為什麼這篇given that中文鄉民發文收入到精華區：因為在given that中文這個討論話題中，有許多相關的文章在討論，這篇最有參考價值！作者posthumous (pardon)看板Eng-Class標題[單字] given有"...
Well, I'm not really sure you wanna learn about my educational background,
given that I was a poor student growing up.
我看中文翻譯，後半段是寫: 因為我從來不是個模範生
所以given有因為的意思?
因為查字典都沒有概念在
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 140.109.244.98
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Eng-Class/M.1462504925.A.DF0.html
→ softseaweed: google: preposition. "taking into account" 05/06 11:27
→ aq7778: 我會翻 有鑒於 05/06 14:09
推 tomokazu: 中英辭典有時候會被他的中文侷限 用英英辭典比較理想 05/06 19:44
推 vinousred: GIVEN可以想成"給定"嗎 05/06 19:55
推 ntust661: 這樣ok嗎 ...background ,because my background is giv 05/06 20:06
→ ntust661: en that I ... 05/06 20:06
→ ntust661: 他應該想說他的背景show出來不好看吧 05/06 20:07
→ ntust661: 以上純屬猜測0.0 05/06 20:07
推 xuuvup: "Given that" is a conjunction. It means "in considerat 05/06 21:37
→ xuuvup: ion of the fact that" 05/06 21:37
推 dashihito: 就我所知，given that比較像if；now that才像because 05/06 23:18
→ kaifrankwind: vinousred: 談數學的時候 可以 05/07 00:00
→ kaifrankwind: 有鑒於稍正式了點(除非透過聲音表情知道是在做效果) 05/07 00:03
→ kaifrankwind: "考量到" 我會這麼講 考量到我過去求學表現並不出色 05/07 00:05
→ kaifrankwind: (而通常想了解別人求學背景應是想找正面突出的表現 05/07 00:06
→ kaifrankwind: 吧) 我猜你不會很想知道我那樣的過去吧? 05/07 00:08
→ kaifrankwind: "考量到"算是"因為"的某一種情況 後者更泛用 在這句 05/07 00:13
→ kaifrankwind: 裡也更通順 只是字典很難把所有同個單字可能的譯法 05/07 00:13
→ kaifrankwind: 都列出來 05/07 00:14
推 kee32: 感覺given that可能性比if高一點,接近"在那前提下"的感覺 05/07 08:55
→ bbbtri: 畢竟 05/07 13:19
→ tacada: 以下全部節錄自Garner的MAU，At the head of a statement 05/07 15:43
→ tacada: (most commonly), given is an age-old shorthand way 05/07 15:43
→ tacada: of saying “assuming as a fact” or “with [the thing 05/07 15:43
→ tacada: stated] supplied as a basis for reasoning.” If what 05/07 15:43
→ tacada: follows given is a mere phrase (without a verb), 05/07 15:43
→ tacada: given appears alone—e.g.: “Given her high position, 05/07 15:43
→ tacada: she does have opposition.” Larry Whitham, “Episcop- 05/07 15:43
→ tacada: alians Brace for Divisive Sessions,” Wash. Times, 13 05/07 15:43
→ tacada: July 1997, at A4. But if a clause follows (with a 05/07 15:43
→ tacada: verb), a that should accompany given—e.g.: “Given 05/07 15:43
→ tacada: that he was a medical student at Brown before turning 05/07 15:43
→ tacada: to professional hockey, Bill McKay might be expected 05/07 15:43
→ tacada: to be a quick study.” Peter Barrouquere, “McKay 05/07 15:43
→ tacada: Learns How to Wing It,” Times-Picayune (New Orleans) 05/07 15:43
→ tacada: , 26 Nov. 1997, at C3. Cf. provided. 05/07 15:43
→ kee32: 所以我沒說錯嘛 05/07 16:17
推 vinousred: 經濟系解數學模型都是GIVEN~SOME CONDITION 05/07 17:53