一封給國家地理頻道「Dog: Impossible」節目負責人的公開信:

An open letter to the leadership team of Nat Geo Wild Dog Impossible:

Translate: Yu-Hwa Su 翻譯: 蘇昱華
Proof: Yen Ke 校對: 葛雁

The International Association of Animal Behavior Consultants (IAABC) applauds National Geographic’s mission to offer intelligent, relevant and captivating non-fiction entertainment. This is a crucial objective, especially as an introduction to children and viewers largely relying on television for their scientific information.
國際動物行為諮詢師協會（IAABC）對於國家地理頻道致力於提供電視觀眾正確知識與科學內容表示讚賞。這是一個非常重要的目標，特別是對依賴電視得到這些知識的兒童與其他觀眾們來說。

However, your stated mission is in direct conflict with your show Dog: Impossible. In fact, the irresponsible treatment of the dogs and people on this show flies in the face of all best practices in animal training and behavior. Rather than promoting science and scientifically-proven methodology, Dog: Impossible sacrifices learning science for more dramatic television.
然而，貴頻道所提供的節目「Dog: Impossible」卻與貴頻道「提供正確的科學知識」的一貫立場衝突。節目中對犬隻以及飼主的不負責處理方式與應有的動物訓練及行為操作的準則相違背。「Dog: Impossible」並沒有提倡科學以及經科學驗證的方法，這節目犧牲了對科學的學習，轉而追求吸睛的電視節目效果。

Matt Beisner appears to have no credentials or education in training and behavior, yet he refers to himself as a behaviorist. His claim that “energy is the one language that every animal on the planet speaks” makes clear he is not one.
Matt Beisner並沒有動物訓練或行為學的相關學習經歷與證照，卻宣稱自己是一位行為學家。從他的主張：「能量是地球上所有動物都會使用的共通語言」，便能明白他並不是行為學家。

His statement, “You don’t need tricks, you don’t need treats, you don’t need force,” shows just how unaware of his own actions he is. His misuse of scientific terminology leads viewers to believe they are learning demonstrated, safe and accepted strategies in helping their dogs. In fact, Mr. Beisner is forcing these dogs from start to finish of each episode. His own “tricks” are that of over-stressing dogs until they’re in a state referred to in psychology and science as “learned helplessness.”
他主張「你不需要技巧、零食、或蠻力 (去訓練狗)」，這顯示出他對於自己的所做所為一無所知。他對科學術語的濫用也會誤導觀眾，讓觀眾以為他們正在學習經證實有效而且安全可接受的方法來幫助狗狗。但這位訓練師在每一集節目上從頭到尾都是在逼迫這些狗，而他所擁有的「技巧」，就是讓狗進入過度緊迫的狀態，直到牠們進入心理學和科學上所指的「習得無助」（learned helplessness）狀態。

Learned helplessness occurs when a subject endures repeated aversive stimuli beyond their control. Originally thought to show a subject's acceptance of their powerlessness, for more than half a century it’s been known instead to be the emotional “shutting down” of the subject. Anxiety, clinical depression, and related mental illnesses are common consequences of this technique in humans.
「習得無助」發生在動物沒有任何控制權，且重複地被施加嫌惡刺激的時候。最初，人們認為習得無助狀態意味著動物「接受」了自身無法改變、無能為力的情形，超過半個世紀以來，人們認為這是動物情緒「關機（shutting down）」的表現。在人類身上，習得無助的常見結果包含焦慮、憂鬱症、以及相關的心理疾病。

Allow us to note some aspects of the trailer and his shows, but first, to point out a few well-documented and commonly understood aspects of dog behavior so that we may better make our points understood.
在我們解釋為何我們認為此節目的預告片與內容不適當之前，我們希望先闡述一些正確的犬隻行為常識，以便您能更理解我們的觀點。

Canine body language indicating stress and severe stress:
顯示出壓力以及嚴重緊迫的犬隻肢體語言：

Compressed bodies
Dry, raspy panting
Wide, open eyes with dilated pupils
Heavy drooling
“Whipping” head and body back, pushing off a handler in order to get away
Growling
Fighting
Biting
縮緊身體
急促的喘氣
睜大雙眼、散瞳
大量流口水
甩頭、用前爪推抱著狗的人以退後、試圖掙脫
低吼
打架
開咬

Eleven seconds into the trailer, Mr. Beisner rubs his hands together, smiling, and says, “This is going to be gnarly.” All professionals know from that statement what the series will spotlight: A poorly (if at all) educated non-professional pushing dogs way beyond therapeutic limits, in the name of “results.”
在預告片11秒的地方，Beisner先生搓手並笑著說「等一下會很精采喔」。所有專業人士都知道這句話代表這個節目的亮點將會是：一名缺乏適當教育的訓練師，逼迫狗到超過其能承受的極限，並把這樣的結果稱為是良好的改善。

Flooding, the term for inundating a subject with their fears, phobias and triggers, is ethically questionable at best, cruel and unnecessary, always. There's also a common danger of spontaneous recovery of the phobia. This is because flooding doesn't replace the fear-response with a different response, it just replaces it with no response. “No response” is simply suppression, not cure.
「洪水法」，指的是故意將動物置於恐慌或恐懼的觸發刺激情境，這樣的方法不道德、殘忍、而且沒必要。另外，恐懼的自發性回復（spontaneous recovery）也是洪水法常見的風險，這是因為洪水法並沒有將害怕的反應重新制約成其他不同的情緒行為，它只是讓動物沒有反應。「沒有反應」只是壓抑，動物並沒有因此感到不害怕或恐慌。

Throughout the trailer dogs are flooded with aversive stimuli such as other dogs, people and equipment, something an ethical professional would not, and could not do per any answerable guidelines of animal training and behavior care.
在整個預告片中，狗狗被迫接受各種嫌惡刺激的洪水法訓練，例如其他狗、其他人類和物品，這是具有道德的專業訓練人員不會做的，任何負責任的動物訓練及行為照護準則也不會如此建議。

Systematic desensitization and counterconditioning, gradual exposure to the feared object, and replacement of a negative emotional association with a more pleasant one, are the recommended techniques used to treat such fear and aggression cases, per all legitimate veterinary, training and behavior organizations.
系統性減敏與反制約，也就是逐步與少量的讓狗接觸其本來會害怕的事物，並且將引發的少量負面情緒與其非常喜愛的事物配對給予，是用來處理恐懼及攻擊案例的建議方法，也是每個好的獸醫師、訓練及行為機構會推薦的方法。

Beisner’s statement that “We know at the Zen Yard that dogs help other dogs come out of their shell and face their fear and get past their aggression” isn’t just scientifically unsupportable, his words ring hollow during the very scene playing while he says those words: Beisner restraining one dog, while his co-host pulls a leashed dog to the first in a completely unnatural gesture perhaps intended to either mimic natural dog greeting (it doesn’t) or to flood the heavily drooling dog who is unable to move or get away. The dogs end up in a fight. They have been set up to fail, and the outcome is inevitable.
Beisner宣稱「我們在Zen Yard（他的訓練中心）知道狗會去幫助其他狗融入外界、面對牠們的恐懼並且克服攻擊行為」，這句話不只是缺乏科學支持，在影片中他講出這句話時搭配的畫面，亦表現出他的說詞缺乏支持：Beisner限制了第一隻狗的行動，由節目的共同主持人以牽繩將另一隻狗以一個完全不自然的姿勢拉到第一隻狗身邊，他們可能是在試著模仿狗狗自然的社交打招呼行為（但並不是），或使用洪水法訓練那隻狂流口水（顯示牠很緊張）並且無法逃脫的狗。最終兩隻狗打起來，訓練師製造的這個情境，讓失敗的結果無可避免。

In the trailer, the assistant host, Stefanie DiOrio, states, “Nervousness can easily turn to fear which can lead to aggression.” This is an accurate statement, which is why it’s so confusing that the entire show would be predicated on pushing dogs to the very edge of survivable stress and into predictable aggression, doubling down on the issues that their owners are struggling with.
在預告片中，節目的共同主持人Stefanie DiOrio說「緊張不安很容易變成真正的恐懼，並且導致攻擊行為」，這句話是正確的，但也讓人更加困惑為何整個節目的走向都在將狗推向牠們所能承受壓力的極限、觸發根本可預測的攻擊行為、並使飼主所面對的問題加倍惡化。

We know that the dramatic changes in behavior, from stressed and wildly aggressive to “calm” dogs, make for compelling TV. To an average pet owner it looks like these dogs are making huge improvements. All clients just want their dog to “Stop being aggressive.” However, we also know that behavior suppression is not the same as behavior modification, that a stressed and shut-down dog is a more dangerous animal than one who is actively showing aggression, and that the long-term prognosis of this kind of intervention is poor for both the client and their dog.
我們知道行為上戲劇性的變化，從一隻緊迫且兇猛攻擊的狗轉變成“冷靜”的狗，這個過程代表了高收視率，在不十分了解行為學的飼主眼中看來，這些狗狗似乎有巨大的進步。飼主都只是希望他們的狗「不要再有攻擊性」，然而我們也知道單純抑制攻擊行為的出現，並不是真正的行為改善技術。舉例來說一隻高壓力但看似沒有反應的狗，遠比一隻會表現出攻擊性的狗要危險許多 (譯註: 因為這樣的狗可能會沒有徵兆地開咬)，因此這種抑制攻擊行為的訓練法，以長遠來看對飼主以及狗狗都是有害的。

It is also worth pointing out that, like his predecessor, Mr Beisner’s assessment of cause for much of the issues he’s asked to address is simple, made especially clear in episode 4 where he not only saves a dog, he “saves a marriage:” Women are unable to effectively lead, must be stronger, must change their ways.
另一個值得注意的事是Beisner先生，如同他在同一個頻道的前輩，西薩，對導致問題的原因評估也過於簡化，例如第四集中他聲稱他不只拯救了狗狗，他還「拯救了這段婚姻」，因為女主人無法有效的領導狗狗，因此她必須更堅強，必須改變他們之間的相處模式。

Misogyny, it seems, cures dog behavior problems. Real exploration and explanation regarding the antecedents and consequences around behaviors are ignored in favor of client blaming.
這段貶抑女性的解釋，看起來似乎能改善犬隻的行為問題，然而關於行為問題真正的前因後果卻被指責客戶所取代，並沒有真正的被探討與解釋。

The clients on the show represent thousands of clients throughout the US and beyond with whom we work every day, helping them to help their dogs. Far from being dogs “other people won’t work with,” the dogs on your show are exactly the clients and dogs that IAABC Certified Dog Behavior Consultants, as well as all members of the American College of Veterinary Behaviorists, Certified Applied Animal Behaviorists, and other certified behavior specialists see and successfully work with every day.
節目中所出現的客戶正代表了我們日常工作中所會幫助的人們與他們的狗，呈現的就是我們在美國跟其他國家的上千位客戶。節目中所出現的這些有著行為問題的狗絕對不是「其他訓練師都不想要處理的狗狗」，事實上這些客戶與狗正是IAABC認證的狗行為諮詢師、美國獸醫行為學家、認證的應用動物行為學家或是其他受認證的行為學專家，每天工作的日常。

We do so using the best practices of our field (see https://m.iaabc.org/about/ethics/), adopted by the leading behavior and training organizations, without psychologically or physically harming the animals we work with.
我們在這個領域也使用最嚴謹的訓練師專業道德守則（英文版參見https://m.iaabc.org/about/ethics/，中文版參見https://reurl.cc/72eVkl），這個守則受領先的行為及訓練機構所採用，使訓練師與行為諮詢師在工作時，不對我們經手的動物造成生理或心理上的傷害。

The IAABC urges Nat Geo WILD to stop promoting this public miseducation. The tactics employed in the name of entertainment are unnecessarily harsh and potentially dangerous to the public, and they teach yet another generation of Nat Geo watchers absolutely incorrect and harmful practices.
IAABC呼籲國家地理頻道（Nat Geo WILD）停止傳播此系列誤導公眾的資訊。以娛樂包裝節目的策略對於觀眾是不必要的粗糙而且有潛在風險的，甚至是向頻道的年輕一代觀眾灌輸完全不正確且有害的做法。

It remains a mystery why your network is so intent on harming dogs. After years of Cesar Milan, to now bring in a man equally unskilled, who equates terrified, angry or entrapped dogs to his own addiction history is remarkable. Are we really satisfied conflating ego with compassion, self-focus with an understanding of animal behavior? Is this the “science” your mission stands for?
我們仍然不知為何貴頻道這麼多年來如此堅持持續傷害狗的這些作為。在西薩 (Cesar Milan) 的節目播映多年之後，現在又引進一個同樣缺乏正確訓練技巧，以自身藥物成癮困擾歷史去錯誤的同理恐懼或憤怒的狗的人。我們能接受一個膨脹自我，而非真正擁有同情心、適當自我聚焦、了解動物行為的「專業人士」嗎？這就是貴節目所宣稱的「科學」立場嗎？

The damage Nat Geo is doing to dogs by choosing this type of programming is astounding. We can only assume that the producers are unaware of this, as it’s hard to imagine such harm and cruelty would be deliberate.
國家地理頻道選擇製作這類節目對於狗狗的傷害甚鉅，我們只能假定節目製作人並沒有意識到這點，因為我們難以想像會有人故意去做這樣有害且殘忍的事情。

Would you show a reality program on heart surgery with a photogenic “self-taught” practitioner, simply stating the star was not a doctor before showing him mutilating a real patient?
想問貴節目是否會採用一個上鏡的“自學”外科醫生錄製心臟手術的實境節目，告知觀眾他並非真正的醫生，然後播放他對病患動刀的畫面？

I leave you with the clearest image of suffering and abuse from your trailer: the Aussie, stressed to the breaking point, thick ropes of drool streaming from its mouth, being choked by a slip lead to compensate for the host’s inability to even effectively muzzle a dog. This dog is at the point of collapse. This dog is being tortured, and that is not hysteria. That is an assessment by any educated measure.
作為結尾，我希望指出貴節目預告片中明確顯示出狗狗受苦或受虐的畫面：那隻澳洲牧羊犬已經瀕臨壓力的極限，您可以看到口水掛在其嘴邊 (大量口水為壓力徵兆)，口罩因為沒有確實的配戴而滑脫，導致牠被勒到快要窒息，已在崩潰邊緣。具備專業與適當教育的人員指出，這隻狗因在節目上被虐待而情緒崩潰，並非其本身歇斯底里。

Please stop this cruel and dangerous programming. To do otherwise is to support that self-taught heart surgery and all the consequences it would bring; that this show is currently bringing to families struggling with their dogs.
Professionals refer to Cesar Milan’s influence on dog training as “job security” because so many dogs ruined or made far worse by his teachings are brought to us by well-intentioned, often weeping owners desperate for real help. Often it is too late.
請停止這系列殘酷且危險的節目。否則貴節目就等同於支持前面舉例的自學的心臟外科「醫師」進行手術一樣，這些危險的後果正由觀眾與他們的狗承擔。專業訓犬人士將西薩米蘭對訓犬的影響戲稱為「工作保障」，因為太多飼主使用了他教授的技巧後，狗狗的狀況變得更糟，而哭著迫切尋找真正的協助，此時通常都為時已晚。

We do not want more work due to this same phenomenon.
我們不想要因為這個節目帶來類似影響而接到更多工作。

We’d be happy to provide you with any education and resources you need to inform your producers about what would qualify as responsible, effective, safe and thoughtful work with the same “red zone” dogs you sell so well.
但我們很樂意提供貴頻道任何需要的教育與資源，讓您們的節目製作人對訓犬工作應有的品質有所理解，例如負責、有效、安全，並且理解到對於在節目中出現的這些「危險」犬隻，事實上有更合理的訓練方法。

Thank you for your consideration.
謝謝您的閱讀與理解。

Marjie Alonso
Executive Director, IAABC
For the Board of Directors

Marjie Alonso
IAABC執行長
代表董事會發言

[科技業的護城河]

這篇是講矽谷投資人, 是如何在一堆的新秀中, 挑選可以投資的創新公司.

裡面有提到護城河.不過有些跟"尋找投資護城河"一書提的不太一樣.

我也認為, 研究個股, 尤其是科技相關類股, 除了要看它有沒有先行者優勢(first mover advantage), 也需要注意公司有沒有自己的生態系統, 以及它在更大的生態圈/供應鏈中扮演了甚麼角色.

********
(中文譯稿見此:https://36kr.com/p/5141901)

常見的護城河至少有以上六種：

技術。更好的基礎技術當然是一種護城河。在極端情況下，能夠為客戶帶來利益的新技術可以演化為一種行業標準，你也可以把它理解為一種壟斷，就像英特爾一樣。

生態系統。 YouTube 從內容生產者、分發渠道到內容的託管、保存，建立起了一整套生態系統。類似的，蘋果的 App Store 也有自己的生態。

網絡效應。社交網絡現在已經很好理解了。此外，如果某種按需服務具備了一定的流動性，並且與消費者建立了親密關係，或者是基本控制了需求或供應方其中一方，也可以算作網絡效應。

產品領導者。像 Salesforce，Workday 和 ServiceNow 這樣的雲服務提供商，搭建了一套完整的解決方案，而且創新速度夠快，產品功能完善，成為其細分行業的領導者，當然也算是一種護城河。

渠道。尤其是對於 to B 產品來說，能不能在一個企業內部流通，既是一個挑戰，也是一種優勢
********

原文寫的比較仔細, 轉貼在下方: https://news.greylock.com/what-do-i-look-for-in-a-pitch-866355bddb3

We love to talk about “network effects” in Silicon Valley, but many believe that starts and end with the social, viral growth of Facebook. But network effects can build many kinds of moats that defend them against copycats and price erosion.

I don’t describe every kind of moat here (e.g., regulatory) and many great companies will have new types of moats — ones yet to be invented. No moat is absolute or permanent or I’d be out of a job! Still, having a thesis on your defensibility is essential, even at the Series A.

--Tech. We continue to believe in new and better fundamental technology as a moat — not so much patents or legal protection, but products that are hard to build well or take advantage of a fundamentally new approach. In extreme cases, a technology advantage that translates into a customer benefit can turn into a standard — an effective monopoly — as in the case of Intel. In most cases, even a great technology moat only gets you far enough to become a market leader, buying you the right to work closely with customers and enabling you to define the market.

--Ecosystem moats come in many flavors — from becoming the default hosting site for user-generated video content (YouTube), to the rapid, developer-driven free adoption of container technologies and growth of associated tooling (Docker), to the developers that now make >$20B a year through the Apple app store.

--Networks. Social networks are now pretty well-understood. Marketplaces and on-demand businesses reach a liquidity point (even a local one) and build mindshare with consumers that becomes hard to displace. Often, marketplaces have some advantaged acquisition strategy for at least one side (demand or supply) — they’ve built a community, offered a compelling new service, have organic or viral spread.

--Product leaders. In the enterprise, cloud pioneers like Salesforce, Workday and ServiceNow built complete, core workflow solutions with a new architecture. Their faster-innovating products, (at that time novel) SaaS consumption model, and dominant go-to-market machines have made them category leaders. Each is now expanding their initial moats to become platforms for other applications and workflows.

--Distribution represents a new generation of user-adopted SaaS products. End-user engagement within organizations is often a weak spot for enterprise software incumbents. Deploying software is a challenge for most organizations, and consumers who are using more software in their own lives expect better choice and usability. Simplicity and quality of design has become a moat, especially when coupled with product features that encourage adoption within an organization, or new layers of value for incremental users within an organization. Is it better for me if my team also uses a tool? What about my manager?

Capturing a unique dataset is also emerging as a moat in the age of AI-powered products. If your workflow product or MVP is useful on its own, and you can use it to collect unique data, you can then learn from that data to build a better and smarter product, improving the user experience — driving a new virtuous cycle.

有人覺得阿甘一再批評美國保守派和川普支持者有失厚道, 但這些人就是很蠢又沒水準啊! 例子層出不窮。英國喜劇演員 Sacha Baron Cohen 製作了一個電視節目, 利用保守派愛搞歧視又排外的心態, 愚弄一票美國政治人物, 讓他們大出洋相。

Cohen 自稱是以色列反恐專家, 說要教導喬治亞州共和黨議員 Jason Spencer 如何辨識恐怖份子並擊退他們。議員先是醜化亞洲觀光客, 假裝在講中文, 趁機偷拍穆斯林女性的裙底。然後又拼命大喊「黑鬼」數次, 企圖嚇跑恐怖份子。最後褪下長褲露出屁股, 以為用屁眼攻擊恐怖份子就會讓他們變成同性戀。任何正常人都會覺得 Cohen 假扮的反恐專家很莫名其妙, 一個做了四任的州議員卻毫不懷疑, 對歧視行為毫無忌諱, 完全忘記自己是公眾人物。

這還不是最誇張。前一集當中, Cohen 跟好幾個共和黨國會議員和擁槍團體首領說他正在推廣一個新提案, 要讓幼稚園孩童帶槍上學, 訓練幼兒用槍。結果這些人不疑有他, 紛紛在攝影機前跟著宣導這個讓人髮指的構想。

節目一播出, 這些政治人物當然是指責 Cohen, 說他邪惡下流, 說自己是惡作劇受害者。都幾歲的人了? 還好意思把自己的愚蠢怪到別人身上? 判斷是非的最基本能力都沒有嗎? 把他們送進議會的選民素質更是不敢想像。

■English Title : Anpanman toy large Ferris wheel 2016 July play house pretend play Japan children magazine seedlings
■中文標題 : 麵包超人玩具大摩天輪2016年七月家家玩假裝兒童日本雜誌苗
■한국어 제목 : 싹 호빵맨 장난감 큰 관람차 2016 년 7 월호 소꿉 놀이 역할 놀이 일본 어린이 잡지
■中文标题 : 面包超人玩具大摩天轮2016年七月家家玩假装儿童日本杂志苗

■チャンネル登録はこちら / Channel subscript → https://goo.gl/in9442

■動画内容説明・概要
アンパンマン「おっきな　かんらんしゃ」、きかんしゃトーマス「ぎんピカカード」、人気キャラクターの「ボディペタシール」など、豪華ふろく満載の7月号！　本誌も、クレヨンしんちゃん、はなかっぱ、きかんしゃトーマスのおはなしなど、楽しいページがいっぱいです！
【組み立てふろく】
アンパンマン　おっきな　かんらんしゃ
迫力満点！　超ビッグサイズの観覧車！　黄色のつまみを回すと、回転盤とゴンドラが回ります。アンパンマンたちをゴンドラに乗せて遊びましょう。

■Video Description / Overview
Anpanman "Okkina Kanransha," Thomas the Tank Engine "silver Pikakado", such as "body Peta seal" of popular character, the July issue of the luxury appendix packed! The journal also, Crayon Shin-chan, Hanakappa, such as the story of Thomas the Tank Engine, is full of fun page!
[Assembly Appendix]
Anpanman Okkina Kanransha
Compelling! Ferris wheel of super-big size! Turning the knob of yellow, and around the rotating disk and the gondola. Let's play put the Anpanman us gondola.

■↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓次のおすすめ動画/Next Recommend Video/下一個推薦視訊/下一个推荐视频/다음의 추천 동영상↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓■

Hane&Mari'sWorld | 魔法使いプリキュア おもちゃ | Maho Girls PreCure TOYS | 魔法使 光之美少女 玩具 | 마법사 프리큐어 장난감
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLXiDlOQjp9BuLW2KPIF_i6w2qmZ_sb4oL

Hane&Mari'sWorld | アンパンマン おもちゃ 紹介動画 | 日本麵包超人玩具介紹 | Japan Anpanman Toys | 일본 호빵맨 장난감
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLXiDlOQjp9BuF1-qE2UZ_hKcFr3JHFjvR

Hane&Mari'sWolrd | マクドナルド ハッピーセット おもちゃ | McDonald Toys | 麥當勞歡樂兒童套餐玩具
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLXiDlOQjp9BsErHhmhB8V-w_uo8pOWNoH

Hane&Mari'sWorld | かみさまみならい ヒミツのここたま おもちゃ | Himitsu no Kokotama Toys
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLXiDlOQjp9BtCrjrdL3rQ7LV6EMuehJyG

Hane&Mari'sWorld | 食玩おもちゃ開封紹介動画 | Candy Toy Chocolat Eggs Review Videos | 日本食品玩具開箱介紹視訊 | 日本零食附赠玩具开箱视频
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLXiDlOQjp9BsE7XPT_X8rDqiLQ8dSG6GG

Hane&Mari'sWorld | めばえ 小学館の学習絵本 | JAPAN KIDS MAGAZINE Mebae | 日本益智幼兒雜誌 | 日本益智幼儿杂志 | 일본 유아 교육 잡지
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLXiDlOQjp9BuALZB4fobNF1rHuHPw6aPl

Hane&Mari'sWorld | カードゲーム データカードダス | Japan Card Game DATA CARDDASS
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLXiDlOQjp9BvpIWj5DaRlZyaeGAYb4IeH

Hane&Mari'sWorld | こども知育玩具おもちゃ | Kids Educational toys | 小孩子智力开发玩具 | 兒童益智玩具
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLXiDlOQjp9BsZLR1WhbtebEniScSe8cJ8

Hane&Mari'sWorld | プリパラ | Pripara | 뿌리빠라
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLXiDlOQjp9BubVuMQ6weTZaJ863klnEys

Hane&Mari'sWorld | メルちゃん ぽぽちゃん 女の子人形玩具 | Baby Doll Toy Mell-Chan Popo-Chan | 咪露娃娃 波波娃娃 女孩子娃娃玩具
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLXiDlOQjp9BuJY7FAPm_8F_HrgrCdxccw

Hane&Mari'sWorld | ツムツム ディズニー | TSUMTSUM Disney | ツムツム アーケード版 | TSUM TSUM ARCADE
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLXiDlOQjp9BvcqEapGDiS7e_aMcR17EKr

Hane&Mari'sWorld | Go！プリンセスプリキュア おもちゃ | Go!PRINCESS PRECURE Toys | 光之美少女公主玩具 | Go! 프린세스 프리큐어 장난감
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLXiDlOQjp9BuqxzXMasRP8aYffrj7QGCj

■撮影機材/Photographic Equipment → キャノン Canon EOS 80D + EF-S18-135mm F3.5-5.6 IS USM