雖然這篇Convulsed鄉民發文沒有被收入到精華區:在Convulsed這個話題中,我們另外找到其它相關的精選爆讚文章
在 convulsed產品中有1篇Facebook貼文,粉絲數超過53萬的網紅黃之鋒 Joshua Wong,也在其Facebook貼文中提到, 泰晤士報人物專訪【Joshua Wong interview: Xi won’t win this battle, says Hong Kong activist】 Beijing believes punitive prison sentences will put an end to pro-...
同時也有1部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過75萬的網紅志祺七七 X 圖文不符,也在其Youtube影片中提到,✔︎ 成為七七會員(幫助我們繼續日更,並享有會員專屬福利):http://bit.ly/shasha77_member ✔︎ 體驗志祺七七文章版:https://blog.simpleinfo.cc/shasha77 ✔︎ 購買黃臭泥周邊商品: https://reurl.cc/Ezkbma 💛 ✔...
-
convulsed 在 志祺七七 X 圖文不符 Youtube 的最讚貼文
2021-09-21 11:00:24✔︎ 成為七七會員(幫助我們繼續日更,並享有會員專屬福利):http://bit.ly/shasha77_member
✔︎ 體驗志祺七七文章版:https://blog.simpleinfo.cc/shasha77
✔︎ 購買黃臭泥周邊商品: https://reurl.cc/Ezkbma 💛
✔︎ 訂閱志祺七七頻道: http://bit.ly/shasha77_subscribe
✔︎ 追蹤志祺IG :https://www.instagram.com/shasha77.daily
✔︎ 來看志祺七七粉專 :http://bit.ly/shasha77_fb
✔︎ 如果不便加入會員,也可從這裡贊助我們:https://bit.ly/support-shasha77
(請記得在贊助頁面留下您的email,以便我們寄送發票。若遇到金流問題,麻煩請聯繫:service@simpleinfo.cc)
--
#史瓦濟蘭 #外交
各節重點:
00:00 開頭
01:19【動畫一分鐘】廣告段落
02:09 從「史瓦濟蘭」到「史瓦帝尼」
03:00 史瓦帝尼是怎樣的國家?
04:20 跟中華民國超麻吉?!
05:36 為什麼我們在非洲沒朋友?
06:41 近期的抗爭活動
07:56 我們的觀點
09:40 問題
09:58 結尾
【 製作團隊 】
|企劃:子觀 Tzu-Kuan/關節
|腳本:子觀 Tzu-Kuan
|編輯:土龍
|剪輯後製:鎮宇
|剪輯助理:珊珊
|演出:志祺
——
【 本集參考資料 】
→在世衛大會上力挺台灣 史瓦帝尼是什麼樣的國家?:https://bbc.in/396plSY
→Support for SADC Troika Mission; Inclusive Dialogue Urgently Needed to Calm Tensions :https://bit.ly/2XciZ1E
→Pro-Democracy Protests Continue In Eswatini, Africa's Last Absolute Monarchy:https://n.pr/3EdUpyl
→UN voices deep concern over reported deaths of protesters in Kingdom of Eswatini:https://bit.ly/2VD0GCe
→eSwatini - Taiwan's last friend in Africa:https://bbc.in/3tRIW2Z
→5 Facts You Need to Know About Eswatini as Pro-Democracy Protests Rage:https://bit.ly/3AcjMy3
→eSwatini tests the limits of its absolute monarchy:https://bit.ly/3nqxI4a
→Africa’s Last Absolute Monarchy Convulsed by Mass Protests:https://nyti.ms/3Cbfo3a
→百年瞬间丨周恩来提出中国援外八项原则:https://bit.ly/3nuILJy
→一帶一路在非洲》鋼索上的「中非命運共同體」,中國大撒幣埋下非洲債務危機:https://bit.ly/3nuIxlG
→非洲逐鹿・開創未來 嚴震生 主講:https://youtu.be/N70g0k5sep8
→原史瓦濟蘭 跟台死忠兼換帖:https://bit.ly/3Cb1xde
→非洲唯一的台灣邦交國陷入動亂!人民要求改革,軍警血腥鎮壓,國王被傳流亡:https://www.storm.mg/article/3793636
→不只拚外交!「王子公主」激發大學國際化:https://bit.ly/3k9eKwY
→外交休兵! 馬英九非洲愛玩瘋?:https://bit.ly/3tDq2fX
→台灣與大陸在非洲的外交戰場 史瓦帝尼局勢動盪引關注:https://bit.ly/3Ejz32S
→1小時連發3文炫耀建交 中國外長:非洲「大團圓」只差1國:https://bit.ly/3Ah8EQQ
→UH-1H直升機正式除役 部分轉贈友邦史瓦帝尼:https://bit.ly/3ljVDzD
【 延伸閱讀 】
→聽我說 融融歷險記 非洲唯一的友邦史瓦帝尼,他們的防疫政策有比我們好嗎?:https://bit.ly/2VDClMD
\每週7天,每天7點,每次7分鐘,和我們一起了解更多有趣的生活議題吧!/
🥁七七仔們如果想寄東西關懷七七團隊與志祺,傳送門如下:
106台北市大安區羅斯福路二段111號8樓
🟢如有引用本頻道影片與相關品牌識別素材,請遵循此規範:http://bit.ly/shasha77_authorization
🟡如有業務需求,請洽:hi77@simpleinfo.cc
🔴如果影片內容有誤,歡迎來信勘誤:hey77@simpleinfo.cc
convulsed 在 黃之鋒 Joshua Wong Facebook 的最佳解答
泰晤士報人物專訪【Joshua Wong interview: Xi won’t win this battle, says Hong Kong activist】
Beijing believes punitive prison sentences will put an end to pro-democracy protests. It couldn’t be more wrong, the 23-year-old says.
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/joshua-wong-interview-xi-wont-win-this-battle-says-hong-kong-activist-p52wlmd0t
For Joshua Wong, activism began early and in his Hong Kong school canteen. The 13-year-old was so appalled by the bland, oily meals served for lunch at the United Christian College that he organised a petition to lobby for better fare. His precocious behaviour earned him and his parents a summons to the headmaster’s office. His mother played peacemaker, but the episode delivered a valuable message to the teenage rebel.
“It was an important lesson in political activism,” Wong concluded. “You can try as hard as you want, but until you force them to pay attention, those in power won’t listen to you.”
It was also the first stage in a remarkable journey that has transformed the bespectacled, geeky child into the globally recognised face of Hong Kong’s struggle for democracy. Wong is the most prominent international advocate for the protests that have convulsed the former British colony since last summer.
At 23, few people would have the material for a memoir. But that is certainly not a problem for Wong, whose book, #UnfreeSpeech, will be published in Britain this week.
We meet in a cafe in the Admiralty district, amid the skyscrapers of Hong Kong’s waterfront, close to the site of the most famous scenes in his decade of protest. Wong explains that he remains optimistic about his home city’s prospects in its showdown with the might of communist China under President Xi Jinping.
“It’s not enough just to be dissidents or youth activists. We really need to enter politics and make some change inside the institution,” says Wong, hinting at his own ambitions to pursue elected office.
He has been jailed twice for his activism. He could face a third stint as a result of a case now going through the courts, a possibility he treats with equanimity. “Others have been given much longer sentences,” he says. Indeed, 7,000 people have been arrested since the protests broke out some seven months ago; 1,000 of them have been charged, with many facing a sentence of as much as 10 years.
There is a widespread belief that Beijing hopes such sentences will dampen support for future protests. Wong brushes off that argument. “It’s gone too far. Who would imagine that Generation Z and the millennials would be confronting rubber bullets and teargas, and be fully engaged in politics, instead of Instagram or Snapchat? The Hong Kong government may claim the worst is over, but Hong Kong will never be peaceful as long as police violence persists.”
In Unfree Speech, Wong argues that China is not only Hong Kong’s problem (the book’s subtitle is: The Threat to Global Democracy and Why We Must Act, Now). “It is an urgent message that people need to defend their rights, against China and other authoritarians, wherever they live,” he says.
At the heart of the book are Wong’s prison writings from a summer spent behind bars in 2017. Each evening in his cell, “I sat on my hard bed and put pen to paper under dim light” to tell his story.
Wong was born in October 1996, nine months before Britain ceded control of Hong Kong to Beijing. That makes him a fire rat, the same sign of the Chinese zodiac that was celebrated on the first day of the lunar new year yesterday. Fire rats are held to be adventurous, rebellious and garrulous. Wong is a Christian and does not believe in astrology, but those personality traits seem close to the mark.
His parents are Christians — his father quit his job in IT to become a pastor, while his mother works at a community centre that provides counselling — and named their son after the prophet who led the Israelites to the promised land.
Like many young people in Hong Kong, whose housing market has been ranked as the world’s most unaffordable, he still lives at home, in South Horizons, a commuter community on the south side of the main island.
Wong was a dyslexic but talkative child, telling jokes in church groups and bombarding his elders with questions about their faith. “By speaking confidently, I was able to make up for my weaknesses,” he writes. “The microphone loved me and I loved it even more.”
In 2011, he and a group of friends, some of whom are his fellow activists today, launched Scholarism, a student activist group, to oppose the introduction of “moral and national education” to their school curriculum — code for communist brainwashing, critics believed. “I lived the life of Peter Parker,” he says. “Like Spider-Man’s alter-ego, I went to class during the day and rushed out to fight evil after school.”
The next year, the authorities issued a teaching manual that hailed the Chinese Communist Party as an “advanced and selfless regime”. For Wong, “it confirmed all our suspicions and fears about communist propaganda”.
In August 2012, members of Scholarism launched an occupation protest outside the Hong Kong government’s headquarters. Wong told a crowd of 120,000 students and parents: “Tonight we have one message and one message only: withdraw the brainwashing curriculum. We’ve had enough of this government. Hong Kongers will prevail.”
Remarkably, the kids won. Leung Chun-ying, the territory’s chief executive at the time, backed down. Buoyed by their success, the youngsters of Scholarism joined forces with other civil rights groups to protest about the lack of progress towards electing the next chief executive by universal suffrage — laid out as a goal in the Basic Law, Hong Kong’s constitution. Their protests culminated in the “umbrella movement” occupation of central Hong Kong for 79 days in 2014.
Two years later, Wong and other leaders set up a political group, Demosisto. He has always been at pains to emphasise he is not calling for independence — a complete red line for Beijing. Demosisto has even dropped the words “self-determination” from its stated goals — perhaps to ease prospects for its candidates in elections to Legco, the territory’s legislative council, in September.
Wong won’t say whether he will stand himself, but he is emphatically political, making a plea for change from within — not simply for anger on the streets — and for stepping up international pressure: “I am one of the facilitators to let the voices of Hong Kong people be heard in the international community, especially since 2016.”
There are tensions between moderates and radicals. Some of the hardliners on the streets last year considered Wong already to be part of the Establishment, a backer of the failed protests of the past.
So why bother? What’s the point of a city of seven million taking on one of the world’s nastiest authoritarian states, with a population of about 1.4 billion? And in any case, won’t it all be over in 2047, the end of the “one country, two systems” deal agreed between China and Britain, which was supposed to guarantee a high degree of autonomy for another 50 years? Does he fear tanks and a repetition of the Tiananmen Square killings?
Wong acknowledges there are gloomy scenarios but remains a robust optimist. “Freedom and democracy can prevail in the same way that they did in eastern Europe, even though before the Berlin Wall fell, few people believed it would happen.”
He is tired of the predictions of think-tank pundits, journalists and the like. Three decades ago, with the implosion of communism in the Soviet bloc, many were confidently saying that the demise of the people’s republic was only a matter of time. Jump forward 20 years, amid the enthusiasm after the Beijing Olympics, and they were predicting market reforms and a growing middle class would presage liberalisation.
Neither scenario has unfolded, Wong notes. “They are pretending to hold the crystal ball to predict the future, but look at their record and it is clear no one knows what will happen by 2047. Will the Communist Party even still exist?”
https://www.penguin.co.uk/books/111/1119445/unfree-speech