雖然這篇Affront synonym鄉民發文沒有被收入到精華區：在Affront synonym這個話題中，我們另外找到其它相關的精選爆讚文章
在 affront產品中有30篇Facebook貼文，粉絲數超過0的網紅，也在其Facebook貼文中提到， Discovering the truth behind President Tsai Ing-wen’s thesis is the responsibility of intellectuals and the media. Six months ago, prosecutors sought ...
同時也有10000部Youtube影片，追蹤數超過2,910的網紅コバにゃんチャンネル，也在其Youtube影片中提到，...
-
affront 在 コバにゃんチャンネル Youtube 的最佳解答
2021-10-01 13:19:08![post-title]()
-
affront 在 大象中醫 Youtube 的最讚貼文
2021-10-01 13:10:45![post-title]()
-
affront 在 大象中醫 Youtube 的最佳解答
2021-10-01 13:09:56![post-title]()
affront 在 Facebook 的最佳貼文
Discovering the truth behind President Tsai Ing-wen’s thesis is the responsibility of intellectuals and the media. Six months ago, prosecutors sought to charge Professor Hwan C. Lin, Professor Ho De-fen, and Dr. Dennis Peng with defamation. It was the first time an acting president brought forth a lawsuit against scholars.
For two years, anyone who doubted Tsai Ing-wen’s thesis, or even questioned it, were ridiculed by the media and legally persecuted. But, aren’t government leaders in a democratic society obligated to have the authenticity of their credentials tested? Why does the opposite prevail in Taiwan? Why can a leader who has their credentials questioned forgo providing proof and can, instead, use the judicial system to suppress those that question them?
The hallmark of a dutiful scholar is how willing they are to uphold academic integrity. A desire to authenticate Tsai’s degree is a basic reaction for anyone who considers themselves part of the academic circle. However, after Tsai sought legal action against the three scholars, the public came to understand that “questioning Tsai’s degree will get you sued.” Such a precedent is an affront to academic integrity, and an insult to intellectuals everywhere.
Can Taiwan deem itself a proud democracy if its head of state is allowed to use privilege to elevate themselves their whole life, and then escape criticism when questioned? Can Taiwan say it’s the proud democracy it claims to be when judicial mechanisms are used to enact acts of academic fraud? Martial law has been abolished for decades, and yet this country still operates like a dictatorship. Today is about transitional justice in the academic realm. Transitional justice begins when we can face our mistakes. Here, justice begins when Tsai faces her own academic fraud.
Today’s press conference is about rallying the public to stand up against authoritarianism. We call on Tsai Ing-wen to do her duty as head of state and divulge the truth about her thesis. If she refuses to do so, then the other purpose of today is to reveal the evidence we have found that uncovers that truth.
It’s time the lies ended. We will hold a press conference at the Legislative Yuan tomorrow at 10:30 a.m. Eat News will broadcast the entire event live: https://www.eatnews.co.uk/video/20210909-1/
#DennisPeng #PengWengjen #HwanCLin #HoDefen #TsaiIngwen #LSEThesisGateScandal
affront 在 Apple Daily - English Edition Facebook 的最讚貼文
The United States House Speaker Nancy Pelosi slammed the trial of Martin Lee, Jimmy Lai and other activists in Hong Kong as “an affront to the rule of law,” rallying to explore every possible option to hold China accountable.
Read more: https://bit.ly/3soBrhX
李柱銘、黎智英等九名泛民主派人士，被控前年8.18維園民陣集會後非法組織和參與遊行，美國眾議院議長佩洛西（Nancy Pelosi）發表聲明，呼籲追究北京壓制香港的責任。
____________
📱Download the app:
http://onelink.to/appledailyapp
📰 Latest news:
http://appledaily.com/engnews/
🐤 Follow us on Twitter:
https://twitter.com/appledaily_hk
💪🏻 Subscribe and show your support:
https://bit.ly/2ZYKpHP
#AppleDailyENG
affront 在 Sam Tsang 曾思瀚 Facebook 的精選貼文
"This story is not unrelated to the American dream: a story about who deserves things simply by virtue of who they are, and who doesn’t; who is instantly presumed to be a true countryman, who will be told to go back to a place they never came from. It is a story about who gets to go where, who gets to exist safely in public, and who is only there on sufferance. It is a story about who gets to be real.
"It is not a surprise that Trump has thrilled white nationalists and white supremacists, Proud Boys and xenophobes and misogynists ....
"His pitch has always been that some things belong to you not because you have earned them but because you did not have to earn them. They are your birthright, and to be denied them is an affront: Supreme Court seats, the presumption of innocence, deference from police officers, the presidency itself."
"We love you. You’re very special. Go home."
Point well made by WaPo ... something for all you Trump supporters to ponder, esp if you're Christian.