[爆卦]Prosecutors是什麼?優點缺點精華區懶人包

雖然這篇Prosecutors鄉民發文沒有被收入到精華區:在Prosecutors這個話題中,我們另外找到其它相關的精選爆讚文章

在 prosecutors產品中有205篇Facebook貼文,粉絲數超過0的網紅,也在其Facebook貼文中提到, Discovering the truth behind President Tsai Ing-wen’s thesis is the responsibility of intellectuals and the media. Six months ago, prosecutors sought ...

 同時也有18部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過878的網紅時事英文 Podcast by ssyingwen,也在其Youtube影片中提到,她曾被稱為世界上最年輕的白手起家女億萬富翁,也被譽為下一個賈伯斯,Elizabeth Holmes 十九歲創立醫療科技新創 Theranos,市值一度高達 90 億美元。但《華爾街日報》2015 年的一篇報導改變了一切,Holmes 被指控詐欺,Theranos 也於 2018 年歇業。備受矚目的詐...

prosecutors 在 Nurulhidayah Ahmad Zahid Instagram 的最佳貼文

2021-09-10 19:13:13

End of Day 4 dan minggu pertama. Perbicaraan disambung Isnin jam 2.30 petang. Semoga Allah permudahkan. Hari2 ke mahkamah mendengar hujah2. Dan ...

prosecutors 在 白彌兒 I Mia Sabathy Instagram 的最讚貼文

2020-11-19 00:39:34

Thank you to our doctors, ambulances, police, WEGA special forces unit, the many people who sent in a total of 20.000 videos to the police, the 2 men ...

  • prosecutors 在 Facebook 的精選貼文

    2021-09-08 23:51:07
    有 1,306 人按讚

    Discovering the truth behind President Tsai Ing-wen’s thesis is the responsibility of intellectuals and the media. Six months ago, prosecutors sought to charge Professor Hwan C. Lin, Professor Ho De-fen, and Dr. Dennis Peng with defamation. It was the first time an acting president brought forth a lawsuit against scholars.

    For two years, anyone who doubted Tsai Ing-wen’s thesis, or even questioned it, were ridiculed by the media and legally persecuted. But, aren’t government leaders in a democratic society obligated to have the authenticity of their credentials tested? Why does the opposite prevail in Taiwan? Why can a leader who has their credentials questioned forgo providing proof and can, instead, use the judicial system to suppress those that question them?

    The hallmark of a dutiful scholar is how willing they are to uphold academic integrity. A desire to authenticate Tsai’s degree is a basic reaction for anyone who considers themselves part of the academic circle. However, after Tsai sought legal action against the three scholars, the public came to understand that “questioning Tsai’s degree will get you sued.” Such a precedent is an affront to academic integrity, and an insult to intellectuals everywhere.

    Can Taiwan deem itself a proud democracy if its head of state is allowed to use privilege to elevate themselves their whole life, and then escape criticism when questioned? Can Taiwan say it’s the proud democracy it claims to be when judicial mechanisms are used to enact acts of academic fraud? Martial law has been abolished for decades, and yet this country still operates like a dictatorship. Today is about transitional justice in the academic realm. Transitional justice begins when we can face our mistakes. Here, justice begins when Tsai faces her own academic fraud.

    Today’s press conference is about rallying the public to stand up against authoritarianism. We call on Tsai Ing-wen to do her duty as head of state and divulge the truth about her thesis. If she refuses to do so, then the other purpose of today is to reveal the evidence we have found that uncovers that truth.

    It’s time the lies ended. We will hold a press conference at the Legislative Yuan tomorrow at 10:30 a.m. Eat News will broadcast the entire event live: https://www.eatnews.co.uk/video/20210909-1/

    #DennisPeng #PengWengjen #HwanCLin #HoDefen #TsaiIngwen #LSEThesisGateScandal

  • prosecutors 在 Facebook 的最讚貼文

    2021-09-08 00:48:09
    有 122 人按讚

    //An activist detained under Hong Kong’s national security law is planning to apply to the High Court to lift restrictions on the media’s reporting of her bail hearing on Wednesday.

    In a message published on Tuesday, Gwyneth Ho argued that laws banning the media from reporting details of bail hearings failed to protect the interests of the accused. The press should be allowed to freely report what happened during those hearings, she said.

    “After the defendants under the national security law were arrested and remanded in custody, the reporting restrictions on bail hearings have turned the process into a ‘black box’, and has created widespread fears in society,” she wrote.

    “The public has no way of knowing the contents of the bail hearings under the national security law, especially the evidence used by the prosecutors and the courts’ assessment of the defendants.”

    Ho is among 47 democracy figures charged with conspiracy to commit subversion, which carries a maximum sentence of life in prison. They are accused of plotting to subvert state power via an informal primary poll held last July. Only 13 of the 47 have been granted bail since early March.

    After being detained for more than six months, Ho will make her bail application at the High Court on Wednesday morning.

    She publicised her arguments a day in advance, saying the reporting restrictions set out under section 9P of the Criminal Procedure Ordinance were originally meant to ensure that defendants received a fair trial. The law limits media coverage of bail hearings to basic information such as the defendant’s name, the court’s decision and bail conditions.

    Those regulations backfired because the lack of transparency had caused the public to doubt whether the national security law had been fairly implemented, Ho wrote, adding that Hong Kong society was worried about arbitrary arrests based on flimsy evidence.

    “In reality, the reporting restrictions benefit the Department of Justice, as it no longer needs to publicly explain the basis of the charges and various political accusations,” she wrote.

    “The restrictions have clearly contravened the principle of public justice, and if the courts still refuse to lift them, the public will inevitably suspect that the courts accept this unfair situation.”

    The open administration of justice was a fundamental principle of Hong Kong’s common law system, and courts should be scrutinised by the public and the press, Ho said, quoting the city’s former chief justice Denys Roberts.

    Hong Kong courts have mostly kept reporting restrictions in place for bail applications under the national security law, though some judges have issued written rulings explaining their decision to grant or refuse bail, which are typically published after a delay.

    Earlier on Tuesday, the court again denied the bail application of former pro-democracy lawmaker Gary Fan, a co-defendant in the subversion case. Like most of the 47, Fan has been in custody for months with no trial date lined up as yet.

    By Holmes Chan//

  • prosecutors 在 Focus Taiwan Facebook 的最佳解答

    2021-09-01 17:45:51
    有 118 人按讚

    Taipei prosecutors indicted three Taiwanese on Wednesday for allegedly recruiting and sending women from Taiwan to the United States and other countries to engage in prostitution.
    https://focustaiwan.tw/society/202109010010

你可能也想看看

搜尋相關網站