[爆卦]obey意思是什麼?優點缺點精華區懶人包

雖然這篇obey意思鄉民發文沒有被收入到精華區:在obey意思這個話題中,我們另外找到其它相關的精選爆讚文章

在 obey意思產品中有12篇Facebook貼文,粉絲數超過9萬的網紅Andrew Chai,也在其Facebook貼文中提到, 「順服基督」到底是什麼意思? 圖/文:蔡頌輝(Andrew Chai) 彼得前書一章2節一般被認為是聖經中對何謂「基督徒」最精簡的定義:「就是照父神的先見被揀選,藉著聖靈得成聖潔,以致順服耶穌基督,又蒙他血所灑的人。」值得注意的是,本節所列的幾個必有的特徵中,唯獨「順服」是外在具體可見的。麥阿瑟(...

 同時也有2部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過7,280的網紅BonTime Bonnie,也在其Youtube影片中提到,不好意思呀~最近顧著找新家~ 編輯影片編輯得很慢 不過已經順利找到了 之後再跟大家分享~ 已經快三月了 現在才出一月最愛 LOLLL 不過二月最愛 也快上傳了 哈哈! 期待期待~大家最近有看甚麼好看的劇 留言推薦我一下吧~ .......................................

obey意思 在 親子で英語力アップ!の英語コーチング Instagram 的精選貼文

2021-05-17 12:47:04

マザーズコーチングスクールを卒業しました!😊 これから、TSCコーチング(一般のコーチング)をもう少し学んで、パートナーシップコーチングも学んでから、マザーズコーチングも教えられる資格を取ろうか、と思っています。 英語コーチングが大忙しなので、少しずつ、少しずつ、ですね。 通常、コーチングとは...

obey意思 在 Andrew Chai Instagram 的最佳解答

2021-02-02 10:44:10

「順服基督」到底是什麼意思? 圖/文:蔡頌輝(Andrew Chai) 彼得前書一章2節一般被認為是聖經中對何謂「基督徒」最精簡的定義:「就是照父神的先見被揀選,藉著聖靈得成聖潔,以致順服耶穌基督,又蒙他血所灑的人。」值得注意的是,本節所列的幾個必有的特徵中,唯獨「順服」是外在具體可見的。麥阿瑟(...

obey意思 在 Cyrus @ 除了旅行、還是旅行 Instagram 的最讚貼文

2020-07-16 20:59:49

#香港黃店 香港人最近每天的心情 就是驚濤駭浪 心累 無奈 憤怒 徬徨 但有一件事不能忘記 就是 「千祈唔好慣」 不能讓荒謬變成日常 。 《論暴政:二十世紀的二十個教訓》(On Tyranny)說到 面對暴政我們要/ 。不盲從權威(Do not Obey in Advance) 。在工作上堅持專...

  • obey意思 在 Andrew Chai Facebook 的最讚貼文

    2021-01-18 17:44:28
    有 653 人按讚

    「順服基督」到底是什麼意思?
    圖/文:蔡頌輝(Andrew Chai)

    彼得前書一章2節一般被認為是聖經中對何謂「基督徒」最精簡的定義:「就是照父神的先見被揀選,藉著聖靈得成聖潔,以致順服耶穌基督,又蒙他血所灑的人。」值得注意的是,本節所列的幾個必有的特徵中,唯獨「順服」是外在具體可見的。麥阿瑟(John MacArthur)說的對:「得救的唯一證明就是順服的生活。 這是一個人真正認識耶稣基督的唯一可能的證據。 如果一個人不以基督爲生活的榜樣,那麽自稱認識基督是一種空洞的口號。」(The only validation of salvation is a life of obedience. It is the only possible proof that a person really knows Jesus Christ. If one does not obey Christ as a pattern of life, then professing to know Him is an empty verbal exercise.)

    然而,順服神到底是怎麼一回事?這包含以下三個等次:

    1. 順服聖經全面的教導。神的子民以神的話語爲自己行事爲人最終極的依據,讓它塑造自己的價值觀、人生志向和道德操守。這個聽起來好像大家都懂,實行起來往往我們卻有太多主見和不順從,尤其是面對一些違背我們的意願和感受的吩咐(諸如饒恕、愛仇敵、不事奉金錢等)的時候,我們會用自己的判斷去認爲哪些可行、哪些不可行。順服基督也包括神為我們所立的領導,聖經中提到包括執政掌權者、奴僕的主人、父母、一家之主、教會的牧者等。除非這些領導的旨意違背了神至高的原則,否則我們應當順服。

    2. 順服神所帶領的情勢。每個人對自己的環境和遭遇都有所期待,但現實不一定如理想。基督徒可以向神求,神有時會應允,有時不會,有時要我們等待。在這種情況下,我們就需要學習順服。所謂順服不是無奈地接受,而是學著在其中甘心和喜樂地面對,知道神仍掌權,這其中必有祂的美意。

    3. 順服聖靈內心的感動。神有時候會把一些特定的感動放在我們裏面,催促我們去做一些事或不做一些事(在聖經許可的範圍內)。如果是一些及時能完成的,不牽涉動用太多資源和其他人參與的,我們應當順服這感動去做——如奉獻支持事工、關顧和服事某個人、對誰說某句造就他的話等。如果是牽涉較多人、影響較大的(如搬家、創業、購堂等),我們就該加以驗證。

  • obey意思 在 Eric's English Lounge Facebook 的最佳解答

    2020-04-06 20:26:31
    有 426 人按讚

    [時事英文] 死亡率(mortality rate)*、壓平曲線(flattening the curve)、活動限制 (lockdown):如何理解這些術語?
     
    Language goes beyond a sealed system governed by a rigid set of rules. To fully understand the meaning of a word, one must look further than connotation and denotation, and also take context into consideration. In this case, one needs to examine the social, political, economic, and even statistical contexts of the terms.
     
    語言並非只是受嚴密規則所約束的封閉系統。為了充分理解一個單詞的意涵,我們不僅要瞭解其本義與引申義,同時還要考慮整個語境。在此一情況下,應要考察社會、政治、經濟甚至統計上的語境。
     
    Does “confirmed cases,” for example, mean the same thing in every country before and during the coronavirus outbreak? What about “lockdowns”? Does it mean that the government is advising people to stay home or is someone nailing your door shut? Some food for thought when reading about the coronavirus outbreak.
     
    例如,在冠狀病毒爆發前以及爆發期間,「確診病例」在各國是否具有相同的含義?那麼,封鎖呢?這是否意味著政府正建議人們留在家中,抑或有人正把你家大門釘上?以上是在閱讀疫情的相關資訊時所引人深思的一些事情。
     
    *同學好心的補充說明:「mortality rate」通常指的是死亡率,而「fatality rate」則是(因罹患某疾病)致死率。兩者都是重要的死亡指標,但計算公式不相同。
     
    ★★★★★★★★★★★★
     
    《紐約時報》報導:
     
    Making sense of the coronavirus pandemic requires getting up to speed on semantics as much as epidemiology. Government officials and health care professionals toss off mentions of mortality rates, flattening the curve and lockdowns, assuming that we know what they mean. But the terms mean different things from country to country, state to state, even city to city and person to person. Officials use the same phrases about mass testing, caseloads and deaths to describe very different situations. That makes it hard to give clear answers to vital questions: How bad are things? Where are they headed?
     
    1. make sense of… 理解……
    2. get up to speed on 了解最新情況;跟上進度
    3. toss off 輕而易舉地處理*
     
    弄懂新型冠狀病毒大流行,既需要了解流行病學的最新情況,也需要在語義學上跟上形勢。「死亡率」、「壓平曲線」和「活動限制」等說法從政府官員和公共衛生專業人士的嘴裡脫口而出,他們假設大家都知道這些詞的意思。但對不同的國家、不同的州,甚至不同的城市和個人來說,這些術語有著不同的含義。 官員們使用「大規模檢測」、「病例數」和「死亡病例數」等相同的措辭,來描繪非常不同的情況。這令一些重要的問題難以得到明確的回答:情況有多糟糕?正在向什麼方向發展?
     
    toss off: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/toss%20off
     
    ★★★★★★★★★★★★
     
    People search for insight by comparing their countries to those that are further along in the epidemic. But if the terms are misleading or used in differing ways, the comparisons are flawed. Also, the statistics and vocabulary offer a false sense of precision while in reality, the information we have shows only a fraction of what’s going on. “The new cases or deaths each day are given as exact numbers, and we’re trained to take that at face value,” said Mark N. Lurie, an epidemiologist at Brown University’s School of Public Health. “But those are far from exact, they’re deeply flawed, and their meaning varies from place to place and from time period to time period.”
     
    4. be further along in 在……上走得更深遠
    5. at face value 根據外表;從表面上看
     
    人們將自己的國家與那些經歷了疫情更多階段的國家進行比較,以求了解情況。但是,如果這些詞語使人產生誤解,或在使用方式上存在差異的話,這種比較就是錯誤的。此外,這些統計數據和詞彙給人以精準的假象,而現實是,我們所掌握的信息僅代表冰山一角。「每天的新增病例數或死亡人數都是以精準數字的形式通報的,我們被訓練成只看這些表面數字。」布朗大學公共衛生學院流行病學家馬克・盧裡說。「但這些數字遠非精準,而且有嚴重缺陷,它們的含義因不同的時間和地點而不同。」
     
    ★★★★★★★★★★★★
     
    I. Confirmed Cases 確診病例
     
    Countries vary wildly in testing for the virus and how they report the numbers, and experts say most infections are going undetected. So the publicized national tallies are rough, incomplete pictures that may not be all that comparable. And that’s if countries are forthcoming about their data.
     
    6. vary wildly in 在……上有極大的差異*
    7. publicize 公布;宣傳
    8. national tallies 國家的統計數據
    9. incomplete pictures 不完整的狀況
    10. forthcoming 樂於幫助的
     
    各國在病毒檢測以及通報數字的方式上有很大差異,而且專家們說,大多數感染都沒有被發現。因此,各國公布的只是粗略的數據,這些並不完整的描繪也許沒有多少可比性。這還是在假設各國願意提供數據的情況下。

    wildly: https://bit.ly/2wkgPjo
     
    ⊹⊹⊹⊹⊹⊹⊹⊹⊹⊹⊹⊹⊹⊹⊹⊹⊹
     
    Officials in the United States say that China, which has reported more than 82,000 infections, has understated its epidemic. Until this week, the Chinese government excluded those patients who tested positive for the virus but had no symptoms. China also doesn’t say how many tests it has conducted, and doubts have been raised about whether it has tested extensively in Xinjiang, the province where it holds hundreds of thousands of Muslims in indoctrination camps. The Covid Tracking Project, run by The Atlantic, has tried to compile all the numbers in the United States and reports more than 1.2 million tests so far, over 3,600 per million people.
     
    11. understate 未如實陳述;避重就輕地說
    12. exclude 把……排除在外
    13. indoctrination camps 再教育營
    14. run by 由……經營
     
    中國通報的累計確診病例超過8萬2千例,美國官員說,中國淡化了國內的疫情。直到本週前,中國政府一直把病毒檢測呈陽性但沒有癥狀的感染者不納入確診病例。中國也未公開接受檢測的人數,而且外界已對中國是否在新疆進行了大規模檢測表示懷疑,中國在那裡把數十萬穆斯林關進了拘禁營。《大西洋月刊》的新冠肺炎追蹤計劃試圖匯總美國的所有數據,它統計到的數字是,美國迄今為止進行了逾120萬例檢測,平均每百萬人超過3600例。
     
    ★★★★★★★★★★★★
     
    II. Widespread Testing 大規模檢測

    It matters not only how many people are tested, but also when, and who they are. Once again, countries differ, shaping what the numbers mean. A few countries, like South Korea, Australia and Singapore, got serious about mass testing early on. They used the information to do ambitious contact-tracing — finding and testing those who had recently been near infected people, even if they had no symptoms.
     
    15. it matters 重要的是
    16. not only……, but also…… 不僅……,而且……
    17. get serious about 認真對待某事
    18. early on 在早期
     
    重要的不只是多少人做了檢測,檢測時間和檢測對象也很重要。各國在檢測時間和對象上也有不同,這讓數字的含義也有所不同。韓國、澳洲和新加坡等少數國家很早就開始認真地進行大規模檢測。他們利用這些信息嚴格追蹤接觸者,也就是找到並檢測那些親密接觸者,即使他們沒有癥狀。
     
    ⊹⊹⊹⊹⊹⊹⊹⊹⊹⊹⊹⊹⊹⊹⊹⊹⊹
     
    But most nations with large numbers of cases have done less testing, waited longer to do it in bulk, and made little attempt at contact tracing. They find themselves playing catch-up with the virus, ramping up testing after their outbreaks had already mushroomed. They detect more cases, but by then it’s hard to tell how much of that growth is the expanding epidemic and how much is expanding surveillance. Unable to meet the demand, they often limit testing to the sickest patients and health workers.
     
    19. in bulk 大量
    20. make little attempt 幾乎未做嘗試
    21. ramp up 增加*
    22. mushroom (v.) 迅速增長;迅速發展*
    23. meet the demand 滿足需求
    24. limit……to 將……限制在……
     
    但大多數存在大量確診病例的國家進行的檢測數量都比較少,都是等了更長時間後才開始進行大規模檢測,而且對追蹤接觸者的工作幾乎未做嘗試。這些國家發現自己在拚命追趕病毒的傳播,在疫情迅速蔓延後才加大了檢測力度。這些國家都檢測到了更多的病例,但此時已很難判斷新增病例中有多少是疫情不斷擴大的結果,有多少是擴大疫情監測的結果。由於無法滿足檢測需求,這些國家通常只能對病情最嚴重的患者以及衛生工作者做檢測。
     
    ramp up: https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/ramp-up
    mushroom: https://www.ldoceonline.com/dictionary/mushroom
     
    ★★★★★★★★★★★★
     
    III. Fatality Rates 致死率
     
    It has been stated time and again: Italy and Spain have high mortality rates among coronavirus patients, Germany’s is low, and China’s is somewhere between. It may not be that simple. Counting the dead is as flawed and inconsistent as counting the infected. Recent reports say that mortuaries in Wuhan, China, where the disease was first discovered, have ordered thousands more urns than usual, suggesting a much higher death toll than the city’s official count, 2,535. The outbreaks in Wuhan, and parts of Italy and Spain, overwhelmed hospitals, forcing many sick people to ride it out at home. No one knows how many people have recovered or died without ever being tested. And if only the sickest patients are tested, then the number of infections will appear smaller and the percentage who die will seem higher.
     
    25. time and again 屢次;一再
    26. as flawed and inconsistent as 像……一樣存在缺陷與不一致
    27. mortuary 停屍間(太平間)
    28. urn 骨灰罈
    29. suggest 暗示*
    30. death toll 死亡人數
    31. to ride it out 安然渡過(難關)*
     
    一個反覆提及的說法是:義大利和西班牙的新冠病毒肺炎患者死亡率高,德國的低,中國的居中。情況也許並不那麼簡單。統計死亡人數和統計感染人數一樣存在缺陷和不一致的地方。最近有報導稱,武漢的殯儀館訂購的骨灰盒數比該市官方統計的2535例死亡高出好幾千,表明死亡人數遠高於官方公布的數字。新冠病毒最早就是在這座城市發現的。武漢以及義大利和西班牙部分地區的疫情使醫院不堪重負,許多患者被迫在家中渡過難關。沒人知道究竟有多少人在從未做檢測的情況下康復或死亡。如果只對病情最嚴重的患者做檢測的話,感染人數看上去會更低,而死亡率看起來將更高。
     
    suggest: https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/suggest
    ride sth out: https://bit.ly/2Rd6Tj6
     
    ★★★★★★★★★★★★
     
    IV. The Peak 疫情高峰
     
    Officials often talk about when the epidemic peaks or plateaus — when a country “flattens the curve.” But they rarely specify, the peak of what? And how can we be sure we’re past it? When an outbreak is growing unchecked, more people become infected and more die each day than the day before. On a graph, the curve showing the daily count of new cases has gone from rising sharply to moving sideways — the curve has flattened — and even begun to move downward. That is one corner being turned: The rate of the spread of the virus has slowed down. It takes longer to turn another: the rate of people dying.
     
    32. from rising sharply to moving sideways 從急劇上升到橫向移動
    33. turn the corner 好轉;度過難關*
     
    官員們經常提疫情何時達到高峰或進入平台期,也就是一個國家「壓平曲線」的時候。但他們很少具體說明是什麼達到了高峰,以及我們怎麼能確定高峰已過?當疫情不受控制地發展時,每天的感染和死亡人數都比前一天多。曲線圖上顯示的每天新增病例數從急劇上升變得趨於平緩——曲線已被壓平——甚至開始下降。這是一個轉折點:病毒的傳播速度已經放緩。度過死亡人數的轉折點則需要更長的時間。
     
    turn the corner: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/turn%20the%20corner
     
    ⊹⊹⊹⊹⊹⊹⊹⊹⊹⊹⊹⊹⊹⊹⊹⊹⊹
     
    But even when those curves flatten, the epidemic still has not “peaked” by another crucial measure: the number of active cases. That figure continues to rise until the number of patients who either die or recover each day is larger than the number of new infections. To ease the staggering load on health care systems, the active cases curve must also flatten and then fall.
     
    34. peak (v.) 使……達到頂峰
    35. either……or…… 不是……就是……
    36. staggering 沉重的;巨大的
     
    但是,即使這些曲線已趨於平緩,疫情的另一個重要衡量指標——現存確診病例數——仍未達到「峰值」。在每天的死亡或康復患者人數超過新增感染人數之前,這個數字還將繼續上升。為緩解衛生系統的沉重負擔,現存確診病例數的曲線也必須先趨平,然後下降。
     
    peak: https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/peak_2
     
    ★★★★★★★★★★★★
     
    V. Lockdowns 封鎖(活動限制)
     
    More than two billion people, including most Americans, are living under something usually called a lockdown. But there is no set definition of that word — or related terms like stay-at-home mandates and social distancing — so the details differ from place to place. The biggest differences may be in enforcement. Some places, like those in the United States with lockdowns, mostly rely on people to follow the rules without coercion. But Italy and others have deployed soldiers to ensure compliance, and French police have fined hundreds of thousands of people for violating restrictions. China, in addition to using security forces, mobilized an army of volunteers, ratcheting up social pressure to obey.
     
    37. set definition 固定的定義
    38. enforcement 實施;執行
    39. rely on 仰賴;依靠
    40. deploy 部署
    41. compliance 服從
    42. fine 處……以罰款(或罰金)
    43. in addition to 除了……之外
    44. mobilize 動員
    45. ratchet sth up/down 逐步增加/減少
     
    全球有20多億人,包括大多數美國人正生活在一般被稱為「活動限制」的狀態下。但這個詞沒有固定的定義,其他的相關說法,比如政府的「待在家裡」和「保持社交距離」令也沒有明確的定義,所以各地的具體做法也不一樣。最大的不同可能在執行方面。有些地方,比如美國有限制令的地方,主要依靠人們自覺遵守,而非強制。但義大利等國為確保限制令的落實而動用了軍隊,法國警方還對數已十萬計的違反禁令者處以罰款。中國除了使用安全部隊外,還動員了一支志願者大軍來加大服從封鎖隔離措施的社會壓力。
     
    ⊹⊹⊹⊹⊹⊹⊹⊹⊹⊹⊹⊹⊹⊹⊹⊹⊹
     
    Italy’s experience shows the looseness of the term. It has gone through several phases of restrictions, applying them to more people, making them stricter and increasing enforcement. A few weeks ago, a person could travel around Italy for a valid work or family reason. Now, people are fined for nonessential walking too far from their homes. But each stage was widely called by the same name: lockdown.
     
    46. looseness 鬆散
    47. valid 確鑿的;合理的;有根據的;讓人信服的
     
    義大利的經歷表明了這個詞語解釋上的自由。義大利的封鎖令經歷了幾個階段,適用範圍擴大到越來越多的人,封鎖及其執行也變得越來越嚴格。幾週前,人們還可以因為正當的工作或家庭原因在義大利旅行。現在,人們會因不必要的離家太遠的走動而被罰款。但禁令的每個階段用的都是同一個泛泛的名稱:活動限制。
     
    《紐約時報》完整報導:https://nyti.ms/2XcCUeT

    圖片出處:https://fxn.ws/34gwSeH
     
    ★★★★★★★★★★★★
     
    時事英文大全:http://bit.ly/2WtAqop
     
    如何使用「時事英文」:https://bit.ly/3a9rr38
     
    #疫情英文

  • obey意思 在 Campus TV, HKUSU 香港大學學生會校園電視 Facebook 的精選貼文

    2019-01-19 23:33:50
    有 1,900 人按讚

    【專題訪問 Interview Feature】2019年度香港大學學生會周年大選中央幹事會候選内閣蒼傲訪問(外務篇) | Interview with Prism, the Proposed Cabinet of Executive Committee, The Hong Kong University Students’ Union of Annual Election 2019 (External Affairs)

    (Please scroll down for English version.)

    中央幹事會候選內閣蒼傲就外務議題接受本台訪問,就不同外務議題立場,包括不反對政府取締民族黨的原因、相信政府DQ議員合法的理據、初一事件有黑幫介入的看法、及對法律制度有信心的理由等發表意見。

    訪問節錄如下:

    1. 你們的政治光譜/政治立場是甚麼?
    我們認為用現有的名詞並不能表達我們莊的政治立場,因為例如本土、港獨等,第一他們並沒有清晰的界定,或是社會一致的定義,我們都認為不論是政治光譜或是政治立場我們作為香港人或是香港接受教育的人,其實我們的立場都會傾向由香港出發。但由香港出發去考慮香港利益時,我們都要考慮時間軸。時間軸的意思是,我們到底在考慮短期還是長期的利益。加上香港的地理位置、經濟結構其實都十分依賴世界上大部份的國家,不論金融、出口產業,所以在考慮香港利益同時,我們都應考慮鄰近國家的政策、議案的推出。所以如果要用幾個字去形容我們的政治立場,我們會選擇「國際視野,本土出發」八個字。前者是考想利益的角度,後者是執行的角度。

    2. 你們是否支持香港獨立?
    首先我們認為它可以被自由地討論,特別是在大學之內。至於是否贊成香港獨立方面,港獨並非香港現時可執行最好的決策,因為尚有很多的選擇可加以考慮及討論。另外我認為香港內部的問題都非常嚴峻,例如我們在政綱小册子上提到的外務議題,如學生自殺、高樓價、創新科技嚴重落後等問題。這些都是我們內部必須解決和面對的問題,所以我們會將那些內部問題列為最優先需要處理的問題。

    3. 你們覺得香港獨立是否合法?
    我們認為任何符合法例的討論都是可被接受的,所以我們認為只要某個人或團體在現時完善的法律制度下,加上沒有違反法律,就應可就不同議題提出想法。

    4. 你們是否同意香港政府取締香港民族黨?
    首先我們相信香港的法治仍然相當完善,所以就香港一套完整司法制度體系下做出的判決,我們並沒有太多質疑或反對。對於民族黨被政府取締或禁止,社會上有不同聲音,但我們相信我們應遵守絕大部分香港市民都認同是完善的法律體系下作出的任何決策。

    5. 你們是否同意香港政府DQ議員?
    其實我們由始至終都相信,而坊間一些調查機構都指出香港的法治制度在世界上都名列前茅,所以我們相信這套法治制度可以帶來公平的審訊,所以對於有部分議員被DQ,我們願意相信整個判決過程是公平的,並且有足夠理據去支持政府所作的判決,所以我們對這件事沒有任何特別意見。

    6. 你們是否支持人大釋法?
    每一個法律的訂立,其實都是由一小部分的精英去開始建構框架,然後隨社會的進步不斷完善。所以法律並非一本已經印刷好的書,而是容許我們不斷修改、去完善,就一些前人的不足作補完。人大釋法亦都如是,我相信重點是我們希望這法列在微調後能得到愈來愈多香港人的支持,這才是一個成功的新詮釋。

    7. 你們是否同意一國兩制?
    我們支持所有在香港回歸時所簽訂的條文,其中當然包括一國兩制。

    8. 你們是否支持國歌法和23條立法?
    因為爭議聲非常之多,所以我們不希望對任何未實施或未明文規定的法例作出過多評論。這是對該法案有所偏頗,該法案到最後還有很多相議的空間,所以我們認為政府應充分考慮各種聲音,從而推出一條為大部分港人所接受的法例。

    9. 你們對違法達義有何看法?
    香港作為擁有完善法律的城市,任何人都有表達訴求或是行動的權利。我們主張每人都有自由去決定自己的事、想表達的聲音,但每人都應為這些行為勇敢承擔相認的法律責任。當然我們更相信這套法律體系是完善和公平的。

    10. 你們對初一事件有何看法?
    對旺角騷動,很多報紙傳媒都報道了有不法份子甚至黑社會的介入,所以旺角騷動的那一批示威者是否單純為表達而表達的市民呢?

    11. 你們是否同意政府以暴動罪控告參與者?
    就對這幾名人士進行拘捕的行為,我們希望香港政府有真憑實據去支持,以及整個審訊過程認該要公平。我希望他們得到公平的審訊。

    Campus TV has interviewed with Prism, the Proposed Cabinet of Executive Committee, The Hong Kong University Students’ Union, Session 2019, with regards to their treatment of external affairs. Prism has expressed their stance and opinions on various external issues, which include: their not opposing the Hong Kong government’s banning of the Hong Kong National Party, believing in the government’s legitimacy for the disqualification of legislators, believing in the involvement of gangs in the Mong Kok Incident of 2016, and expressing their confidence in the current legal system.

    The interview excerpts are as follows:

    1. Where do you stand on the political spectrum? / How would you define your political stance?
    We believe the current word items are unable to express our Cabinet’s political stance. For example, if you consider the term localism or Hong Kong independence, these groups have not a clear boundary or universal definition given by the society. Whether it be the political spectrum or political stance, us who are Hong Kong-ers or who have been educated in Hong Kong, have a tendency to think from the standpoint of Hong Kong. If we consider the benefits from the standpoint of Hong Kong, we also need to consider the timeline. This (the timeline) means, that we should consider if these benefits are of short term or long term. Therefore, when considering Hong Kong’s benefits, we should also consider the policies and bills of neighbouring countries. Therefore, if we had to define our political stance in terms, it would be “international perspective that comes from a local standpoint”. The former is a consideration to the benefits, the latter is a consideration to the execution.

    2. Do you support Hong Kong independence?
    Firstly, we think this matter could be discussed freely, especially within the premises of the University. In terms of agreeing with Hong Kong independence, we think that Hong Kong independence is currently not the best option to be executed in Hong Kong, because there are still many other options to consider and discuss about. In addition, I think that Hong Kong’s internal affairs are very severe, like the external affairs that are mentioned in our campaign booklet, for example, students’ suicides, rising property prices, the severely outdated innovation and technology. These are problems that our internal department has to confront and resolve, therefore we put these internal affairs as our priority.

    3. Do you think that Hong Kong independence is legal?
    We believe any discussion that is in compliance with the law is acceptable. Therefore, we think that under the current, comprehensive legal system, with no breaching of the law, a person or group should be allowed to speak their thoughts on different issues.

    4. Do you agree with Hong Kong government’s banning of the Hong Kong National Party?
    Firstly, we believe that Hong Kong’s rule of law is still quite comprehensive. Therefore, we do not have much hesitation nor opposition for a judgment that is based on what we consider to be an intact judicial system of Hong Kong. In terms of the banning of the Hong Kong National Party, the society has different voices, but we believe we ought to obey the judgment that comes from what the majority of Hong Kong considers to be a comprehensive legal system.

    5. Do you agree with Hong Kong government’s disqualification of legislators?
    Actually, we have since the very beginning believed in Hong Kong’s rule of law as quite a frontrunner in the world; this has been backed by some survey organisations within the community too, so we believe that this rule of law can bring out a fair trial. Therefore, in regards to the disqualification of some legislators, we willingly believe that the entirety of the judgment process has been fair, with sufficient arguments to back up the government’s verdict. We do not express any special opinions towards this incident.

    6. Do you support the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress’ Interpretation of the Basic Law (SCNPC's Interpretation of BL, or Interpretation of the Basic Law by the SCNPC)?
    For the enactment of every legislation, it starts from a small portion of elites that begin to build its (the legislation’s) framework, it then continues to be improved as society grows. For this reason, the law is not a printed book, it allows us to continually amend, better, and complete items that are left neglected or faulted by predecessors. This applies for the SCNPC's Interpretation of BL, I believe the most important thing is, we hope to gain more Hong Kong-ers’ support under these fine-tunings (by the SCNPC's Interpretation of BL), we think this is what counts as a successful re-interpretation of the law.

    7. Do you agree with the constitutional principle of “one country, two systems”?
    We support all the terms that were signed in the Handover of Hong Kong, and this definitely includes the principle of “one country, two systems”.

    8. Do you support the National Anthem Bill and the enactment of Article 23?
    Due to the many controversies on this matter, we do not wish to comment on any legislation that has yet to be implemented or stipulated in explicit terms. This would be a prejudice on the said bill(s). These bills still have a lot of room for negotiation, so we believe the government should consider different voices, so as to introduce a legislation that is accepted by the majority of Hong Kong-ers.

    9. What are your views on the idea of achieving justice by violating the law?
    Hong Kong is a city with a comprehensive legal system; anyone has the right to express their own appeal or action. We advocate that everyone has the freedom to decide for their own deeds and express their own thoughts, but everyone should also be responsible to bear the consequences of their actions. Needless to say, we definitely believe that our legal system is perfect and fair.

    10. What are your views on the Mong Kok Incident in 2016?
    With regards to the Mong Kok unrest, many media sources have reported about the involvement of many illegal parties, and even that of gangs or triads. So, are the demonstrators in the Mong Kok unrest really with pure intentions to speak up, for the sake of expressing themselves as Hong Kong citizens?

    11. Do you agree with the government’s decision to charge participants (of the Mong Kok Incident in 2016) with the offence of rioting?
    With regards to the arrest of those participants, we hope that the Hong Kong government has had solid evidence to support (their arrest), and that the trial process has been fair. I hope they receive a fair trial.
    ___________________________________

    二零一九年度香港大學學生會周年大選其他候選人包括候選常務秘書麥嘉晉、校園電視候選內閣、學苑候選編輯委員會及候選普選評議員。

    2019年度周年大選中央諮詢大會將於一月二十一日至一月二十五日在中山廣場舉行,時間為下午十二時半至二時半。

    Other candidates for the Annual Election 2019 include the Proposed General Secretary Mak Ka Chun Eugene, the Proposed Cabinet of Campus TV, the Proposed Editorial Board of Undergrad, and the Proposed Popularly Elected Union Councillor.

    The Central Campaign for Annual Election 2019 will be held from the 21st to 25th of January at the Sun Yat-sen Place, from 12:30 to 14:30.

你可能也想看看

搜尋相關網站