雖然這篇procedure字根鄉民發文沒有被收入到精華區:在procedure字根這個話題中,我們另外找到其它相關的精選爆讚文章
在 procedure字根產品中有17篇Facebook貼文,粉絲數超過66萬的網紅跟著董事長遊台灣,也在其Facebook貼文中提到, 【閒話一句】- 轉摘自講義雜誌 ————————————————— 人生的各種角色,沒有誰上路前,是真的「完全準備好了」 — 十方行銷顧問公司負責人林詠慈的分享 當有一個人想到你時,他是快樂的,我覺得這是天地間非常美好的情感 — 臺灣大學中國文學系教授蔡璧名認為,聚散都要懂得溫柔 帶著你的根本,...
同時也有2部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過0的網紅Ruby Daddy vlog,也在其Youtube影片中提到,""本集拍攝時間約2021/4月份拍攝的,並非在疫情期間"" 正常小孩約在一個月的時候就會替胎毛,而我們卻是在快三個月才替胎毛 剃完的胎毛根臍帶,我們請廠商做成胎毛筆、臍帶章、開運章、爸爸媽媽的章 原來做胎毛筆有這麼多"美尬"~故把這集做成影片,分享給你們~希望你們喜歡! 最重要的的~別忘了訂閱我~...
-
procedure字根 在 賓狗單字Bingo Bilingual Youtube 的最佳貼文
2019-09-11 21:00:03#記得打開CC字幕
《夢中夢》官方翻譯由我們提供 🎉🎉🎉
熊仔創作及演唱的夢中夢,意境深遠
他用細膩的文字及旋律,捕捉出光鮮亮麗的藝人心中的惆悵和困惑
一起來解析這首好歌,同時用我們的翻譯來學英文吧!
👇最下面還有歌詞翻譯全文喔👇
❤️💛💚💙💜
Facebook 讓你下載單字卡:https://www.facebook.com/bingobilingual/
Instagram 讓你看 Bingo 私生活:https://instagram.com/bingobilingual_bb/
➡️ 金曲譯者的其他影片:
《玫瑰少年 Womxnly》蔡依林 | 歌詞解析及翻譯
https://youtu.be/lGG_BBFNsf0
絕美翻譯!! 郁可唯 路過人間 cover 用英文唱
https://youtu.be/VEKxfu-4C8g
兩秒學5個單字 | 周湯豪 兩秒終 歌詞翻譯
https://youtu.be/cb1I1u3R9LE
綠茶婊翻成 green tea bxtch?! | 波霸奶茶 陳瑾緗 歌詞翻譯及解析
https://youtu.be/1aZp8z2avq0
【夢中夢歌詞翻譯】
不同的城市 同個故事
Different cities, same story
不同的粉絲 同種注視
Different fans, same gaze
不同的音軌 重複錄製
Different soundtracks recorded over and over
不同的巡迴 演無數次
Different tours performed again and again
不同的光芒 同樣刺眼 像把我穿透
Numerous rays of light, dazzling alike, all try to pierce through me
不同的訪綱 同樣嗜血 等著我犯錯
Numerous interview outlines, sinister alike, are all filled with traps
不同的房號 同樣失眠 和夢魘纏鬥
Numerous hotel rooms, unsleepable alike, all give me nightmares
不同處方藥 同樣制約 暫時性挽救
Numerous prescriptions, inhibiting alike, all cure only the symptoms
不同人知道我 但沒人認識我
People know me, but no one understands me
不同人需要我 沒人敢正視我
People need me, but no one looks at me directly
不同的治療後 沒人能根治我
After receiving different therapies, I’m still not cured
不同的包裝粉飾後 我感到更赤裸
After putting on different masks, I feel more naked
當這loop重複
As the loop repeats itself
靈魂和肉體逐漸不同步
My soul and body gradually fall out of sync
不同的佈景 上演同個劇情 不同幕
Different settings, same scenario, different acts
抽離後 看著自己變麻木
Looking at myself from a distance, I feel more and more apathetic
it’s just like déjà vu
it’s just like déjà vu
當我又被陌生眼神圍繞
When I’m yet again surrounded by unfamiliar people
鎂光燈聚焦
Flashlights from the paparazzi
浮躁的喧鬧
Noise of the crowd
skr 煞車聲伴隨刺耳尖叫
skr car brake sounds and shrill screams
man you‘re sick as hell
man you‘re sick as hell
有人拿著麥克風在宣告
Into the mic someone speaks
man you’re sick as hell
man you‘re sick as hell
回憶閃過像音樂劇前導
Memories flash before my eyes like a teaser of a musical
is it real?
is it real?
注定的人生 像由人編造
My life is predestined like a script already written
is it real?
is it real?
宿命都成真 是否是圈套
Can't escape my destiny. Is this all a trap?
is it real?
is it real?
當畫面顛倒
When the screen goes upside down
顏色被抽離只剩線條
The colors are sucked out; only lines are left
一瞬間忘記我在追夢中 還是睡夢中
Suddenly, I’m not sure whether I’m chasing my dream or dreaming a dream
我像是身處一場很真實的夢中夢
It’s like a vivid dream within a dream
造神 毀神 標準 流程
Being put on and then knocked off a pedestal; what a standard procedure
掌聲 噓聲 一轉身 鴉雀無聲
Cheering and criticism both disappear as I turn around
俯瞰山腳下的城市沈睡
I look at the city in the foothills of the mountains while it’s fast asleep
那曾是珍貴的人事物 驀然回首人事已非
There used to be people and things I cherished, but they’re all gone now
everything fading away
everything fading away
已沒有了退路 只能向上奮力的推
There’s no turning back; all I can do is push the rock uphill
推著我的罪惡感
That rock is my guilt
每個晚上 質問著我會不會扼腕
Every night, I feel guilty and ask myself whether I feel regret
為了短暫的歡愉
For my temporary pleasure
讓那業障不斷堆砌 積沙成塔
My karmic debts accumulate day after day
已無法急剎車 像邁向註定結局希臘神話
There’s no stopping now; I’m like a tragic hero in Greek mythology
然而當我達到山頂 I’ll be recognized
But I'll be recognized once I reach the summit
悲劇夠經典也會永遠被記載 right?
And my tragic story will be remembered, right?
and I’ll never rest
and I’ll never rest
Til I’m higher than Everest
Til I’m higher than Everest
a legend that will never die
a legend that will never die
I’ll never die!
I’ll never die!
而當熱潮逐漸退散
As the fame fades
人群減半
Half of the fans disappear
失去新鮮感
Interest on the wane
娛樂版 追尋下個天團
The paparazzi start looking for the next superstar
man your end has come
man your end has come
有人拿著診斷書在宣判
Someone is reading my diagnosis
man your end has come
man your end has come
回憶閃過像漫畫格片段
Memories flashes before my eyes like comic strips
is it time?
Is it time?
夢想的成真 永遠最璀璨
A dream looks the most beautiful the moment it comes true
is it time?
Is it time?
陪葬的純真 鮮少人揭穿
But few talk about the innocence sacrificed
is it time?
is it time?
當畫面旋轉
When the screen rotates
顏色被抽離只剩黑暗
The colors are sucked out; only darkness is left
一瞬間忘記我在追夢中 還是睡夢中
Suddenly, I’m not sure whether I’m chasing my dream or dreaming a dream
我像是身處一場很真實的夢中夢
It’s like a vivid dream within a dream
造神 毀神 標準 流程
Being put on and then knocked off a pedestal; what a standard procedure
掌聲 噓聲 一轉身 鴉雀無聲
Cheering and criticism both disappear as I turn around
大石頭大石頭
Big rock, big rock
爬坡爬坡
Uphills, uphills
夢中曾經有人承諾我將獲得解脫
In my dream, someone once promised me freedom
作為交換條件 某部分的我被奪走
As long as I give up some parts of me
究竟為何 在夢中卻已渾濁
Which parts? The memory is too vague now
夢醒後 內容回想起總是荒謬
The dream always feels ridiculous when I’m awake
迴盪的殘響隱約聽見終將再次重逢
But somehow I still hear the voice saying we’ll meet again
帶著參悟 帶著困惑 一步步邁向業果
With enlightenment and bewilderment, my efforts will culminate in my karmic fruits
大石頭大石頭
Big rock, big rock
爬坡爬坡
Uphills, uphills
procedure字根 在 跟著董事長遊台灣 Facebook 的最佳貼文
【閒話一句】- 轉摘自講義雜誌
—————————————————
人生的各種角色,沒有誰上路前,是真的「完全準備好了」
— 十方行銷顧問公司負責人林詠慈的分享
當有一個人想到你時,他是快樂的,我覺得這是天地間非常美好的情感
— 臺灣大學中國文學系教授蔡璧名認為,聚散都要懂得溫柔
帶著你的根本,不管哪裏,都可以再次花開
— 身兼編劇、製作人、導演的徐譽庭,她的分享
—————————————————
【戴勝益講故事】
—————————————————
★KPI>SOP
王品的成功是KPI,而不是SOP。
SOP (Standard Operation Procedure)是指「標準作業流程」,而KPI(Key Performance Index)指的是「關鍵績效指標」。
王品集團有嚴格完整的KPI制度,主管不在公司照樣運作順暢,因為企業是「制度在運作,而非人在管理」。
王品除「王品憲法」與「龜毛條款」企業文化外,SOP標準作業流程的落實,與KPI關鍵績效指標制度的完善,讓企業得以長久運作,更成為永續經營的關鍵所在。
-----------------
◆ 數字可呈現許多不同意義,全仰賴正確的方針與策略。
—————————————————
【每日好詩】
—————————————————
唐詩-泊秦淮
煙籠寒水月籠沙,夜泊秦淮近酒家。
商女不知亡國恨,隔江猶唱後庭花。
杜牧(公元803─852)
-----------------
元曲-一枝花·不伏老
攀出牆朵朵花,折臨路枝枝柳。花攀紅蕊嫩,柳折翠條柔,浪子風流。憑着我折柳攀花手,直煞得花殘柳敗休。半生來折柳攀花,一世裏眠花臥柳。
關漢卿(1220-1300)
-----------------
此圖片地點為俄羅斯莫斯科
◆推薦我三十年來每月必看的講義雜誌,純為『呷好到相報』,並非業配!
戴勝通
訂閱講義雜誌客服電話:02-27067889#112或0800-536789
procedure字根 在 翁琬柔 Joyce Facebook 的最讚貼文
雖然沒有收到相關單位邀請,但是我已經幫自己加了一個頭銜,就是子宮頸抹片大使。
三月中在台灣做了例行的子宮頸抹片檢查,以往的檢查都是正常,所以就這樣飛回紐約,結果接到電話:「你的抹片檢查異常,而且算是嚴重的,請回診。」我的抹片檢查出高度病變,數字是7,也就是很可能是CIN1,上網查了很多駭人的資訊,雖然知道其實還是切片檢查最準,但心裡還是很不安,儘管我台灣的醫生認為可以等到我年底回台灣再做陰道鏡檢查,不過一直把這事壓在心上的感覺很不好,所以我想在美國儘速就醫。
我那爛到不行的前公司沒有幫我保險,申請了一下、又因為找工作忙延誤,等到我真的預約到醫生已經是五月中了,當時因為貪圖講中文方便,在法拉盛找了一間我事後才知道風評很差的醫院,當時那個醫生說台灣的抹片報告她不接受,所以從抹片開始做,一個星期之後,結果跟三月的一樣,就幫我做切片檢查,又過了一星期,報告出來後她說:「再惡化下去就是癌症,建議妳快點手術,我幫妳介紹認識的醫生。」我的報告是哪個級別?狀況怎樣?HPV是哪種?手術有什麼副作用?針對我的問題都顧左右而言他,我怎麼可能放心,所以開啟了另外找醫生的旅程。
後來我找到在曼哈頓的Mount Sinai有個評價非常好的台裔美國人醫生,前幾篇文章有分享過看診經驗,基本上看診我們用的都是英文,但她非常仔細地跟我解釋這病變是怎麼回事,跟我說我的手術是怎麼進行,會割掉的地方是哪裡,不會讓我以後生孩子有流產風險,反正看診流程就是安心感爆棚,我也沒問這手術到底多少錢、我保險負擔多少、我要自付多少,就決定給這個醫生做手術了。
我要做的手術是,LEEP (Loop electrosurgical excision procedure) 子宮頸圓錐狀切除手術,就是當子宮頸上皮有病變,醫生會經由陰道,用圓錐方式切除子宮頸病灶,手術會通過環行金屬絲(圈電極)傳導高頻交流電,利用高頻電流所特有的乾燥脫水效應、電弧切割效應來切開對電極接觸的組織,LEEP是一種常見的婦科手術,手術時間短、出血量少,也是治療宮頸癌前病變的有效方法。
決定不影響台灣健保資源、要在美國做手術後,我開始上網閱讀大量資料,也煩了幾位台灣的婦產科醫生,看來不是很嚴重的手術,只要醫生做得好,就不會影響生育,因為紐約的術後餐七天要七百美金,我就從台灣訂了三週份的鱸魚精,現省400美金(好媳婦上身),也跟公司請假,在上週五做了手術。
看台灣的朋友分享手術經過,大家都會進行全身麻醉,我會對麻醉過敏,醒來之後會吐,所以手術前我吃了一頓大餐,反正都會吐出來熱量吸收不了,真的賺到,吃飽飯吞了兩顆醫生叮嚀的止痛藥就頂著圓滾滾的肚子去診所找我的醫生,她要我脫下褲子內褲後坐上檢查的椅子,然後就說:「要開始囉,不會超過五分鐘。」等一下?我們不麻醉???????????????????????她笑著說:「麻醉的時間我都做完了。」不是啊?????????????台灣都會麻啊????????????????
我還在驚恐的時候,她就拿著一個管狀物塞入我的陰道,很痛,很不舒服,我感到我的心跳開始加速,很緊張,想問他們有沒有娃娃玩偶可以抱又說不出口(以為是醫美診所),摸摸胸口,好險戴了爸爸送我的玉佩,好吧抓著它吧,醫生說:「我要開始囉,千萬不能動喔。」接著我就聞到一股燒焦味,大約兩分鐘後,醫生說:「好了!結束了!」叮嚀我不要劇烈運動、不要提重物、兩週之後回診,燒的過程真的沒有感覺,是插入管狀物的時候不舒服。
「結束了?我可以走了??」
「(笑出來)對,可以了。」
「吃東西呢?我是不是術後不能吃一些薑啊蒜啊還是要注意什麼?」
「Eat whatever you want!」
這醫生在美國長大,沒有受到我們這種不能吃冰、術後要好好調理身體的觀念影響,但沒關係,我還是要把術後這段時間當成月子來做,剛好手術隔天生理期來了,就在家躺到了星期二才開始上班,每天乖乖喝鱸魚精,吃得清淡,也喝了很多溫水。現在是術後第五天,身體沒有感到不舒服或是異狀,下週回診的時候看狀況醫生就能宣判我何時可以恢復運動,我也會順便打我的子宮頸疫苗第一劑。
這次的經驗讓我覺得最可怕的地方不是手術沒有麻醉(好其實也滿驚恐的但我後來查了很多國家都沒麻),是我前一次的抹片檢查明明正常,就在短短一年半的時間內進化到了CIN2,離原位癌非常近,要不是前一次抹片沒有抹到正確的地方,就是這病毒實在很猛烈,雖然我本身免疫系統、代謝系統都不好,很難靠自己的力量對抗病毒,但是就在短短一年半的時間進化到高度病變,就表示這病毒不能忽略,而我們一般看不見自己的子宮頸,她三分之二的地方沒有感覺神經,根本感覺不到病變,所以子宮頸抹片真的很重要。
三月跟大家分享我的抹片檢查結果,收到好多好多好多讀者的經驗分享,大家都說看到我的分享又想起了要去做檢查,希望大家看完這篇文章,可以訂下一個檢查的時間,如果真的會忘記,可以在每年自己生日的月份檢查,送自己的身體一個禮物,如果有相同經驗、施打子宮頸疫苗經驗的朋友,也歡迎私訊給我,我會匿名貼在限時動態跟大家分享,不會愧對我子宮頸抹片大使的稱號的!
#在診間的等待時間還有心情自拍
procedure字根 在 無待堂 Facebook 的最佳貼文
❗️重要:電檢處告示並不代表導演團隊立場
《佔領立法會》及《理大圍城》遭電檢處多番為難❗️
(Please scroll down for English)
香港電影、報刊及物品管理處要求《佔領立法會》及《理大圍城》片首加上聲明,我們要澄清這聲明並非創作人的意願。
《佔領立法會》及《理大圍城》一直為外界爭議度非常高的電影,導演團隊一直為真實紀錄各社會運動而不惜冒著各種風險,電影帶來的回響及反應大家有目共睹。
但!
香港電影、報刊及物品管理處(簡稱電檢處)卻利用各種手段,逼使導演們需要作出非本人意願的聲明!如果不跟從指引,電檢處便可以利用行政手段令放映無法進行!
電檢處要求作出之聲明如下:
《佔領立法會》:
「影片紀錄2019年7月1日立法會綜合大樓受到示威衝擊的嚴重事件,當中有部分描述或行為,根據現行法例可能會構成刑事罪行。」
《理大圍城》:
「影片紀錄2019年11月在香港理工大學及周邊地點發生的嚴重事件,當中有部分描述或行為,根據現行法例可能會構成刑事罪行。此外,影片部分內容或評論亦可能未獲證實或有誤導成份。」
影意志表示強烈不滿電檢處以下行為:
1.以保障各方為由,實屬保障自己之實來強逼修改影片
2.要求影片開首作出聲明,但不願表明此為電檢處要求
3.以不知明原因推翻由電檢處發出的證明書
4.未能按時發出證明書,並將責任推卸於申請者
以下為影意志與電檢處之洽商經過:
7月中時,影意志為舊版本影片申請電檢證明書。
8月7日(國安法生效約一個月後)
影意志首次收到電檢處通知,表示需要在電影片頭加入由電檢處發出之警告字眼。影意志清楚表示此字句並不是出自導演團隊意願,並不會修改影片。電檢處表示,若不跟從指引,有機會令行政程序時間增加。
9月3日(國安法生效約兩個月後)
影意志重新遞交申請,並於新版本影片中加入電檢處要求之字句,及標明此字句為電檢處要求。
9月8日
影意志收到電檢處通知,表示影片開首有不屬於此影片之告示字眼,要求刪改。影意志表示此要求不合理,電檢處不能在未執行檢視工作前便要求申請者進行更改;但對方亦一貫作風,以會引致檢視工作延誤等為由而要求進行修改。
9月9日
影意志立即按電檢處要求遞交新版本。
9月15日
影意志致電查詢電檢進度,對方則回應未能於本星期批核證明書。影意志表明早於9月3日已遞交申請,理應9月17日收到證明書;電檢處解釋因為9月11日才正式收到更新版本影片,當作9月14日才正式開始工作,故最快只能於9月21日發出證明書。(影意志:申請表已列明9月3日為申請日期,但因為電檢處內部審查緩慢而將責任推卸。)
9月18日 下午6時40分 (辦公完結時間為下午6時)
電檢處通知影意志需在片頭加上其提供的告示字句,並於9月21日當日交回新版本,否則未能於放映當日發出證明書;影意志重新要求要標示電檢處是發出告示者,並且需於放映當日收到證明書。電檢處回覆,告示並不能標明是電檢處發出,並且只能按照他們要求作出更改。
同時,影意志被告知原有舊版本的電檢證明書不能使用,因為新舊版本不可同時擁有兩張證明書(影意志不明所以,但對方亦無法列出清晰原因)
9月21日
直到放映前兩小時,影意志才收到電檢處發出的證明書,而《理大圍城》被評為III級,需作出退票手續。為觀眾帶來不便,影意志深感抱歉。
影意志及香港紀錄片工作者不希望為業界帶來錯誤先例,但亦不想真相任由香港政府扼殺、及默許歷史被政權改寫!為了能順利放映,影意志暫時接受此條件,但一定會繼續上訴!請大家廣傳此消息!多謝大家一直支持香港電影;煩請以後看電影出現奇怪告示,請大家不要誤會導演們!
*註1:在香港舉行之所有公開放映,需獲得由香港電影、報刊及物品管理處發出的核准證明書,方可進行放映活動;否則,實屬違法。
__________
❗️Disclaimer: The opinion expressed in the statement issued by The Office for Film, Newspaper and Article Administration (OFNAA) does not reflect the views of the director and the production team.
The Tug of War with the OFNAA over “Taking back the Legislature" + "Inside the Red Brick Wall".
Although “Taking back the Legislature" and "Inside the Red Brick Wall" have not shied away from controversy, yet the production crew have always strived to objectively capture every social movement against all odds, and the films have received a wide swath of responses since their release.
Nevertheless, the OFNAA has gone out of their way to coerce the directors into making statements against their wills. When failed to oblige, they could face having their works barred from screening by the OFNAA with whatever administrative reasons they might come up with.
Therefore, Ying E Chi hereby express our strong discontent to the following actions of the OFNAA:
1. Force the films to be edited under the pretext of protecting everyone, but in fact, only to protect their own interest
2. Request an announcement to be made at the beginning of the film, yet refused to be declared as the one who demanded the announcement
3. Overturn the previous certificate issued by the OFNAA with unspecified reason
4. Fail to issue the certificate on time as promised, whilst shifting the responsibility to the applicant
The statement required by the OFNAA is as follows:
“Taking back the Legislature”:
“This film records the serious incident of the storming of the Legislative Council Complex on 1 July 2019. Some of those depictions or acts may constitute criminal offences under prevailing laws.”
“Inside the Red Brick Wall:
“This film records the serious incidents at The Hong Kong Polytechnic University and nearby areas in November 2019. Some of those depictions or acts may constitute criminal offences under prevailing laws. Some of the contents of or commentaries in the film may be unverified or misleading.”
Here is how the negotiation between Ying E Chi and the OFNAA unfolds:
Mid-July
Ying E Chi filed an application for a Certificate of Approval for the old version of “Taking back the Legislature" + "Inside the Red Brick Wall".
7/8/2020 (A month after the National Security Law was enacted)
The first time Ying E Chi were notified by the OFNAA that a warning issued by them must be added at the beginning of the film. Ying E Chi then categorically declared that since the content of the warning does not reflect the will of the director, the films will not be edited as a result. The OFNAA responded by saying the administrative procedure might be delayed if their instructions have not been followed.
3/9/2020 (About 2 months after the National Security Law was enacted)
Ying E Chi handed in the application again with a new version of the films including the warning statement as requested, indicating that the warning is issued by the OFNAA.
8/9/2020
Ying E Chi were informed by the OFNAA to remove the statement at the beginning of the film as it does not belong to the film. Ying E Chi responded by calling out the absurdity of such request, as the OFNAA ought not to ask the films to be edited before they even review the whole film. Yet again the OFNAA demanded the changes to be made since it might cause a delay in the reviewing process.
9/9/2020
As a result, Ying E Chi submitted a new version at the first instance at the request of the OFNAA.
15/9/2020
Ying E Chi phoned in to enquire about the application procedure, since the application was made on the 3 Sep, so the Certificate of Approval should be issued on 17 Sep. However, the OFNAA replied that the Certificate of Approval would in fact not be granted this week for they claimed to have received the updated version on 11 Sep, so they could only have begun the reviewing process officially on the 14th, and thus the earliest time the certificate could be issued would be 21 Sep. (Note: Despite the official application date listed on the application form was 3 Sep, the OFNAA still tried to avoid the responsibility caused by their sluggish bureaucratic process.
18/9/2020 6.40pm (Office Hour ends at 6pm)
The OFNAA informed Ying E Chi that a statement PROVIDED by them must be included at the start of the film, and the new version must be handed in on 21 Sep, otherwise the Certificate of Approval would not be issued on the day of the screening. Ying E Chi again requested to indicate the OFNAA as the one who issued the statement, and that the certificate should be granted on screening day. The OFNAA, however, rejected to be identified as the one who issued such a statement, and insisted that all amendments can only be made subject to their approvals and requirements. At the time, Ying E Chi were informed that the Certificate of Approval obtained for the old version of “ Taking back the Legislature" + "Inside the Red Brick Wall" could no longer be used, as there cannot be two certificates for both old version and the updated version. (Ying E Chi, are deeply confounded by this sudden decision, but the OFNAA has failed to offer any clarifications.)
21/9/2020
Not only have Ying E Chi just received the certificate on the day of the screening from OFNAA, but at the same time we have been notified that "Inside the Red Brick Wall” has been classified as a Category III Film, and therefore need to make the refund arrangements.
We are profoundly sorry about the inconvenience caused.
It is not the wish of Ying E Chi and Hong Kong Documentary Filmmakers to set the wrong example for the industry, yet we would hate to have the truth to be buried by the Hong Kong Government or to let those in power rewrite the history. Ying E Chi have compromised for this instance in order to facilitate this screening, we, nevertheless, will keep on protesting, so please spread the words and make our story known. Thank you for continuing to support Hong Kong films, and from now on please do not be misled by any bizarre statements in movies and misunderstand the directors.
*Note: Under the Film Censorship Ordinance (Cap 392), a film intended for exhibition in Hong Kong at any public place has to be submitted to the Office for Film, Newspaper and Article Administration for prior approval. Failing to comply with such requirement may constitute a criminal offence.