熱門Ptt文章

[爆卦]speech格式是什麼？優點缺點精華區懶人包

雖然這篇speech格式鄉民發文沒有被收入到精華區：在speech格式這個話題中，我們另外找到其它相關的精選爆讚文章

在 speech格式產品中有10篇Facebook貼文，粉絲數超過7萬的網紅Eric's English Lounge，也在其Facebook貼文中提到， [專頁公告] 英文學習「生態系」更新 English Learning Ecosystem Update As I began exploring Instagram, I struggled to find a way to deliver useful academic content. ...

　同時也有1部Youtube影片，追蹤數超過2萬的網紅siuyuenchin，也在其Youtube影片中提到，✅WhatsApp即時查詢： https://wa.me/85265886588 ✅直接網上報名： https://www.siuyuenchinese.com/hkjy01/bk_18327876.html ✅參觀上課網站： www.siuyuenchinese.com 課程推介： (1)...

「speech格式」的推薦目錄

speech格式 在 Kenneth Lau Instagram 的最佳貼文

2021-04-29 07:57:25

/ Paper 3 Final Reminders Part 1 [請立即 share 俾 friends] . 大家應該休息完一陣喇，要準備佔分最重 Paper 3，要打大佬！💪🏼💪🏼💪🏼💪🏼 . ✅ 請先睇 Regular 07及08 Paper 3嘅筆記俾咗好多 Final Tips 大家，包...

speech格式 在 Calvin Sun Instagram 的最讚貼文

2021-04-29 07:18:59

Welcome back! 依家送上paper 3 final reminders! Part A 1 記住超必DQPKR, 尤其是R 2 記住jot 四大天王備用，千祈唔好放空 3 Predict 填充/續寫Speech 4 Suggestion/ Change 記住有verb 5 小心Past ...

speech格式 在 Kenneth Lau Instagram 的精選貼文

2020-05-03 17:47:30

/ Paper 3 Final Reminders Part 1 [請立即 share 俾 friends] . 大家應該休息完一陣喇，要準備佔分最重 Paper 3，要打大佬！💪🏼💪🏼💪🏼💪🏼 . ✅ 請先睇 Regular 7.6 Paper 3 網上補課俾咗好多 Final Tips 大家 ✅...

  • Eric's English Lounge

    speech格式 在 Eric's English Lounge Facebook 的最佳解答

    2021-02-07 14:16:28
    有 273 人按讚

    [專頁公告] 英文學習「生態系」更新

    English Learning Ecosystem Update

    As I began exploring Instagram, I struggled to find a way to deliver useful academic content. Instagram posts typically focus on images, short clips, and concise text, which are attention grabbing but not always entirely conducive to language learning. I looked over the posts of established Instagram English learning accounts, and experimented with vocabulary posts and even news posts for a couple of weeks. Not wanting to post just images, I thought about creating something new even with the rigid format of the platform.

    當我開始研究怎麼用IG，我想盡了各種辦法，希望能提供大家一些實用的學術內容。 IG 的特色著重在圖片、短片以及簡潔的文字，這樣的方式雖然很容易引人注目，卻不全然有助於語言學習。我瀏覽了 IG 上英文教學網紅的貼文，並在這幾週嘗試發了一些學術單字與新聞相關的文章。我並不想只是發一些圖片，而思考著要如何在既有框架下創作一些新的東西。

    ★★★★★★★★★★★★

    A tenet of using tech in education is to engage students with what they are familiar with, not give them an entirely new platform that is difficult to use. So, how could I create a new series of Instagram posts that is both educational and unique? I thought about my goal to disseminate academic English resources, and how I could leverage my experience as a curriculum writer and voice recording artist for public school textbooks.

    一個使用科技進行教育的原則是用學生熟悉的方式與他們互動，而非用了全新的平台卻使他們難以學習。那麼，我應該如何創作獨特且具教育意義的一系列全新 IG 發文呢？我想到了我傳遞學術英文資源的目標，以及思考到該如何發揮身為教科書編輯者與音頻錄製者的經驗。

    ★★★★★★★★★★★★

    So far, this is what I have at the moment. I will post Word of the Day (每日一詞), high frequency vocabulary words that you see in academic texts and sometimes on the news. These Tier 2 academic vocabulary words are not exclusive to a single domain and complement the theme-based approach I’ve taken with my mind-mapping vocabulary class. You can find other vocabulary learning methods here.

    這是我目前所想到的內容：我會發布「每日一詞」，也就是學術文章或是新聞中有時出現的高頻字彙。這些Tier 2學術詞彙並不限於單個領域，更補充了我在心智圖詞彙攻略課程中採用的主題式學習法。你還可以在下面網站找到其他詞彙學習方法。

    🎓 詞彙學習方法：http://bit.ly/2JGXKvK

    In these posts, I added the pronunciation, collocation, and example sentences of each word for students. These words will be helpful to university-level students who often read academic texts and the news. Students can access them by simply clicking on the hashtag 學術英語單字.

    在這些貼文中，我為學生提供了發音、搭配用法和例句。這些單字會對經常閱讀學術文章和新聞的大學程度學生有所幫助。學生只要點貼文上的＃學術英語單字即可看到貼文。

    🎓 學術英文單字: https://bit.ly/3cxH091

    ★★★★★★★★★★★★

    To help students use more precise and common academic phrases, I then added Academic Phrases (每日一句), set phrases that appear in both academic speech and writing. These phrases have varying functions from introducing a topic to comparing and contrasting ideas. There is a difference between speech and writing, so I picked words that could be used for both. If one is used only in a specific context, I will make note of it in the video recording. This series of posts will help students with language output, and can be found under the following hashtag 學術英語片語.

    為了幫助學生使用更精準、更道地的常見學術用語，我們接著會進入「每日一句」，也就是在學術演說與寫作中常見的用語。這些片語具有不同的功能，範圍涵蓋介紹主題到比較、對比想法等等。而演講和寫作之間也有不同，所以我選擇了都可以使用的片語。如果只能在特定情況下使用，我會在影片中特別說明。該系列文章將會幫助學生提高語言輸出能力，可以在 # 學術英語片語找到。

    🎓 學術英文片語: https://bit.ly/3aqaQcP

    ★★★★★★★★★★★★

    Last, I will follow up with an abridged version of breaking news (時事英文) with high frequency collocations and audio recordings. This will provide students with the input of not only individual words, but how to use them in output (speech and writing) with context. While all these news posts might seem independent at first, I will eventually link and organize them by theme when there are enough posts. Along with my news class, these extra posts will help students stay aware of current events, acquire set phrases used in journalism, and develop critical thinking. These posts can currently be found under the hashtag EEL時事英文.

    最後，我們會跟進精簡版的「時事英文」，其中包含高頻搭配詞與錄音資料。這些內容不僅可以提供你們輸入單字，而且可以幫助你們知道如何搭配情境輸出，再將這些內容使用在口說與寫作中。這些貼文一開始雖然看似獨立，當素材足夠後我會再將他們進行連結與整理。這些貼文和我的新聞課程將幫助學生維持對時事的敏銳度，掌握新聞中使用的固定用法，並養成批判性思維。這些貼文目前可以在 # EEL時事英文。

    🎓 批判性思考問題大全: http://bit.ly/34rdtJ7

    🎓 EEL時事英文: https://bit.ly/36tDusv

    ★★★★★★★★★★★★

    There is a lot more I want to do to create an ecosystem of free academic English learning materials. I will continue modifying our post format to meet your needs, but these are my plans for Instagram thus far. Join us on our journey to make bilingual academic English resources more readily available to all! Let’s continue to learn and grow together!

    建立免費的學術英文學習系統是件大工程，我會持續修改我們發文的格式以符合你們的需求與習慣，這些只是我目前 IG 學術英語學習計畫的一部分。加入我們的旅程來讓雙語的學術英文資源更加普及！讓我們一起學習與成長！

    ★★★★★★★★★★★★

    🎓 學術英文單字: https://bit.ly/3cxH091

    🎓 學術英文片語: https://bit.ly/3aqaQcP

    🎓 EEL時事英文: https://bit.ly/36tDusv

    🎓 批判性思考問題大全：http://bit.ly/34rdtJ7

    🎓 該如何學習英文？http://bit.ly/3inxdCP

  • 新思惟國際

    speech格式 在 新思惟國際 Facebook 的最讚貼文

    2020-01-02 09:00:00
    有 235 人按讚

    #亞東紀念醫院張維倫藥師
    　
    市面上教簡報設計的課程很多，有些學費可能連新思惟的尾數都不到（我也曾一度動心），但來上完這門課後，我感到非常慶幸，因為新思惟的獨特性，是其他市面上課程所辦不到的！
    　
    #新思惟的獨特性　
    1️⃣知道我們這些醫療、科學界主流觀眾，他們想要的是什麼（又或者他們也不知道他們要什麼，但是看過我們的報告後，就知道原來他們要的就是這個），對收服圈內人，具有高度專一性的奧義領略。
    　
    2️⃣Before & after 的內容，都是一些自己平常會接觸到的慘劇實例。
    　
    在有限的課程時間中，這種密集的 debug & rechallenge，會比去參加其他包含各種領域的大雜燴簡報課來的有效率，且與會學員幾乎都是你的同行，所以你沒想到的問題，別人也很可能會發問，因此能間接收載更多資訊和解決潛在的疑問。（例如：為什麼簡報格式要 4:3？為什麼 Poster 的文字要靠左排列？）
    　
    3️⃣小班制教學：我已經受夠了傳統大鍋炒的教學，但新思惟的實作時間，會有許多有如杜比環繞音效一般的助教在學員四周待命，一舉手，他們馬上就會拎著折凳，坐在你的身旁貼身指導，省時高效又親切，非常卓越！
    　
    　　
    #一次搞定醫學簡報常見的問題
    ☑️數據圖特多　☑️表格特複雜　☑️影像判讀難　
    　
    從 case report 到 scientific presentation，從 invited speech 到行政簡報，每種類型，有什麼重點、該如何拆解，給你最精準的指導。　　
    　
    　
    #越早來上越好
    ▪️ 每一次上台，都在替自己加分！
    ▪️ 在生涯的早期，產生深遠的雪球效應。
    ▪️ 被人記得，在同輩中脫穎而出，獲得升遷。
    ▪️ 讓專業被看見，開始自己的獨立品牌經營。
    　
    🔸2020 第一梯公開班，報名開跑！
    🔸3 / 8（日）醫學簡報與電子壁報工作坊　
    🔸https://grsp2013.innovarad.tw/event

  • 健吾

    speech格式 在 健吾 Facebook 的最佳解答

    2019-07-10 18:56:12
    有 354 人按讚


    各位，生成器也許已沒有用了。選管會一天就收到4500封電郵。看來，大家炸他電郵還是有點用的。

    以下乃沈大師言為「內部AO提供範本」。的確是官話文章，請先仔細閱讀，才選擇是否發出電郵吧。

    你還有5小時。

    请广传，好人一生平安。

    [#官方資訊] 早前分享了一位高級政務官朋友就《逃犯條例》爭議的感受，得到數千轉載，迴響十分熱烈，也有不少公務員私訊回應。本頁對象一直以黃藍以外的專業人士為主，雖然平日只分享國際視野資訊，但在關鍵時刻，也希望為一些平日對社會抽離的朋友，提供更多資訊參考。以下是我的另一位AO朋友擔心局勢惡化，希望以自己的方式真正為特區政府服務，因此以私人身份草擬的意見書，回應特區政府選舉管理委員會關於區議會選舉的官方諮詢，並使用了完美官僚理據、格式和文法，就DQ候選人提供了詳細意見。根據官方資訊，《逃犯條例》收到4500份意見書，其中3000份「贊成」，因此發出意見書並非毫無價值。這位AO表示，大家可以直接使用這格式，根據個人觀點加減內容直接電郵遞交，因為香港人大家都忙，這過程只需一分鐘，應該最符合成本效益。截止日期是7月10日或之前，請廣傳，好人一生平安。

    10 July 2019

    Chairman
    Electoral Affairs Commission (EAC)
    By Email: eacenq@eac.hk

    Dear Chairman,

    Public consultation on District Council Election proposed guidelines

    I write to object to Chapter 3 of the Proposed Guidelines, as it gives Government an unjust, unfair, and unchecked power to disqualify any candidate during the nomination period by reason of Government’s own political motives.

    Chapter 3.1 of the Proposed Guidelines says that : “Under the law, the validity of a candidate’s nomination is to be determined by the Returning Officer (RO). The EAC is neither empowered nor involved in the making of such decision and would not provide any advice on the decision made by the RO”.

    Chapter 3.9(b) of the Proposed Guidelines describes the requirement by which a candidate must declare (through signing a “Confirmation Form” by the EAC) that he would uphold the Basic Law and pledge allegiance to the HKSAR.

    It is totally unclear whether a Confirmation Form duly signed by a candidate is itself sufficient to discharge the candidate’s duty to declare his willingness to uphold the Basic Law and pledge allegiance to the HKSAR when he is elected to the office.

    Previous elections showed that an RO, who was a civil servant (pitched at Administrative Officer Staff Grade C / District Officer) appointed to the role of RO prior to the election, could make subjective and arbitrary judgment about a candidate’s state of mind and political orientation, with selective reference to some or a few past writings, speeches, statements, expression of opinions, posts in social media platforms in relation to the candidate, instead of merely looking at a Confirmation Form duly signed.

    I find it outrageous to see that Ms. Anne Teng, then District Officer (Eastern) appointed to the role of RO in a legislative council by-election last year, could refuse to acknowledge a confirmation form signed by Miss Agnes Chow Ting and disqualify her, citing absurd and arbitrary reasons with reference to some of Miss Chow’s previous remarks or those of her political party, and without giving Miss Chow a fair opportunity to respond to those reasons uttered unreasonably by the RO.

    The Proposed Guidelines shows that the EAC has failed its duty to introduce any additional safeguard or measures to plug this unreasonable, unlawful and unconstitutional loophole, which may still be freely exploited by any RO in the next election driven by bad faith and political motive.

    It is unacceptable that the EAC could confess that it is “neither empowered nor involved in the making of such decision and would not provide any advice on the decision made by the RO” (Chapter 3.1). I question how the EAC can still “ensure that an election is conducted openly, fairly and honestly at all times” – its statutory duty enshrined in the Electoral Affairs Commission Ordinance - when it is not involved in scrutinising or monitoring the exercise of an RO’s power in disqualifying any candidate at the RO’s own political preference.

    The Guidelines did not describe in detail how an RO could, on his or her own, research during the short nomination period the political belief and past sayings of any candidate. The Guidelines are also silent as to whether the RO would have received biased or secret advice from any agency such as Department of Justice, Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Bureau, Home Affairs Department, Information Services Department, etc., which may have compiled a detailed recollection of a candidate’s previous remarks in advance. It was suggested by some that such a compilation of speech or opinion records prepared by any agency other than the RO could have assisted the RO unlawfully in reaching a dangerous disqualification decision to deprive a candidate of the right to stand for the election.

    I must remind the EAC that the right to stand for election is a fundamental right guaranteed under the Basic Law and the Hong Kong Bill of Rights. The United Nations Human Rights Committee’s General Comment 25 also states that “political opinion may not be used as a ground to deprive any person of the right to stand for election.”

    I am disappointed to see that the proposed Guidelines have not offered anything substantive to protect a candidate from the RO’s unlawful interference in the election by disqualifying candidates he or she dislikes. The EAC must look at this carefully to see what it can do.

    The current remedy about determining the lawfulness of an RO’s disqualification decision through an election petition to be adjudicated later by the court one or two years after the actual election is totally unsatisfactory, with the lapse of time which delays the timely delivery of a just outcome.

    I stress that I object to Chapter 3 of the Proposed Guidelines in its entirety. I urge you to review all the processes described in Chapter 3 again and independently. In so doing, you must resist all political considerations wrongly dictated by the Chief Executive, Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Bureau, Department of Justice, or other government agency seeking to disturb the fairness and integrity of the forthcoming district council election.

    Yours sincerely,

    XXXX

    更新：有熱心網友翻譯為中文版，並對原文作出修訂，請隨便share／修改：

    10 July 2019

    選舉管理委員會主席 鈞啓

    選舉管理委員會主席鈞鑒： 關於區議會選舉活動建議指引公眾諮詢事宜

    本人謹致函對建議指引第三章表達反對意見。建議指引第三章將賦予政府不公平、不公正以及不被箝制的權力，容許政府於提名階段取消香港市民的參選資格，以迎合政府自身的政治目的。

    建議指引第三章第一部分（3.1）指：「根據法例，候選人的提名是否有效 ，完全是由選舉主任作出決定，選管會無權並一向沒有參與， 亦不會給予任何意見。」
    建議指引第三章3.9(b) 要求候選人透過簽署選管會擬備的確認書表明他／她擁護《基本法》並保證對香港特別行政區效忠。

    至於候選人是否能夠簽署確認書就能滿足擁護《基本法》並保證對香港特別行政區效忠的要求，建議指引對此完全沒有清晰交代。

    過往選舉顯示，首長級丙級政務官／民政事務專員級別的公務員於選舉前獲委任為選舉主任，便能夠就候選人的思緒及政治取向作出主觀且隨意獨斷的決定，並只需揀選候選人往日曾經發表的文章、言論、宣言、意見表達、社交媒體帖文以及社交媒體專頁發佈關於對候選人的帖文穿鑿附會，當作輔證，而非僅以候選人是否有簽署確認書為單獨基礎作判斷。

    去年立法會補選，時任東區民政事務專員鄧如欣獲委任為選舉主任，居然拒絕周庭小姐簽署的確認書，以周庭小姐及其所屬政黨昔日的言論去佐證選舉主任荒唐的理由，去褫奪周庭小姐的參選資格，並且沒有給予周庭小姐公平機會回應選舉主任的無理指控，實在令人憤慨。

    由建議指引可見，選舉管理委員會並無引入任何措施或保障，去堵塞上述不合理、不合法、不合憲的漏洞。今後選舉主任依然可以使用此漏洞，依據其個人的政治目的或理念，惡意褫奪任何香港市民的參選資格。

    選舉管理委員會於第三章第一部分（3.1）指：「根據法例，候選人的提名是否有效 ，完全是由選舉主任作出決定，選管會無權並一向沒有參與， 亦不會給予任何意見。」此點完全不可接受。當選舉管理委員會對選舉主任按其個人政治取向褫奪候選人參選資格的權力不作任何箝制、監察或審查， 又能如何履行其法定職責，「確保在香港舉行的選舉是以公開、公平和誠實的方式進行」呢？

    建議指引並無對選舉主任如何可於短促的提名期內研究並審查任何候選人的政治理念及昔日言論有任何著墨。 建議指引亦未有論及選舉主任會否收到其他機構的秘密意見或者偏頗意見。上述的其他機構，例如律政司、內地及政制事務局、民政事務總署或政府新聞處等，可能預先詳細記錄相關候選人的昔日言論。據悉，上述由第三方準備的詳細記錄可能不合法地導致選舉主任作出褫奪候選人選舉資格的危險決定。

    本人必須提醒選舉管理委員會，被選舉權是獲香港基本法及香港人權法案保障的基本權利。聯合國人權事務委員會第25號一般性意見亦指出：「不得以政治見解為由剝奪任何人參加競選的權利。」

    本人對建議指引並未就保障候選人不被選舉主任按其個人喜惡褫奪資格，防止選舉主任非法干預選舉採取任何措施深感失望。選舉管理委員會必須詳細檢視自己對上述問題有何解決方法。

    就選舉主任褫奪參選資格的合法性，目前透過選舉呈請，並於選舉完結一兩年後由法庭裁決的安排實在強差人意。當中所耗的時間令公義遲來。
    本人對建議指引第三章完全反對。本人懇求主席重新並獨立審視第三章所包含的所有程序。在重新審視的時候，懇請閣下撇除並抗拒所有政治考量，尤其是來自行政長官、政制及事務內地局、律政司及其他政府機構企圖干預未來區議會選舉的誠信和公平性的政治考量。

    敬祝 鈞安 XXXXXXXX 敬上

    2019年7月9日

你可能也想看看

搜尋相關網站