旁邊那杯 scotch 是道具，跟對方聊到中途，拿起杯子呷一口，是型的。

但那杯 scotch 也有個實際作用，就是用來定驚。無數次用 Zoom 的經驗，也沒有一次像如此戰戰兢兢。

「Hi Marcus，」這個笑容很高貴，「幾好嗎你？」

看著螢幕上這位女士，緊張得連拿起杯子的力氣都沒有；我有可能是全世界第一個，用 Zoom 跟前度女友的媽媽見面的人。晚上十一時，一早洗澡了，但隆重其事是必然的，頭還是要 gel 得靚靚仔仔。

「Auntie 你好，」感覺到自己僵硬的笑容，「我 ok 呀，呢邊都仲叫安全，你嗰邊而家點樣？」兩老住在紐約，情況令人擔心，可幸伯母仍然精神爽利。

恰到好處的 small talk 之後，她有技巧地帶到正題，而其實那刻我還是不知道她找我所謂何事。「係呢，」她眉毛輕揚，「你哋...... 仲有冇聯絡？」問得咁直接，真係要飲啖酒定驚。

「間中都有 text，但係 COVID 之後好似都冇見過面。」想了想，她這樣一問，有點令人不安。「佢冇嘢嗎？」

伯母笑了笑，欲言又止，似在尋找適當的對白，終於：「我就係想你幫我睇吓佢有冇嘢。」好半天，不懂反應過來；想知多一點，但伯母似乎又不想說太多。臨睡前被這樣吊癮，十級痛苦。「I am more than happy to find out for you，不過好奇想問下，點解你唔問佢其他朋友，要問我？」

這次伯母答得爽快：「有時有啲嘢，佢對住熟嘅朋友都未必講，反而對住一啲無關痛癢嘅人，she might open up a bit。」有必要幫伯母澄清一下，其實她在美國接受教育，未退休前是華爾街一家大行的超級 banker，所以中文真係麻麻，「無關痛癢」四個字確是刺痛了我的小心靈，但我原諒她。

難得人家信任，我當然不會太慢，兩天後已經約了她在一家以前我們拍拖時候，喜歡 catch up for a quick lunch 的地方—— Chinnery。

著住一件姣姣哋淺粉紅嘅我，早到十分鐘，當佢嚟到，見到佢頭髮仍然係咁飄逸，嘴唇仍然係咁迷人，眼神仍然係咁高傲，但竟然著咗件深藍色嘅連身裙。十次有八次著深藍色，佢都係因為心情唔好。

「Dark blue？Anything bothering you？」

「好憎你嗰啲自以為事嘅所謂觀察力囉，叫咗嘢食未呀？」

女人話好憎，未必真係好憎，要聽埋語氣。佢語氣出賣咗佢，其實完全唔憎，而且有啲冧。

約會舊情人，最好約在老地方，為什麼？除了熟悉的氣氛，還有熟悉的經理。「Hello 葉生，Hello 楊小姐，好耐冇見你哋一齊嚟喇。」有啲對白，你畀定五舊水叫個經理講佢都未必交到咁真摯嘅戲，何況呢吓完全免費，老地方的威力呢。

Beef tartar 來到。蛋，落晒；酒，落一半。放在吐司上，goodness，是舊人的味道。

「估下我噚晚同邊個 Zoom？」

「Not in the mood for guessing，直接講唔該。」

「你媽咪。」

「你認真？」她咬著吐司瞪大眼睛的樣子超超超可愛。

「好認真。」

「佢同你講乜嘢？」

「佢叫我問你有冇嘢。」

「暫時冇嘢，」她定了定神說。

「咁到底你有乜嘢？」

「都話冇嘢咯。」

「喂，你兩母女係咪玩我呀，你知唔知我今日頭痛呀。」

「你頭痛關我咩事？」她竟然笑。

「我噚晚見你媽咪特登 gel 番個頭，你知我有 gel 喺個頭瞓唔到㗎啦，咪去洗頭囉，跟住求其抹幾下就瞓著咗，今朝就頭痛喇。」

她笑得更開懷，在袋裏拿了一盒藥丸放在枱上：「Panadol 呀。」

「For M 痛㗎喎姐姐。」

她笑得更起勁，我也被她感染了。一起傻笑了很久之後，才慢慢靜下來，默然回味著剛才的打鬧，至少我是，希望她也是。

已經沒有打算追問她什麼，反而是最後，那杯咖啡來到之後，她主動說：「係佢。」

Oh shit…

「佢出軌？」

她苦笑搖頭。

「唔係出軌......唔通出櫃？」

「好無聊呀你，」她隨手拿起一包糖向我擲過來。

「Then what is it？」

攪拌著咖啡好半天後，她才鄭重吐出一句：「顏色唔同。」

「Wholly shit…… 」

「原來有好多嘢，」她低著頭說，「我自己係唔知。」

「你之前唔知佢咩顏色？」

「知，一早知。我話我自己唔知嘅，係我唔知原來顏色唔同，可以有咁嘅 impact。」

我想了想，終於想出一句很型的對白：「人覺得唔知點算，唔係因為我哋有嘢唔知，而係有啲嘢，我哋以為自己知，但其實原來唔係咁。」

「Wow…… 」她看著我，「你係咪 quote 緊一個作家？」

「係，Oscar Wilde。」

她忍不住大笑：「葉生，it ain’t what you don’t know that gets you into trouble but it’s what you know for sure that just ain’t so，唔係 Oscar Wilde，係 Mark Twain 呀。」

「差唔多啫。」

埋單離開後，我的腳步很慢，在沉思。「仲有咩笑話想講呀？」她站在鏡子前面問我。

「唔係笑話想唔想聽？」我反問。

「請。」

「我想講：我同你，以前；佢同你，而家。」

「What？」

「即係呢，我上個禮拜日，同我老細喺 Grand Hyatt 食早餐。平時嗰度嗰個時間好靜，但嗰朝好多人，好嘈，因為 staycation，let’s put it that way，嗰啲唔係平時會喺 Grand Hyatt 見到嘅人。」

「你想講咩？」她不明白。

「你就係 Grand Hyatt，我就係平時 Grand Hyatt 嘅客。然後，我同你之前發生嗰件事......就係呢個 COVID…...佢...... 就係 staycation 嘅住客。唔想發生嘅嘢發生咗，畀人乘虛而入。」

「我未聽過咁荒謬嘅比喻，and that’s a very mean thing to say。」

「對唔住，it’s a mean thing to say but I say what I mean。」

「講嘢唔使咁坦白，」她盯著我說，「太坦白會傷害人。」

「香港人呢，已經唔可以每日坦坦白白講嘢，你係咪想我連對住你，都要講大話？」

她若有所思了一會，說了這樣一句：「Can you give me a hug？」

「求之不得，」我禽獸般撲過去。

「Not as what you think，」她退後一步，「but as 同路人。」

【After Winning Majority in LegCo: Beijing's Crackdown May Trigger International Intervention】

***感謝Hong Kong Columns - Translated，將我早前撰寫『議會過半想像：以「#國際攬炒」反制「臨立會2.0」』長文（https://www.facebook.com/joshuawongchifung/photos/a.313299448762570/2887650867994069/）翻譯成英文，鼓勵國際社會關注立會選舉一旦過半的沙盤推演，在最惡劣形勢下的制衡策略。***

中文精簡版本：https://www.facebook.com/joshuawongchifung/photos/a.564294826996363/2888641404561682/

Hongkongers have experienced our revolution for over half a year. They no longer take a consequentialist view to the effectiveness of their movement as they did years ago, or waste time second-guessing the intentions and background of fellow activists. Following the defensive battles at CUHK and PolyU, November’s District Council election saw a great victory of unity. More marvellous is the union between peaceful and “valiant” protesters.

In the process of resisting tyranny, the people have realised that one cannot prioritize one strategy over another. This is also how the common goal of “35+” came into being—the hope that we will win over half of the seats in the Legislative Council (LegCo) this September, such that the political spectrum that represents the majority of Hongkongers is able to gain control of legislative decisions. The political clout of Hongkongers will increase if 35 or more seats are successfully secured on our side. It is certainly one vital step to achieve the five demands within the system.

The possibility of realizing legislative majority

Technically it is not unrealistic to win a majority even under the current undemocratic system. Back in the 2016 LegCo election, we already won 30 seats. In addition to the District Council (First) functional constituency seat that is already in the pocket of the pan-democrats, as long as the candidates in Kowloon East and New Territories West do not start infighting again, we could safely secure 33 seats based on the number of pan-dem votes in 2016.

The other 3 seats required to achieve a majority depend on democrats’ breakthrough among the functional constituencies by dispersing the resources of the Liaison Office. They also count on whether the turnout this September could exceed 71.2% — that of last year’s District Council elections. Some of the factors that could affect the turnout include: will the epidemic persist into the summer? Will there be potential violent repression of protests in the 2 weeks preceding the election? Will Hong Kong-US relations be affected by the downturn of the global economy?

Therefore, the ambition of “35+” is to be prioritised by the resistance as both a means and an end. I have already expressed my support for an intra-party primary at the coordination meeting. In the meantime, it is pleasing to see the ongoing debates reaching a consensus of maximising the seats among geographical constituencies in the upcoming election.

Whilst enthusiastic coordination, we should also assess the post-election landscape and gauge Beijing’s reactions: if we do not reach 35 seats, Hong Kong will be subject to tighter control and more severe repression by China; but if the democratic parties successfully form a majority in LegCo, CCP’s fears of a “constitutional crisis” would become imminent. Hence, the key questions are how the Pan-Democrats should deal with the volatile political situation in Hong Kong and how they are going to meet Beijing’s charge head-on.

Watching out for Beijing’s dismissal of LegCo after reaching majority

To take back control of LegCo such that it faithfully reflects the majority’s principles and needs is the definition of a healthy democracy. Recently, however, DAB’s Tam Yiu-chung has warned that the plan of the Pan-Dems to “usurp power” in the LegCo would only lead to Beijing’s forceful disqualification of certain members or the interpretation of the Basic Law. This proves that winning a majority in LegCo is not only a popular conception but also a realistic challenge that would get on the nerves of Beijing. Could Beijing accept a President James To in LegCo? These unknown variables must be addressed upon achieving a majority.

While there is no telltale sign as to Beijing’s exact strategy, we are already familiar with the way CCP manipulated the Basic Law in the past 4 years. Having experienced three waves of disqualifications in LegCo, twice kicked out of LegCo with my team, and thrice locked up in jail, I have no false hopes of an easy compromise from Beijing: they would not let Pan-Dems control LegCo for half a year and wait (as is the proper procedure) until after having negatived the Budget to dissolve the legislature, and thereby giving them an easy victory in the re-elections. The greater the Pan-Dems threaten Beijing’s rule in Hong Kong, the more likely that it will trigger Beijing’s repression.

Since the disqualification and arrest of lawmakers have already become “normalised”, one can even imagine the police stepping into the LegCo building to force Pan-Dems into voting. Neither is it beyond our imagination to expect the CCP to kick out all 70 lawmakers in a fit of rage and replace them with a provisional LegCo “2.0” [HKCT note: The first was from 25 Jan 1997 to 30 Jun 1998]. To depend on a majority that could lead to a chapter of a “new testament” for One Country, Two Systems is perhaps what many elites long for, but they are overly optimistic:for a ticket to the promised land will not be available at the Chief Executive election campaign a year and a half later.

Admittedly, the Pan-Dems cannot unilaterally initiate “Laam-chaau” [HKCT note: mostly translated into “scorched-earth” mentality or “mutual destruction”; some even translated into “If I burn, you burn with us”]. The most they can do is to force a standstill of the government, and not for long the LegCo will have been eliminated from the equation to make the wheels turn again. It all leaves the plan of “Negativing the motion → Dissolving LegCo → Re-election after re-election → the stepping down of Carrie Lam” merely as overly positive speculation, probably resulting from their overestimate of CCP's capacity for rational calculation. The Pan-Dems must guard their frontlines and recognise what the biggest threat from Hong Kong to China could be. In this case, should LegCo sessions be disrupted or suspended, the Pan-Dems would have to be well prepared to surmount the expected obstacles and prevent the disqualification crisis 4 years ago—a Catch-22 indeed.

Productive tension from global intervention: Using Laam-chaau against the CCP

What aggravates the CCP the most is the potential threat to Hong Kong’s unique status as the one and only “separate customs territory”. Any miscalculation will compromise its role as the Chinese economy’s “white gloves”. Imagine if CCP were to disqualify all 70 elected lawmakers and convene a meeting north of the Shenzhen River to pass a resolution to Hong Kong’s affairs (much like the Provisional Legislative Council “1.0" in 1997), how great will the shock be in a world with an effective Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act? However hard it is to predict the future one thing is certain: With the US presidential election just around the corner, blows to the separation of powers would not be tolerated, and the West would necessarily effect countermeasures against the Hong Kong government.

Beijing has been relying upon Hong Kong to navigate the international community for decades. While clamping down on the political freedom of the cosmopolitan city, Beijing desires to maintain the financial centre’s economic freedom. Hence, we started lobbying for the Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act four years ago, and today we are determined to promote “Laam-chaau” on an international scale.

The will of the voters must be reflected in an election. If a “35+” legislature were to be dismissed and replaced, such flagrant violation of democracy would assuredly cause a greater backlash than the infamous extradition bill. Knowing what the reality ahead of us could be, we have to combine our election and international strategies to oppose the placement of a 35+ LegCo with an “Emergency Legislative Council 2.0”, to advance an international “Laam-chaau” to Hong Kong’s status as “separate customs territory”. Only then will we stand a chance to resist the regime and to realise the five demands.

Adjusting our mindset: Overcoming the “constitutional crisis” to reach a resolution

Upon the realization of the “35+” LegCo, it is expected that the CCP will launch a devastating counterattack. The Pan-Dems should not expect LegCo to run normally; neither can the lawmakers realise their governing blueprints they have for Hong Kong. Rather, candidates will be able to compete against one another with visions of a liberated Hong Kong through popular vote. Bringing this point up has nothing to do with undermining the common goal of reaching a majority in LegCo, but rather channels the battle of LegCo to positive use upon the rule of law’s death and a “constitutional crisis” ahead. Knowing that Hongkongers have nothing to fall back on, all Pan-Dems should not miss the only way to the realization of “35+”.

Thus, be they partisans, nonpartisans, incumbent politicians, amateur politicians, or the civil society as a whole – if we stay in the political discourse of 2016 and continue to perpetuate old stereotypes, that is to deal with the divisions on the pan-democratic camp by favouring the most “local” faction; to consider only resource allocation and self-aggrandizement as the purpose of a LegCo campaign; to ignore how potential lawmakers are fitted to what specific roles; to turn a blind eye to the journey of resistance since last summer (extending indefinitely into the future)—They would lead as astray and cost us lose a precious opportunity for change by winning a 35+ majority.

The extent to which the pan-democrats can stay united in light of the political atmosphere since last summer is another problem that our side must to address. Before the watershed moment of 12th June 2019, many democratic delegates were trapped in the mentality of needing to “preserve people’s livelihood”, “be content of what we have accomplished”, and other strategies that favours stability. As the government refuses to heed to the five demands, whether the democrats, especially those in the functional constituencies, have the political will to go all-in is the real difficult question that confronts us in the upcoming LegCo election.

All in all, if “35+” cannot be realised, it is unsurprising to see LegCo being more heavily suppressed in the next 4 years; even if "35+" is achieved, it is questionable whether the pan-democrats are able to weather multiple attacks, verbal or physical, from the regime (judging from its power in the last four years) and utilise the international Laam-chaau strategy against the displacement of LegCo. Adhering to the motto of “we fight on, each in his own way”, I can only hope that Hongkongers in elections, street confrontations and international front can reconcile with each other, so that we may collectively compel the government to yield to our demands in the next six months. It is only by reaching a resolution before a real constitutional crisis that we can combat the institutional violence of the regime and not be devoured by it.

https://hkcolumn.blogspot.com/2020/04/joshua-wong-after-winning-majority-in.html?fbclid=IwAR216gf53pG_j9JOpDfr2GItvjLfrFSekKTPzoEs3-s9KBqvPEwz865P8vw

今天在看披頭四吉他手
GEORGE HARRISON的紀錄片
然後就被他這首「Run Of The Mill」歌吸引
妙的是
這首歌的歌名中文翻譯
是屬於一個曖昧的字眼
他不屬於任何單字的直譯
像極了你我那些
難以一言以蔽之又斷不了的關係

別問好不好
一切都還好

分享給你

「Run Of The Mill」一切還好
演唱：GEORGE HARRISON

Everyone has choice
每個人都能選擇
When to and not to raise their voices
什麼時候拉高或是降低他們的音量
It's you that decides
一切，由你決定
Which way will you turn
你想走哪條路
While feeling that our love's not your concern
這一刻，請用心去感受，我們的愛不是你的困擾
It's you that decides
一切，由你決定


No one around you
在你身邊，並沒有人
Will carry the blame for you
會將責怪推向你
No one around you
在你身邊，並沒有人
Will love you today and throw it all away
會在今天深愛你，然後又把這一切忘記
Tomorrow when you rise
明天，當你醒來
Another day for you to realize me
這新的一天，你可以用更好的一切去了解我
Or send me down again
或者再次把我傷痛


As the days stand up on end
随著時間一天天走向盡頭
You've got me wondering how I lost your friendship
你令我一直猜不懂，我是為何失去你的友誼
But I see it in your eyes
但我在你的眼中，看清了這一切


Though I'm beside you
就算你在我身邊
I can't carry the lame for you
可我沒辦法以殘缺的自己看著你

I may decide to
我可能或做出決定
Get out with your blessing
帶著你的祝福走得遠遠的
Where I'll carry on guessing
到了那個地方，我可能仍然會想


How high will you leap
你會有多麽興奮
Will you make enough for you to reap it?
你是否會做好準備收穫這一切
Only you'll arrive
只有當你抵達了這裡
At your own made end
你的終點這刻
With no one but yourself to be offended
除了你自己，真沒人能因此觸怒
It's you that decides
一切，由你決定

追蹤Gina music社群挖掘更多音樂🌹

facebook👉 https://www.facebook.com/Ginamusicland
痞客邦👉http://anna8310112000.pixnet.net/blog

Don't forget to turn on the bell icon for future uploads 🔔✔️
🌸本影片與The Linch Agency、 Mr.生活扉頁 合作宣傳🌸

For business enquiries, photo and song submissions contact: https://www.facebook.com/Ginamusicland

____________________________________________________

Social Media:

音樂串流歌曲連結▶https://song.link/i/1508105911

Gentle Bones是第一位被環球音樂集團簽約的新加坡音樂人，在 2016 年，他靠著自己的努力贏得了富比世亞洲「30 位30歲以下最具影響力人士」的稱號；也在同年成為第一位新加坡歌手贏得了香港亞洲流行音樂節 SuperNova Award！除此之外，也被英國知名媒體 BBC 稱為「新加坡的紅髮愛德。」

LYRICS:

How are you doing?
「妳在做什麼呢？」
How have you been?
「妳過得好嗎？」
Sending this text for the fifth time this week
這是我這週第五次送出這樣的訊息
So when can I call you
所以當我可以打電話給妳時
There’s so much to say
我有好多好多話想說
Sending this text cuz I struggle when we are face to face
送出這封訊息只因當我們面對面時，我總是不知所措

If you only knew
但願妳能明白
The love you refuse
被妳拒絕的愛
Waiting by the phone for you
仍在等妳的電話響起

But you misunderstand
但妳誤會了
When I make these plans
當我寫下這些計畫時
Tried to please then try to mend
我只是嘗試著彌補這一切

Cuz we shouldn’t even have to run
因為我們根本不該逃避彼此
When did this lose all its fun?
什麼時候這一切都失去樂趣了呢
I know these words are not the ones that you want
我知道這些字不是你所冀望的
But you won’t say that we’re done
但你絕不會說出口 我們分手吧
If you told me what you want
如果你願意早點告訴我你想要什麼
Then we wouldn’t even have to run
那麼我們就不用一直逃避彼此


How are you feeling?
「你還好嗎？」
Are you free in the evening?
「今晚有空嗎？」
I just wanted to see you once outside of my dreams
我只想與你見上一面而不是在夢裡
But I’m guessing you’d rather try this tomorrow
但我猜 你可能會希望找時間再說
Honestly right now we’re hollow
說真的，現在的我們如此空虛
We’ve been that way now far too long but let’s get this over with
我們維持這種關係太久了 現在就讓我們結束吧

If we only knew
但願我們能知道
The love we refuse
被我們拒絕的愛
Tried to please then try to mend
也曾努力過、修補過

Cuz we shouldn’t even have to run
因為我們根本不該逃避彼此
When did this lose all its fun?
什麼時候這一切都失去樂趣了呢
I know these words are not the ones that you want
我知道這些字不是你所冀望的
But you won’t say that we’re done
但你絕不會說出口，我們分手吧
If you told me what you want
如果你願意早點告訴我你想要什麼
Then we wouldn’t even have to run
那麼我們就不用一直逃避彼此

Forget you said I’m the one
忘了你曾說過我是唯一
I’d go away if you say right now we’re done
若妳說我們已經結束了我會離去
Do you hate what we’ve become?
你會討厭我們現在的樣子嗎？
We shouldn’t even have to run
我們根本不該變成這樣的

♡Our video on J Lou's channel [Reading RACIST Hate Comments In ASMR ft. Emi Wong]: https://youtu.be/9JN3gyEJPBQ

Finally a collab video that many of you asked for!!!! Remember to check out the one we did on J Lou's channel as well of us reading racist hate comments in ASMR

►J Lou's YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/JLou0
►J Lou's Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/jlouofficial/

♡SUBSCRIBE FOR WEEKLY VIDEOS 訂閱我的頻道你不會後悔☺
► http://bit.ly/SubscribeToEmi

♡ADD ME ON 成為我的朋友☺
Instagram: @EmiWong_
► https://www.instagram.com/emiwong_
Facebook: @Emi Wong
►https://www.facebook.com/StayFitandTravel/

♡Chinese Subtitles Added by Priscilla Lee

♡HELP ME TRANSLATE MY VIDEOS 觀眾朋友有時間可以幫我加字幕, 非常感激!☺
http://www.youtube.com/timedtext_cs_panel?tab=2&c=UCvGEK5_U-kLgO6-AMDPeTUQ

♡WATCH MORE VIDEOS (PLAYLISTS)
VLOGS ► http://bit.ly/EmiVlogs
WORKOUTS ► http://bit.ly/WorkoutWthEmi
BEGINNER WORKOUTS ► http://bit.ly/BeginnerWorkoutsWithEmi
FITNESS & DIET TIPS ► http://bit.ly/FitnessDietTipsWithEmi
EAT (FOOD VLOGS!) ► http://bit.ly/EatWithEmi
TRAVEL ► http://bit.ly/TravelWithEmi
RECIPES ► http://bit.ly/CookWithEmi
FUN CHALLENGES ► http://bit.ly/ChallengesWithEmi
MAKE UP & FASHION ► http://bit.ly/MakeUpFashionWithEmi
廣東話片 Videos in Cantonese ► http://bit.ly/CantoneseVideosEmi
有中文字幕的片 With Chinese Subtitles ► http://bit.ly/ChineseSubtitlesEmi

英國人Luke也是一名Pokemon粉絲，得知Luke也懂廣東話後，我決定考一下他知道多少Pokemon的中文名，大家來看看這位英國鬼佬猜了些甚麼！也順便學一下Pokemon的英文名呢！

Luke的頻道→
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCdDXgCNygO1GC0SrvIZlKPQ

☆★ 按此訂閱rios→ http://rios.in/riosarc
★☆ rios的主頻道→ http://rios.in/rioscircle
☆★ 合作查詢→ im@rios.pro
★☆ rios的合作頻道→ http://rios.in/saaiitv

★☆ rios的推薦影片 ★☆

● 【PTCGO直播教學】卡牌、遊戲規則超新手教學! | Pokemon卡牌
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JYpWQALdFcc

● 【廣東話諺語考死你】英國鬼佬講廣東話挑戰！小心別笑死！
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W5IZCwpjQR4

● 91-Year-Old Grandma Guesses Pokemon Names
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i4PKHk0LL4Q

☆★ 最新動向 (馬上知道最新消息)★☆
● Instagram https://www.instagram.com/riostam/ (鐵道模型)
● Instagram https://www.instagram.com/rioscircle/ (最新動向)
● Instagram https://www.instagram.com/poke.mum/ (Pokemon相關)
● Facebook https://www.facebook.com/rioscircle/
● Saaii的網站 http://www.saaii.net

【關鍵字】
rios, rios arc, rios circle, 弧圓亂語,rios arc 弧圓亂語, 廣東話諺語考死你, Youtuber 專訪, 香港 Youtuber,pokemon go 攻略,pokemon go 香港,pokemon go 香港 攻略,pokemon go 秘技,pokemon go 星塵,pokemon go 星塵 秘技,pokemon go 星塵 加倍,pokemon go 強化星塵,pokemon go 星塵,pokemon 英文名,pokemon 中文名,pokemon 精靈名,寵物小精靈 英文名,快龍,肥大,guessing pokemon names,pokemon 估名,pokemon 猜猜我是誰,pokemon 猜名,pokemon 猜謎