各位，生成器也許已沒有用了。選管會一天就收到4500封電郵。看來，大家炸他電郵還是有點用的。

以下乃沈大師言為「內部AO提供範本」。的確是官話文章，請先仔細閱讀，才選擇是否發出電郵吧。

你還有5小時。

请广传，好人一生平安。

[#官方資訊] 早前分享了一位高級政務官朋友就《逃犯條例》爭議的感受，得到數千轉載，迴響十分熱烈，也有不少公務員私訊回應。本頁對象一直以黃藍以外的專業人士為主，雖然平日只分享國際視野資訊，但在關鍵時刻，也希望為一些平日對社會抽離的朋友，提供更多資訊參考。以下是我的另一位AO朋友擔心局勢惡化，希望以自己的方式真正為特區政府服務，因此以私人身份草擬的意見書，回應特區政府選舉管理委員會關於區議會選舉的官方諮詢，並使用了完美官僚理據、格式和文法，就DQ候選人提供了詳細意見。根據官方資訊，《逃犯條例》收到4500份意見書，其中3000份「贊成」，因此發出意見書並非毫無價值。這位AO表示，大家可以直接使用這格式，根據個人觀點加減內容直接電郵遞交，因為香港人大家都忙，這過程只需一分鐘，應該最符合成本效益。截止日期是7月10日或之前，請廣傳，好人一生平安。

10 July 2019

Chairman
Electoral Affairs Commission (EAC)
By Email: eacenq@eac.hk

Dear Chairman,

Public consultation on District Council Election proposed guidelines

I write to object to Chapter 3 of the Proposed Guidelines, as it gives Government an unjust, unfair, and unchecked power to disqualify any candidate during the nomination period by reason of Government’s own political motives.

Chapter 3.1 of the Proposed Guidelines says that : “Under the law, the validity of a candidate’s nomination is to be determined by the Returning Officer (RO). The EAC is neither empowered nor involved in the making of such decision and would not provide any advice on the decision made by the RO”.

Chapter 3.9(b) of the Proposed Guidelines describes the requirement by which a candidate must declare (through signing a “Confirmation Form” by the EAC) that he would uphold the Basic Law and pledge allegiance to the HKSAR.

It is totally unclear whether a Confirmation Form duly signed by a candidate is itself sufficient to discharge the candidate’s duty to declare his willingness to uphold the Basic Law and pledge allegiance to the HKSAR when he is elected to the office.

Previous elections showed that an RO, who was a civil servant (pitched at Administrative Officer Staff Grade C / District Officer) appointed to the role of RO prior to the election, could make subjective and arbitrary judgment about a candidate’s state of mind and political orientation, with selective reference to some or a few past writings, speeches, statements, expression of opinions, posts in social media platforms in relation to the candidate, instead of merely looking at a Confirmation Form duly signed.

I find it outrageous to see that Ms. Anne Teng, then District Officer (Eastern) appointed to the role of RO in a legislative council by-election last year, could refuse to acknowledge a confirmation form signed by Miss Agnes Chow Ting and disqualify her, citing absurd and arbitrary reasons with reference to some of Miss Chow’s previous remarks or those of her political party, and without giving Miss Chow a fair opportunity to respond to those reasons uttered unreasonably by the RO.

The Proposed Guidelines shows that the EAC has failed its duty to introduce any additional safeguard or measures to plug this unreasonable, unlawful and unconstitutional loophole, which may still be freely exploited by any RO in the next election driven by bad faith and political motive.

It is unacceptable that the EAC could confess that it is “neither empowered nor involved in the making of such decision and would not provide any advice on the decision made by the RO” (Chapter 3.1). I question how the EAC can still “ensure that an election is conducted openly, fairly and honestly at all times” – its statutory duty enshrined in the Electoral Affairs Commission Ordinance - when it is not involved in scrutinising or monitoring the exercise of an RO’s power in disqualifying any candidate at the RO’s own political preference.

The Guidelines did not describe in detail how an RO could, on his or her own, research during the short nomination period the political belief and past sayings of any candidate. The Guidelines are also silent as to whether the RO would have received biased or secret advice from any agency such as Department of Justice, Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Bureau, Home Affairs Department, Information Services Department, etc., which may have compiled a detailed recollection of a candidate’s previous remarks in advance. It was suggested by some that such a compilation of speech or opinion records prepared by any agency other than the RO could have assisted the RO unlawfully in reaching a dangerous disqualification decision to deprive a candidate of the right to stand for the election.

I must remind the EAC that the right to stand for election is a fundamental right guaranteed under the Basic Law and the Hong Kong Bill of Rights. The United Nations Human Rights Committee’s General Comment 25 also states that “political opinion may not be used as a ground to deprive any person of the right to stand for election.”

I am disappointed to see that the proposed Guidelines have not offered anything substantive to protect a candidate from the RO’s unlawful interference in the election by disqualifying candidates he or she dislikes. The EAC must look at this carefully to see what it can do.

The current remedy about determining the lawfulness of an RO’s disqualification decision through an election petition to be adjudicated later by the court one or two years after the actual election is totally unsatisfactory, with the lapse of time which delays the timely delivery of a just outcome.

I stress that I object to Chapter 3 of the Proposed Guidelines in its entirety. I urge you to review all the processes described in Chapter 3 again and independently. In so doing, you must resist all political considerations wrongly dictated by the Chief Executive, Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Bureau, Department of Justice, or other government agency seeking to disturb the fairness and integrity of the forthcoming district council election.

Yours sincerely,

XXXX

更新：有熱心網友翻譯為中文版，並對原文作出修訂，請隨便share／修改：

10 July 2019

選舉管理委員會主席 鈞啓

選舉管理委員會主席鈞鑒： 關於區議會選舉活動建議指引公眾諮詢事宜

本人謹致函對建議指引第三章表達反對意見。建議指引第三章將賦予政府不公平、不公正以及不被箝制的權力，容許政府於提名階段取消香港市民的參選資格，以迎合政府自身的政治目的。

建議指引第三章第一部分（3.1）指：「根據法例，候選人的提名是否有效 ，完全是由選舉主任作出決定，選管會無權並一向沒有參與， 亦不會給予任何意見。」
建議指引第三章3.9(b) 要求候選人透過簽署選管會擬備的確認書表明他／她擁護《基本法》並保證對香港特別行政區效忠。

至於候選人是否能夠簽署確認書就能滿足擁護《基本法》並保證對香港特別行政區效忠的要求，建議指引對此完全沒有清晰交代。

過往選舉顯示，首長級丙級政務官／民政事務專員級別的公務員於選舉前獲委任為選舉主任，便能夠就候選人的思緒及政治取向作出主觀且隨意獨斷的決定，並只需揀選候選人往日曾經發表的文章、言論、宣言、意見表達、社交媒體帖文以及社交媒體專頁發佈關於對候選人的帖文穿鑿附會，當作輔證，而非僅以候選人是否有簽署確認書為單獨基礎作判斷。

去年立法會補選，時任東區民政事務專員鄧如欣獲委任為選舉主任，居然拒絕周庭小姐簽署的確認書，以周庭小姐及其所屬政黨昔日的言論去佐證選舉主任荒唐的理由，去褫奪周庭小姐的參選資格，並且沒有給予周庭小姐公平機會回應選舉主任的無理指控，實在令人憤慨。

由建議指引可見，選舉管理委員會並無引入任何措施或保障，去堵塞上述不合理、不合法、不合憲的漏洞。今後選舉主任依然可以使用此漏洞，依據其個人的政治目的或理念，惡意褫奪任何香港市民的參選資格。

選舉管理委員會於第三章第一部分（3.1）指：「根據法例，候選人的提名是否有效 ，完全是由選舉主任作出決定，選管會無權並一向沒有參與， 亦不會給予任何意見。」此點完全不可接受。當選舉管理委員會對選舉主任按其個人政治取向褫奪候選人參選資格的權力不作任何箝制、監察或審查， 又能如何履行其法定職責，「確保在香港舉行的選舉是以公開、公平和誠實的方式進行」呢？

建議指引並無對選舉主任如何可於短促的提名期內研究並審查任何候選人的政治理念及昔日言論有任何著墨。 建議指引亦未有論及選舉主任會否收到其他機構的秘密意見或者偏頗意見。上述的其他機構，例如律政司、內地及政制事務局、民政事務總署或政府新聞處等，可能預先詳細記錄相關候選人的昔日言論。據悉，上述由第三方準備的詳細記錄可能不合法地導致選舉主任作出褫奪候選人選舉資格的危險決定。

本人必須提醒選舉管理委員會，被選舉權是獲香港基本法及香港人權法案保障的基本權利。聯合國人權事務委員會第25號一般性意見亦指出：「不得以政治見解為由剝奪任何人參加競選的權利。」

本人對建議指引並未就保障候選人不被選舉主任按其個人喜惡褫奪資格，防止選舉主任非法干預選舉採取任何措施深感失望。選舉管理委員會必須詳細檢視自己對上述問題有何解決方法。

就選舉主任褫奪參選資格的合法性，目前透過選舉呈請，並於選舉完結一兩年後由法庭裁決的安排實在強差人意。當中所耗的時間令公義遲來。
本人對建議指引第三章完全反對。本人懇求主席重新並獨立審視第三章所包含的所有程序。在重新審視的時候，懇請閣下撇除並抗拒所有政治考量，尤其是來自行政長官、政制及事務內地局、律政司及其他政府機構企圖干預未來區議會選舉的誠信和公平性的政治考量。

敬祝 鈞安 XXXXXXXX 敬上

2019年7月9日

學習官僚語言其實好緊要

[#官方資訊] 早前分享了一位高級政務官朋友就《逃犯條例》爭議的感受，得到數千轉載，迴響十分熱烈，也有不少公務員私訊回應。本頁對象一直以黃藍以外的專業人士為主，雖然平日只分享國際視野資訊，但在關鍵時刻，也希望為一些平日對社會抽離的朋友，提供更多資訊參考。以下是我的另一位AO朋友擔心局勢惡化，希望以自己的方式真正為特區政府服務，因此以私人身份草擬的意見書，回應特區政府選舉管理委員會關於區議會選舉的官方諮詢，並使用了完美官僚理據、格式和文法，就DQ候選人提供了詳細意見。根據官方資訊，《逃犯條例》收到4500份意見書，其中3000份「贊成」，因此發出意見書並非毫無價值。這位AO表示，大家可以直接使用這格式，根據個人觀點加減內容直接電郵遞交，因為香港人大家都忙，這過程只需一分鐘，應該最符合成本效益。截止日期是7月10日或之前，請廣傳，好人一生平安。

10 July 2019

Chairman
Electoral Affairs Commission (EAC)
By Email: eacenq@eac.hk

Dear Chairman,

Public consultation on District Council Election proposed guidelines

I write to object to Chapter 3 of the Proposed Guidelines, as it gives Government an unjust, unfair, and unchecked power to disqualify any candidate during the nomination period by reason of Government’s own political motives.

Chapter 3.1 of the Proposed Guidelines says that : “Under the law, the validity of a candidate’s nomination is to be determined by the Returning Officer (RO). The EAC is neither empowered nor involved in the making of such decision and would not provide any advice on the decision made by the RO”.

Chapter 3.9(b) of the Proposed Guidelines describes the requirement by which a candidate must declare (through signing a “Confirmation Form” by the EAC) that he would uphold the Basic Law and pledge allegiance to the HKSAR.

It is totally unclear whether a Confirmation Form duly signed by a candidate is itself sufficient to discharge the candidate’s duty to declare his willingness to uphold the Basic Law and pledge allegiance to the HKSAR when he is elected to the office.

Previous elections showed that an RO, who was a civil servant (pitched at Administrative Officer Staff Grade C / District Officer) appointed to the role of RO prior to the election, could make subjective and arbitrary judgment about a candidate’s state of mind and political orientation, with selective reference to some or a few past writings, speeches, statements, expression of opinions, posts in social media platforms in relation to the candidate, instead of merely looking at a Confirmation Form duly signed.

I find it outrageous to see that Ms. Anne Teng, then District Officer (Eastern) appointed to the role of RO in a legislative council by-election last year, could refuse to acknowledge a confirmation form signed by Miss Agnes Chow Ting and disqualify her, citing absurd and arbitrary reasons with reference to some of Miss Chow’s previous remarks or those of her political party, and without giving Miss Chow a fair opportunity to respond to those reasons uttered unreasonably by the RO.

The Proposed Guidelines shows that the EAC has failed its duty to introduce any additional safeguard or measures to plug this unreasonable, unlawful and unconstitutional loophole, which may still be freely exploited by any RO in the next election driven by bad faith and political motive.

It is unacceptable that the EAC could confess that it is “neither empowered nor involved in the making of such decision and would not provide any advice on the decision made by the RO” (Chapter 3.1). I question how the EAC can still “ensure that an election is conducted openly, fairly and honestly at all times” – its statutory duty enshrined in the Electoral Affairs Commission Ordinance - when it is not involved in scrutinising or monitoring the exercise of an RO’s power in disqualifying any candidate at the RO’s own political preference.

The Guidelines did not describe in detail how an RO could, on his or her own, research during the short nomination period the political belief and past sayings of any candidate. The Guidelines are also silent as to whether the RO would have received biased or secret advice from any agency such as Department of Justice, Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Bureau, Home Affairs Department, Information Services Department, etc., which may have compiled a detailed recollection of a candidate’s previous remarks in advance. It was suggested by some that such a compilation of speech or opinion records prepared by any agency other than the RO could have assisted the RO unlawfully in reaching a dangerous disqualification decision to deprive a candidate of the right to stand for the election.

I must remind the EAC that the right to stand for election is a fundamental right guaranteed under the Basic Law and the Hong Kong Bill of Rights. The United Nations Human Rights Committee’s General Comment 25 also states that “political opinion may not be used as a ground to deprive any person of the right to stand for election.”

I am disappointed to see that the proposed Guidelines have not offered anything substantive to protect a candidate from the RO’s unlawful interference in the election by disqualifying candidates he or she dislikes. The EAC must look at this carefully to see what it can do.

The current remedy about determining the lawfulness of an RO’s disqualification decision through an election petition to be adjudicated later by the court one or two years after the actual election is totally unsatisfactory, with the lapse of time which delays the timely delivery of a just outcome.

I stress that I object to Chapter 3 of the Proposed Guidelines in its entirety. I urge you to review all the processes described in Chapter 3 again and independently. In so doing, you must resist all political considerations wrongly dictated by the Chief Executive, Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Bureau, Department of Justice, or other government agency seeking to disturb the fairness and integrity of the forthcoming district council election.

Yours sincerely,

XXXX

更新：有熱心網友翻譯為中文版，並對原文作出修訂，請隨便share／修改：

10 July 2019

選舉管理委員會主席 鈞啓

選舉管理委員會主席鈞鑒： 關於區議會選舉活動建議指引公眾諮詢事宜

本人謹致函對建議指引第三章表達反對意見。建議指引第三章將賦予政府不公平、不公正以及不被箝制的權力，容許政府於提名階段取消香港市民的參選資格，以迎合政府自身的政治目的。

建議指引第三章第一部分（3.1）指：「根據法例，候選人的提名是否有效 ，完全是由選舉主任作出決定，選管會無權並一向沒有參與， 亦不會給予任何意見。」
建議指引第三章3.9(b) 要求候選人透過簽署選管會擬備的確認書表明他／她擁護《基本法》並保證對香港特別行政區效忠。

至於候選人是否能夠簽署確認書就能滿足擁護《基本法》並保證對香港特別行政區效忠的要求，建議指引對此完全沒有清晰交代。

過往選舉顯示，首長級丙級政務官／民政事務專員級別的公務員於選舉前獲委任為選舉主任，便能夠就候選人的思緒及政治取向作出主觀且隨意獨斷的決定，並只需揀選候選人往日曾經發表的文章、言論、宣言、意見表達、社交媒體帖文以及社交媒體專頁發佈關於對候選人的帖文穿鑿附會，當作輔證，而非僅以候選人是否有簽署確認書為單獨基礎作判斷。

去年立法會補選，時任東區民政事務專員鄧如欣獲委任為選舉主任，居然拒絕周庭小姐簽署的確認書，以周庭小姐及其所屬政黨昔日的言論去佐證選舉主任荒唐的理由，去褫奪周庭小姐的參選資格，並且沒有給予周庭小姐公平機會回應選舉主任的無理指控，實在令人憤慨。

由建議指引可見，選舉管理委員會並無引入任何措施或保障，去堵塞上述不合理、不合法、不合憲的漏洞。今後選舉主任依然可以使用此漏洞，依據其個人的政治目的或理念，惡意褫奪任何香港市民的參選資格。

選舉管理委員會於第三章第一部分（3.1）指：「根據法例，候選人的提名是否有效 ，完全是由選舉主任作出決定，選管會無權並一向沒有參與， 亦不會給予任何意見。」此點完全不可接受。當選舉管理委員會對選舉主任按其個人政治取向褫奪候選人參選資格的權力不作任何箝制、監察或審查， 又能如何履行其法定職責，「確保在香港舉行的選舉是以公開、公平和誠實的方式進行」呢？

建議指引並無對選舉主任如何可於短促的提名期內研究並審查任何候選人的政治理念及昔日言論有任何著墨。 建議指引亦未有論及選舉主任會否收到其他機構的秘密意見或者偏頗意見。上述的其他機構，例如律政司、內地及政制事務局、民政事務總署或政府新聞處等，可能預先詳細記錄相關候選人的昔日言論。據悉，上述由第三方準備的詳細記錄可能不合法地導致選舉主任作出褫奪候選人選舉資格的危險決定。

本人必須提醒選舉管理委員會，被選舉權是獲香港基本法及香港人權法案保障的基本權利。聯合國人權事務委員會第25號一般性意見亦指出：「不得以政治見解為由剝奪任何人參加競選的權利。」

本人對建議指引並未就保障候選人不被選舉主任按其個人喜惡褫奪資格，防止選舉主任非法干預選舉採取任何措施深感失望。選舉管理委員會必須詳細檢視自己對上述問題有何解決方法。

就選舉主任褫奪參選資格的合法性，目前透過選舉呈請，並於選舉完結一兩年後由法庭裁決的安排實在強差人意。當中所耗的時間令公義遲來。
本人對建議指引第三章完全反對。本人懇求主席重新並獨立審視第三章所包含的所有程序。在重新審視的時候，懇請閣下撇除並抗拒所有政治考量，尤其是來自行政長官、政制及事務內地局、律政司及其他政府機構企圖干預未來區議會選舉的誠信和公平性的政治考量。

敬祝 鈞安 XXXXXXXX 敬上

2019年7月9日

#陳水扁 總統 ⚡病情嚴重惡化,民團夜宿喚人權
前總統陳水扁驚傳在9月中曾發生⚡呼吸中止⚡現象，時間長達8分多鐘, (請點撃下方 #阿扁 照片，只需回文一次，全世界自動分享人同步 ) Once again, it's time to look at Taiwan. Unfortunately, there is still a need to call for freedom from prison for Chen Shui-bian and a need to call out Ma Ying-jeou (the most unpopular president in Taiwan's history) to stop abusing human rights principles for shameful political hunts. For those of you who have been following, this call has been made for far too long and has seen deaf ears. For those new and old, let's look at some of the why. Following the latest findings in Taiwan's judicial system, the need is stronger than ever: a free Taiwan needs a free Chen Shui-bian. With a deeply problematic trial process, a failure to provide adequate medical care, and a dangerous message to a new multiparty democracy, Ma Ying-jeou's quest to continue to jail the first and only politician outside the Kuomintang (KMT) to hold highest office is a bad and faithless move. It is indicative of an attempt, with the complicity of the rest of the KMT for failing to speak out and dissent, to beat back the human rights that Taiwan's people have fought with their lives to acquire. The rights enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) deserve durable and complete respect, not the sort of abuse heaped upon them in the actions of a hapless president who's single-digit approval ratings suggest an intent to forgo the beauty of rights in an effort to grab the ugliness of raw power. 但就算病情如此危急，法務部仍拒絕讓陳水扁保外就醫。對此，有許多公民團體預計將於17日夜宿自由廣場，希望藉此喚起民眾對 #阿扁 人權的關注。根據榮總醫師郭正典證實，陳水扁在3個月內發生2次呼吸中止現象，最近一次是在9月14日凌晨，時間長達8分多鐘。陳水扁病情嚴重惡化，就連台中榮總醫師也無法醫治。前總統陳水扁驚傳在9月中曾發生呼吸中止現象，時間長達8分多鐘。有許多公民團體預計將於17日夜宿自由廣場，希望藉此喚起民眾對陳水扁人權的關注。針對法務部堅持不讓陳水扁保外就醫之事，現在有《陳水扁總統民間醫療小組》、《臺灣醫社》等多個公民團體預計在17日前往法務部召開記者會，並夜宿自由廣場。這些公民團體想藉由實際行動喚起民眾對陳水扁人權的重視，並希望法務部能承諾同意讓陳水扁保外就醫、居家治療。他們也強調，若未能得到法務部善意的回應，將不排除有下一步的動作。Taiwan has a long history in the history books of the West. When the Portuguese sailed by in 1544, they named the main island Ilha Formosa, or "Beautiful Island" by the Portuguese when they sailed by in 1544, though indigenous peoples who'd already been there for at least five thousand years already had names for it. In the following three and a half centuries China, Spain, and the Netherlands all juggled claims of sovereignty, settlement, and trading rights before the Qing Dynasty ceded the area to Japan in the late nineteenth century. After WWII, the Republic of China was established by the Kuomintang (KMT) in retreat from the Chinese civil war and took possession after Japan's surrender.
Taiwan魂認識台灣人的總統－陳水扁 ☔ #台湾の本土化運動を推進する立場からの総統である 呂秀蓮 明確宣布，本周日(28日)下午2點在中山堂及西門町舉辦的台灣和平中立公投連署活動結束之後，立即轉往台灣博物館 (襄陽路2號)進行救扁絕食。呼籲各界人士以各種方式共同響應，以免陳水扁前總統在法務部的怠慢中病情惡化，導致任何不測。陳總統民間醫療小組, 郭正典 陳昭姿 郭長豐 Johnny Huang 黃育旗 聲明 : 對於呂副總統將以絕食要求讓陳總統儘速保外就醫一事，我們深表心痛與不捨。伴隨且照顧陳總統將近三年的民間醫療小組，非常了解陳總統，他寧可犧牲自己性命，也不願意任何人為救援他而絕食傷身，尤其支持者不乏老弱民眾；此外，絕食可能引起的生命健康風險，還需要顧及醫療後援是否充足。基於上述理由，身為醫療團隊成員，我們不主張響應絕食，但呼籲群眾前去關心與聲援，不讓呂副總統孤單。希望馬政府尊重醫療專業，履行人道與人權，儘快讓陳總統返家療養, 臺左維新主辦救扁音樂會之打倒國民黨 自由廣場, 協辦與聯名團體目前確定有(依筆畫排序)：小蜜蜂全國工作總部、公投護台灣聯盟、太陽­花青年福音團、台灣北社、台大濁水溪社、民主鬥陣、全面真軍、青春快閃、拷秋勤、捍衛­台灣文史青年組合、基進側翼、黑色島國青年陣線、激進陣線、 臺左維新, Video sorce 福爾摩鯊會社 FORMOSHOCK , 我們亦在此向所有支持釋放陳前總統的朋友，公開徵求陳水扁總統相關的影片、照片（無版­權疑慮者），作為我們後續製作活動宣傳影片的材料。
這一次，我們用Free Hugs愛與擁抱，讓阿扁回家
#自由阿扁FreeHugs擁抱Taiwan魂聨盟
#可蕾亞特FreeHugs免費擁抱Taiwan工作室聯盟
♻ #綠色能源公益慈善免費擁抱Taiwan聯盟 ♨
➿ #免費擁抱影片Free_Hugs_Videos_Campaign_Taiwan聯盟
#綠色能源公益慈善免費擁抱Taiwan聯盟Free_Hugs_Green_E_Campaign
⛵ #姚宗翰公益慈善免費擁抱FreeHugs高雄里民Taiwan聯盟
＃黑色島國童年陣缐 聯盟
1⃣ #免費母語FreeHugs擁抱本土Taiwan藝文聯盟
2⃣ #無料の抱擁FreeHugs台日友好TaiwanJapan聯盟
3⃣ #免費幽默擁抱人生FreeHugs好笑Taiwan聯盟
4⃣ #免費健康FreeHugs醫學研究Taiwan聯盟
5⃣ #免費建國擁抱大旗FreeHugs自由獨立Taiwan聯盟
6⃣ #免費病毒擁抱駭客FreeHugs精研所Taiwan聨盟
7⃣ #CatherineYen免費藝術擁抱世界FreeHugs和平Arts聯盟Campaign
8⃣ #自由擁抱FreeHugs政治Taiwan聯盟
9⃣ #免費吃喝玩樂FreeHugs擁抱八卦芭樂Taiwan聯盟
1⃣ 0⃣ #自由革命擁抱軍火FreeHugs造反Taiwan聯盟
＃自由阿扁FreeHugs擁抱Taiwan魂 2003
www.facebook.com/FreeHugsAbian
#白色雨傘搶救阿扁革命 2003年陳水扁替二千三百萬天天呼口號自由人權民主的台灣人拿下世界人權獎 ,全民總動員人命關天,這是台灣人權之戰 ❗請拷背下方 # 超連結 ＃ HashTag 配合您相関fb文章，把搶救阿扁總統的聲音傳出台灣島，大家搶救那當初六百萬的人民選出來的，亞洲第一位和平政權轉移的總統 Universal Declaration of Human Rights ＃陳水扁のリリース ＃無料の抱擁FreeHugs陳水扁JapanTaiwanCampaign ＃該編
＃UDHRsaveAbian #FreeShuiBianChen #FreeAbian #白色雨傘搶救阿扁革命 # 立即釋放阿扁總統 ＃阿扁 ＃陳水扁 ＃陳水扁總統立即無罪開釋 #微罪減刑

㊙『 扁 案 五 大 荒 謬 』㊙
1. 史無前例，檢察官：「辦不出來就走人」
　2. 為關而關，台北地方法院審判中途換法官
　 3. 檢察官脅迫，證人辜仲諒、杜麗萍作偽證
　 4.「國務機要費案」高等法院改判無罪
　 5. 所謂「扁四大案」大多已判無罪定讞
http://abian.tw/?c=6&id=744&ref=ch
The "Republic of China" (ROC) had a rocky start under the KMT. With the status as the sole legal party and as puppet prop of Chiang Kai-shek's dictatorship (followed by his son's), the KMT established an authoritarian state replete with human rights abuse and little freedom accorded to the island. With the White Terror beginning with the 228 Incident ini 1949 and initiating martial law that was the world's longest when eliminated in 1987 (currently only human rights horrorshow Syria has a longer record), the KMT has a grim record as caretaker of the rights of Taiwan's residents. Only in the last decade of the twentieth century was there any legal opposition party and only in the last five years of it was the first direct presidential election, with the 1996 term of incumbent, Lee Teng-hui, serving his final term as president. In the next election, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) saw Chen Shui-bian and Annette Lubecome the president/vice-president in the first non-KMT administration in the ROC. The duo won a second term in 2004 and were precluded from another term in 2008, when the KMT returned to power with the election of Ma Ying-jeou (fifty eight percent and reelected in 2012 with fifty one percent). Disturbingly after Ma took office, a vendetta has been pursued against Chen.前總統陳水扁目前仍在台中監獄服刑，其子陳致中今天替他發表兩本新書《 #送進黑牢的愛心餐》和《 #穿透黑暗的天光 》，#陳致中 說，根據最新民調，有7成的台灣民眾認為阿扁應該保外就醫，呼籲馬英九不要漠視民意，早日讓父親出獄接受治療。
http://m.ltn.com.tw/news/politics/breakingnews/1121842
20141002《扁案態度民調 6成4支持讓扁返家休養》
http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/politics/breakingnews/1121060
20140915《阿扁的海角七億證實莫須有，民進黨中央大咖竟無人敢發聲？》http://disp.cc/b/163-87ne
20140806《特偵組查無陳水扁海外洗錢證據 全案簽結》
http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/politics/breakingnews/1074444
20140810「什麼、原來沒有海角七億？陳前總統，對不起」
http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/opinion/paper/803327
20100608《〈快訊〉侵占機密外交款項　陳水扁獲判無罪》
http://goo.gl/6phAJO
Rather than engage in a peaceful transfer of power, which might have helped burnish the KMT image showing them to be gracious winners rather than sore losers, the Ma administration pursued any and every wisp of possible allegation in a set of legal proceedings that were deeply disturbing and violated the international legal norms that we take for granted in the developed and democratic world. Shifting charges, witness intimidation, costumed harassment, and a public relations smear campaign did not speak highly of the motivations of the prosecution (directed by Ma's Special Prosecutor and only answerable to him) nor of any evidence as being other than gauzily thin hearsay. It served to indict Ma himself as incapable of reconciling an island that could only be called "polarized" in the most charitable and expansive use of the term. On innumerable charges, and with the KMT incapable of producing any definitive list of pending cases to us in nearly three years of requests by us nor to even define in law the supposed "inability" of Ma to offer better relief to a former president and the only one from the opposition, Chen was sentenced to nineteen years and has served over a third of his sentence. [台灣"實"事]「扁案」是「政治迫害」！
9/22 民報《涂醒哲：扁總統政績輝煌 根據陸續出爐判決 何罪之有？》
文中含『扁案 五案 判決結果』簡圖、『阿扁總統１２大政績』－
★ 自始至終攏相信阿扁總統的支持者 可以"溫習"、
　具正義感、但受媒體/親友誤導而誤會阿扁總統的台灣人 請看！
[FB專頁]『陳水扁』、『涂醒哲 改變嘉義的力量』
https://www.facebook.com/chiayi.twu?fref=ts
https://www.facebook.com/abian1012?hc_location=timeline
➡#蔡宜蓁 http://goo.gl/Lg3rgU ➡#StevenHong http://goo.gl/fKDRDkEdit Chen was jailed with considerable prejudice and with clearly premeditated intent to silence dissent from the KMT agenda. His conditions of detention were below those of an international standard of prison conditions and his treatment was depressingly disregardful of his position and state. While we firmly believe that all peoples should receive equal treatment under the law, we also believe that it is a deeply dangerous message to treat Chen so despicably for charges that appear to us (and increasingly to the public and opinion leaders) to be trumped up and based on accusations of nonviolent behaviors. As the first and only opposition leader in the highest political office, Chen's supporters of all stripes both past and current, and any who would deviate from a programmatically KMT-dictated agenda, have been warned off with a hideous message. Ma has certainly shown his willingness to attack any who deviate from his orthodoxy, including the KMT members who happened to be Minister of Justice and the widely respected Speaker of the Legislative Yuan (Taiwan's single-house legislative House). Additionally, his treatment during incarceration has, once again we state, created new medical conditions that are serious and have made others worse (in some cases permanent). This experience is another systematic attack on his basic human rights.＜快訉＞：特偵組查無洗錢實證，釋放陳水扁，偵辦5年多，將陳總統洗錢案全案簽結，因為查無任何不法，但是陳總統人呢？在黑牢已經快6年，腦病變愈來愈嚴重，不准保外就醫，國務機要費案無罪、外交零用金案無罪，唯一在執行的龍潭案，關鍵證人辜仲諒早就承認作偽證，全臺灣人站出來~前總統陳水扁先生說；有次吃飯時，被米粒阻塞嗆到，後來到門診取出一堆米粒；過幾天，有次半夜一點多，他不知是嗆到，還是睡眠呼吸中止症的關係，一直無法呼吸，他就想到猝死，「萬一真的有事，我放棄急救，不要插管，不要浪費葉克膜」。黃煌雄以4張照片追溯17個月來扁病情的發展http://m.appledaily.com.tw/.../politics/20140616/417057 What's new? What's new is that a panel of special prosecutors have now dismissedany possibility of added money-laundering charges against Chen after five years of his time in prison with sinking hope. After the conviction of an earlier special prosecutor, there should be serious suspicion renewed and increased about the legitimacy, motivation, and impartiality of this set of cases. Once again, Chen appears innocent of the array of charges against him while his medically-verified ill-health has been caused, aggravated, and made permanent because of the conditions of his incarceration. Chen should be freed immediately and a special prosecutor might open an investigation into Ma Ying-jeou himself.<需要分享這個活動，讓訊息散發出去.謝謝> 保外就醫依監獄行刑法第五十八條之規定有下列情形之一：(一) 受刑人現罹疾病，在監內不能為適當之醫治者。(二) 受刑人衰老或殘廢不能自理生活者。(三) 懷胎五月以上或分娩後未滿二月者。陳水扁目前的身體狀況不好，而且有生命危險：http://alliancesafeguardingtaiwan.blogspot.tw/.../blog...
人權也是民主的指標!,讓世界看到 台灣人期盼維護人權與民主的心意!, 連署頁 http://ppt.cc/QhmB 連署方式 http://ppt.cc/qsS0 Americans could use hearing more about Taiwan's history, politics, and culture. Given that we spent decades declaring that Taipei was the legitimate government of China only to suddenly lurch such recognition to Beijing in an effort to contain and counter the Soviet Union, you'd think we'd know more. You'd especially think we'd know more since we continued to be the guarantor of Taiwan's autonomy with military exercises, arms sales, and implied willingness to intervene on behalf of Taipei in the event that Beijing were to use force. Moreover, as perhaps the standard-bearer of East Asia's quickest shift from authoritarian rule to multiparty democracy and a society as wired and hip as Tokyo (or Portland), you'd think we'd be at least aware of the stakes at hand. As the de facto guardians of Taiwan's freedom when it comes to the threats from Beijing, we are morally bound to speak up for Taiwan's human rights protections and to withdraw support from those elements who would eliminate them or apply them selectively 連署內容的中文翻譯;,基於醫療人權原則，我們呼籲盡速讓前總統陳水扁保外就醫。台灣前總統陳水扁已經被關6年多，這些年來他的身體狀況一直不好，被送至醫院做詳細的檢查。前總統陳水扁被診斷出腦部額顳葉病變導致的多重功能退化，例如睡眠呼吸中止症與尿失禁，還有可能因嗆到而導致窒息，以及意外跌倒撞到頭部等致命危險。 就算是受刑人也有接受醫療的基本人權，這是普世人權的核心價值。陳前總統罹患多種疾病，需要在專門的醫院接受立即且合適的治療，而不是在監獄裡。所有唯一 代表臺灣魂的阿扁總統 (請點擊下筆跡照片同步補充資訉及分享) ➿➡http://goo.gl/xhbesh Taiwan has seen tectonic changes in only the last thirty years, mostly forward. But the last six years have seen attempts to reverse the gains made, and it must cease so Taiwan can move forward again. The people of Taiwan deserve the human rights gains they have fought for, and for those gains to both continue and to be durable. It is time to free Chen Shui-bian and to dump Ma Ying-jeou. Take a moment to contact your Senators and Representatives in Congress (once again, seewww.contactingthecongress.com for details on how) and ask them to speak up on behalf of Chen Shui-bian and to watch carefully the rabidly vengeful Ma Ying-jeou. There should most certainly be a resolution to prevent or deprive Ma from obtaining a United States passport to use to flee with ill-gotten gains after the end of his disastrous second term, but it is the freedom of Chen, and the hope of the pluralist rights-loving Taiwanese themselves that is the most important goal. Don't let the ugliness of Ma destroy the beautiful island.#陳水扁 #阿扁 #柯p挺阿扁保外就醫 ..∧_∧.•*""*•親愛的好友➡ #綠色能源公益慈善免費擁抱Taiwan聯盟 Free Hugs團結力量大
➿➡http://goo.gl/Agb9UR The UDHR and other human rights documents and standards affirms that human rights be available to everyone. It shouldn't matter what party people belong to or whether they have a different view than another party. It is time for all Taiwan to come to the defense of hard-won principles and to not stand idly by while Ma lies and Chen dies. It is time for Americans to speak up for what is right with a full-throated defense of rights requested of their representatives. Chen's death (or even continued demise of declining health) is an affront to the ideals of multiparty democracy, impartial justice systems, and the imperative for peaceful transfers of power between political parties.
➿ #Design 原作 By #謝靜鋒 #好好吃QQ人像館
http://goo.gl/eu3xjc
⛵ #Edit 編輯 By #可蕾亞特FreeHugs免費擁抱Taiwan工作室聯盟
http://goo.gl/RR50W4

☔ #袁紅冰 對 #阿扁 總統完全改觀, 他寫這本書是要為 平反 #陳水扁 總統
這本書好像2012年就出了, 不過我五月看到的是2014年4月重新編版的版本. 應該很多前輩都看過了, 不過還是分享一下(而且連 #誠品書店 都自我審查, 開始愛放不放袁紅冰的書了)

總之, 袁紅冰在2009年的書"台灣大劫難"裡對陳水扁跟他家族貪腐給台灣自由造成的傷害嚴厲批評, 不過從2010年起中共內部權力鬥爭以後, 很多機密的訊息流出來,就把共產黨跟國民黨是如何聯手預謀, 在中共總参二部主導下, 把阿扁構陷出貪瀆案, 然後從此汙名化台灣的民主及台獨思想.自此袁紅冰對阿扁完全改觀, 他寫這本書是要為阿扁平反, 他寫:"陳水扁執政八年期間,台灣擠身世界上最自由的國家行列. 這是台灣的驕傲, 也是人類自由事業的重大成果.當前, 陳水扁冤案在拷問台灣的良知. 台灣人如果沒有勇氣和智慧拯救處於司法迫害下的臺灣之子陳水扁, 也就不可能拯救台灣的前途...."

他認為現在不只是要爭取陳水扁保外就醫的權力或特赦, 更重要是要揭露陳水扁遭受中共及其操控的勢力的政治誣陷和司法迫害的內幕, 向世界證明陳水扁無罪, 從而還陳水扁以公道.裡面還提到2004年阿扁競選總統連任時的三一九槍擊案, 也是中共安排的, 而且本來就預計要刺而不殺(呂后是倒楣的), 只要輕傷,並且事後用中共在台灣養的名嘴及藍營人士去發輿論說一切都是阿扁自己策畫的苦肉計,綠營當然會反駁, 然後在藍綠吵來吵去時, 中共就安排李昌鈺來鑑定(原來他也是他們的人啊~~), 在李昌鈺結論三一九"非政治謀殺"後,說阿扁自導自演的輿論更是沸沸揚,一切都是中共的完美演出...

來幫書畫個重點~
2000年阿扁當選總統, 中共國民黨所有的人都嚇一跳, 連阿扁自己都沒有想到, 中共就慌了手腳想要打擊他; 書裡講應該只有李登輝預見阿扁會當選,寫說李登輝力推連戰為國黨候選人, "只因其人至於至蠢, 至笨至拙, 獲選為該黨候選人已經表示未選先輸", 逼著宋楚瑜脫黨參選, 幫助阿扁當選;

2002年中共總参二部就出"囚"這個對台戰略, 目的是從政治摧毀台灣的民主跟台獨, 因為這會影響到中共的核心國家利益. 從這裡就開始了中共主謀, 國民黨幫兇把扁羅織入罪的計畫了, 重點是用台灣法律程序對阿扁進行追訴, 正好用到國民黨的政治遺產- 一直追隨國民黨的檢調司法情治部門;

2004年陳雲林曾經建議中共當局全力投入政治資源, 幫助國民黨打贏民進黨, 但是沒被採納, 一來阿扁執政這四年, 中共醞釀的還不夠, 沒有把握一次摧毀他;二來因為中共想要讓國民黨再餓四年, 讓一些2000年敗選時還沒投奔中共結盟取暖的國民黨權貴, 徹底的失守奔向中共;然後就是開始嚴密監控阿扁全家, 幕僚所有身邊的人...
順便養十幾個名嘴, 中共判斷台灣為典型庸俗小市民社會, 民心民意主由同樣庸俗的大眾傳播媒介左右, 除了輿論讓人們相信的東西之外, 再沒有任何其他事實真相~

再由中共暗中出資, 由徹底投共的台灣商人出面買台灣媒體 (忘忘), 他們提出在2008年後要充分應用操控台灣輿論的能力, 形成對台獨抑制避之唯恐不及的政治氛圍，紅衫軍也是中共的完美計畫一部分, 施明德可能到現在都還搞不清楚狀況, 但是施明德當時曾經力阻國民黨權貴徹底發動動亂衝進總統府攻扁, 不知是否因還有良知?
2008年年初中共台灣戰略家辛旗總結紅衫軍運動時, 曾惋惜嘆:"紅衫軍攻入偽總統府,抓拿陳水扁之謀功敗垂成, 是一大憾事. 否則, 我軍早可藉機揮師入台...";
(這不是暴民, 什麼才是暴民?)

"囚"本來是設定到2012年就終結, 在胡胡出席18代移交政權時順便簽和平協議close thedeal, 但中共爆發薄熙來事件, 他們太忙了就沒做這事...中共很喜歡林毅夫（到今天為止仍被通諜罪追訴）曾有考慮他當台灣特別行政區第一個特首才由星雲開口把他"人道關懷"回台灣, 就是林毅夫想出用EFCA把台灣鎖進中國經濟體不得翻身~
中共收買了前美國AIT包道格, 包在2012年大選前幫馬助選，
㊙美國幫馬作弊二次總統選舉真像80內回文
㊙➡點擊這65回文➡
https://www.facebook.com/river10des…/posts/10203105393291822

陳雲林說可以用十億美元幫馬英九買一個諾貝爾和平獎.中共透過國安部的戰略特務蔡國強去把馬英九女兒納入旗下學爆破~ (所以馬在中共手裡的就是女兒嗎? 沒有裸照也沒有神秘689嗎?)

中共對馬的定位認為是亡黨亡國之君, 他們對馬的威脅利誘不斷, 對馬覺得有點煩, 因為馬還有權力, 不像國民黨權貴已經無權, 只要中共略施小惠就感激涕零, 馬想要開天價, 所以偶爾我們看到統媒也一直在挑撥藍營內部反馬, 或強力主打馬低民調的新聞, 就是中共在給他下馬威.2011年夏天, 台灣大選忙著競選時, 黃世銘率檢察系統官員訪問大陸受到接待, 事後在相關報告中留下兩句話: 通過接待活動的安排, 給台灣檢察官留下一個深刻印象,及祖國是他們的堅強後盾, 他們依法承辦台獨勢力的努力, 會得到強有力的支持.台灣檢察官員都很放鬆, 普遍表現出對美食美酒以及某些刺激性娛樂的興趣..." 黃世銘回來後不久, 檢調單位就以國安密帳起訴李登輝.

總結-阿扁到底為什麼還在坐牢？？

如果這本書的內容屬實, 坐牢的不應該是他, 鄭南榕已然離世,

阿扁還咽咽一息的活著, 他應該要好好的, 被台灣人尊敬的活著-More #陳水扁加油 to read

代表臺灣魂的阿扁總統 (請點擊下親口訴由鄭爽先生筆跡之照片，同步回文補充資訉及分享) ➿➡http://goo.gl/xhbesh
#柯p 挺阿扁保外就醫

..∧_∧.•*""*•親愛的好友
➡ 18個 Taiwan #FreeHugs粉絲團
團結力量大
➿➡http://goo.gl/Agb9UR

#可蕾亞特FreeHugs免費擁抱Taiwan工作室聯盟
http://goo.gl/RR50W4

♻⏩ #綠色能源公益慈善免費擁抱Taiwan聯盟 ♨ #高雄氣爆
❤ 57 義工小編大隊 ~發動⚡ 甲級動員 ⚡支援救災 ❤
http://goo.gl/hMKTpn

➿⏩ #免費擁抱影片Free_Hugs_Videos_Campaign_Taiwan聯盟

http://goo.gl/GpRAAI

#姚宗翰公益慈善免費擁抱FreeHugs高雄里民Taiwan聯盟

Google簡連結 http://goo.gl/21R5zq

☔ #姚宗翰網路後援會

Google簡連結 http://goo.gl/z2cduy

#可蕾亞特FreeHugs免費擁抱Taiwan工作室聯盟

⛵ #姚宗翰網路後援會

#姚宗翰公益慈善免費擁抱FreeHugs高雄里民Taiwan聯盟

♻ ➡ #綠色能源公益慈善免費擁抱Taiwan聯盟 ♨ #高雄氣爆

➿ ➡ #免費擁抱影片Free_Hugs_Videos_Campaign_Taiwan聯盟

➡ #Click點撃這分享101支綠色能源公益慈善免費擁抱影片Taiwan聯盟

目前增架新第7至17個facebook #FreeHugs粉絲團 專頁,己64位義工小編，無限期招慕志工朋友聨盟參與

1⃣ #免費母語FreeHugs擁抱本土Taiwan藝文聯盟

2⃣ #無料の抱擁FreeHugs台日友好TaiwanJapan聯盟

3⃣ #免費幽默擁抱人生FreeHugs好笑Taiwan聯盟

4⃣ #免費健康FreeHugs醫學研究Taiwan聯盟

5⃣ #免費建國擁抱大旗FreeHugs自由獨立Taiwan聯盟

6⃣ #免費病毒擁抱駭客FreeHugs精研所Taiwan聨盟

7⃣ #CatherineYen免費藝術擁抱世界FreeHugs和平Arts聯盟Campaign

8⃣ #自由擁抱FreeHugs政治Taiwan聯盟

9⃣ #免費吃喝玩樂FreeHugs擁抱八卦芭樂Taiwan聯盟

#自由革命擁抱軍火FreeHugs造反Taiwan聯盟