靜靜雞有其必要性。唔單止可以提防篤灰,好緊要嘅係我哋要尊重同埋珍惜大家仲可以選擇放啲咩/唔放啲咩上網嘅權利同自由。
.
睇多咗cyber security,知道唔單單係Data會跟我哋一世,Metadata (data about data) 更加係政權企業想拎起手嘅嘢。假設data係Telegra...
靜靜雞有其必要性。唔單止可以提防篤灰,好緊要嘅係我哋要尊重同埋珍惜大家仲可以選擇放啲咩/唔放啲咩上網嘅權利同自由。
.
睇多咗cyber security,知道唔單單係Data會跟我哋一世,Metadata (data about data) 更加係政權企業想拎起手嘅嘢。假設data係Telegram中我哋實際嘅message內容,metadata就可以係send呢個message嘅時地人、打字速度等,以及發/收信者嘅下一部行動。唔係話好似689咁怕後生個時登報聲討但後尾要奶共所以要諗清楚當下每一步,而係我哋太習慣咩都放晒上網。
.
先唔講我哋嘅data/metadata會流去咩人咩組織嘅手中,好似Zuboff提出嘅學說就指出,喺呢個digital age以social media作為生活軸心,好多人都「over-share personal information」。意思?喺未被全天候監控,我哋仍有權利同自由去決定有幾多自己嘅嘢 (data & metadata) 交去ISP、Google、Facebook呢類公司。
.
好似Shoshana Zuboff (2019) 所指,我哋慢慢對自己被長時間監控嘅現實變得麻木("...produces a psychic numbing that inures us to the realities of being tracked, parsed, mined, and modified. It disposes us to rationalize the situation in resigned cynicism, create excuses that operate like defense mechanisms ('I have nothing to hide'), or find other wats to stick our heads in the sand, choosing ignorance out of frustration and