only know better: without democracy, we cannot even have basic human rights!

In this case, although we did not instigate or commit acts of violence, I believe that in the eyes of the prosecution and the court, the violence on the day of the incident can still be counted against us, based on the August 18 and October 1 case. And now I must ask - If Hong Kong had a fair and just universal election, and the public could directly veto laws they did not approve of at the Legislative Council, then how could the violent clashes of 2019 have come about? If the violence we see is so heinous, how do we feel about the institutional violence that insists on the imposition of draconian laws even after millions of people have taken to the streets? If we cannot accept violent rebellion, how can we remain silent in the face of even greater and more oppressive institutional violence? The true and frequent violence is the kind of violence that ignores people's demands, that tramples on their opinions, that deprives them of their right to express themselves. People who truly hate violence and abhor it cannot accuse violent resistance on the one hand and tolerate institutional violence on the other. If I have to bear the criminal responsibility for the violence caused by the peaceful demonstration, then who should bear the criminal responsibility for the social unrest caused by failed administration?

The roots of society's problems

From a court's point of view, it may be that what happened in 2019 was just a series of social unrest, and that those who broke the law must be held personally accountable. What happened in 2019 was not something that I alone or the defendants could have made possible, and the crux of the social problem was not the 'criminals' but the 'causes of crime'. I understand the concept of " applying severe punishment to a troubled world", but if "decimation" was really the solution, there would not have been more violent rebellions in 2019 after the Mongkok "riot" in 2016 and the heavy sentences handed down to protesters by the Court of Appeal in 2017.

If we do not want social unrest, we must get to the root of the problem and implement the "five demands" step by step, so as to achieve fundamental reforms and win back the hearts of the people. 2019's anti-revision movement is indeed a continuation of 2014's Umbrella Movement, and even though the court may think that both movements are caused by a "perverse wind", I must clarify that the core of both movements is the pursuit of democracy and universal suffrage, and the people being the masters of their own house. In the District Council election on 24 November 2019, which is the closest thing to universal suffrage, nearly 3 million people voted, and the democratic camp won a huge victory, winning majority in 17 District Councils. As canaries in the monetary coal mine, we have repeatedly reminded the government to withdraw the extradition bill and fundamentally reform the system, and the march in Kowloon on 20 October was certainly an opportunity to reflect public opinion. Now, by imposing heavy penalties on us, the court is only punishing public opinion, trapping the canaries in a birdcage, or even stifling them in the palm of their hands, suffocating the freedom of expression.

The importance of persistence

As a result of the crackdown after the mass movement, we lost Apple Daily, the Hong Kong Professional Teachers' Union, and the Civil Human Rights Front. Many of our democratic leaders and comrades who had contributed to the movement were imprisoned, and many of our friends who had been passionately involved in the movement had been forced to lay low under the threat of the National Security Law. I still believe that the faith of Hong Kong people and the glory of humanity seen in 2019 will remain unchanged. I will never forget the millions of people who braved the rain and the heat to resist tyranny and evil laws, demonstrating our unity of purpose; I will never forget the crowds of people who gave way to ambulances, demonstrating our civility; I will never forget the young people who sacrificed their lives, demonstrating our courage and bravery; I will never forget the silver-haired who took to the streets to protect the youth, demonstrating our care for each other; I will never forget the "five demands" and the 2019 District Council election, demonstrating our rationality and decency.

Your Honour, I have nothing to be ashamed of and no remorse for what I did on that day. It is my great honour to be in prison with my comrades and to be able to walk with the public after my release. If the rule of law were to lose its democratic foundation, the courts would have no choice but to accept the legal restrictions set by the autocratic regime and become a political tool to eliminate dissent at any time. As Lord Hoffmann, a non-permanent overseas judge of the Court of Final Appeal, said, civil disobedience from the conscience has a long and honourable tradition, and history will prove us right. I hope that my comrades in arms who walked with me in protests will keep their faith and live in love and truth in the midst of this difficult time.

Finally, as I did nine years ago, I would like to say something to those who oppose us, borrowing the words of American civil rights leader Reverend Martin Luther King: "We shall match your capacity to inflict suffering by our capacity to endure suffering. We shall meet your physical force with soul force. Do to us what you will, and we shall continue to love you. We cannot in all good conscience obey your unjust laws because noncooperation with evil is as much a moral obligation as is cooperation with good. Throw us in jail and we shall still love you."

Peace be with me and my family, with Your Honour, and with the people of Hong Kong. There are no thugs, only tyranny; five demands, not one less! To god be the glory and to people be the glory!

The Fifth Defendant
Wong Ho Ming
19 August 2021

【呱吉Podcast】新資料夾(48)：高校界聞風喪膽

本集由【樂天國際銀行】贊助播出

現在開戶輸入推薦碼(WIN)，開戶成功並且於指定期間成功啟用金融卡，就可以得到200元的獎勵金！疫情期間宅在家網路購物最安全，於樂天市場使用樂天國際銀行帳戶轉帳支付，回饋10%限期樂天點數無上限。還不快買爆他！

點我開戶➡️ https://bit.ly/3dZloCn
--
呱吉大燒聲
上週星座運勢：猜猜巨蟹座、處女座、雙子座是誰？
終極一班
采翎消失兩週的真相
一百年前的台灣
:::樂天國際銀行之十萬塊能買什麼:::
夏天的泳池充滿美好
健身中心老闆騷擾會員
做核心運動可能會做出病？
小歐的壺鈴秘密
用Taylor Swift對抗民眾的警察
你很機車 也很汽車
呱吉的第一次騎機車經驗(很臭)
會咬人的狗不會吠吧？
什麼叫做撿貓咪？
降龍十一掌與還珠格格
挪威反修圖新法
采翎差點參與小Ｘ瓶之亂
我是韓國人！
--
📫 商業合作請寄信至 norge@65535studio.com
🐸 加入呱吉官方LINE帳號 https://lin.ee/uuepLUX
--
📣 Spotify:
https://spoti.fi/3xvgoNF
📣 KKBOX:
https://bit.ly/2UDp59O
📣 Apple Podcast:
https://apple.co/3hLLeuG
📣 Google Podcast:
https://bit.ly/3qY6Kk6
📣 SoundOn:
https://sndn.link/froggy/iDKnso

PS4遠端搖控程式不支援WIN7作業系統哦！只有WIN10跟8可用。
時間目錄
00:05 掛機撿足跡原理
~電腦遠端搖控PS4五步驟~
01:13 1.PS4設定WIFI連線
01:38 2.PC端安裝搖控程式
02:22 3.把PS4手把插進電腦
02:43 4.接取撿足跡任務
03:08 5.啟動巨集程式

附上逐字稿：

首先說明原理，座騎本身有自動尋找足跡功能，但它只會不停的往下一個足跡移動，你需要連續按「圈」才可以撿足跡（隨機獲得調查報告）。

因此，要實現自動掛機撿足跡有兩種方法，一，設定按圈連發。但目前只有PC版可自行設定連發（以前影片教過了），

（PS4要另購非原廠的很貴的連發手把）

另一種方法是啟動PS4內建的遠端搖控功能，然後從電腦或手機上搖控遊戲（手機理論可行，但未實測），再開巨集連續按圈，這樣很簡單就實現自動掛機撿足跡的操作了。

重點，如果你電腦沒有巨集程式可用，或你根本就不會用巨集，請關掉影片，找幼稚園以上程度的工具人幫你比較快。

基於版權及木馬病毒疑慮，這邊不會提供你任何免費的巨集程式。

接下來使用步驟教學：
1.PS4設定WIFI連線，並開啟遠端搖控功能。
WIFI你可以連接家裡的中華電信數據機或手機上的WIFI也可以。確定能連接上網後，遠端搖控功能打勾。

2.PC端安裝搖控程式
首先到PS4官網下載遠端搖控程式（網址請自己查），安裝好了之後，輸入你的PSN帳號密碼。

注意，這帳號密碼必須跟你PS4登入的帳密相同（廢話），
如果你輸入朋友家的帳密，就會去搖控他家的PS4，雖然這樣就可以玩他的遊戲或幫他打王，但這不是本篇重點。

3.把PS4手把插進你的電腦裡，
然後按OPTIONS，靜待遠端連線成功後，就可以在電腦上面玩自己或別人家的PS4。

4.接取可以撿足跡的任務
比方說MR150的「神賜的台地（可獲得危險度3歷戰調查報告）」，進場後，召喚座騎，然後開地圖，取消追蹤目標。這樣座騎就只會四處尋找足跡，不會緊跟在麒麟後面。

5.啟動巨集程式
巨集程式隨便你要用什麼牌子都好，巨集設定為「Enter」，它在遊戲中的作用等同於按「圈」。然後設定「開關」，按一下是啟動巨集，再按一下取消，最後設定為１秒鐘按兩下（500毫秒1次）。

都弄好後，回到遊戲頁面，就會看到角色在自動撿足跡。然後就可以掛著不管它了。

如果你沒辦法理解以上教學內容，請找工具人幫助你，原理超級簡單，就是讓電腦自動重覆按「Enter」，就會一直撿足跡了。



#魔物獵人世界 #怪物猎人 #MHW #MHWI