毋忘五大訴求　公民抗命有理
—10‧20九龍遊行陳情書
（案件編號：DCCC 535/2020）

——————————————————
「毋忘初衷，活在愛和真實之中」
撐阿銘，即訂閱Patreon：
patreon.com/raphaelwong
—————————————————

胡法官雅文閣下：

　　2012年，我第一次站在法庭上承認違反「公安惡法」，述說對普選的盼望，批評公安惡法不義，並因公民抗命的緣故，甘心樂意接受刑罰。當年我說，如果小圈子選舉沒有被廢除，惡法沒有消失，我依然會一如故我，公民抗命，並且我相信將會有更多學生和市民加入這個行列。想不到時至今日，普選仍然遙遙無期，我亦再次被帶到法庭接受審判，但只是短短７年，已經有數十萬計的群眾公民抗命，反對暴政。今日，我承認違反「未經批准的政府」所訂立「未經批准的惡法」之下的「未經批准集結」罪，我不打算尋求法庭的憐憫，但請容許我佔用法庭些微時間陳情，讓法庭在判刑前有全面考慮。

暴力之濫觴

　　在整個反修例運動如火如荼之際，我正承擔另一宗公民抗命案件的刑責。雖然身在獄中，但仍然心繫手足。我在獄中電視機前見證6月9日、6月16日及8月18日三次百萬港人大遊行，幾多熱愛和平的港人冒天雨冒彈雨走上街頭，抗議不義惡法，今日關於10月20日的案件，亦是如此。可能有人會問，政府已在6月暫緩修例，更在9月正式撤回修例，我等仍然繼續示威，豈非無理取鬧？我相信法官閣下肯定聽過「遲來的正義並非正義」（Justice delayed is justice denied）這句格言。當過百萬群眾走上街頭，和平表達不滿的時候，林鄭政府沒有理睬，反而獨行獨斷，粗暴踐踏港人的意願，結果製造出後來連綿不絕的爭拗，甚至你死我活的對抗。經歷眾多衝突痛苦之後，所謂暫緩撤回，已經微不足道，我們只是更加清楚：沒有民主，就連基本人權都不會擁有！

　　在本案之中，雖然我們都沒有鼓動或作出暴力行為，但根據早前8‧18及10‧1兩宗案件，相信在控方及法庭眼中，案發當日的暴力事件仍然可以算在我們頭上，如此，我有必要問：如果香港有一個公平正義的普及選舉，人民可以在立法會直接否決他們不認可的法律，試問2019年的暴力衝突可以從何而來呢？如果我們眼見的暴力是如此十惡不赦，那麼我們又如何看待百萬人遊行後仍然堅持推行惡法的制度暴力呢？如果我們不能接受人民暴力反抗，那麼我們是否更加不能對更巨大更壓逼的制度暴力沈默不言？真正且經常發生的暴力，是漠視人民訴求的暴力，是踐踏人民意見的暴力，是剝奪人民表達權利的暴力。真正憎恨暴力，痛恨暴力的人，不可能一方面指摘暴力反抗，又容忍制度暴力。如果我需要承擔和平遊行引發出來的暴力事件的刑責，那麼誰應該承擔施政失敗所引發出來的社會騷亂的罪責呢？

社會之病根

　　對於法庭而言，可能2019年所發生的事情只是一場社會騷亂，務必追究違法者個人責任。然而，治亂治其本源，醫病醫其病根，我雖然公民抗命，刻意違法，控方把我帶上法庭，但我卻不應被理解為一個「犯罪個體」。2019年所發生的事情，並不是我一個人或我們這幾位被告可以促成，社會問題的癥結不是「犯罪份子」本身，而是「犯罪原因」。我明白「治亂世用重典」的道理，但如果「殺雞儆猴」是解決方法，就不會在2016年發生旺角騷亂及2017年上訴庭對示威者施以重刑後，2019年仍然會爆發出更大規模的暴力反抗。

如果不希望社會動亂，就必須正本清源，逐步落實「五大訴求」，從根本上改革，挽回民心。2019年反修例運動，其實只是2014年雨傘運動的延續而已，縱使法庭可能認為兩個運動皆是「一股歪風」所引起，但我必須澄清，兩個運動的核心就是追求民主普選，人民當家作主。在2019年11月24日區議會選舉這個最類近全民普選的選舉中，接近300萬人投票，民主派大勝，奪得17個區議會主導權，這就是整個反修例運動的民意，民意就是反對政府決策，反對制度暴力，反對推行惡法，不容爭辯，不辯自明。我們作為礦場裡的金絲雀，多次提醒政府撤回修法，並從根本上改革制度，而在10月20日的九龍遊行當然是反映民意的平台契機。如今，法庭對我們施加重刑，其實只不過是懲罰民意，將金絲雀困在鳥籠之內，甚至扼殺於鼓掌之中，窒礙表達自由。

堅持之重要

　　大運動過後的大鎮壓，使我們失去《蘋果日報》，失去教協，失去民陣，不少民主派領袖以及曾為運動付出的手足戰友都囚於獄中，不少曾經熱情投入運動的朋友亦因《國安法》的威脅轉為低調，新聞自由示威自由日漸萎縮，公民社會受到沈重打擊，我亦失去不少摯友，有感傷孤獨的時候，但我仍然相信，2019年香港人的信念，以及所展現人類的光輝持久未變。我不會忘記百萬人民冒雨捱熱抗拒暴政，抵制惡法，展現我們眾志成城；我不會忘記人潮紅海，讓道救護車，展現我們文明精神；我不會忘記年青志士直接行動反對苛政，捨身成仁，展現我們膽色勇氣；我不會忘記銀髮一族走上街頭保護年青人，展現我們彼此關懷；我不會忘記「五大訴求」，不會忘記2019年區議會選舉，展現我們有理有節。

　　法官閣下，我對於當日的所作所為，不感羞恥，毫無悔意。我能夠在出獄後與群眾同行一路，與戰友同繫一獄，實是莫大榮幸。若法治失去民主基石，將使法庭無奈地接受專制政權所訂立解釋的法律限制，隨時變成政治工具掃除異見，因此爭取民主普選，建設真正法治，追求公平正義，仍然是我的理想。在這條路上，如有必要，我仍然會公民抗命，正如終審法院海外非常任法官賀輔明（Lord Hoffmann）所言，發自良知的公民抗命有悠久及光榮的傳統，歷史將證明我們是正確的。我期望，曾與我一起遊行抗命的手足戰友要堅持信念，在艱難歲月裡毋忘初衷，活在愛和真實之中。

　　最後，如9年前一樣，我想借用美國民權領袖馬丁路德金牧師的一番話對我們的反對者說：「我們將以自己忍受苦難的能力，來較量你們製造苦難的能力。我們將用我們靈魂的力量，來抵禦你們物質的暴力。對我們做你們想做的事吧，我們仍然愛你們。我們不能憑良心服從你們不公正的法律，因為拒惡與為善一樣是道德責任。將我們送入監獄吧，我們仍然愛你們。」（We shall match your capacity to inflict suffering by our capacity to endure suffering. We shall meet your physical force with soul force. Do to us what you will, and we shall continue to love you. We cannot in all good conscience obey your unjust laws because noncooperation with evil is as much a moral obligation as is cooperation with good. Throw us in jail and we shall still love you.）

　　願慈愛的主耶穌賜我們平安，與我和我一家同在，與法官閣下同在，與香港人同在。沒有暴徒，只有暴政；五大訴求，缺一不可！願榮耀歸上帝，榮光歸人民！

第五被告
黃浩銘
二零二一年八月十九日

Lest we forget the five demands: civil disobedience is morally justified
- Statement on 10‧20 Kowloon Rally
(Case No.: DCCC 535/2020)

Your Honour Judge Woodcock

In 2012, I stood before the court and admitted to violating the "Public Security Evil Law". I expressed my hope for universal suffrage, criticized the evil law as unjust, and willingly accepted the penalty for civil disobedience. Back then, I said that if the small-circle election had not been abolished and the draconian law had not disappeared, I would still be as determined as I was, and I believe that more students and citizens would join this movement. Today, universal suffrage is still a long way off, and I have been brought before the court again for trial. But in just seven years, hundreds of thousands of people have already risen up in civil disobedience against tyranny. Today, I plead guilty to "unauthorised assembly" under an unapproved evil law enacted by an unauthorised government. I do not intend to seek the court's mercy, but please allow me to take up a little time in court to present my case so that the court can consider all aspects before sentencing me.

The roots of violence

At the time when the whole anti-extradition law movement was in full-swing, I was taking responsibility for another civil disobedience case. Although I was in prison, my heart was still with the people. I witnessed the three million-person rallies on 9 June, 16 June and 18 August on television in prison, when many peace-loving people took to the streets despite the rain and bullets, to protest against unjust laws. Some people may ask, "The Government has already suspended the legislative amendments in June and formally withdrew the bill in September, but we are still demonstrating, are we not being unreasonable?" I am sure your Honour has heard of the adage "Justice delayed is justice denied". When more than a million people took to the streets to express their discontent peacefully, the Lam administration ignored them and instead acted arbitrarily, brutally trampling on the wishes of the people of Hong Kong, resulting in endless arguments and even confrontations. After so many conflicts and painful experiences, the so-called moratorium is no longer meaningful. We only know better: without democracy, we cannot even have basic human rights!

In this case, although we did not instigate or commit acts of violence, I believe that in the eyes of the prosecution and the court, the violence on the day of the incident can still be counted against us, based on the August 18 and October 1 case. And now I must ask - If Hong Kong had a fair and just universal election, and the public could directly veto laws they did not approve of at the Legislative Council, then how could the violent clashes of 2019 have come about? If the violence we see is so heinous, how do we feel about the institutional violence that insists on the imposition of draconian laws even after millions of people have taken to the streets? If we cannot accept violent rebellion, how can we remain silent in the face of even greater and more oppressive institutional violence? The true and frequent violence is the kind of violence that ignores people's demands, that tramples on their opinions, that deprives them of their right to express themselves. People who truly hate violence and abhor it cannot accuse violent resistance on the one hand and tolerate institutional violence on the other. If I have to bear the criminal responsibility for the violence caused by the peaceful demonstration, then who should bear the criminal responsibility for the social unrest caused by failed administration?

The roots of society's problems

From a court's point of view, it may be that what happened in 2019 was just a series of social unrest, and that those who broke the law must be held personally accountable. What happened in 2019 was not something that I alone or the defendants could have made possible, and the crux of the social problem was not the 'criminals' but the 'causes of crime'. I understand the concept of " applying severe punishment to a troubled world", but if "decimation" was really the solution, there would not have been more violent rebellions in 2019 after the Mongkok "riot" in 2016 and the heavy sentences handed down to protesters by the Court of Appeal in 2017.

If we do not want social unrest, we must get to the root of the problem and implement the "five demands" step by step, so as to achieve fundamental reforms and win back the hearts of the people. 2019's anti-revision movement is indeed a continuation of 2014's Umbrella Movement, and even though the court may think that both movements are caused by a "perverse wind", I must clarify that the core of both movements is the pursuit of democracy and universal suffrage, and the people being the masters of their own house. In the District Council election on 24 November 2019, which is the closest thing to universal suffrage, nearly 3 million people voted, and the democratic camp won a huge victory, winning majority in 17 District Councils. As canaries in the monetary coal mine, we have repeatedly reminded the government to withdraw the extradition bill and fundamentally reform the system, and the march in Kowloon on 20 October was certainly an opportunity to reflect public opinion. Now, by imposing heavy penalties on us, the court is only punishing public opinion, trapping the canaries in a birdcage, or even stifling them in the palm of their hands, suffocating the freedom of expression.

The importance of persistence

As a result of the crackdown after the mass movement, we lost Apple Daily, the Hong Kong Professional Teachers' Union, and the Civil Human Rights Front. Many of our democratic leaders and comrades who had contributed to the movement were imprisoned, and many of our friends who had been passionately involved in the movement had been forced to lay low under the threat of the National Security Law. I still believe that the faith of Hong Kong people and the glory of humanity seen in 2019 will remain unchanged. I will never forget the millions of people who braved the rain and the heat to resist tyranny and evil laws, demonstrating our unity of purpose; I will never forget the crowds of people who gave way to ambulances, demonstrating our civility; I will never forget the young people who sacrificed their lives, demonstrating our courage and bravery; I will never forget the silver-haired who took to the streets to protect the youth, demonstrating our care for each other; I will never forget the "five demands" and the 2019 District Council election, demonstrating our rationality and decency.

Your Honour, I have nothing to be ashamed of and no remorse for what I did on that day. It is my great honour to be in prison with my comrades and to be able to walk with the public after my release. If the rule of law were to lose its democratic foundation, the courts would have no choice but to accept the legal restrictions set by the autocratic regime and become a political tool to eliminate dissent at any time. As Lord Hoffmann, a non-permanent overseas judge of the Court of Final Appeal, said, civil disobedience from the conscience has a long and honourable tradition, and history will prove us right. I hope that my comrades in arms who walked with me in protests will keep their faith and live in love and truth in the midst of this difficult time.

Finally, as I did nine years ago, I would like to say something to those who oppose us, borrowing the words of American civil rights leader Reverend Martin Luther King: "We shall match your capacity to inflict suffering by our capacity to endure suffering. We shall meet your physical force with soul force. Do to us what you will, and we shall continue to love you. We cannot in all good conscience obey your unjust laws because noncooperation with evil is as much a moral obligation as is cooperation with good. Throw us in jail and we shall still love you."

Peace be with me and my family, with Your Honour, and with the people of Hong Kong. There are no thugs, only tyranny; five demands, not one less! To god be the glory and to people be the glory!

The Fifth Defendant
Wong Ho Ming
19 August 2021

#Opinion by Allan Au Ka-lun 區家麟｜”In Hong Kong today, those who obey will be presumed innocent until proven guilty, and those who disobey will be punished before trial. This is just the new set of instructions for legal weapons, but is it fair and just?”

Read: https://bit.ly/3ohAnvq

“今日香港，順我者無罪推定，逆我者未審先判，乃法律武器的新編使用說明，公道嗎？”
__________
📱Download the app:
http://onelink.to/appledailyapp
📰 Latest news:
http://appledaily.com/engnews/
🐤 Follow us on Twitter:
https://twitter.com/appledaily_hk
💪🏻 Subscribe and show your support:
https://bit.ly/2ZYKpHP

#AppleDailyENG

寫給香港人的二十條歷史教訓：
《On Tyranny: Twenty Lessons from the Twentieth Century》

在立場新聞的專欄裡讀過區家麟的書評文章，從頭條新聞的「未來現在學」又見過沈旭暉引述講解，最近終於閱畢這本《On Tyranny: Twenty Lessons from the Twentieth Century》──耶魯大學歷史系教授Timothy Snyder以Facebook帖文擴充寫成的警世小書。

雖然略嫌書中的鋪排、脈絡有點散亂，但讀著這二十條歷史教訓，很自然就能對號入座，發現每一則都像訴說著香港人正身處的政治環境、社會實況，因為我們早已步入極權主義橫行的暴政時代。在亂世中應當如何自處？這本書或許可以給我們一點啟示。

1. Do not obey in advance / 切莫盲從權威
由智慧燈柱，到全民檢測，下一步可能就是推行健康碼、社會信用評分，面對這樣言而無信的政府，你還會選擇盲目相信、自願順從嗎？

2. Defend institutions / 捍衛制度
在禮崩樂壞的時代，更要盡力守著每一道防線──法律、教育、醫療、傳媒……加入工會，在自己的崗位上出一分力吧。

3. Beware the one-party state / 小心一黨專政
掌權者會用盡一切方法整肅異己，Salami tactics（切香腸戰術）是循序漸進的蠶食技巧，先從右派打起，接著中間派，再打左派，直至移除所有政敵。立法會參選確認書的出現，梁天琦等人被裁定提名無效，到後期愈來愈多的DQ事件，連OMDB楊岳橋也真的變成了Dead body，有人還認為自己可以置身事外嗎？

4. Take responsibility for the face of the world / 為世界的面貌負責
香港警察將示威者標籤為「曱甴」，納粹德軍也曾以「曱甴」、「老鼠」等稱呼來貶低猶太人，作者提醒我們要注意這些去人性化的仇恨標誌，不要隨波逐流地犯上平庸之惡，在生活的每個細節上也絕不能隨便妥協。

5. Remember professional ethics / 勿忘專業倫理
這讓我想起了改編自真實事件的《1987：逆權公民》，一名首爾大學生在偵訊期間遭受酷刑致死，檢察官堅持驗屍、醫生拒絕捏造死因、記者們鍥而不捨地追查真相、學生引領民眾參與示威，最終推翻了全斗煥的獨裁政權。不同角色都恪守著專業倫理，電影裡沒有唯一的主角，因為人人皆英雄。

6. Be wary of paramilitaries / 小心那些準軍事組織
7. Be reflective if you must be armed / 若你是軍警人員 請時時反思
這兩課的道理顯而易見。聽命行事、執行任務從來都不是違背良知的藉口，到了今時今日，誰都知道那三萬人裡沒有一個是無辜的。

8. Stand out / 勇於挺身而出
國安法實施後，如今再站出來說真話、做實事，要付出的代價已變得愈來愈大，但還是要像周庭、黎智英說的那樣，無悔為香港做正確的事。也像袁國勇教授早前接受BBC專訪，透露華南海鮮市場早被清理一空的情況，質疑武漢官員隱瞞疫情。這些挺身而出的英勇行為都是可敬的。

9. Be kind to our language / 珍惜我們的語言
在《1984》的世界裡，真理部可以藉著修訂官方認可的新語辭典，逐步刪除、摧毀收錄的文字，令人民可用的語言愈加貧乏，最後再也說不出任何批評政府的話。請珍惜我們固有的廣東話、繁體字，拒絕匪語、殘體字的文化入侵。

10. Believe in truth / 相信事實
11. Investigate / 當個追求真相的調查者
看免費新聞不是毫無代價的，在這個Fake news當道、人人皆記者的時代，具備公信力、求真精神的第四權顯得特別重要。世上沒有什麼真正客觀中立的新聞，報導與否、篇幅多寡、取材角度、後期剪接全都是立場，一落筆、一開cam就有態度。請好好篩選你的資訊來源，以訂閱、捐款等行動支持那些仍然相信事實、追求真相的傳媒，也為自己所轉發的每個訊息負起責任。

12. Make eye contact and small talk / 望進你我的眼 彼此閒話家常
「這是個讓你與周遭保持聯繫、打破社會隔閡，並了解誰值得、誰不值得信任的方法。」最近看到人人手持一份蘋果日報時，總有一種窩心的感覺。這一課要說的就是不妨與身邊的同路人微笑相認，互相勉勵一下。

13. Practice corporeal politics / 親身實踐政治
「我們可以利用社群媒體組織抗議活動，但若沒有走上街頭，就不會產生任何真正效果。」雖然九月的立法會選舉已被強行押後，但初選結果反映的民意，大家還是有目共睹的。疫情尚未趨緩，設計文宣也好、落區派發防疫物資也好，總有些事可以積極參與。

14. Establish a private life / 維護私人生活
審查似乎已經無處不在，個人在網絡上的一言一行隨時會被翻查出來成為日後罪證。航空業、教育界在過去一年發生的白色恐怖，參選議員因為舊有帖文或照片而觸及DQ紅線，到國安法下的以言入罪，你的事業、家庭、自由與人生安全都受到威脅。極權主義(Totalitarianism)並非指政權無所不能，而是無孔不入地監控、影響我們的生活，抹除公領域與私領域的疆界。

15. Contribute to good causes / 為好事盡一分力
假如你不能冒險親身參與其中，也可以選擇資助一些能夠表達你價值觀的機構與組織，間接協助他人行善。不過對於某些偽善、背信棄義的NGO，就早日停止捐獻吧。

16. Learn from peers in other countries / 學取他國經驗
多留意世界時事，培養自己的國際視野，你會發現，歷史總是在重複上演。我們踏上了南韓、烏克蘭曾經走過的路，南營洞的場景換上了新屋嶺，Berkut與Titushky不就是防暴警與白衣人嗎？現在又輪到泰國與白羅斯(Belarus的正名)步我們的後塵，極權施行暴政，人民便輸出革命。

17. Listen for dangerous words / 注意危險的政治用語
「對極端主義或恐怖主義這類詞語保持警覺。對緊急狀態或例外狀態這些危險字彙保持敏感。」去年利用《緊急法》倉卒宣布《禁蒙面法》，現在又借疫情下的《限聚令》打壓集會，很不幸地，這些用語早已走進香港新聞的日常。

18. Be calm when the unthinkable arrives / 在難以想像的事發生時保持冷靜
像希特拉利用1933年的國會縱火案鞏固權力，像普京以各種襲擊事件來推行恐懼管理(terror management)，無論那些恐襲背後是由誰來策劃，當權者的目的都已達到。也像電影《十年》裡的《浮瓜》單元，港區國安法的預言已然成真。

19. Be a patriot / 當個愛國者
愛你的土地，就像那首數字歌一樣，5201314。

20. Be as courageous as you can / 盡你所能保持勇氣
這一課只有一句話──「如果沒有人願意為了捍衛自由而死，所有人都將死於暴政。」

廿課書，二十條歷史教訓。這位Professor還說：「切忌人云亦云。要以屬於自己的方式發出話語，就算你想表達的就是他人的說法也一樣。努力與網路保持距離，要勤讀書。」網絡上的資訊浪花不斷襲向我們，唯有埋首書本才能享有片刻的寧靜，寫下這篇文章，就是我以自己的方式發出的話語。共勉之。

►Home Kong 的製作過程:
https://youtu.be/b8Z-VUNiqGg

►"Home Kong" Lyrics:
香港 唯一嘅地方我叫屋企
守護 我會堅持到尾唔放棄
點解未做好自己 就要喺度講人哋
充滿批鬥內鬥 呢個地方仲係港人地？
721 831 101 呢啲日子
真係聽見都心悒
呢個政府表面民主其實內裏不一
走上街頭爭取公義最小銘心刻骨

勢弱言輕 決不虛作無聲
趁住年輕 追逐遠方流星
勢弱言輕 決不虛作無聲
猶如繁星 流水化作寒冰

光明來臨之前日子永遠最黑暗
復活之後我就起身唔會再被困
香港人怒憤 唔需要你憐憫
港英時代埋下嘅根 Fuck it everyone say
時間 會證明邊個啱
代表我哋嘅核心價值冇人可以推翻
革命之時 我地準備同你搏鬥
命運好壞 只會掌握於我雙手

I know I’m dope
Got a perfect soul
I hate those shit
Never step back wow
Dark days, I just wanna say
I’m ok but please don’t go away
Damn hey
Where are they? Where the fuck are they?
Aren’t they wanna liberate fucking liberate
Stop hesitate hey
Come on never too late
Break the fucking rules that can never obey

勢弱言輕 決不虛作無聲
趁住年輕 追逐遠方流星
勢弱言輕 決不虛作無聲
猶如繁星 流水化作寒冰

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Find me on Instagram:
chumichael
鐘意我啲片嘅記得follow我!!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
我的其他影片：
【荷蘭】歐洲旅記 2020 荷蘭 EP2
https://youtu.be/UipRkeeCC3s
☑倫敦街頭實測?慘遭歧視？三月中的Chinatown?沒人戴口罩？｜關於英國戴口罩的分享
https://youtu.be/FanXb7sBdYw
☑歐洲旅記 2020 荷蘭 EP1
https://youtu.be/OtnuVjOVWw0
☑[大阪] 大阪全集
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SQH0LKXhi_8&list=PL0Q753x2Y6Jf-oKRxCVQziWMzqH4CPrM_
☑【YORK】教堂也會被雷劈⚡？充滿血腥味的斜角巷?？英國最不想面對的黑歷史？｜英國旅記
https://youtu.be/VpVtGHseToY
☑不單是遊戲？地表最強文宣？｜Liberate Hong Kong 光復香港 遊戲介紹
https://youtu.be/fnmtAI3LuD4
☑如果小丑是鼓手｜Cream - White Room drum cover by JOKER
https://youtu.be/RHFzUHYUfyU
☑[布吉] 十二廢青旅記全集
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qvGyA_9cdjk

不好意思呀～最近顧著找新家～
編輯影片編輯得很慢
不過已經順利找到了
之後再跟大家分享～
已經快三月了
現在才出一月最愛 LOLLL
不過二月最愛 也快上傳了 哈哈！
期待期待～大家最近有看甚麼好看的劇
留言推薦我一下吧～

............................................................

⭐️ 不定時每週更新影片 ⭐️
?SUBSCRIBE & BE FRIENDS
https://www.youtube.com/bontime

.............................................................

⭐️ January Favourites ⭐️

產品：
維生素C沖劑
Obey 黑色針織帽
H&M 奶茶色衛衣
https://www2.hm.com/en_ca/productpage.0715624008.html

音樂：
LOFI MUSIC

電視劇：
Real Detective
Aaron Hernandez
(補充： 案件蠻近期的 他是2013年被捕2017年自殺了）
浪漫醫生金師傅2

.............................................................

⚡️ 優惠分享 ⚡️

Lifecode Boutique
https://www.lifecodeboutique.com/discount/BONTIME15
折扣碼 〖BONTIME15〗享有85折優惠！

YesStyle
https://www.yesstyle.com/en/home.html?rco=BONTIME123
Extra 5% off on first purchase, Extra 2%off future order

.............................................................


⚡️ MUSICS ⚡️

?Get It Right Now - Hallman
?Jay Troit - Lax Superlative

?Musics are from
https://www.epidemicsound.com/referral/n49ktz/

⚡️ GIF ⚡️
Graphics from giphy.com

.............................................................


⚡️
每個人的生活習慣 感受 都不一樣 歡迎大家留下自己的意見
但是請互相尊重 不要強加意見感受到其他人身上
因為我們都是獨一無二 有著不同喜好的人
⚡️


.............................................................


⚡️ KEYWORDS ⚡️
#溫哥華／加拿大／溫哥華必吃／溫哥華必去／溫哥華必玩／溫哥華必知／溫哥華留學／溫哥華移民／溫哥華美食／溫哥華旅遊／加拿大旅遊／#加拿大生活／溫哥華生活／Canada／#Vancouver／香港／美妝／開箱／#香港女生在溫哥華


.............................................................


⚡️This video is not sponsored. Some of the links are affiliated. 這不是合作影片, 說明欄裡包含分潤連結

We might be asked or we might be ordered to perform duties that we do not want to perform. Say, in a crowd control situation, what we’re doing now is to maintain law and order but perhaps after 1997 we’ll be asked to exercise force on the crowds that is unnecessary.

In other words, in simple terms, we’re afraid that we’ll be ordered to do things that we do not want to do.

(You would refuse to obey orders?)

I would, if I am asked to do things that, in my opinion, are immoral or incorrect.

But I must say I would stay until the very last minute because this is my home. This is the place (where) I was born, brought up and educated. I want to stay. I want to serve the people of Hong Kong.



▍成人英語再起步

? 5、6月份成人英語再起步課程已滿額。感謝大家支持！⁣⁣
現時只設常規課程，內容聽講讀寫運用，詳細內容，建議試堂體驗。

常規班時間表：
● 初階常規班／星期三／7 - 8 pm
● 高階常規班／星期一／7:30 - 9 pm
● 高階常規班／星期三／8 - 9:30 pm

訂閱與芬尼學英語 ► http://bit.ly/flayt-sub

▍中、小學常規班
課程資料、時間表 ► http://bit.ly/fla-timetable


喜歡我們的短片嗎？到 Patreon 支持我們！ ► http://bit.ly/fla-patreon
歡迎提供字幕 :)

▍播放清單：
今天只學一個字 ► http://bit.ly/2DRQPgE
名人英語 ► http://bit.ly/2EUc8QO
語文知識 ► http://bit.ly/2GzuW8b
Word Pairs 怎樣分 ► http://bit.ly/2hS1MCF
時事英語 ► http://bit.ly/2RqrMok
品牌名學英語 ► http://bit.ly/2qd3mUq
朗誦節特訓 ► http://bit.ly/2PBqZno

▍更多學習資源：
● 加入 Finnie's Facebook 群組：http://bit.ly/flafbgp
● 訂閱電子報：http://bit.ly/fla-nl
● 下載免費學習資源：http://bit.ly/36VhrYS

▍Follow 芬尼：
● Blog: http://bit.ly/fla-blog
● Facebook: http://bit.ly/fla-facebook
● Instagram: http://bit.ly/fla-instagram
● Pinterest: http://bit.ly/fla-pinterest

Free stuff!!! :)
● Use my iHerb Discount Code: ASC7218
● Sign up at AirBnb and get HKD$290 in travel credit: https://www.airbnb.com/c/tiffanys213
● Get a FREE first Uber ride (up to HK$50): https://www.uber.com/invite/tiffanys2213ue
● Get TWO months of free SkillShare premium:
https://skl.sh/2IIHhr8
● Get HKD$60 off your next order at Foodpanda: https://fdpnda.app.link/tB3PF2LhZV
● Get HKD$100 of credit to spend across your next 4 orders at Deliveroo: https://roo.it/tiffanyccs
● Get HKD$100 off your order at NOSH:
TIFH437