雖然這篇Jeering鄉民發文沒有被收入到精華區：在Jeering這個話題中，我們另外找到其它相關的精選爆讚文章
在 jeering產品中有3篇Facebook貼文，粉絲數超過7萬的網紅Apple Daily - English Edition，也在其Facebook貼文中提到， #Opinion by Leung Kai Chi 梁啟智｜"Originally, there was not a consensus among the populace how to response to the revised electoral system. The various s...
同時也有1部Youtube影片，追蹤數超過5萬的網紅黃偉民易經講堂，也在其Youtube影片中提到，Wong Wai Man 國歌法在香港進行得如火如荼，但市民對《義勇軍進行曲》噓之如故，怎麼辦？ 北京政權的愚蠢，在於，對外用金錢買尊重，對內用惡法凶百姓，然後洋洋自得。 那個政權不希望得到民眾的尊重和支持？ 這是千古政治領袖，寢食難安的問題： 如何可使民眾，對你又忠又敬，互相勸勉，積極地在社會生...
「jeering」的推薦目錄
jeering 在 劉熏 ChingChing Instagram 的最讚貼文
2020-11-02 14:02:55
- 剛剛翻相簿時， 看到了這張照片， 突然發現牠耳朵上的數字是087； 於是，我就想......🤔 這隻鹿好像偷偷在罵我🤣 - The Chinese pronunciation of “087” is “ling ba chi”. That we say “you’re an idiot!” in...
jeering 在 Daphne Iking Instagram 的最佳解答
2020-05-12 18:37:37
That annoying paunch. Gets to me. Baik makan puas2 jer lah 😒. Whatever I do, it’s always there. Especially when I’m on the throne. Cipap betul. Jeerin...
jeering 在 Kenneth’s Team ✎ Instagram 的最佳貼文
2020-05-10 17:02:11
/ June 26, 2018 Onlookers Arrested for Urging Suicide Attempter On . Summary: “Just jump already” and “You won’t die” were some of the last words a 19...
-
jeering 在 黃偉民易經講堂 Youtube 的最佳解答
2017-11-14 19:26:24Wong Wai Man
國歌法在香港進行得如火如荼，但市民對《義勇軍進行曲》噓之如故，怎麼辦？
北京政權的愚蠢，在於，對外用金錢買尊重，對內用惡法凶百姓，然後洋洋自得。
那個政權不希望得到民眾的尊重和支持？
這是千古政治領袖，寢食難安的問題：
如何可使民眾，對你又忠又敬，互相勸勉，積極地在社會生活呢？
不單是領導人，其實，公司老闆，為人父母，都問同樣的問題。如何得到老百姓、員工、子女的尊重，如何引發他們的積極性呢？
孔子說：
空洞的宣傳沒有用，騙得一時，騙不了一世。對老百姓，政府首先要尊重自己，有一套莊嚴的管治哲學，百姓自然對你恭敬。
讓大家能夠安居樂業，可以孝其老，慈其幼，他們自然會忠心，全心全意的為社會。
提拔有才能的人，教育那些條件資質有限平庸之輩，自然人人都會積極努力在社會奮鬥了。
這些道理，其實，人人心中明白，也只不過是佛家說的因果而已。
現在，不尋找香港人噓《義勇軍進行曲》的根源，以為立條法例，再噓就拉你，就可以杜絕憤怒和鄙視？
對香港，國歌法只是一場滋擾。對市民固然是滋擾，對將來的執法者，無論是警察或康文署人員；對律政署草擬法例的官員；或見義勇為，協助執法的市民，都是一場滋擾。
這是香港法制上的一場大媽舞，是品味的淪落，只有舞者，樂在其中。
2017年11月14日 星期二下午5pm
你的收看、訂閱、讚好便是對「易經講堂」的支持，謝謝。![post-title]()
jeering 在 Apple Daily - English Edition Facebook 的精選貼文
#Opinion by Leung Kai Chi 梁啟智｜"Originally, there was not a consensus among the populace how to response to the revised electoral system. The various solutions I have heard about so far include enduring all the disgrace and insults just in order to run for office, and putting election under a boycott as proposed by a lot of people. The difference between the two is whether you cast a blank or invalid vote, or abstain from voting. Some advocate running in election in a jeering manner by making “the Coriander Party” and ‘the Siu Mai(Cantonese steamed dumping with shrimp) Concern Group” bricks-and-mortar political groups that send candidates to stand in election to see what reasons the vetting committee will be able to come up with to disqualify them from taking part. However, it was not anticipated that the government adopted a high profile to dress down anyone who calls on others to cast a blank vote, which, to everyone’s surprise, unified what the populace thought in a short while. Everyone is now convinced that casting a blank vote is a solution worth considering. As far as incitement to casting blank vote made a criminal offence is concerned, I am afraid that the government is the first one culpable for it."
Read more: https://bit.ly/3dFwQDx
"坊間對於如何對應修改後的選舉制度，本來沒有统一意見。我聽過的方案，除了忍辱負重繼續參選之外，也有很多朋友說應該杯葛，分別只是投白票廢票還是索性不投票。也有一些朋友提議調侃式參選，把「芫茜黨」和「燒賣關注組」變成實體參選，看看資格審查委員會可以想出怎樣的理由出來取消他們的資格。不料政府大鑼大鼓訓斥投白票，反而一下子在民間統一思想，大家都覺得投白票是個值得考慮的方案。若說煽惑投白票有罪，第一個有罪的恐怕是政府本身。"
____________
📱Download the app:
http://onelink.to/appledailyapp
📰 Latest news:
http://appledaily.com/engnews/
🐤 Follow us on Twitter:
https://twitter.com/appledaily_hk
💪🏻 Subscribe and show your support:
https://bit.ly/2ZYKpHP
#AppleDailyENG
jeering 在 Howtindog's Channel Facebook 的最佳解答
[HowtinQuote]
我一向都很欣賞Dale Allison的坦誠, 佢會更正自己之前寫過的嘢, 亦會對自己本來信奉的嘢提出疑問. 最近喺佢一篇文入面, 見到呢段文字, 是很真實的情況:
Imagine with me a young graduate student in a department of religion. She becomes convinced, let us say, that Albert Schweitzer’s reconstruction of Jesus was close to the truth—or, as the case may be, not close to the truth—because a revered professor, whose arguments she has not the means to rebut, persuades her of this. Once her paradigm about Jesus is in place, a cognitive bias will also be in place. We all see what we expect to see and want to see—like highly prejudicial football fans who always spot more infractions committed by the team they are jeering against than by the team they are cheering for. If we hold a belief, we will notice confirming evidence, especially if we are aware that not everyone agrees with us. Disconfirming evidence, to the contrary, makes us uncomfortable, and so we are more likely to miss, neglect, or critically evaluate it. We do not see things as they are but as we construe them to be. After a period of time, then, one might anticipate that our graduate student will have collected her own evidence for her professor’s belief and become all the more persuaded of its correctness. As soon, moreover, as she communicates her views in public fashion, say by tutoring undergraduates or publishing a paper, she may be set for life—especially as one’s self-perception as an expert, the psychologists tell us, typically enlarges self-confidence. The prospect of embarrassment from publicly admitting error can make it hard to admit error to oneself, to undertake the difficult cognitive task of rearranging data into a new pattern after one has long been looking at an old pattern.
......
In my own case, my picture of Jesus was developed long before I much worried about the details of method, and long before I went on record as espousing this or that view of the criteria of authenticity. Moreover, and as one would cynically expect, the method that I developed later led straight to a Jesus congenial to the judgments of my youth. This I find disturbing, and my history cannot be atypical. Surely no one started with method. The implication seems to be that developing and deploying our criteria serve less to help us make truly new discoveries than to help us to confirm inclinations already held in advance.
~Dale C. Allison, Jr., "How to Marginalize the Traditional Criteria of Authenticity," in Handbook for the Study of the Historical Jesus (eds. T. Holmen and S.E. Porter; Leiden: Brill, 2011) 3-30.
jeering 在 盧斯達 Facebook 的精選貼文
【國際足協查噓中國國歌事件 港隊主場對中國或被罰閉門作賽 | 本土新聞】
法新社報道，國際足協十日表示，就港隊八日對卡塔爾的世界盃亞洲區外圍賽，開賽前奏起中國國歌時有球迷報以噓聲，進行調查。報道指，港隊可能面對的懲罰，包括十一月十七日主場對中國隊的世界盃外圍賽，可能要閉門進行。報道又提到，去年香港發生雨傘革命，支持民主的抗爭者對中國態度轉差。（節錄）
全文連結：http://www.localpresshk.com/…/fifa-investigate-jeering-of-…/
【離地觀點橫行 香港要有《本土新聞》】
贊助方法
Paypal: http://goo.gl/NntVdv
或：東亞銀行戶口 015-254-68-00092-8 (Local Press Ltd) ，支票，ATM，網上過數均可。