雖然這篇doses中文鄉民發文沒有被收入到精華區：在doses中文這個話題中，我們另外找到其它相關的精選爆讚文章
在 doses中文產品中有6篇Facebook貼文，粉絲數超過4萬的網紅立法委員林奕華，也在其Facebook貼文中提到， 我國因莫德納疫苗無法穩定到貨，除原本優先接種疫苗名單第一至第三類人員和孕婦，仍維持間隔28天施打第二劑外，其他都宣佈推遲為間隔10至12週。雖然已是同島不同命，但現在等第二劑的民眾更是焦慮，因為到底能不能在12週內順利完成接種得到足夠的保護力，竟然也得不到政府的保證？在此提醒中央疫情指揮中心，到...
同時也有1部Youtube影片，追蹤數超過3萬的網紅[email protected]，也在其Youtube影片中提到，HPV Vaccine (Cervical Cancer Vaccine) - Dr. Chen Siu Wai [email protected] Source: https://www.finddoc.com/en (1) Is HPV vaccine still effective if one...
doses中文 在 說點英文 A Bit of English Instagram 的精選貼文
2021-08-02 20:36:03
#chillpillenglish 🔻S2EP07: 我們疫起學苗叫，一起苗苗苗苗苗 Taiwan Signs Deals for 20 Million Doses of COVID Vaccines🔻 — 💡 聽 Podcast 開啟英文會話力！💡 台灣現在的疫苗狀況到底是怎麼樣呢？🦠💉疫苗拿～～...
-
doses中文 在 [email protected] Youtube 的精選貼文
2015-02-11 17:29:10HPV Vaccine (Cervical Cancer Vaccine) - Dr. Chen Siu Wai Ivo@FindDoc.com
Source: https://www.finddoc.com/en
(1) Is HPV vaccine still effective if one has had sexual intercourse? 0:19
(2) At about what age should one get HPV vaccine? Is HPV vaccine applicable to both genders? 1:02
(3) Why should men need to have HPV vaccination? 1:42
(4) How many shots of HPV vaccine are necessary? 2:17
(5) Is it appropriate to have HPV vaccination when women are pregnant / breastfeeding? 2:56
(6) How does one get tested for HPV infection? 3:25
(7) How safe is the HPV vaccine? Are there any side effects? 4:09
瀏覽中文版本短片：
http://youtu.be/HnnhAnS2PKI
Search Doctor information:
https://www.finddoc.com/
Let's Connect:
https://www.facebook.com/FindDoc
https://plus.google.com/102821364210960788806/posts![post-title]()
doses中文 在 立法委員林奕華 Facebook 的最佳貼文
我國因莫德納疫苗無法穩定到貨，除原本優先接種疫苗名單第一至第三類人員和孕婦，仍維持間隔28天施打第二劑外，其他都宣佈推遲為間隔10至12週。雖然已是同島不同命，但現在等第二劑的民眾更是焦慮，因為到底能不能在12週內順利完成接種得到足夠的保護力，竟然也得不到政府的保證？在此提醒中央疫情指揮中心，到目前為止找得到有關莫德納疫苗施打的官方指引中，第二劑都是建議4週或6週；就算有疫苗限制，WHO也寫明間隔最長也就是12週！
有關莫德納接種第二劑應該間隔多久，美國CDC和WHO網站寫得很清楚。美國CDC認為間隔為4週，最長為6週，超過6週才接種第二劑的有效性訊息有限。WHO也是建議間隔4週，可延長至6週；若疫苗供應嚴重限制的國家，為提高第一劑的覆蓋率，可考慮將第二劑疫苗延遲至最長12週；建議遵守完整接種時間表，而且兩次接種不建議混打。
附上美國CDC和WHO相關連結和肉容：
➡️美國CDC
♦️英文版：
Moderna COVID-19 vaccine
Get your second shot 4 weeks (or 28 days) after your first.
You should get your second shot as close to the recommended 4-week interval as possible. However, your second dose may be given up to 6 weeks (42 days) after the first dose, if necessary. You should not get the second dose early. There is currently limited information on the effectiveness of receiving your second shot earlier than recommended or later than 6 weeks after the first shot.
♦️中文版：
莫德納COVID-19疫苗
請在接種第一劑後的4週（或28天）接種第二劑。
您應盡可能在建議的4週間隔內接種第二劑。但是，如有必要，第二劑可以在接種第一劑後6週（42天）接種。不應過早接種第二劑。目前，關於在建議的時間之前或第一劑接種6週之後接種第二劑的有效性訊息有限。
♦️網站連結：
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/second-shot.html
➡️WHO
♦️英文版：
SAGE recommends the use of the Moderna mRNA-1273 vaccine at a schedule of two doses (100 µg, 0.5 ml each) 28 days apart. If necessary, the interval between the doses may be extended to 42 days.
Studies have shown a high public health impact where the interval has been longer than that recommended by the EUL. Accordingly, countries facing a high incidence of COVID-19 combined with severe vaccine supply constraints could consider delaying the second dose up to 12 weeks in order to achieve a higher first dose coverage in high priority populations.
Compliance with the full schedule is recommended and the same product should be used for both doses.
♦️中文版：
戰略諮詢專家組推薦的莫德納mRNA-1273疫苗使用方案為，分兩次接種（每次100微克，0.5毫升），間隔28天。如有必要，接種間隔可延長至42天。
研究表明，如果間隔時間比《緊急使用清單》建議的時間長，會對公共衛生產生嚴重影響。因此，面臨COVID-19發生和疫苗供應嚴重限制的國家，可考慮將第二劑疫苗延遲至最多12週，以便在高優先人群中實現更高的第一劑覆蓋率。
建議遵守完整接種時間表，兩次接種應使用相同的產品。
♦️網站連結：
https://www.who.int/news-room/feature-stories/detail/the-moderna-covid-19-mrna-1273-vaccine-what-you-need-to-know?gclid=Cj0KCQjw6ZOIBhDdARIsAMf8YyHAy7nQ2sGbTqgw2vsOWnOTUCKFMFsrQX97xWqq9gHrEy_YAnoBMVsaAprKEALw_wcB
doses中文 在 管碧玲 (kuanbiling) Facebook 的最佳貼文
張忠謀對半導體供應鏈在地化的致詞引起矚目，我將全文的翻譯，分享給大家：
張忠謀APEC非正式領袖會議致詞全文：（中文在後）
This Informal Retreat has been called to discuss how Asia-Pacific can collaborate to move through the COVID health crisis, and to accelerate the post-COVID economic recovery. Chinese Taipei will address these two topics specifically.
On COVID-19, Chinese Taipei has had an excellent record so far. With a population of 23 million, over the last year and half, and in spite of a recent surge which has now abated, we have had a total of about fifteen thousand infected cases (.07% of the population), and 763 deaths (3 out of one hundred thousand).
We believe that our experience and know-how gained can help other APEC members. We have been, and continue to be willing to help. We have donated masks and other medical supplies to other APEC members in the past and are ready and willing to share our anti-COVID-19 know-how with you.
At the same time, WE NEED HELP! Our vaccination coverage at present is less than 20%. Although the U.S. and Japan have been generous in donating vaccines to us, and our private institutions have succeeded in procuring ten million doses of vaccines, we still need more vaccines, and need them sooner! Most other APEC members need help as well. We must ask for help from the APEC members that possess and produce more vaccines than they themselves need.
On re-vitalizing Post-COVID economy, Chinese Taipei urges free trade among APEC members and in the world, after giving consideration to vital national security needs.
In the past seven decades, free trade has enabled vibrant growth in most APEC economies. Free trade is merely a way in which each APEC economy contributes its own competitive advantage and every APEC member benefits.
Recently, however, we note with concern the tendency to want self-sufficiency or “on-shoring” of semiconductor chips. We must point out that in the past many decades free trade has greatly helped the advance of semiconductor technology. In turn, the ever greater complexity of the technology has caused the supply chain to go “off-shore”.
It would be highly impractical to try to turn back the clock. If it is tried, cost will go up and technology advance may slow. What may happen is that after hundreds of billions and many years have been spent, the result will still be a not-quite-self-sufficient, and high-cost supply chain.
We do recognize national security concerns, and believe that for security applications, a self-sufficient supply chain within one’s own borders is prudent. However, for the much larger civilian market, a supply chain substantially based on free trade system is by far the best approach.
In summary, on COVID-19, Chinese Taipei can help, is ready and willing to help with its know-how, but also needs more vaccines sooner, along with many other APEC members. On Post-COVID economic re-vitalization, Chinese Taipei urges free trade, after giving consideration to vital national security concerns.
（中文翻譯）
此次非正式領袖會議召開的目的是討論亞太地區應如何合作以度過新型冠狀病毒（COVID-19）疫情危機，並加速疫後經濟復甦。中華台北將就這兩個議題表達看法。
面對新型冠狀病毒（COVID-19）疫情，中華台北迄今維持傑出防疫紀錄。我們有兩千三百萬人口，儘管近期疫情曾一度升溫，但目前業已趨緩，在過去超過一年半的時間中，總確診病例數約為一萬五千例（佔總人口0.07%），其中死亡病例數為763例（約為十萬分之三）。
相信我們在過程中得到的經驗與知識能夠協助其他APEC成員。我們持續地願意提供協助。過去我們曾捐贈口罩與其他醫療物資予其他APEC成員，現在也準備好與你們分享我們抗疫的知識。
同時，我們也需要幫助！目前我們的疫苗注射覆蓋率低於20%。雖然美國與日本已慷慨捐贈疫苗，我們的民間機構也已成功採購一千萬劑，我們仍然需要更多數量的疫苗，而且需要儘快取得！其他多數的APEC成員也需要幫助。我們需要向目前擁有並生產超過他們自身所需疫苗數量的APEC成員尋求協助。
針對疫後經濟復甦，中華台北敦促APEC成員，在考慮重要國家安全需求後，彼此間及與全球進行自由貿易。
在過去70年，自由貿易使多數APEC經濟體蓬勃發展。自由貿易僅是各APEC經濟體貢獻自己的競爭優勢，而其他APEC成員藉此受惠的方法。
然而近來，我們很關切要求「境內」半導體晶片自給自足的趨勢。我們必需指出，過去數十年的自由貿易大幅促進半導體技術發展。因此，越趨複雜的技術致使供應鏈走向「境外」。
試圖讓時光倒流是相當不切實際的，如果嘗試讓時光倒流，不僅成本將會提升以及技術的進步可能放緩。在花費了數千億與許多年的時間之後，結果仍將是無法充分自給自足且成本很高的供應鏈。
我們認同國家安全的顧慮確實存在，也相信針對國安應用，在國境內存有一個能夠自給自足的供應鏈是審慎的作法。然而，針對規模大得許多的民間市場，一個基於自由貿易體系的供應鏈是最好的作法。
總結來說，針對新型冠狀病毒（COVID-19）疫情，中華台北能夠協助，我們也願意、並準備好以自身的知識與經驗提供協助，但也和其他許多APEC成員一樣，需要儘快取得更多疫苗。關於疫後經濟復甦，中華台北敦促在考慮關鍵國家安全需求後，應該採取自由貿易。
doses中文 在 國際狗語日報 X 百靈果News Facebook 的最佳貼文
剛剛運動的時候邊聽BBC Podcast，突然聽到台灣公司買疫苗的關鍵字，沒想到仔細一聽報導差點沒吐血。BBC竟然報導台灣政府為了"保住顏面"，"不願意"購買BNT疫苗。但卻隻字不提台灣所面臨來自中國的巨大外交及軍事威脅。
BBC News 中文（繁體）這麼偏頗可以嗎?
如果要報導中台關係 與其武斷下結論 希望這位記者有機會來台灣了解
BBC News, Taiwan is facing serious military and diplomatic threats from the Chinese government. How can you jump to the conclusion that the government is “RELUCTANT to purchase vaccines” in order to “SAVE FACE”. Isn't your report too biased?
影片是兩個片段合在一起
--以下為原文逐字稿--
Two Taiwnese firms have taken matters into their own hands to buy a large consignment of Pfizer Biontech Covid jabs after the government was reluctant to purchase the medicine because it’s being distributed by a company based in mainland China.
Asia Pacific editor Michael: “Taiwan and China are currently locked in this bitter diplomatic dispute over the future status of Taiwan. China wants it to be part of China. Taiwan thinks it should be independent. That’s the background. So in Taiwan over recent months there’s been a surge of Covid cases, and the Taiwanese government has been desperate to get hold of vaccines. It got AZ, got Moderna. It hasn’t been able to get the Pfizer Biontech. That’s because in that region, in East Asia, it’s been distributed by a Chinese company. Taiwanese government was unwilling because of those reasons I just mentioned to deal directly with a Chinese company. So what’s happened is these two Taiwanese firms stepped in: they bought 10 million doses of Pfizer Biontech vaccines from this Chinese company and they are going to hand it over to Taiwan. They spent 350 million dollars. In effect, these companies have acted as intermediate just so that the Taiwanese government can save face not to deal directly with this Chinese company.