為什麼這篇soon詞性鄉民發文收入到精華區:因為在soon詞性這個討論話題中,有許多相關的文章在討論,這篇最有參考價值!作者aqw123 (Θ)看板Eng-Class標題[文法] would as soon的句型用法時間...
soon詞性 在 Kenneth’s Team ✎ Instagram 的最佳貼文
2020-05-10 17:02:11
/ June 24, 2018 No Phones in Jury Trials Starting July . Summary: In response to multiple incidents where members of the public were found taking pict...
請問高手們一個文法觀念
(就算不是高手也歡迎參與討論)
http://goo.gl/BsXDik
http://goo.gl/X2KC2R
http://211.75.39.208/adv/grammar/data/SU591.htm
以上三個網頁我都有看懂了
另外我知道
would rather
=would sooner
=would just as soon
=would as soon
=had rather
=had sooner
=had just as soon
=had as soon
我只是想另外請問一個問題:
http://211.75.39.208/adv/grammar/data/SU591.htm
這個網頁的最最最下面的句型:
would/ had as soon + V1........as V2.
我的認知是這個句型只能有一個主詞
不能像
I would rather you hadn't failed the test.
因為他們有兩個主詞(I 和 you)
另外
would/ had as soon + V1........as V2.
是不是只能講現在或未來的假設
我的認知是好像這個句型不適用「與過去事實相反的假設語氣」
請問我的這兩個認知(單一主詞與時態限制)對嗎?
謝謝高手們!!!
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 114.35.105.129
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Eng-Class/M.1467084170.A.82A.html
謝謝各位參與討論
*******************
serif大大說的我懂
因為would as soon = would rather
但是我想問的是
would/ had as soon + V1........as V2.
能同一句話有「兩個主詞」嗎?
例如: I would rather you weren't my son. (有兩個主詞)
另外
能表「與過去事實相反的假設語氣」嗎?
我不是只是在說 would as soon
我是說包含兩個 as 的 完整句子
would/ had as soon + V1........as V2.
請知道的人繼續指教
感謝!!!
※ 編輯: aqw123 (114.35.105.129), 06/29/2016 23:23:58
我了解了
感謝!!!
※ 編輯: aqw123 (114.35.105.129), 06/30/2016 10:59:17