24 Jun 2021 :: Stock order team member Ernie dah smpai untuk member area Kuching-Samarahan. Area lain terus menuju alamat mereka sendiri... 🥳🥳 antara produk Shuang Hor yang member order adalah ...
1) Jia Hor Lingzhi ( lingzhi Gred 3 )
2) Yung Kien Pollen - dalam bentuk kapsul
3) Yung Kien Pollen ( Granular ) - dalam bentuk sachets
4) Lacto Berry
5) Jia Hor Instant Soya Protein Powder
6) Lu Chun Lingzhi Plus Tea
7) CEO CAFE 4 IN 1 & CEO CAFE 3 IN 1
8) GreenZhi ToothGel

Daftar jadi member RM16 sahaja.. Maok jadi member untuk harga lebih murah untuk penjagaan kesihatan? Hubungi Ernie 📲 014 356 6088 📲 http://www.wasap.my/60143566088/MahuDaftarJadiAhliShuangHor

打造智慧數據湖，Google Cloud 今天推出三項新服務讓資料在雲更聰明

2021/05/27 INSIDE 硬塞的網路趨勢觀察

Google Cloud 在今天舉辦的 Google Data Cloud Summit 上，發布三項全新解決方案：Dataplex、Datastream 和 Analytics Hub Beta 版，將涵蓋旗下的資料庫和資料分析產品組合，為企業提供一個整合式資料平台，協助企業打破資料孤島。

評論

Google Cloud 在今天舉辦的 Google Data Cloud Summit 上，發布三項全新解決方案：Dataplex、Datastream 和 Analytics Hub Beta 版，將涵蓋旗下的資料庫和資料分析產品組合，為企業提供一個整合式資料平台，協助企業打破資料孤島，安全地預測業務成果並賦予使用者能力，在現今不斷變化的數位環境中即時制定明智的決策。

「Gartner 近期的問卷調查結果顯示，企業預估每年在品質不甚理想的資料上平均花費 $1,280 萬美元。」 因為資料散布在多個雲端和地端部署環境中的資料庫、資料湖泊、資料倉儲和資料市集內，企業除了要設法集中控管及管理應用程式，更需要即時整合資料來改善決策，加快創新腳步及提升客戶體驗。

Google Cloud 資料庫、資料分析及 Looker 商業智慧平台總經理暨副總裁 Gerrit Kazmaier 說明，企業須把資料視為具備將所有相關業務面向整合為一的能力。如今所有產業紛紛轉換為以數位化為主的業務型態，因為他們明白資料不但是創造價值的要素，同時也是推動數位轉型的關鍵。

透過運用 Google Cloud 的資料平台，客戶現在將能採用全方位且涵蓋完整資料生命週期的資料雲端方案，從業務執行系統到可進行未來預測和自動化作業的 AI 與機器學習工具等均包含在內。

Datastream-為客戶提供即時資料複製功能：目前提供 Beta 版體驗的 Datastream 提供全新的無伺服器異動資料擷取 (CDC) 和複製服務，讓客戶可以從 Oracle 和 MySQL 資料庫將資料串流即時擷取至 Google Cloud 服務，例如 BigQuery、可於 PostgreSQL 上執行的 Cloud SQL、Google Cloud Storage 和 Cloud Spanner。

企業可運用這項解決方案強化即時性數據分析功能、資料庫的複製速度以及事件驅動架構等。率先採用此方案的客戶 Schnuck Markets, Inc.運用 Datastream 簡化了架構，而將 Oracle 資料複製到 BigQuery 和 Cloud SQL 也不再會延遲數小時之久。

Analytics Hub-提高資料共用安全與易用性：Analytics Hub 可為企業創造安全且即時的資料交換服務，借助 Analytics Hub，企業可以在不論組織的內外部，安全地共享數據和洞察，包括動態儀表板和機器學習模型。

Analytics Hub 協助企業整合其數據資產，如將 Google 獨有數據、產業數據和公開數據整合一起。Analytics Hub 建立於 BigQuery 現行且普及的共享功能基礎上，目前已經使數千家企業透過數據分析進行革新，並透過不僅是單純共享數據的方法，來加快洞察的取得。

Dataplex-協助企業簡化資料管理作業：目前提供 Beta 版體驗的 Dataplex 是一種智慧資料網路架構，可提供單一整合式的分析體驗，能將 Google Cloud 和開放原始碼結合在一起，使企業能夠快速整理、保護、整合及分析其數據。

自動化的資料品質可讓數據資料學家和分析師利用自選工具確保資料的一致性，不須移動或複製資料即可統整並管理資料。Google 提供傑出的 AI 和機器學習功能，讓企業能夠利用內建的智慧資料來縮短處理繁複基礎架構的時間，並將更多心力轉而投入於發掘資料價值，以帶來更多業務成果。身為 Dataplex 早期客戶，Equifax 與 Google 合作致力將 Dataplex 納入自己的核心分析平台，不但簡化了工作負載，還建立了所有內部分析資料都適用的單一指令控管及管理平台。

在資料雲端高峰會舉辦期間，Google Cloud 也發表了資料庫和數據分析產品組合方面的其他最新消息：

基於對多雲端的策略性承諾，Google 陸續推出分別適用於 Microsoft Azure 的 BigQuery Omni Beta 版和 Looker 商業智慧平台正式版，藉此協助客戶取得跨雲端環境的關鍵資料深入分析結果。繼去年發表適用於 AWS 的 BigQuery Omni 後，這次發表的最新消息更延續了市場對此技術的展望。

BigQuery ML 異常偵測 可協助客戶透過使用 BigQuery 的內建機器學習功能，以更輕鬆的方式檢測異常資料模式。目前許多客戶將這項技術運用於多種用途，包括銀行詐欺偵測和生產製造不良原因分析。

Dataflow 為客戶提供了具備成本效益的快速串流分析解決方案。而預計於第三季推出的 Dataflow Prime 將提供業界領先的自動垂直擴充和數據管道正確配置技術，為客戶最大幅度地降低整體擁有成本。此外，Dataflow Prime 更內建了 AI 和機器學習技術，可以為客戶提供串流預測功能，例如時間序列分析、可主動識別瓶頸的智慧診斷功能，以及可提高使用率的自動微調功能。

Google 也將全代管關聯資料庫 Cloud Spanner 的入門價格降低 90%，連同即將推出的精細個體規模調整功能 (granular instance sizing) ，將同樣提供無限制的空間規模與99.999％的可用性，用以支援要求最苛刻的應用程式運作。BigQuery 與 Spanner 的整合功能也即將推出，可讓使用者透過 BigQuery 查詢 Spanner 中的交易資料，以便提供更豐富且即時的深入分析結果。而 Spanner 新增的 Key Visualizer 功能(目前為 Beta 版本)，可提供互動式監控功能，方便開發人員迅速識別使用模式。此外，Cloud Bigtable 更具備可達 99.999%(5 9s) SLA 的讀取和寫入可用性。

資料來源：https://www.inside.com.tw/article/23648-google-data-cloud-summit

📜 [專欄新文章] Uniswap v3 Features Explained in Depth

✍️ 田少谷 Shao

📥 歡迎投稿： https://medium.com/taipei-ethereum-meetup #徵技術分享文 #使用心得 #教學文 #medium

Once again the game-changing DEX 🦄 👑

Image source: https://uniswap.org/blog/uniswap-v3/

Outline

0. Intro1. Uniswap & AMM recap2. Ticks 3. Concentrated liquidity4. Range orders: reversible limit orders5. Impacts of v36. Conclusion

0. Intro

The announcement of Uniswap v3 is no doubt one of the most exciting news in the DeFi place recently 🔥🔥🔥

While most have talked about the impact v3 can potentially bring on the market, seldom explain the delicate implementation techniques to realize all those amazing features, such as concentrated liquidity, limit-order-like range orders, etc.

Since I’ve covered Uniswap v1 & v2 (if you happen to know Mandarin, here are v1 & v2), there’s no reason for me to not cover v3 as well ✅

Thus, this article aims to guide readers through Uniswap v3, based on their official whitepaper and examples made on the announcement page. However, one needs not to be an engineer, as not many codes are involved, nor a math major, as the math involved is definitely taught in your high school, to fully understand the following content 😊😊😊

If you really make it through but still don’t get shxt, feedbacks are welcomed! 🙏

There should be another article focusing on the codebase, so stay tuned and let’s get started with some background noise!

1. Uniswap & AMM recap

Before diving in, we have to first recap the uniqueness of Uniswap and compare it to traditional order book exchanges.

Uniswap v1 & v2 are a kind of AMMs (automated market marker) that follow the constant product equation x * y = k, with x & y stand for the amount of two tokens X and Y in a pool and k as a constant.

Comparing to order book exchanges, AMMs, such as the previous versions of Uniswap, offer quite a distinct user experience:

AMMs have pricing functions that offer the price for the two tokens, which make their users always price takers, while users of order book exchanges can be both makers or takers.

Uniswap as well as most AMMs have infinite liquidity¹, while order book exchanges don’t. The liquidity of Uniswap v1 & v2 is provided throughout the price range [0,∞]².

Uniswap as well as most AMMs have price slippage³ and it’s due to the pricing function, while there isn’t always price slippage on order book exchanges as long as an order is fulfilled within one tick.

In an order book, each price (whether in green or red) is a tick. Image source: https://ftx.com/trade/BTC-PERP

¹ though the price gets worse over time; AMM of constant sum such as mStable does not have infinite liquidity

² the range is in fact [-∞,∞], while a price in most cases won’t be negative

³ AMM of constant sum does not have price slippage

2. Tick

The whole innovation of Uniswap v3 starts from ticks.

For those unfamiliar with what is a tick:

Source: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/t/tick.asp

By slicing the price range [0,∞] into numerous granular ticks, trading on v3 is highly similar to trading on order book exchanges, with only three differences:

The price range of each tick is predefined by the system instead of being proposed by users.

Trades that happen within a tick still follows the pricing function of the AMM, while the equation has to be updated once the price crosses the tick.

Orders can be executed with any price within the price range, instead of being fulfilled at the same one price on order book exchanges.

With the tick design, Uniswap v3 possesses most of the merits of both AMM and an order book exchange! 💯💯💯

So, how is the price range of a tick decided?

This question is actually somewhat related to the tick explanation above: the minimum tick size for stocks trading above 1$ is one cent.

The underlying meaning of a tick size traditionally being one cent is that one cent (1% of 1$) is the basis point of price changes between ticks, ex: 1.02 — 1.01 = 0.1.

Uniswap v3 employs a similar idea: compared to the previous/next price, the price change should always be 0.01% = 1 basis point.

However, notice the difference is that in the traditional basis point, the price change is defined with subtraction, while here in Uniswap it’s division.

This is how price ranges of ticks are decided⁴:

Image source: https://uniswap.org/whitepaper-v3.pdf

With the above equation, the tick/price range can be recorded in the index form [i, i+1], instead of some crazy numbers such as 1.0001¹⁰⁰ = 1.0100496621.

As each price is the multiplication of 1.0001 of the previous price, the price change is always 1.0001 — 1 = 0.0001 = 0.01%.

For example, when i=1, p(1) = 1.0001; when i=2, p(2) = 1.00020001.

p(2) / p(1) = 1.00020001 / 1.0001 = 1.0001

See the connection between the traditional basis point 1 cent (=1% of 1$) and Uniswap v3’s basis point 0.01%?

Image source: https://tenor.com/view/coin-master-cool-gif-19748052

But sir, are prices really granular enough? There are many shitcoins with prices less than 0.000001$. Will such prices be covered as well?

Price range: max & min

To know if an extremely small price is covered or not, we have to figure out the max & min price range of v3 by looking into the spec: there is a int24 tick state variable in UniswapV3Pool.sol.

Image source: https://uniswap.org/whitepaper-v3.pdf

The reason for a signed integer int instead of an uint is that negative power represents prices less than 1 but greater than 0.

24 bits can cover the range between 1.0001 ^ (2²³ — 1) and 1.0001 ^ -(2)²³. Even Google cannot calculate such numbers, so allow me to offer smaller values to have a rough idea of the whole price range:

1.0001 ^ (2¹⁸) = 242,214,459,604.341

1.0001 ^ -(2¹⁷) = 0.000002031888943

I think it’s safe to say that with a int24 the range can cover > 99.99% of the prices of all assets in the universe 👌

⁴ For implementation concern, however, a square root is added to both sides of the equation.

How about finding out which tick does a price belong to?

Tick index from price

The answer to this question is rather easy, as we know that p(i) = 1.0001^i, simply takes a log with base 1.0001 on both sides of the equation⁴:

Image source: https://www.codecogs.com/latex/eqneditor.php

Let’s try this out, say we wanna find out the tick index of 1000000.

Image source: https://ncalculators.com/number-conversion/log-logarithm-calculator.htm

Now, 1.0001¹³⁸¹⁶² = 999,998.678087146. Voila!

⁵ This formula is also slightly modified to fit the real implementation usage.

3. Concentrated liquidity

Now that we know how ticks and price ranges are decided, let’s talk about how orders are executed in a tick, what is concentrated liquidity and how it enables v3 to compete with stablecoin-specialized DEXs (decentralized exchange), such as Curve, by improving the capital efficiency.

Concentrated liquidity means LPs (liquidity providers) can provide liquidity to any price range/tick at their wish, which causes the liquidity to be imbalanced in ticks.

As each tick has a different liquidity depth, the corresponding pricing function x * y = k also won’t be the same!

Each tick has its own liquidity depth. Image source: https://uniswap.org/blog/uniswap-v3/

Mmm… examples are always helpful for abstract descriptions 😂

Say the original pricing function is 100(x) * 1000(y) = 100000(k), with the price of X token 1000 / 100 = 10 and we’re now in the price range [9.08, 11.08].

If the liquidity of the price range [11.08, 13.08] is the same as [9.08, 11.08], we don’t have to modify the pricing function if the price goes from 10 to 11.08, which is the boundary between two ticks.

The price of X is 1052.63 / 95 = 11.08 when the equation is 1052.63 * 95 = 100000.

However, if the liquidity of the price range [11.08, 13.08] is two times that of the current range [9.08, 11.08], balances of x and y should be doubled, which makes the equation become 2105.26 * 220 = 400000, which is (1052.63 * 2) * (110 * 2) = (100000 * 2 * 2).

We can observe the following two points from the above example:

Trades always follow the pricing function x * y = k, while once the price crosses the current price range/tick, the liquidity/equation has to be updated.

√(x * y) = √k = L is how we represent the liquidity, as I say the liquidity of x * y = 400000 is two times the liquidity of x * y = 100000, as √(400000 / 100000) = 2.

What’s more, compared to liquidity on v1 & v2 is always spread across [0,∞], liquidity on v3 can be concentrated within certain price ranges and thus results in higher capital efficiency from traders’ swapping fees!

Let’s say if I provide liquidity in the range [1200, 2800], the capital efficiency will then be 4.24x higher than v2 with the range [0,∞] 😮😮😮 There’s a capital efficiency comparison calculator, make sure to try it out!

Image source: https://uniswap.org/blog/uniswap-v3/

It’s worth noticing that the concept of concentrated liquidity was proposed and already implemented by Kyper, prior to Uniswap, which is called Automated Price Reserve in their case.⁵

⁶ Thanks to Yenwen Feng for the information.

4. Range orders: reversible limit orders

As explained in the above section, LPs of v3 can provide liquidity to any price range/tick at their wish. Depending on the current price and the targeted price range, there are three scenarios:

current price < the targeted price range

current price > the targeted price range

current price belongs to the targeted price range

The first two scenarios are called range orders. They have unique characteristics and are essentially fee-earning reversible limit orders, which will be explained later.

The last case is the exact same liquidity providing mechanism as the previous versions: LPs provide liquidity in both tokens of the same value (= amount * price).

There’s also an identical product to the case: grid trading, a very powerful investment tool for a time of consolidation. Dunno what’s grid trading? Check out Binance’s explanation on this, as this topic won’t be covered!

In fact, LPs of Uniswap v1 & v2 are grid trading with a range of [0,∞] and the entry price as the baseline.

Range orders

To understand range orders, we’d have to first revisit how price is discovered on Uniswap with the equation x * y = k, for x & y stand for the amount of two tokens X and Y and k as a constant.

The price of X compared to Y is y / x, which means how many Y one can get for 1 unit of X, and vice versa the price of Y compared to X is x / y.

For the price of X to go up, y has to increase and x decrease.

With this pricing mechanism in mind, it’s example time!

Say an LP plans to place liquidity in the price range [15.625, 17.313], higher than the current price of X 10, when 100(x) * 1000(y) = 100000(k).

The price of X is 1250 / 80 = 15.625 when the equation is 80 * 1250 = 100000.

The price of X is 1315.789 / 76 = 17.313 when the equation is 76 * 1315.789 = 100000.

If now the price of X reaches 15.625, the only way for the price of X to go even higher is to further increase y and decrease x, which means exchanging a certain amount of X for Y.

Thus, to provide liquidity in the range [15.625, 17.313], an LP needs only to prepare 80 — 76 = 4 of X. If the price exceeds 17.313, all 4 X of the LP is swapped into 1315.789 — 1250 = 65.798 Y, and then the LP has nothing more to do with the pool, as his/her liquidity is drained.

What if the price stays in the range? It’s exactly what LPs would love to see, as they can earn swapping fees for all transactions in the range! Also, the balance of X will swing between [76, 80] and the balance of Y between [1250, 1315.789].

This might not be obvious, but the example above shows an interesting insight: if the liquidity of one token is provided, only when the token becomes more valuable will it be exchanged for the less valuable one.

…wut? 🤔

Remember that if 4 X is provided within [15.625, 17.313], only when the price of X goes up from 15.625 to 17.313 is 4 X gradually swapped into Y, the less valuable one!

What if the price of X drops back immediately after reaching 17.313? As X becomes less valuable, others are going to exchange Y for X.

The below image illustrates the scenario of DAI/USDC pair with a price range of [1.001, 1.002] well: the pool is always composed entirely of one token on both sides of the tick, while in the middle 1.001499⁶ is of both tokens.

Image source: https://uniswap.org/blog/uniswap-v3/

Similarly, to provide liquidity in a price range < current price, an LP has to prepare a certain amount of Y for others to exchange Y for X within the range.

To wrap up such an interesting feature, we know that:

Only one token is required for range orders.

Only when the current price is within the range of the range order can LP earn trading fees. This is the main reason why most people believe LPs of v3 have to monitor the price more actively to maximize their income, which also means that LPs of v3 have become arbitrageurs 🤯

I will be discussing more the impacts of v3 in 5. Impacts of v3.

⁷ 1.001499988 = √(1.0001 * 1.0002) is the geometric mean of 1.0001 and 1.0002. The implication is that the geometric mean of two prices is the average execution price within the range of the two prices.

Reversible limit orders

As the example in the last section demonstrates, if there is 4 X in range [15.625, 17.313], the 4 X will be completely converted into 65.798 Y when the price goes over 17.313.

We all know that a price can stay in a wide range such as [10, 11] for quite some time, while it’s unlikely so in a narrow range such as [15.625, 15.626].

Thus, if an LP provides liquidity in [15.625, 15.626], we can expect that once the price of X goes over 15.625 and immediately also 15.626, and does not drop back, all X are then forever converted into Y.

The concept of having a targeted price and the order will be executed after the price is crossed is exactly the concept of limit orders! The only difference is that if the range of a range order is not narrow enough, it’s highly possible that the conversion of tokens will be reverted once the price falls back to the range.

As price ranges follow the equation p(i) = 1.0001 ^ i, the range can be quite narrow and a range order can thus effectively serve as a limit order:

When i = 27490, 1.0001²⁷⁴⁹⁰ = 15.6248.⁸

When i = 27491, 1.0001²⁷⁴⁹¹ = 15.6264.⁸

A range of 0.0016 is not THAT narrow but can certainly satisfy most limit order use cases!

⁸ As mentioned previously in note #4, there is a square root in the equation of the price and index, thus the numbers here are for explantion only.

5. Impacts of v3

Higher capital efficiency, LPs become arbitrageurs… as v3 has made tons of radical changes, I’d like to summarize my personal takes of the impacts of v3:

Higher capital efficiency makes one of the most frequently considered indices in DeFi: TVL, total value locked, becomes less meaningful, as 1$ on Uniswap v3 might have the same effect as 100$ or even 2000$ on v2.

The ease of spot exchanging between spot exchanges used to be a huge advantage of spot markets over derivative markets. As LPs will take up the role of arbitrageurs and arbitraging is more likely to happen on v3 itself other than between DEXs, this gap is narrowed … to what extent? No idea though.

LP strategies and the aggregation of NFT of Uniswap v3 liquidity token are becoming the blue ocean for new DeFi startups: see Visor and Lixir. In fact, this might be the turning point for both DeFi and NFT: the two main reasons of blockchain going mainstream now come to the alignment of interest: solving the $$ problem 😏😏😏

In the right venue, which means a place where transaction fees are low enough, such as Optimism, we might see Algo trading firms coming in to share the market of designing LP strategies on Uniswap v3, as I believe Algo trading is way stronger than on-chain strategies or DAO voting to add liquidity that sort of thing.

After reading this article by Parsec.finance: The Dex to Rule Them All, I cannot help but wonder: maybe there is going to be centralized crypto exchanges adopting v3’s approach. The reason is that since orders of LPs in the same tick are executed pro-rata, the endless front-running speeding-competition issue in the Algo trading world, to some degree, is… solved? 🤔

Anyway, personal opinions can be biased and seriously wrong 🙈 I’m merely throwing out a sprat to catch a whale. Having a different voice? Leave your comment down below!

6. Conclusion

That was kinda tough, isn’t it? Glad you make it through here 🥂🥂🥂

There are actually many more details and also a huge section of Oracle yet to be covered. However, since this article is more about features and targeting normal DeFi users, I’ll leave those to the next one; hope there is one 😅

If you have any doubt or find any mistake, please feel free to reach out to me and I’d try to reply AFAP!

Stay tuned and in the meantime let’s wait and see how Uniswap v3 is again pioneering the innovation of DeFi 🌟

Uniswap v3 Features Explained in Depth was originally published in Taipei Ethereum Meetup on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.

👏 歡迎轉載分享鼓掌

ご覧いただきありがとうございます！

今日は「刻みネギ塩たこマリネ」。
https://www.instagram.com/p/BxYcf1KA5Aq/

タコのお刺身を買ってきて、さっとおつまみに。
ネギ塩で会える子音でやみつきおつまみの完成です！
ぜひぜひやってみてくださいね^ ^



================================================
簡単に作れて美味しいくて人気レシピを紹介しています！
料理動画で作り方を確認できるので、初心者の方でも
安心して美味しい料理を作ることができますよ〜！

朝ごはん/昼ごはん/晩ごはんお好きな時に作ってみてくださいね！
作り置きにしてお弁当の具材にしてもいいですね！
================================================


【材料】

調理時間：10分
材料：2人前
難易度：★☆☆

ボイルたこ…200g
万能ネギ/長ネギ...各10cm
ミニトマト…2個
鶏がらスープ...小さじ1/2
ごま油…小さじ1
塩・こしょう…適量


【作り方】

1, 茹でたたこをスライスする。万能ネギ、長ネギをみじん切りにし、ミニトマトは1/8のくし切りにする。
2, 小鉢などに顆粒の鶏がらスープを水小さじ1（分量外）で溶かし、ごま油、塩・こしょうと混ぜ合わせる。
3, 調味料にたこを和える。器に盛り、ミニトマトを飾る。



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

【Ingredients】

Cooking time: 15 minutes (+3h for cooling)
Ingredients: 2 servings
Level: ★☆☆


Boiled octopus ... 200g
Universal leek / Leek leek ... 10cm each
Mini tomatoes ... 2
Chicken soup ... 1/2 tsp
Sesame oil ... 1 tsp
Salt / pepper ... appropriate amount


[How to make]

1, Slice the boiled octopus. Minced all-purpose onions and long onions, and cut tomatoes into 1/8 combs.
2. Dissolve the granular chicken soup in a small bowl with 1 teaspoon of water (not included), mix with sesame oil, salt and pepper.
3, Add octopus to seasoning. Serve in a bowl and decorate with mini tomatoes.


チャンネル登録はこちら☆
http://urx3.nu/ZO5b




-----------------------------------------------------------------------
☆活動/SNS
Twitter：https://twitter.com/gucci_fuufu
Instagram：https://www.instagram.com/gucci_fuufu
オフィシャルレシピサイト：https://gucci-fuufu.com/
オフィシャルブログ：https://ameblo.jp/guccifuufu/
note：https://note.com/guccifuufu

▼お仕事のご依頼はお気軽にこちらから▼
[email protected]


☆動画内でよく使う調理器具
包丁メイン(Zwilling Sellmax MD67 200m)：https://amzn.to/2Nd0pxO
包丁ペティ(Zwilling Sellmax MD67 130m)：https://amzn.to/2BJr6oi
鍋(STAUB) : https://amzn.to/31NhTpw
フライパン(Ballarini)：https://amzn.to/2BGngw6

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

#タコ #簡単おかず #おつまみ #トマト #副菜 #おかず #時短 #簡単 #作り方

ใกล้วันวาเลนไทน์เข้ามาทุกทีๆแล้วนะคะ ฟ้าเลยทำลุคนี้ขี้นมท เหมาะสำหรับไปออกเดทแรก หรือเหมาะสำหรับสาวๆที่มีแฟนชอบแต่งหน้าอ่อนๆเบาๆ 55555 ลุคนี้เป็นลุคที่แต่งง่ายมากๆ และฟ้าคิดว่ามันละมุนมากเลยค่ะทุกคน ฟ้าอยากให้เพื่อนๆลองแต่งตามดูนะคะ รับรองว่าแฟนรักแฟนหลงไปเลย 555555

Products in the video
MERCI Vitamin C Extra Bright Serum
Lin Super Perfect Powder Foundation
Benefit Hoola bronzing powder
Kate Designing Eyebrow
Merrezca eyebrow slim mascara
KMA Peach Mellow Granular Eye
L´oreal Voluminous False Fiber Lashes
VER.88 Silky Touch Powder Blush No. V2
Srichand Enchanted Forever Matte Liquid Lip no.13
Cute Press Let the Adventure Begin Cashmere Lip Crayon

Follow me
IG _faahh --- https://www.instagram.com/_faahh/
facebook underfaahh --- https://www.facebook.com/underfaahh/
Twitter underfaahh --- https://twitter.com/underfaahh

? 新正如意 新年发财 ซินเจียยู่อี่ ซินนี้ฮวดไช้ ? ตรุษจีนปีนี้แก้มขอให้ทุกคนมีความสุข เฮงๆ รวยๆ กันนะคะ

วันนี้มาในลุคคุณหนูร้านทอง(ม้วน) 55555 บอกเลยว่าลุคนี้สวยปัง!! จะเป็นอาหมวย อาอี๊ หรืออาซ้อ ก็แต่งตามได้ง่ายๆ ที่สำคัญคือใช้เครื่องสำอางถูกและดี พร้อมแล้ว ไปแต่งลุคนี้รับอั่งเปากันเลยค่าา ...

ลุคนี้แก้มใช้เครื่องสำอาง ตามนี้เลย:
ODBO OOPS EUTEST COLLECTION LIQUID FOUNDATION #เบอร์21
NAMI MAKEUP PRO SEOUL GIRLS FULL COVER CONCEALER (เบอร์ NATURAL BASE)
ETUDE HOUSE PLAY 101 STICK CONTOUR DUO
SO MERRIS SAY GROWING FOUNDATION POWDER #เบอร์2
NYX PROFESSIONAL MAKEUP 3 STEPS TO SCULPT PALETTE
SIVANNA COLORS EYEBROW CONTOURING KIT
MAYBELLINE THE CITY MINI EYESHADOW PALETTE
4U2 LOVE ME HARDER2 #21 HOT NICKI
MAYBELLINE VOLUM’ EXPRESS THE MAGNUM MASCARA
1028 VISUAL THERAPY INFINITY EYELINER
MAYBELLINE COLOR SENSATIONAL CREAMY MATTE #SIREN IN SCARLET
KMA PEACH MELLOW GRANULAR EYE
CATHY DOLL FLASH ME BAKED LIGHTING POWDER