[爆卦]orally pronunciation是什麼?優點缺點精華區懶人包

雖然這篇orally pronunciation鄉民發文沒有被收入到精華區:在orally pronunciation這個話題中,我們另外找到其它相關的精選爆讚文章

在 orally產品中有24篇Facebook貼文,粉絲數超過3萬的網紅營養麵包(呂孟凡營養師),也在其Facebook貼文中提到, [那些年你聽過的營養鬼話#19] 多吃豬腳可以豐胸!!!🐷 這則鬼話是粉絲提供的,我本人其實沒聽過, 我只聽過人家說坐月子的時候要吃豬腳幫助泌乳。 (到底可否幫助泌乳又是另外一件事了,本篇不討論) 🐷🐷🐷豬腳的營養成分🐷🐷🐷 這邊指的豬腳我原本猜是豬蹄膀,而不是豬腳肉, 因為謠傳內容中可以豐...

 同時也有1部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過41萬的網紅Rinozawa,也在其Youtube影片中提到,2014年6月30日/Y:2歳8ヶ月/R:5歳1ヶ月 There is no example which was awakened even if they say 'wake up' orally. Hahaha So we tickle them :) リノさん足癖悪いなぁ( ̄m ̄ ☆階段...

  • orally 在 營養麵包(呂孟凡營養師) Facebook 的最佳貼文

    2021-02-10 19:00:34
    有 603 人按讚

    [那些年你聽過的營養鬼話#19]

    多吃豬腳可以豐胸!!!🐷

    這則鬼話是粉絲提供的,我本人其實沒聽過,
    我只聽過人家說坐月子的時候要吃豬腳幫助泌乳。
    (到底可否幫助泌乳又是另外一件事了,本篇不討論)

    🐷🐷🐷豬腳的營養成分🐷🐷🐷

    這邊指的豬腳我原本猜是豬蹄膀,而不是豬腳肉,
    因為謠傳內容中可以豐胸的主要跟脂肪以及膠原蛋白有關。
    有麵粉則留言提到:月子餐用的花生豬腳湯通常用的是豬前蹄,
    所以讓我們來看看100公克豬蹄膀跟豬前腳的營養成分:

    豬蹄膀:
    熱量:331大卡
    蛋白質:17.1公克
    脂質:28.6公克
    碳水化合物:0公克

    在豆魚蛋肉類中,豬蹄膀的脂質含量是名列前茅的!
    無庸置疑豬蹄膀是屬於高脂肪蛋白質,
    熱量當然也是名列前茅的......
    所以能不能讓胸部豐滿我不確定,
    但多吃的話全身會都會豐滿是一定的!

    再來看看每100公克豬前腳的營養價值:
    熱量:252大卡
    蛋白質:21.9公克
    脂質:17.6公克
    碳水化合物:0公克

    比起來豬前腳屬於中脂肪蛋白質,比豬蹄膀好多了。

    🧐🧐🧐為什麼認為豬腳可以幫助豐胸?🧐🧐🧐

    坊間認為豬腳可以幫助豐胸的原因不外乎以下兩個:

    1. 因為豬腳脂肪多
    解析:
    女性的乳房的確有一大部分是由脂肪細胞組成,
    認為豬腳脂肪含量高就可以豐胸是很直觀的想法。
    但是!!!
    如果是這樣的話,那為什麼不直接喝油就好了?
    豬腳的脂肪有比較厲害嗎?

    當然沒有!!!

    而且豬腳的脂肪有一大部分是飽和脂肪,
    吃多了對心血管實在不健康。
    再者,怎麼保證豬腳裡面的豬油就只會跑到胸部儲存?
    油脂很有可能堆積在腹部、臀部、大腿等妳不想要它去的地方。

    2. 因為豬腳有膠原蛋白
    解析:
    膠原蛋白是一個很大的分子,
    我們吃了膠原蛋白之後,
    膠原蛋白會被人體的胃蛋白酶;胰蛋白酶素分解,
    最終成為三胜肽、雙胜肽及胺基酸才會被小腸吸收,
    一般認為最後在血液循環中的形式是游離胺基酸。
    因此不像大多人想像的,
    吃膠原蛋白,膠原蛋白就會維持原狀抵達想要的地方。
    在血液循環中的並不是完整的膠原蛋白,
    而是已經被分解後的胺基酸,
    而這些胺基酸會不會到達你想要的地方再去合成膠原蛋白?
    這件事情就更不可考了。
    何況豬腳裡的膠原蛋白遠不及脂肪的含量..........

    ♥♥♥結論♥♥♥

    多吃豬腳可以豐胸是沒有科學證據支持的,
    事實上坊間很多宣稱可以豐胸的產品目前也沒有科學證據支持,
    在學術搜尋以:breast enlargement, food, nutrition作為關鍵字搜尋,

    查不到任何文獻!
    查不到任何文獻!
    查不到任何文獻!
    (很重要所以說三次)

    如果各位神人可以查到的話歡迎分享給我~
    如果靠食補就可以豐胸的話,
    我當然也是很樂意分享給麵粉們知道!

    愛美是女人的天性,
    加上現在的社會風氣很愛拿身材來做文章,
    導致女性們多少都會介意自己的胸部大小。
    我年輕時也曾經相信過喝XXXXXX可以豐胸的講法,
    也買了好多來喝(大家自行腦補是什麼產品),
    在我個人身上證明了根本沒有效🤣🤣🤣
    雖然n=1不能代表甚麼,
    但就是我自身的經驗,所以提供給大家參考。

    妳可能會說:可是某某某吃了看起來很有效啊!
    大家可以回想一下國中理化的第一個單元,
    如果要確定是吃了某樣東西達到的效果,
    那麼只能改變一個變因,其他的變因都必須保持固定。
    所以妳現在看到她的身材很好,雖然是正向結果,
    但不一定就是特定產品造成的結果,
    除了最大的影響:基因以外,
    在她發育時期可能還有其他很多影響的因素,
    造成現在她的身材很好。

    基本上過了發育時期以後要二次發育是不太可能的事情,
    胸部的大小還是跟基因比較有關,
    發育期的營養狀況或許會有影響,
    不過以現在台灣的經濟發展條件,
    大部分的青少年不太會有營養不均衡的狀況發生,
    反而蠻多還要擔心營養過剩呢!

    阿不過,如果覺得"我就是錢多!""有喝有保庇!"
    那我也是無法阻止妳的XD

    Reference:
    1. 食品成分資料庫2019年版。
    2. Watanabe-Kamiyama, M., Shimizu, M., Kamiyama, S., Taguchi, Y., Sone, H., Morimatsu, F., … Komai, M. (2010). Absorption and Effectiveness of Orally Administered Low Molecular Weight Collagen Hydrolysate in Rats. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 58(2), 835–841. doi:10.1021/jf9031487
    #那些年你聽過的營養鬼話 #豐胸 #豬腳
    #媒體未經同意請勿任意轉載

  • orally 在 Jamie Chua Facebook 的最佳貼文

    2020-11-02 11:55:23
    有 170 人按讚

    HydraQ Max®️ is a skin care product that is taken orally in capsule form. An all original blend of multiple natural ingredients that work together to moisturize and fight glycation to improve skin quality on multiple fronts. It helps brighten my skin, reduces fine lines and wrinkles in just 15 days!

    For more information, head over to www.profroyal.com

  • orally 在 小小人物做小事 - 高松傑Jacky Facebook 的精選貼文

    2020-10-06 14:27:29
    有 31 人按讚


    My recent article😎😎😎

    https://m.orangenews.hk/details?recommendId=138868

    Opinion|The Police is duty-bound to enforce the law resolutely

    HK Current

    2020.10.06 11:05

    By Athena Kung

    According to the statement made by the US Department of State on 3rd of October 2020 (local time), the arrests made by the Hong Kong Police on 1st of October 2020 were criticized by the Department as malicious ones. It has been alleged by the US Department of State that the Hong Kong Police merely enforces the law for the aim of achieving political goals, which amounts to serious violation of Hong Kong's rule of law and thus strongly attack individual's human rights as well as Hong Kong people's freedom of expression, procession and assembly. The Central Government was commented by the US Department of State as being given up the undertaking of "One country, Two systems" completely. Obviously, such allegations against both the Central Government and HKSAR made by US Government were very serious. To examine whether such comments were fair ones, we have to carefully consider if the allegations really have any valid legal basis or foundation.

    According to both the Hong Kong Bill of Rights Ordinance, Cap. 383, Laws of Hong Kong (hereinafter referred to as "the BORO“) and and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (hereinafter referred to as the "ICCPR "), the freedoms of expression, procession and assembly were not absolute, and might be subject to restrictions as prescribed by law. Article 16 and 17 of the BORO relates to the freedom of opinion and expression and right of peaceful assembly which can be enjoyed by Hong Kong people:
    "Article 16
    Freedom of opinion and expression
    (1) Everyone shall have the right to hold opinions without interference.
    (2) Everyone shall have the right to freedom of expression; this right shall include freedom to seek, receive and impart information and ideas of all kinds, regardless of frontiers, either orally, in writing or in print, in the form of art, or through any other media of his choice.
    (3) The exercise of the rights provided for in paragraph (2) of this article carries with it special duties and responsibilities. It may therefore be subject to certain restrictions, but these shall only be such as are provided by law and are necessary—
    (a) for respect of the rights or reputations of others; or
    (b) for the protection of national security or of public order (ordre public), or of public health or morals.
    [cf. ICCPR Art. 19]

    Article 17
    Right of peaceful assembly
    The right of peaceful assembly shall be recognized. No restrictions may be placed on the exercise of this right other than those imposed in conformity with the law and which are necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security or public safety, public order (ordre public), the protection of public health or morals or the protection of the rights and freedoms of others.
    [cf. ICCPR Art. 21]"

    Thus, freedom of expression, procession and assembly in Hong Kong are not absolute. On the other hand, such rights are subject to restrictions as prescribed by law in the interests of public order, public safety and the interests of others, and so on.

    Besides, Section 10(a) to (e) of the Police Force Ordinance, Cap 232, Laws of Hong Kong has clearly stated inter alia that:
    "10. The duties of the police force shall be to take lawful measures for—
    (a) preserving the public peace;
    (b) preventing and detecting crimes and offences;
    (c) preventing injury to life and property;
    (d) apprehending all persons whom it is lawful to apprehend and for whose apprehension sufficient grounds exists;
    (e) regulating processions and assemblies in public places or places of public resort;
    …………"

    What has really occurred in Hong Kong in various districts on 1st of October 2020?
    (1) At around 1400 hours, a group of people gathered and yelled along Great George Street in Causeway Bay, which might have constituted offences related to unauthorised assemblies under the Public Order Ordinance, Cap 245, Laws of Hong Kong and offences related to prohibited group gatherings under the Prevention and Control of Disease (Prohibition on Group Gathering) Regulation, Cap 599G, Laws of Hong Kong. Even though the Police had given multiple warnings at the scene and raised the blue flag requesting participants to leave the scene, at around 1500 hours, a large group of protesters still remained at the same place. Some of them even commenced to chant the slogan “Liberate Hong Kong, Revolution of Our Times” over and over again. Thus, they were suspected of inciting or abetting others to commit acts of secession, which might constitute relevant offences under the HKSAR National Security Law. Afterwards, some protesters even spilled onto the road and breached public peace.

    (2) At around 1500 hours, 2 men in the vicinity of Tin Ma Court in Wong Tai Sin hurled some petrol bombs and large objects at Lung Cheung Road. Having attended the scene, the police noticed that traces of the road being charred, as well as fences and traffic cones left on it. After investigation, the Police found that even though a large amount of vehicles were travelling along the road at the time of the incident, fortunately, no vehicle was hit by the petrol bombs and objects successfully. In any event, the rioters’ such heinous acts had severely endangered road users and breached public peace.

    (3) The Police intercepted a man at Stewart Road in Wanchai at about 1600 hours and found him in possession of a foldable sharp knife which was at the same size of a business card. The 23-year-old man was subsequently arrested on suspicion of possession of an offensive weapon, as there stood a strong likelihood that he might intend to use the said item to injure members of the public or police officers.

    (4) At around 1500 hours, the Police set up a roadblock along a section of the Tuen Mun Road near Summit Terrace in Tsuen Wan to intercept suspicious vehicles, and found extendable sticks, a helmet, face masks and a large amount of promotional leaflets inside a private car with an expired vehicle licence. Some of the leaflets contained slogans suspected of calling for “Hong Kong independence” written on them. The 35-year-old male driver of the car was arrested on suspicion of various offences including “Possession of Instrument Fit for Unlawful Purpose”, “Driving an Unlicenced Vehicle” and “Driving Without Third Party Insurance”.
    (5) At around 1630 hours, the Police stopped and searched a man in the vicinity of Tonnochy Road and Lockhart Road in Causeway Bay, and found items including a cutter, a spanner, plastic straps and a pair of gloves in his backpack. The 20-year-old man was subsequently arrested on suspicion of possession of offensive weapons.
    (6) After nightfall, protesters continued to gather in different districts. To ensure public safety, the Police have enforced the law resolutely according to the situations arising in different districts. At 2200 hours, not less than 86 persons have been arrested in multiple districts. Among them, 74 persons including four District Councillors were arrested on suspicion of taking part in unauthorised assemblies in Causeway Bay, while the rest were arrested on suspicion of committing offences including possession of offensive weapon, failing to produce proof of identity, possession of forged identity card, disorderly conduct in a public place and driving an unlicenced vehicle. Besides, 20 persons were given fixed penalty notices for suspectedly breaching the Prevention and Control of Disease (Prohibition on Group Gathering) Regulation.

    Actually, the Police is duty-bound to enforce the law resolutely. On the facts, all arrests taken place on 1st of October 2020 were absolutely lawful and necessary to maintain law and order in the society and protect the life and property of all Hong Kong residents. Undoubtedly, the US officials have all along been adopting "double standards" in expressing utterly irresponsible remarks on law enforcement actions in the HKSAR. Everyone is equal before the law. So long as there is evidence supporting that someone has violated the law, no matter what his or her status or background is, he or she must face the legal consequence. Being a law enforcement agency, the Police must take action whenever they come across any unlawful acts in strict accordance with the laws in force. All cases must be handled in a fair, just and impartial manner by the Police in accordance with the law, which is the only and real reason as to why the Police arrested the 86 odd people on 1st of October 2020. To conclude, all criticizms made by the US towards the Hong Kong Police, HKSAR Government and Central Government were all unfair without any legal or concrete support at all.

    It appears that the US government has always been refusing to accept the truth that the HKSAR is an inalienable part of the People's Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as "the PRC") and a local administrative region which enjoys a high degree of autonomy, as contrary to absolute autonomy, and comes directly under the Central People's Government. Hong Kong affairs are internal matters of the PRC. The system in Hong Kong is not "Two countries, Two systems". Hong Kong will never be an independent country with a pro-American government formed by the Opposition Camp in Hong Kong. Any foreign governments like the US must at once stop scaremongering and interfering in any form in Hong Kong's affairs. The "Colour Revolution" promoted by the US in Hong Kong should be terminated in no time.

    The author is Barrister-at-law.

    The views don't necessarily reflect those of Orange News.

    責編: CK Li

你可能也想看看

搜尋相關網站