[爆卦]Contiguous pytorch是什麼?優點缺點精華區懶人包

雖然這篇Contiguous pytorch鄉民發文沒有被收入到精華區:在Contiguous pytorch這個話題中,我們另外找到其它相關的精選爆讚文章

在 contiguous產品中有16篇Facebook貼文,粉絲數超過6,071的網紅Jacky 玩具匣,也在其Facebook貼文中提到, Ultimate Godzilla FREE SHIPPING TO THE CONTIGUOUS U.S.! 不是one12 系列的 Ships Aug - Oct 2022 美國免運,好大隻。 此項目免費運送到美國本土 請注意:由於圖很大,強烈建議您不要在高於 3 英尺高的表面上顯示。 怪獸之王...

 同時也有4部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過3萬的網紅Software Surfing,也在其Youtube影片中提到,Beautiful Brunei Thanks to sizeable deposits of oil and gas, the tiny tropical sultanate of Brunei Darussalam has one of the highest standards of liv...

  • contiguous 在 Jacky 玩具匣 Facebook 的最讚貼文

    2021-09-17 00:32:53
    有 16 人按讚

    Ultimate Godzilla
    FREE SHIPPING TO THE CONTIGUOUS U.S.!
    不是one12 系列的
    Ships Aug - Oct 2022
    美國免運,好大隻。
    此項目免費運送到美國本土
    請注意:由於圖很大,強烈建議您不要在高於 3 英尺高的表面上顯示。
    怪獸之王哥斯拉將統治您的收藏!
    終極哥斯拉的細節和尺寸都非常巨大,從牙齒到尾巴有 3 英尺長!他的特點是 10 個關節點,包括一個鉸接的下巴和一個帶有內部骨架電樞的尾巴,該骨架經久耐用但非常靈活。
    這個巨大的怪獸具有燈光和聲音,通過隱藏在他背上的按鈕激活。按下這些按鈕可以激活哥斯拉的點亮功能和/或聽到他可怕的咆哮!
    終極哥斯拉人偶包裝在一個收藏家友好的盒子裡,適合國王,非常適合展示。
    This item ships FREE to the contiguous U.S.
    PLEASE NOTE: Due to the substantial size of the figure, it is strongly recommended that you do not display on surfaces above 3’ high.
    Godzilla, King of the Monsters, is here to rule over your collection!
    Immense in detail and size, Ultimate Godzilla measures a gargantuan 3 feet from teeth to tail! He features 10 points of articulation including a hinged jaw, and a tail with an internal skeleton armature that is durable yet highly posable.
    This colossal kaiju features lights and sound, activated via buttons discreetly hidden on his back. Depress these buttons to activate Godzilla’s light-up function and/or to hear his monstrous roar!
    The Ultimate Godzilla figure comes packaged in a collector-friendly box, fit for a King and perfect for display.
    *This product is intended for collectors ages 15 and up and is not suitable for children. The product may contain small parts that can be a choking hazard as well as sharp points that can cause injury. The item is not designed for rough play and is considered a display item for collectors.

  • contiguous 在 Facebook 的最讚貼文

    2021-04-01 17:46:25
    有 603 人按讚

    #心肌梗塞的心電圖診斷

    急性心肌梗塞在心電圖上最早出現的是鄰近兩個導程的超急性對稱型T波幅度升高(hyperacute T change),緊接著是ST波段上升。

    J點 (J Point): QRS波的終點與ST波段起始點的交界點,即為J點,是用來決定ST波段改變的大小的基準點。

    依據2018 MI 定義,心肌缺氧的心電圖都需要出現在同組群(contiguous)兩個導程上,才能符合診斷。例如對大於40歲男性而言,V2之ST上升 >0.2 mV,V1>0.1 mV,則符合心肌梗塞的診斷。但如果是男性其ST上升只出現在V2,V3,且 >0.1 mV,及<0.2 mV,結果是正常的。如果是女性, V2, V3 的ST上升<0.15 mV,亦是正常。

    #病理性Q波(Pathological Q wave)

    無LVH 及LBBB之前提之下,先前的心肌梗塞的Q波(亦即病理性Q波),其特點如下:

    1. V2–V3的Q波 ≥ 0.02 秒,或V2及V3出現QS波
    2. 在I, II, aVL, aVF 之Q波 ≥ 0.03秒,深度 ≥ 1mm
    3. Q波出現在V4-V6之同組群任何兩個導程(I, aVL;V1–V6;II, III, aVF)
    3. V1-V2的R波 ≥ 0.04秒及R/S >1,及同向的T波變化(無傳導阻滯情況下)

    Q波的意義:

    1.Q波可以是心肌纖維化而產生,而沒有冠狀動脈疾病。
    2.心肌受損後,數分鐘至小時後出現的Q波意味著心肌壞死。
    3.急性心肌缺氧早期,或急性心肌梗塞立即實施血管再通暢治療,都可能出現短暫的Q波。

    #LBBB患者的心肌梗塞心電圖

    在所有因急性冠心症就診的病人中, 心電圖呈現LBB者約佔2%。這些人通常較多為年老、女性、有心臟病史、高血壓與心衰竭。長期追蹤來看,心電圖呈現LBBB且疑似AMI的患者,統計起來有較高的major adverse cardiac events (MACE) 比率。

    LBBB患者的心肌梗塞心電圖
    Sgarbossa Criteria (1996)

    (1)任意導程出現同向 (concordant) 的ST elevation ≥1mm (最重要),
    (2) V1, V2或V3出現ST depression ≥1mm,
    (3)任意導程出現反向 (discordant) 的 ST elevation ≥ 15mm,
    Sgarbossa Criteria第3條件比較爭議,敏感度與專一度不足信賴。Dr Smith SW在2012提出改版。原來的第三要件:任意導程出現反向 (discordant) 的 ST elevation ≥ 5 mm,改為ST上升/S波深度≥ 25%

    Smith-Modified Sgarbossa Criteria (2012)
    (1)任意導程出現同向 (concordant) 的ST elevation ≥1mm,
    (2) V1, V2或V3出現ST depression ≥1mm,
    (3)任意導程出現反向 (discordant) 的 ST上升/S波深度≥ 25%

    2018 ESC/ACC/AHA提出的更簡化:
    任意導程出現同向 (concordant) 的ST elevation ≥1mm,即可診斷LBBB患者的心肌梗塞

    #AMI
    #ECG
    #LBBB
    #Pathological_Q_wave

    繼續閱讀詳細內容↓↓↓#

  • contiguous 在 Mordeth13 Facebook 的最佳解答

    2021-03-09 12:04:03
    有 14 人按讚

    Jenna Cody :

    Is Taiwan a real China?
    No, and with the exception of a few intervening decades - here’s the part that’ll surprise you - it never has been.

    This’ll blow your mind too: that it never has been doesn’t matter.

    So let’s start with what doesn’t actually matter.

    Until the 1600s, Taiwan was indigenous. Indigenous Taiwanese are not Chinese, they’re Austronesian. Then it was a Dutch colony (note: I do not say “it was Dutch”, I say it was a Dutch colony). Then it was taken over by Ming loyalists at the end of the Ming dynasty (the Ming loyalists were breakaways, not a part of the new Qing court. Any overlap in Ming rule and Ming loyalist conquest of Taiwan was so brief as to be inconsequential).

    Only then, in the late 1600s, was it taken over by the Chinese (Qing). But here’s the thing, it was more like a colony of the Qing, treated as - to use Emma Teng’s wording in Taiwan’s Imagined Geography - a barrier or barricade keeping the ‘real’ Qing China safe. In fact, the Qing didn’t even want Taiwan at first, the emperor called it “a ball of mud beyond the pale of civilization”. Prior to that, and to a great extent at that time, there was no concept on the part of China that Taiwan was Chinese, even though Chinese immigrants began moving to Taiwan under Dutch colonial rule (mostly encouraged by the Dutch, to work as laborers). When the Spanish landed in the north of Taiwan, it was the Dutch, not the Chinese, who kicked them out.

    Under Qing colonial rule - and yes, I am choosing my words carefully - China only controlled the Western half of Taiwan. They didn’t even have maps for the eastern half. That’s how uninterested in it they were. I can’t say that the Qing controlled “Taiwan”, they only had power over part of it.

    Note that the Qing were Manchu, which at the time of their conquest had not been a part of China: China itself essentially became a Manchu imperial holding, and Taiwan did as well, once they were convinced it was not a “ball of mud” but actually worth taking. Taiwan was not treated the same way as the rest of “Qing China”, and was not administered as a province until (I believe) 1887. So that’s around 200 years of Taiwan being a colony of the Qing.

    What happened in the late 19th century to change China’s mind? Japan. A Japanese ship was shipwrecked in eastern Taiwan in the 1870s, and the crew was killed by hostile indigenous people in what is known as the Mudan Incident. A Japanese emissary mission went to China to inquire about what could be done, only to be told that China had no control there and if they went to eastern Taiwan, they did so at their own peril. China had not intended to imply that Taiwan wasn’t theirs, but they did. Japan - and other foreign powers, as France also attempted an invasion - were showing an interest in Taiwan, so China decided to cement its claim, started mapping the entire island, and made it a province.

    So, I suppose for a decade or so Taiwan was a part of China. A China that no longer exists.

    It remained a province until 1895, when it was ceded to Japan after the (first) Sino-Japanese War. Before that could happen, Taiwan declared itself a Republic, although it was essentially a Qing puppet state (though the history here is interesting - correspondence at the time indicates that the leaders of this ‘Republic of Taiwan’ considered themselves Chinese, and the tiger flag hints at this as well. However, the constitution was a very republican document, not something you’d expect to see in Qing-era China.) That lasted for less than a year, when the Japanese took it by force.

    This is important for two reasons - the first is that some interpretations of IR theory state that when a colonial holding is released, it should revert to the state it was in before it was taken as a colony. In this case, that would actually be The Republic of Taiwan, not Qing-era China. Secondly, it puts to rest all notions that there was no Taiwan autonomy movement prior to 1947.

    In any case, it would be impossible to revert to its previous state, as the government that controlled it - the Qing empire - no longer exists. The current government of China - the PRC - has never controlled it.

    After the Japanese colonial era, there is a whole web of treaties and agreements that do not satisfactorily settle the status of Taiwan. None of them actually do so - those which explicitly state that Taiwan is to be given to the Republic of China (such as the Cairo declaration) are non-binding. Those that are binding do not settle the status of Taiwan (neither the treaty of San Francisco nor the Treaty of Taipei definitively say that Taiwan is a part of China, or even which China it is - the Treaty of Taipei sets out what nationality the Taiwanese are to be considered, but that doesn’t determine territorial claims). Treaty-wise, the status of Taiwan is “undetermined”.

    Under more modern interpretations, what a state needs to be a state is…lessee…a contiguous territory, a government, a military, a currency…maybe I’m forgetting something, but Taiwan has all of it. For all intents and purposes it is independent already.

    In fact, in the time when all of these agreements were made, the Allied powers weren’t as sure as you might have learned about what to do with Taiwan. They weren’t a big fan of Chiang Kai-shek, didn’t want it to go Communist, and discussed an Allied trusteeship (which would have led to independence) or backing local autonomy movements (which did exist). That it became what it did - “the ROC” but not China - was an accident (as Hsiao-ting Lin lays out in Accidental State).

    In fact, the KMT knew this, and at the time the foreign minister (George Yeh) stated something to the effect that they were aware they were ‘squatters’ in Taiwan.

    Since then, it’s true that the ROC claims to be the rightful government of Taiwan, however, that hardly matters when considering the future of Taiwan simply because they have no choice. To divest themselves of all such claims (and, presumably, change their name) would be considered by the PRC to be a declaration of formal independence. So that they have not done so is not a sign that they wish to retain the claim, merely that they wish to avoid a war.

    It’s also true that most Taiwanese are ethnically “Han” (alongside indigenous and Hakka, although Hakka are, according to many, technically Han…but I don’t think that’s relevant here). But biology is not destiny: what ethnicity someone is shouldn’t determine what government they must be ruled by.

    Through all of this, the Taiwanese have evolved their own culture, identity and sense of history. They are diverse in a way unique to Taiwan, having been a part of Austronesian and later Hoklo trade routes through Southeast Asia for millenia. Now, one in five (I’ve heard one in four, actually) Taiwanese children has a foreign parent. The Taiwanese language (which is not Mandarin - that’s a KMT transplant language forced on Taiwanese) is gaining popularity as people discover their history. Visiting Taiwan and China, it is clear where the cultural differences are, not least in terms of civic engagement. This morning, a group of legislators were removed after a weekend-long pro-labor hunger strike in front of the presidential palace. They were not arrested and will not be. Right now, a group of pro-labor protesters is lying down on the tracks at Taipei Main Station to protest the new labor law amendments.

    This would never be allowed in China, but Taiwanese take it as a fiercely-guarded basic right.

    *

    Now, as I said, none of this matters.

    What matters is self-determination. If you believe in democracy, you believe that every state (and Taiwan does fit the definition of a state) that wants to be democratic - that already is democratic and wishes to remain that way - has the right to self-determination. In fact, every nation does. You cannot be pro-democracy and also believe that it is acceptable to deprive people of this right, especially if they already have it.

    Taiwan is already a democracy. That means it has the right to determine its own future. Period.

    Even under the ROC, Taiwan was not allowed to determine its future. The KMT just arrived from China and claimed it. The Taiwanese were never asked if they consented. What do we call it when a foreign government arrives in land they had not previously governed and declares itself the legitimate governing power of that land without the consent of the local people? We call that colonialism.

    Under this definition, the ROC can also be said to be a colonial power in Taiwan. They forced Mandarin - previously not a language native to Taiwan - onto the people, taught Chinese history, geography and culture, and insisted that the Taiwanese learn they were Chinese - not Taiwanese (and certainly not Japanese). This was forced on them. It was not chosen. Some, for awhile, swallowed it. Many didn’t. The independence movement only grew, and truly blossomed after democratization - something the Taiwanese fought for and won, not something handed to them by the KMT.

    So what matters is what the Taiwanese want, not what the ROC is forced to claim. I cannot stress this enough - if you do not believe Taiwan has the right to this, you do not believe in democracy.

    And poll after poll shows it: Taiwanese identify more as Taiwanese than Chinese (those who identify as both primarily identify as Taiwanese, just as I identify as American and Armenian, but primarily as American. Armenian is merely my ethnicity). They overwhelmingly support not unifying with China. The vast majority who support the status quo support one that leads to eventual de jure independence, not unification. The status quo is not - and cannot be - an endgame (if only because China has declared so, but also because it is untenable). Less than 10% want unification. Only a small number (a very small minority) would countenance unification in the future…even if China were to democratize.

    The issue isn’t the incompatibility of the systems - it’s that the Taiwanese fundamentally do not see themselves as Chinese.

    A change in China’s system won’t change that. It’s not an ethnic nationalism - there is no ethnic argument for Taiwan (or any nation - didn’t we learn in the 20th century what ethnicity-based nation-building leads to? Nothing good). It’s not a jingoistic or xenophobic nationalism - Taiwanese know that to be dangerous. It’s a nationalism based on shared identity, culture, history and civics. The healthiest kind of nationalism there is. Taiwan exists because the Taiwanese identify with it. Period.

    There are debates about how long the status quo should go on, and what we should risk to insist on formal recognition. However, the question of whether or not to be Taiwan, not China…

    …well, that’s already settled.

    The Taiwanese have spoken and they are not Chinese.

    Whatever y’all think about that doesn’t matter. That’s what they want, and if you believe in self-determination you will respect it.

    If you don’t, good luck with your authoritarian nonsense, but Taiwan wants nothing to do with it.

  • contiguous 在 Software Surfing Youtube 的最佳貼文

    2020-01-12 13:11:52

    Beautiful Brunei

    Thanks to sizeable deposits of oil and gas, the tiny tropical sultanate of Brunei Darussalam has one of the highest standards of living in the world. Its two non-contiguous territories, situated on the northern coast of Borneo in South-East Asia, are home to some of the region's most pristine rain forest habitats.
    The country only gained independence in 1984, but has the world's oldest reigning monarchy and centuries of royal heritage. At the helm of the only remaining Malay Islamic monarchy in the world, the Sultan of Brunei comes from a family line that dates back over 600 years. The current sultan, His Majesty Sultan Haji Hassanal Bolkiah, has been on the throne for 43 years and is one of the world's richest individuals.
    Visitors to the "Abode of Peace" (the literal translation of darussalam) will find the country surprisingly laid-back and relaxing. In addition to admiring the gilded domes, towering minarets and extraordinary ornamentation of two landmark mosques in the capital, Bandar Seri Begawan, tourists can explore water villages by boat and on foot, learn about local culture in several interesting museums, sample delicious Malay cuising (some of the best can be found at open-air markets), and experience the incredibly biodiversity of the Bornean rain forest in Ulu Temburong National Park.

    得益於大量的石油和天然氣,汶萊達魯薩蘭國的熱帶小蘇丹國成為世界上生活水平最高的國家之一。它的兩個非毗連領土位於東南亞婆羅洲北部海岸,是該地區一些最原始的雨林棲息地的所在地
    汶萊直到1984年才獲得獨立,但擁有世界上最古老的君主立憲制和幾個世紀的皇家遺產。 汶萊蘇丹是世界上僅存的馬來伊斯蘭君主制的掌舵者,其家族血統可追溯到600年前。現任蘇丹國王已登基43年,是世界上最富有的人之一。
    參觀“和平之地”(達魯薩蘭國的字面意思)的遊客會發現該國出乎意料地悠閒自在。除了欣賞首都的鍍金圓頂聳立的宣禮塔和兩個地標清真寺的非凡裝飾之外,遊客還可以乘船和步行探索水上村莊,在幾個有趣的博物館中了解當地文化,品嚐美味的馬來人美食,一些最好的產品可以在露天市場找到,並在烏魯天布瑯國家公園體驗婆羅洲雨林的生物多樣性。

  • contiguous 在 Shiney Youtube 的最佳解答

    2019-03-06 21:35:03

    Anthem พากย์ไทย

    Anthem is an online multiplayer action role-playing video game developed by BioWare and published by Electronic Arts. The game was released worldwide for Microsoft Windows, PlayStation 4 and Xbox One on February 22, 2019.

    Set on an unnamed planet, players assume the role of a Freelancer: heroic adventurers who wear powerful exosuits to defend humanity from the threats beyond their cities' walls. The game's title refers to the Anthem of Creation, a powerful and mysterious force responsible for most of the extraordinary technology, phenomena, and threats in the world. In the main narrative, the player's Freelancer is tasked with stopping a villain named The Monitor from seizing control of the Anthem.

    Anthem received mixed reviews from critics, who criticized it for its grind, technical aspects, and story, contributing to an experience that felt repetitive and shallow, although its combat, flight controls, and visuals received some praise.

    Anthem combines third-person shooter and action role-playing game elements in a "contiguous open world" shared with up to three other players in which they take the role of a Freelancer donning fully customizable exosuits called Javelins. These suits can be customized to have various unique weapons and superhuman abilities. Two classes of Javelins were shown during Anthem's presentation at Microsoft's E3 2017 Conference: the Ranger, which is an all-around and balanced Javelin, and the Colossus, which is a larger and more heavily armored Javelin made to fill in more of a tanking role. Other Javelins include the Storm, which uses powerful technology to unleash the "rage of the hymn" while floating effortlessly in the air, and the Interceptor, which is focused on close-quarter combat and can move quickly into and out of combat.

    Players can build relationships with various non-playable characters, but they cannot establish romantic relationships with them, as was a trademark of previous BioWare games. The central meeting point of the game takes place in Fort Tarsis, the central stronghold of Anthem. Built by the eponymous General Helena Tarsis, it serves as a fortified settlement against the threats of the outside world and is also the point where the player goes to receive new missions and freelance assignments. It is a melting pot where all the different factions of the game meet, including the Sentinels, Corvus, Cyphers, and Arcanists.

    The game features both single-player and co-operative multiplayer elements in a "shared world" that can have up to four squad members per team. Teams can fight savage beasts and ruthless marauders while exploring lost ruins and experiencing massive, world-altering terrain occurrences, such as "Shaper Storms".

  • contiguous 在 Shiney Youtube 的最讚貼文

    2019-03-05 16:04:00

    Anthem พากย์ไทย

    Anthem is an online multiplayer action role-playing video game developed by BioWare and published by Electronic Arts. The game was released worldwide for Microsoft Windows, PlayStation 4 and Xbox One on February 22, 2019.

    Set on an unnamed planet, players assume the role of a Freelancer: heroic adventurers who wear powerful exosuits to defend humanity from the threats beyond their cities' walls. The game's title refers to the Anthem of Creation, a powerful and mysterious force responsible for most of the extraordinary technology, phenomena, and threats in the world. In the main narrative, the player's Freelancer is tasked with stopping a villain named The Monitor from seizing control of the Anthem.

    Anthem received mixed reviews from critics, who criticized it for its grind, technical aspects, and story, contributing to an experience that felt repetitive and shallow, although its combat, flight controls, and visuals received some praise.

    Anthem combines third-person shooter and action role-playing game elements in a "contiguous open world" shared with up to three other players in which they take the role of a Freelancer donning fully customizable exosuits called Javelins. These suits can be customized to have various unique weapons and superhuman abilities. Two classes of Javelins were shown during Anthem's presentation at Microsoft's E3 2017 Conference: the Ranger, which is an all-around and balanced Javelin, and the Colossus, which is a larger and more heavily armored Javelin made to fill in more of a tanking role. Other Javelins include the Storm, which uses powerful technology to unleash the "rage of the hymn" while floating effortlessly in the air, and the Interceptor, which is focused on close-quarter combat and can move quickly into and out of combat.

    Players can build relationships with various non-playable characters, but they cannot establish romantic relationships with them, as was a trademark of previous BioWare games. The central meeting point of the game takes place in Fort Tarsis, the central stronghold of Anthem. Built by the eponymous General Helena Tarsis, it serves as a fortified settlement against the threats of the outside world and is also the point where the player goes to receive new missions and freelance assignments. It is a melting pot where all the different factions of the game meet, including the Sentinels, Corvus, Cyphers, and Arcanists.

    The game features both single-player and co-operative multiplayer elements in a "shared world" that can have up to four squad members per team. Teams can fight savage beasts and ruthless marauders while exploring lost ruins and experiencing massive, world-altering terrain occurrences, such as "Shaper Storms".

你可能也想看看

搜尋相關網站