毋忘五大訴求　公民抗命有理
—10‧20九龍遊行陳情書
（案件編號：DCCC 535/2020）

——————————————————
「毋忘初衷，活在愛和真實之中」
撐阿銘，即訂閱Patreon：
patreon.com/raphaelwong
—————————————————

胡法官雅文閣下：

　　2012年，我第一次站在法庭上承認違反「公安惡法」，述說對普選的盼望，批評公安惡法不義，並因公民抗命的緣故，甘心樂意接受刑罰。當年我說，如果小圈子選舉沒有被廢除，惡法沒有消失，我依然會一如故我，公民抗命，並且我相信將會有更多學生和市民加入這個行列。想不到時至今日，普選仍然遙遙無期，我亦再次被帶到法庭接受審判，但只是短短７年，已經有數十萬計的群眾公民抗命，反對暴政。今日，我承認違反「未經批准的政府」所訂立「未經批准的惡法」之下的「未經批准集結」罪，我不打算尋求法庭的憐憫，但請容許我佔用法庭些微時間陳情，讓法庭在判刑前有全面考慮。

暴力之濫觴

　　在整個反修例運動如火如荼之際，我正承擔另一宗公民抗命案件的刑責。雖然身在獄中，但仍然心繫手足。我在獄中電視機前見證6月9日、6月16日及8月18日三次百萬港人大遊行，幾多熱愛和平的港人冒天雨冒彈雨走上街頭，抗議不義惡法，今日關於10月20日的案件，亦是如此。可能有人會問，政府已在6月暫緩修例，更在9月正式撤回修例，我等仍然繼續示威，豈非無理取鬧？我相信法官閣下肯定聽過「遲來的正義並非正義」（Justice delayed is justice denied）這句格言。當過百萬群眾走上街頭，和平表達不滿的時候，林鄭政府沒有理睬，反而獨行獨斷，粗暴踐踏港人的意願，結果製造出後來連綿不絕的爭拗，甚至你死我活的對抗。經歷眾多衝突痛苦之後，所謂暫緩撤回，已經微不足道，我們只是更加清楚：沒有民主，就連基本人權都不會擁有！

　　在本案之中，雖然我們都沒有鼓動或作出暴力行為，但根據早前8‧18及10‧1兩宗案件，相信在控方及法庭眼中，案發當日的暴力事件仍然可以算在我們頭上，如此，我有必要問：如果香港有一個公平正義的普及選舉，人民可以在立法會直接否決他們不認可的法律，試問2019年的暴力衝突可以從何而來呢？如果我們眼見的暴力是如此十惡不赦，那麼我們又如何看待百萬人遊行後仍然堅持推行惡法的制度暴力呢？如果我們不能接受人民暴力反抗，那麼我們是否更加不能對更巨大更壓逼的制度暴力沈默不言？真正且經常發生的暴力，是漠視人民訴求的暴力，是踐踏人民意見的暴力，是剝奪人民表達權利的暴力。真正憎恨暴力，痛恨暴力的人，不可能一方面指摘暴力反抗，又容忍制度暴力。如果我需要承擔和平遊行引發出來的暴力事件的刑責，那麼誰應該承擔施政失敗所引發出來的社會騷亂的罪責呢？

社會之病根

　　對於法庭而言，可能2019年所發生的事情只是一場社會騷亂，務必追究違法者個人責任。然而，治亂治其本源，醫病醫其病根，我雖然公民抗命，刻意違法，控方把我帶上法庭，但我卻不應被理解為一個「犯罪個體」。2019年所發生的事情，並不是我一個人或我們這幾位被告可以促成，社會問題的癥結不是「犯罪份子」本身，而是「犯罪原因」。我明白「治亂世用重典」的道理，但如果「殺雞儆猴」是解決方法，就不會在2016年發生旺角騷亂及2017年上訴庭對示威者施以重刑後，2019年仍然會爆發出更大規模的暴力反抗。

如果不希望社會動亂，就必須正本清源，逐步落實「五大訴求」，從根本上改革，挽回民心。2019年反修例運動，其實只是2014年雨傘運動的延續而已，縱使法庭可能認為兩個運動皆是「一股歪風」所引起，但我必須澄清，兩個運動的核心就是追求民主普選，人民當家作主。在2019年11月24日區議會選舉這個最類近全民普選的選舉中，接近300萬人投票，民主派大勝，奪得17個區議會主導權，這就是整個反修例運動的民意，民意就是反對政府決策，反對制度暴力，反對推行惡法，不容爭辯，不辯自明。我們作為礦場裡的金絲雀，多次提醒政府撤回修法，並從根本上改革制度，而在10月20日的九龍遊行當然是反映民意的平台契機。如今，法庭對我們施加重刑，其實只不過是懲罰民意，將金絲雀困在鳥籠之內，甚至扼殺於鼓掌之中，窒礙表達自由。

堅持之重要

　　大運動過後的大鎮壓，使我們失去《蘋果日報》，失去教協，失去民陣，不少民主派領袖以及曾為運動付出的手足戰友都囚於獄中，不少曾經熱情投入運動的朋友亦因《國安法》的威脅轉為低調，新聞自由示威自由日漸萎縮，公民社會受到沈重打擊，我亦失去不少摯友，有感傷孤獨的時候，但我仍然相信，2019年香港人的信念，以及所展現人類的光輝持久未變。我不會忘記百萬人民冒雨捱熱抗拒暴政，抵制惡法，展現我們眾志成城；我不會忘記人潮紅海，讓道救護車，展現我們文明精神；我不會忘記年青志士直接行動反對苛政，捨身成仁，展現我們膽色勇氣；我不會忘記銀髮一族走上街頭保護年青人，展現我們彼此關懷；我不會忘記「五大訴求」，不會忘記2019年區議會選舉，展現我們有理有節。

　　法官閣下，我對於當日的所作所為，不感羞恥，毫無悔意。我能夠在出獄後與群眾同行一路，與戰友同繫一獄，實是莫大榮幸。若法治失去民主基石，將使法庭無奈地接受專制政權所訂立解釋的法律限制，隨時變成政治工具掃除異見，因此爭取民主普選，建設真正法治，追求公平正義，仍然是我的理想。在這條路上，如有必要，我仍然會公民抗命，正如終審法院海外非常任法官賀輔明（Lord Hoffmann）所言，發自良知的公民抗命有悠久及光榮的傳統，歷史將證明我們是正確的。我期望，曾與我一起遊行抗命的手足戰友要堅持信念，在艱難歲月裡毋忘初衷，活在愛和真實之中。

　　最後，如9年前一樣，我想借用美國民權領袖馬丁路德金牧師的一番話對我們的反對者說：「我們將以自己忍受苦難的能力，來較量你們製造苦難的能力。我們將用我們靈魂的力量，來抵禦你們物質的暴力。對我們做你們想做的事吧，我們仍然愛你們。我們不能憑良心服從你們不公正的法律，因為拒惡與為善一樣是道德責任。將我們送入監獄吧，我們仍然愛你們。」（We shall match your capacity to inflict suffering by our capacity to endure suffering. We shall meet your physical force with soul force. Do to us what you will, and we shall continue to love you. We cannot in all good conscience obey your unjust laws because noncooperation with evil is as much a moral obligation as is cooperation with good. Throw us in jail and we shall still love you.）

　　願慈愛的主耶穌賜我們平安，與我和我一家同在，與法官閣下同在，與香港人同在。沒有暴徒，只有暴政；五大訴求，缺一不可！願榮耀歸上帝，榮光歸人民！

第五被告
黃浩銘
二零二一年八月十九日

Lest we forget the five demands: civil disobedience is morally justified
- Statement on 10‧20 Kowloon Rally
(Case No.: DCCC 535/2020)

Your Honour Judge Woodcock

In 2012, I stood before the court and admitted to violating the "Public Security Evil Law". I expressed my hope for universal suffrage, criticized the evil law as unjust, and willingly accepted the penalty for civil disobedience. Back then, I said that if the small-circle election had not been abolished and the draconian law had not disappeared, I would still be as determined as I was, and I believe that more students and citizens would join this movement. Today, universal suffrage is still a long way off, and I have been brought before the court again for trial. But in just seven years, hundreds of thousands of people have already risen up in civil disobedience against tyranny. Today, I plead guilty to "unauthorised assembly" under an unapproved evil law enacted by an unauthorised government. I do not intend to seek the court's mercy, but please allow me to take up a little time in court to present my case so that the court can consider all aspects before sentencing me.

The roots of violence

At the time when the whole anti-extradition law movement was in full-swing, I was taking responsibility for another civil disobedience case. Although I was in prison, my heart was still with the people. I witnessed the three million-person rallies on 9 June, 16 June and 18 August on television in prison, when many peace-loving people took to the streets despite the rain and bullets, to protest against unjust laws. Some people may ask, "The Government has already suspended the legislative amendments in June and formally withdrew the bill in September, but we are still demonstrating, are we not being unreasonable?" I am sure your Honour has heard of the adage "Justice delayed is justice denied". When more than a million people took to the streets to express their discontent peacefully, the Lam administration ignored them and instead acted arbitrarily, brutally trampling on the wishes of the people of Hong Kong, resulting in endless arguments and even confrontations. After so many conflicts and painful experiences, the so-called moratorium is no longer meaningful. We only know better: without democracy, we cannot even have basic human rights!

In this case, although we did not instigate or commit acts of violence, I believe that in the eyes of the prosecution and the court, the violence on the day of the incident can still be counted against us, based on the August 18 and October 1 case. And now I must ask - If Hong Kong had a fair and just universal election, and the public could directly veto laws they did not approve of at the Legislative Council, then how could the violent clashes of 2019 have come about? If the violence we see is so heinous, how do we feel about the institutional violence that insists on the imposition of draconian laws even after millions of people have taken to the streets? If we cannot accept violent rebellion, how can we remain silent in the face of even greater and more oppressive institutional violence? The true and frequent violence is the kind of violence that ignores people's demands, that tramples on their opinions, that deprives them of their right to express themselves. People who truly hate violence and abhor it cannot accuse violent resistance on the one hand and tolerate institutional violence on the other. If I have to bear the criminal responsibility for the violence caused by the peaceful demonstration, then who should bear the criminal responsibility for the social unrest caused by failed administration?

The roots of society's problems

From a court's point of view, it may be that what happened in 2019 was just a series of social unrest, and that those who broke the law must be held personally accountable. What happened in 2019 was not something that I alone or the defendants could have made possible, and the crux of the social problem was not the 'criminals' but the 'causes of crime'. I understand the concept of " applying severe punishment to a troubled world", but if "decimation" was really the solution, there would not have been more violent rebellions in 2019 after the Mongkok "riot" in 2016 and the heavy sentences handed down to protesters by the Court of Appeal in 2017.

If we do not want social unrest, we must get to the root of the problem and implement the "five demands" step by step, so as to achieve fundamental reforms and win back the hearts of the people. 2019's anti-revision movement is indeed a continuation of 2014's Umbrella Movement, and even though the court may think that both movements are caused by a "perverse wind", I must clarify that the core of both movements is the pursuit of democracy and universal suffrage, and the people being the masters of their own house. In the District Council election on 24 November 2019, which is the closest thing to universal suffrage, nearly 3 million people voted, and the democratic camp won a huge victory, winning majority in 17 District Councils. As canaries in the monetary coal mine, we have repeatedly reminded the government to withdraw the extradition bill and fundamentally reform the system, and the march in Kowloon on 20 October was certainly an opportunity to reflect public opinion. Now, by imposing heavy penalties on us, the court is only punishing public opinion, trapping the canaries in a birdcage, or even stifling them in the palm of their hands, suffocating the freedom of expression.

The importance of persistence

As a result of the crackdown after the mass movement, we lost Apple Daily, the Hong Kong Professional Teachers' Union, and the Civil Human Rights Front. Many of our democratic leaders and comrades who had contributed to the movement were imprisoned, and many of our friends who had been passionately involved in the movement had been forced to lay low under the threat of the National Security Law. I still believe that the faith of Hong Kong people and the glory of humanity seen in 2019 will remain unchanged. I will never forget the millions of people who braved the rain and the heat to resist tyranny and evil laws, demonstrating our unity of purpose; I will never forget the crowds of people who gave way to ambulances, demonstrating our civility; I will never forget the young people who sacrificed their lives, demonstrating our courage and bravery; I will never forget the silver-haired who took to the streets to protect the youth, demonstrating our care for each other; I will never forget the "five demands" and the 2019 District Council election, demonstrating our rationality and decency.

Your Honour, I have nothing to be ashamed of and no remorse for what I did on that day. It is my great honour to be in prison with my comrades and to be able to walk with the public after my release. If the rule of law were to lose its democratic foundation, the courts would have no choice but to accept the legal restrictions set by the autocratic regime and become a political tool to eliminate dissent at any time. As Lord Hoffmann, a non-permanent overseas judge of the Court of Final Appeal, said, civil disobedience from the conscience has a long and honourable tradition, and history will prove us right. I hope that my comrades in arms who walked with me in protests will keep their faith and live in love and truth in the midst of this difficult time.

Finally, as I did nine years ago, I would like to say something to those who oppose us, borrowing the words of American civil rights leader Reverend Martin Luther King: "We shall match your capacity to inflict suffering by our capacity to endure suffering. We shall meet your physical force with soul force. Do to us what you will, and we shall continue to love you. We cannot in all good conscience obey your unjust laws because noncooperation with evil is as much a moral obligation as is cooperation with good. Throw us in jail and we shall still love you."

Peace be with me and my family, with Your Honour, and with the people of Hong Kong. There are no thugs, only tyranny; five demands, not one less! To god be the glory and to people be the glory!

The Fifth Defendant
Wong Ho Ming
19 August 2021

【每日國際選讀】
#文末挑戰多益選擇題📝
日報酬三倍、虧損也三倍
10年上漲 7298% 的TQQQ，你敢買嗎？
開啟「接收通知」和「搶先看」每天吸收雙語時事新知
來讀華爾街日報獨家


🥇This Fund Is Up 7,298% in 10 Years. You Don’t Want It.
這支基金10年上漲7298%，但不建議貿然購買(上)


🍎Few funds in history can rival the returns of ProShares UltraPro QQQ, a $7 billion exchange-traded fund that seeks to triple the daily performance of the Nasdaq 100 index.
ProShares UltraPro QQQ的回報率在基金產業史上罕有匹敵，這支規模70億美元的ETF，所追求的日報酬為納斯達克100指數日報酬的三倍。

-rival: 與…匹敵、爭鋒
-exchange-traded fund; ETF: 指數股票型基金
*ETF指能在股票交易所買賣的指數型基金，是一種被動追蹤某一指數表現的共同基金，在集中市場掛牌，像一般股票交易供投資人買賣。

-daily performance: 日報酬

💸Yet fewer can rival its risk, and you can lose money on it even in a flat or rising market. You should think three times before investing in such a fund.
但這支基金的風險也大到讓其他同行望塵莫及，即便在市場橫盤或上漲時也可能讓你虧錢。要投資這樣一支基金你恐怕必須三思而行。

-flat market : 市場持平、橫盤
-補充用法：think twice 三思而後行

🍀Commonly called by its ticker symbol, TQQQ, the fund returned an average of 51.5% annually over the 10 years ended July 31, making it the single best-performing mutual fund or ETF of the past decade, according to Morningstar Inc. Over the 10 years through Aug. 13, the fund has earned a cumulative gain of 7,298%.
人們一般用股票代碼TQQQ來稱呼這支ETF。根據晨星公司（Morningstar Inc.）數據，截至2020年7月31日的10年裡，TQQQ的年平均回報率為51.5%，是過去10年中表現最好的共同基金或ETF。在截至8月13日的10年裡，TQQQ累計取得了7298%的回報率。

-ticker symbol: 股票代號
-return:回報、報酬
-mutual fund: 共同基金
-cumulative:累計的、累加的

未完待續...
TQQQ究竟是怎麼操作的？
加入文末每日國際選讀計畫，解鎖完整語音導讀版

——
原文連結請看留言
——

❓❓多益模擬題❓:
Between Feb. 18 and March 20, during the coronavirus _____, the Nasdaq 100 ___ 27.3%. TQQQ lost 69.1%.

🙋🏻‍♀️🙋🏼‍♀️
A. clash/uplifted
B. crash/ fell
C. clamp/failed
-
【每日國際選讀，熱烈招生中！】
華爾街日報訂閱超值方案 📰
專屬 #臉書社團，浩爾 #每日語音導讀
「留言+1」，就送你 #優惠碼 及 #導讀試聽！

上榜心得第五篇
行政組許舜淵
“Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better.”
-Samuel Beckett
這句話是我準備三等考試期間的精神食糧。
從警專畢業後因為成績不佳分發到了新北市，浮沈了幾年了回到家鄉，真的靜下心來後發現人生突然失去了目標，於是決定考試，108年因為準備時間不足而落榜，但我並沒有因此喪氣，仔細的觀察成績單，找出自己失敗的原因，目標是下次考試一定要進步。
每個人唸書吸收的方法不同，所以我不分享各科的心得，而是我面對考試的策略，第一次落榜後，我分析三等考試的上榜關鍵在申論題，選擇題只要是有認真唸書的合格考生，基本上都不會差太多，所以今年考試我特別著手申論題，不管是法科還是理論科目，都需要大量的練習，買了三包國考申論題用紙，寫各種歷屆試題，三等、四等、佐二類、研究所、警正班等等，只要跟三等行政相關科目的試題我都會練習，遇到不會寫的題目不要慌張，可以查書本、或網路上的資料，全國碩博士論文網站有非常多好的資料可以擷取，申論題沒有一定的正解，但要圍繞著題目解答，言之有物，法條型題目要能寫的出適用法條並且針對題目解釋、理論科目要能敘述理論的內容、不需要全部和課本相同，但是要述出題旨要點，練習完後將所有資料匯集裝訂，在反覆的看，畫出重點，練到當你看見題目就知道這題要考什麼時就代表有相當的成果，而選擇題就是申論題寫累時的消遣。
三等行政相對於其他科系，資訊相對的公開許多，網路上都有許多學長姊分享各種書單，我也是從網路上爬文做功課就得到資訊，如同其他學長姊所說，警察法規必讀程譯老師的聖經及題解書，法規我就只讀這兩本，寫完所有的題目，在專業科目裡法規也是我這次的最高分。
最後分享面對考試的心態，我回家鄉後很幸運的選到了不是太繁重的派出所，但因離家較遠所以我每天通勤來回差不多要花一個半小時，加上外勤的日夜輪班非常辛苦，所以一如之前考上的學長姊所說，時間利用非常重要，我會利用各種不需要出勤的班唸書，深夜勤如果沒事就是讀書，早上下班後也不要馬上睡覺，再唸兩至三個小時，這是一場毅力的競賽，撐到最後我不會告訴你必定上榜，但機率提升很多。考試的期間會遇到很多阻礙和煩心的事，要自己調適，適當的運動，或找其他方式放鬆，這個過程很辛苦，但是越折磨自己的人，會造就你的強大。
最後我想告訴還在努力的學長姊們，考試這個過程的辛苦和折磨，會受到家庭、工作環境等的影響，我曾經聽過各種比我還辛苦上榜的案例，並且我會問自己，為何他/她都可以考上，而我會考不上，程譯老師上課時曾說過，再忙的單位都有人上榜；再輕鬆的單位都有人落榜，考試絕大部分的關鍵取決於態度。考試前要準備到你進度100分的程度，當你準備到100分才有可能考出70分，如果用半吊子的心態只準備70分，那考出來可能就只有50分。
最後，祝福各位還在三等考試這條路上努力的學長姊，只要堅持就會有成果，不要害怕辛苦，可以哭，但擦乾眼淚繼續翻開書，
加油!
#學生說沒有我幫忙就沒有今天的他哈真的很謝謝但其實是你認真我才能跟著沾光

歡迎訂閲頻道 https://goo.gl/AZFTS7

在Kiddy Land看到一個做雞蛋布丁的做法，於是買了這個玩具，但結果失敗了

最近這個蛋布丁機推出了還推出了蛋黃哥版本，更可愛，當然用法是一樣的，不少youtuber也試用了, 雖然我是失敗了，但其實也有其他成功youtuber可作參考的
古娃娃版本
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MIFVZG_lU9c
大J版本
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3gWs0aRxNA

連小朋友NyoNyo TV試用也成功了
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0JBJ2LK5XNA

======================================================
我的人氣影片
日本便利店/超市奶茶試飲報告 人気ミルクティ飲み比べ- 你愛哪一款?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iFPbvv2LzB0

[東京美食] 直擊開腦過程 享用吞拿魚稀有部分日日吞拿魚解體show 餐廳
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yQIAuujBXHM

[東京旅遊] 淺草1天遊 ByeBye Panda bus パンダバス 再見熊貓巴士 / Day trip at Asakusa on Panda Bus
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7tc9Xyjc2Zg&t=9s

[日本特色餐廳] 超可愛~與馬騮互動的居酒屋かやぶき / Japan Monkey Isakaya, interact with real Monkey
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NF7uf8iAN1k

[日本新年/日本跨年] 日本人如何倒數? 淺草史上最無奈倒數! / How Japanese count down for New Year?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dq4FQRZk1e0&t=1s
======================================================
【自我介紹】
我是在日香港人，高中時的一個大阪homestay 就喜歡上日本了
不敢講是一個日本達人, 但也知道不少哦...
想知道瞭解更多我在日本的生活及故事可以聽一下的香港電台訪問
https://goo.gl/yNwu8a

【自己紹介】
私は日本在住の香港人です。高校生の頃に参加した、
大阪ホームステイプログラムをきっかけに日本が好きになりました。
日本のことを知る達人とはまだ言えませんが、
そこそこ知っているレベルに達してきましたよ！

======================================================
影片每星期不定時上載 / ビデオを毎週アップします
聯絡、查詢、合作 gigiblogger@outlook.com
歡迎大家為此頻道貢獻字幕 / チャンネル字幕のご提供は大歓迎 / Subtitle contribution welcome
http://www.youtube.com/timedtext_cs_panel?tab=2&c=UCk_8jA93Ha9UTZ0s_ZE3MjA
字幕教學 https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/6054623

想提升你的youtube 影片質素或為你的頻道提升人氣、甚至乎在youtube 賺錢，大家還可以學我一樣報讀World Youtuber School的網上課程
課程以中文教授，配以筆記，方便隨時查閲復習， 更會定時作直播分享，讓你吸收到最新的知識
詳細連結 https://goo.gl/iM6BLM

======================================================
我的日本旅遊channel, 敬請訂閲 /日本の国内旅チャンネル、登録してね!
https://www.youtube.com/user/gigijapantravel

想得到我的最新資訊及分享，請訂閲我其他平台賬戶
Facebook
https://goo.gl/NfvX9b
instagram
https://goo.gl/Gselyv

閲讀更多我的日本旅遊文章
新假期
http://adf.ly/1en1xm
gotrip
http://adf.ly/1en1yb

Gigi東京生活情報 | 日本玩樂情報 | 東京好去處 | 東京吃喝玩樂 | 東京自由行 | 日本自由行 | 日本生活 | 東京生活 | 日本分享 | 東京分享 | 東京必去 | 日本必去 | 日本必試 | 東京必試 | 在日港人 | VLOG | 日本文化體驗 | 日本觀光 | 東京活動 | 東京イベント | 留日生活 | 東京在住 | 東京旅遊 | 日本旅遊 | 日本旅行 | 東京旅行 | Living in Japan | Tokyo foreigners | 日本自駕遊 | 日本旅游攻略 | 東京旅遊攻略 | 日本自由行攻略 | 東京自由行攻略 | 遊日攻略 | 日本餐廳 | 日本美食 | 東京餐廳 | 東京美食 | travel vlog | 東京遊 | 東京快閃旅行 | 日本試食 | 日本快閃旅行 | 東京一日遊 | 東京旅遊達人 | 日本旅遊達人 | 東京遊 | 日本遊 | 東京好去處 | 日本便利店 | 日本超市 | 日本零食 | 日本試食 | 日本最新 | 美食推介 | 東京窮遊 | 日本窮遊 | 東京平食 | 日本平食 | 雞蛋布丁 | 料理 | たばごプリン | egg pudding maker | 日本玩具 | 開箱 | おかしなたまご まわしてまわして まるごとプリン | Kiddy Land | Takara Tomy

謝謝收看 Thank you for watching
御覧になっていただきありがとうございます

-~-~~-~~~-~~-~-
Latest Video: "[日本文化] 大阪人不習慣的東京生活! 在日本酒館工作會被非禮嗎？"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wcsyG8FeSh8
-~-~~-~~~-~~-~-