Di bunuh kerana Facebook?

(Netflix kena kecam sebab bias katanya dalam berkongsi fakta sebab nampak berat sebelah.. saya tulis review pun kena kecam jugak sebab selari dengan netflix. Maka ramai suruh baca sudut pandang lain bab pembunuhan ini.. maka saya dah tengok sudut lain dan tulis semula. semoga semua berpuas hati...)

Alkisahnya...

Malam tadi saya ajak bini layan dokumentari kisah benar pembunuhan kejam seorang wanita bersama dua anaknya di Amarica.

“Doku pasal apa ni bang?”

“Abang baca sepintas lalu, kisah isteri kena bunuh kerana Facebook, jom layan”

“Ok, teruja tajuk tu, jom”

Ringkasan cerita, ada keluarga bahagia, isteri mampu bina rumah idaman, suami kerja oil and gas, ada dua anak perempuan yang comel, ada kejiranan yang baik, Cuma masalahnya laki nak anak lelaki, dan ditakdirkan akhirnya isteri mengandung anak lelaki.

Lebih menarik, segala kehidupan laki bini itu didokumentasikan dalam bentuk video dan status FB, wajah selfie bahagia, video anak sambut hari jadi, video pergi bercuti, dan semua itu dirakam oleh isteri.

Lebih mengejutkan si isteri bangga update status facebook yang dia bossy, high-strung and dominant, ala macam queen control lah tu, atau laki ni jenis takut bini, taat apa sahaja cakap bini, siap ada video bini paksa laki jadi santa clause dan suruh ambik telefon buat itu ini.. laki ngkiut jer.

Ada juga si bini update dia gaduh dengan mertua sebab beli aiskrim kat anak, lepas tu marahkan laki depan mertua, dan ada pulak kisah mertua dan adik beradik perempuan si lelaki ni tak suka pada bininya kerana terlalu control dan macam dah rampas si suami dari keluarga mertua.

Tiba tiba jiran perasan si isteri ni dan tak update FB, whatsapp tak jawab, call tak angkat dan bila call polis, suami baru balik kerja tengok rumah bersih dan jumpa cincin perkahwinan atas meja. Isteri dan anaknya hilang, maka kelam kabut suami mintak tolong jiran ada CCTV untuk cari isteri.

Tapi bila polis siasat, rupanya yang bunuh isteri dan dua anak mereka adalah suami yang dah tak tahan hidup dengan perempuan tu, berpunca juga ada skandal. Hampeh!!

Apa yang mengejutkan masyarakat, lelaki ni baik takde rekod jenayah, tapi bila dah mengamuk, anak dua orang buang dalam loji, bini dicekik dan mayat di tanam dekat gurun.

Rupanya di Amarica, 3 orang wanita di bunuh oleh pasangan setiap hari, dan pembunuhan ini bukan secara tiba tiba tapi adalah di rancang oleh lelaki selepas tak tahan hidup bersama.

Dari kisah benar ini, saya pun godek internet, dan tengok ada macam macam pendapat warga internet:

Antaranya:

Ada yang kata punca utama adalah sebab bini terlalu control, bini jadi big bos, marah laki depan mertua, hmm, okey, dalam islam, lelaki akan jadi dayus bila takut bini lalu ikut je apa cakap bini hingga nak balik rumah mak pun tunggu bini setuju, adohai.. tapi bunuh anak tu memang tak ada hati perut!

Ada juga yang kata salah jin, dan hantu, dalam video ada yang Nampak kelibat makhluk halus, saya malas nak komen, sebab tak setuju, bagi saya laki tu salah besar sebab curang dan membunuh, perempuan pulak salah besar jugak sebab terlalu control.

Ada jugak yang kata salah perempuan curang, dia yang hasut suami orang tu bunuh isteri dan anak anak.

Ada jugak salahkan Netflix sebab tak tepat dalam melaporkan berita, kisah sebenar kononya perempuan tu tak salah apa apa, yang salah adalah lelaki, dari awal hingga akhir semua salah lelaki termasuk ayah lelaki tu, aduhhhh..

Macam macamlah ulasan warganet, apa yang dapa kita ambik iktibar, dalam rumah tangga, tolong jangan gaduh dengan mertua, baik belah laki ataupun bini, carilah jalan berdamai, dan jangan marah pasangan depan mertua, takde sesiapapun yang bahagia dalam situasi itu, baik mertua, laki kau, atau kau sendiri!

Lepas tu, perempuan yang tahu suami orang ada masalah dan masuk kacau bagi idea yang bukan bukan pada suami orang juga punca masalah utama saya rasa, sebab nak poligami memang tak dibenarkan di USA, banyak kes ada orang ketiga bukan berakhir kahwin senyap senyap, tapi akan membunuh pasangan, aduhhhh.

Itu yang di Amarica, 3 orang wanita di bunuh oleh pasangan setiap hari, salah nafsu lelaki lah ni!

Sebab?, yelah.., walaupun bini dia mungkin queen control, walaupun awek baru dia mungkin bagi idea macam macam, tapi lelaki itu tetap salah, kerana bunuh anak kecik tiada maaf, itu kejam dan melampau!,

Jika lelaki itu beriman, takut tuhan, tak akan dia tergamak bunuh anaknya yang jika kita tengok di FB dia pun, comel dan maja, aduhhh.

Kenapa kau kejam wahai seorang ayah yang sanggup membunuh anak yang boleh berkata kata, “mak okey tak? Kita nak ke mana? Kenapa tutup muka kakak?

Sob..sob..

Maka begitulah sedikit sebanyak moral dari kes pembunuhan The Watts family murders berlaku pada August 13, 2018 di Colorado. Suaminya Christopher Lee Watts (born May 16, 1985) membunuh isteri yang sedang mengandung Shanann Cathryn Watts (born January 10, 1984) by strangulation. Dia juga bunuh dua anak perempuanya, four-year-old Bella and three-year-old Celeste, dan kini dipenjarakan seumur hidup.

Ps: Oh ye, dari dokumentari ini juga ada satu info rare: laki jika tiba tiba sado adalah petanda curang, sebab mereka dapat semangat hidup yang baru! polis amarica bagitahu ni, aduhhhh, patutlah abang mayat selalu gagal nak sado, petanda setia rupanya.

Woha!

Happy birthday Strangulation!!!!! Kawaiiii ne!!!!

SARAWAK ELECTIONS JUSTIFY THE URGENT NEED FOR ELECTORAL REFORMS

Legitimacy to govern from free and fair elections is the hallmark of democracy and fulfills the dictum to be governed with the true and informed consent of the people.

The recent Sarawak state elections witnessed the strangulation of democracy with massive open electoral misdeeds.

The continued gerrymandering through arbitrary redelineation exercise, the blatant use of government machinery, vote buying, on the spot allocations, promises of unfettered future spending, vanishing indelible ink and limited media access are symptomatic of the failings of democratic governance and an uneven level playing field.

Sarawak PKR and opposition candidates are marginalised from enjoying the same treatment as their BN counterparts. Not only are they are forced to face the likes of the PM and the DPM dispensing cash like theres no tomorrow whilst their only 'semenanjung' counter force is held up by the immigration; but they also face an unfair redelienation process created to attenuate gains made in previous elections.

As such, we applaud and will continue to work alongside BERSIH, Parliament and state legislature, the judiciary and other reform minded NGOs who have been at the forefront in demanding truly free and fair elections. It is precisely due to their perseverance that the Sarawak PKR through YB See Chee How proceeded with our legal suit against the EC's redelineation process which was unconstitutional as it was drawn heavily in favor of the incumbent, following the 29 objections made for the 11 new seats announced by SPR.

A cursory glance at past practices include the 5th Sarawak state election having 48 seats, which with a denial of BN's two thirds majority when BN won only 28 (PBB:14,SUPP:11,SNAP:3) seats, PBDS 15 seats and Permas 5 seats.

The redelineation process ended up with the creation of 8 new state seats totalling 56 state seats by the 6th Sarawak state elections in 1991.

True enough, the tried and tested redelienation trick then won BN 49 new state seats and PBDS 7 seats.

We must reaffirm and redouble our demand for electoral reforms. Unless reforms are executed before the next general elections; then Malaysia will continue its decline into autocracy and illegitimacy. The skewed redelienation process will end up crushing more opposition held seats in other states throughout Malaysia.

Whilst Chief Minister Adenan has much to celebrate through his popular vote of 61.8 percent and his 87.8 percent of state legislature win, it would be all the more legitimate with a fair redelienation and electoral process which accords fair treatment and coverage to all legitimate political entities.

NURUL IZZAH ANWAR
MEMBER OF PARLIAMENT FOR LEMBAH PANTAI
VICE PRESIDENT AND ELECTION DIRECTOR OF KEADILAN

[1]http://www.thestar.com.my/…/supp-against-kuching-redelinea…/

Please Like & Subscribe!
Highlight from my stream https://www.twitch.tv/himechar
Get my IG - FB - Twitter below:
https://www.instagram.com/himechar
https://www.facebook.com/HimeChar
https://twitter.com/himechar

Episode 131, A Textual Analysis
===============================
We open with Char sitting too close to the screen who goes on to tell Bell not to sit to close to the screen. In the background is Purple Pony - not sitting too close to the screen and the only blameless character in this entire story. Bell ignores mom's instruction and makes a virtue of sitting too close to the screen by pulling faces. She gets so close she accidentally nudges the camera.
[The opening "Hi" was from later in the VOD and got pulled to the front to set up Char to fail.]

As Bell runs out of and back into shot, we get the first hint of the cooped-up energy that will power the following drama. A misunderstanding occurs between touching and moving - in the literal interpretation of a three year old, accidentally touching the cam isn't deliberately moving it. The potential for conflict increases.

Char rightly involves Bell in her hair drying choices and the shot finishes on Purple Pony exhibiting an expression that tells us what it takes to survive in this household; Pony's seen things we people wouldn't believe.

Char is attacked by her own domestic appliance, makes an appeal for sympathy but gets a wide Pony grin. She puts on a brave face, Bell attempts her first strangulation then possesses the stream, Char gives her first 'not like this' speech explaining why Bell and chores don't mix. Bell proves she and chores don't mix by jumping on freshly folded laundry which fully triggers Char leading to Act 2.

Act 2 - full Bell meltdown. Char's ultra-mom skills birth Bell off the bed and slowly out of the world of pain she created for herself but she's still full of "no". Char counters with breathing, hugging and drinking but Bell responds by banning her from talking to Chat. Char deploys an entire bookshelf plus water plus science in what is rapidly becoming turn based combat then Bell makes a fatal mistake. Instead of banning mommy from making animal noises she instead bans Chat from reading a book we can't see anyway (well, she is only three!). Bell is slowly running out of "no", Char corners her into talking about her feelings (scary, am I right fellas?).

Act3 - age check, strangle #2 and Bell's in possession again. Char counters with "hug" but Bell cruelly starts to follow her knowing full well mommy's got more used to losing followers than gaining them. Bed incursion and the stream is knocked flat, Char enters the fray but Bell kicks clean over her to floor the stream again - our vision's blurred: medic!. Then Bell shows how she did it by kicking her mommy but it's too late: we lost this one Chat. A knockout, two falls or a submission, them's the rules. Game over.

Editor: James 'MOV r0,r0' Staples https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCcn-XPhePJ5D5Uc6ExWG3PA