【力量訓練的「訓練量」該如何設定？】

跑者的訓練量俗稱「跑量」，單位是「公里」，所以月跑量三百是指一個月總訓練距離300公里。在力量訓練圈的「訓練量」（Training Volume）常是「總反覆次數」 （Total Repetition）的同義詞；而「月總量」就是指一個月的總反覆次數，像我們會建議初跑者的月跑量最好不要超過100公里一樣，在做重訓時，有沒有一個區間可以讓大家參考呢？下面是《The System》的作者群建議：

#以下為譯文：
以剛接觸訓練的新手來說，月總量最好從750次（總反覆次數）開始；而菁英運動員的上限設在1,600次。在前蘇聯時代，我們親眼看到他們運動員以更高的月總量進行訓練。然而，我們後來也發現這跟他們使用加強運動表現的補給品有關，那使運動員能更快恢復。

總反覆次數是指在單一個週期中（這裡是指中週期）所有基本力量動作重複次數的總合。因此總反覆次數750的意思是在不同的訓練強度與動作中總共累計的次數，但這個數字不包括輔助訓練的動作。

從帳面上來看，750這個數字分配到一個月十二到十六次課表當中，看起來似乎很小，但我們這們所定的750這個數字比較像是「基本量」，而非下限，如果總反覆次數低於750下，就不會為運動員的成長帶來實質的影響。表 4.14 中的數值並不是意味著高水平或菁英運動員在四週內的總反覆次數永遠不會有低於1,000次情況發生，那只是維持成長的基本量。對運動員的恢復能力影響最大的是訓練量，因此這些範圍中比較需要注意的是上限的數值。若月總量超過上限值，恢復能力將快速到受到侵害，而且侵害的速度比任何其他因素都快。

一位菁英水準的運動員可以在一個月的時間裡完成1,000次以下的訓練，就算在恢復期也經常發生。然而，訓練新手若超過1,000次的上限，大都要承擔受傷或嚴重過度訓練的風險。

許多教練擔心他們的運動員練不夠，所以無法有效獲得力量和爆發力的進步。他們不想因為目標定得太低而有所保留，這讓他們感覺是「浪費」了一個月的訓練時間。剛開始採用這個方法來訓練時有這種感覺很自然，我們系統中的每一位教練也都曾經歷過相同的掙扎。

美國的力量教練已經把「訓練要用盡全力」當作一種信念，訓練完還有餘力好像就會覺得不夠認真。但請相信我們。我們說的方法很少失敗，也幾乎沒有過度訓練的風險，這些區間已被證明能最有效地幫助運動員進步。

在調整運動員的訓練量時，需要考慮到他們的技巧、經驗、過去的醫療史、訓練史、性別、實際年齡與訓練年齡。

我們過去的慘痛教訓可以讓你少走許多彎路。當你在訓練量的拿捏上猶豫不決時，原則是寧少勿多。寧可因量太少沒進步，也不要犯下過量訓練的錯誤。

總訓練量不包括輔助訓練或是特別針對「局部效果」的練習次數。那些動作主要是為了強化特定肌肉或是使全身力量動作能做得更好的輔助性訓練，所以我們不會把它們算在總訓練量中。
最受我們重視的力量訓練動作不只對身體的負擔很大，技術要求也很高；正因如此，我們才會嚴格限制訓練量。

雖然輔助訓練不會被計算在總訓練量裡，但你不要因此失控，開始加練很多你想練的輔助動作。永遠記住：效率第一。

#原文如下
The absolute floor of volume for a novice athlete is 750 total exercise repetitions per month, and the ceiling for the elite athlete is 1,600 total reps. During our time in the former Soviet Republics, we witnessed athletes performing even higher monthly training volumes. However, as we found later, that was often with the benefit of performance-enhancing substances that allowed for more rapid recovery.

In a single cycle, the total number of repetitions pertains to all exercises performed in the key movements. This means 750 total repetitions are spread between the different exercises among the range of training intensities we want to emphasize.

On the surface, these can seem like small numbers when we consider they may be spread out over 12 to 16 training sessions. That 750-rep total is really more like the basement rather than the floor of total volume—any less than 750 will not budge the needle on gains. That does not mean advanced or elite-level athletes will not have cycles that dip below 1,000 reps. These ranges should be more prescriptive of the ceiling of higher volumes to avoid exceeding. Pushing monthly volume beyond these ranges erodes recovery more rapidly than any other factor.

An elite-level athlete can use a month with a total volume of under 1,000 reps, as will often be the case when returning to training. However, a novice athlete can rarely exceed the 1,000-rep ceiling without risking an injury or a significant overtraining effect.

Many coaches worry their athletes will not do enough work to promote gains in strength and power. They do not want to “waste” a month by aiming too low on total volume and leaving some gains in the tank. That is a natural feeling when adopting this method, and each of us went through the same mental struggle.

Strength coaches in America are not hard-wired to accept less than maximum. However, trust us when we say that without fail, these ranges have proven to be the most effective in generating progress with almost no risk of overtraining.

Fine-tuning where your athletes fall in a volume range takes skill, experience, and consideration of their medical and training history, biological and training age, and gender.
The bloody trail of our mistakes can save you a lot of added stress: When in doubt, it is always better to err on the side of less volume than too much.

The total volume number does not include accessory work or exercises of “local effect.” Those exercises are more targeted muscle strengthening or exercises to support the main movements.

We are mainly concerned about the most physically taxing exercises that demand more of an athlete’s attention to technique—hence, the volume restrictions.

Although the accessory work is not included in the volume calculations, you still cannot go wild, adding as much as you want. Always remember this: efficiency first.
(以上摘錄自原文第132~133)
--
若有發現翻譯不到位或有問題的地方，非常歡迎也希望各界指正！

【基礎力量訓練的動作有哪些？】

在我的觀念裡，力量訓練可分為「基礎力量」和「專項力量」。前者是每一種運動項目都要練的，後者跟運動項目有關，例如游泳、自行車、足球和跑步的「專項力量」都會有差別。但「基礎力量」會大同小異，這個大同中就一定有蹲舉……等動作。但除了蹲舉還有哪些？《The System》這本談論基礎力量的專書已經明確回答了這個問題，下面引用原文書第34頁分享如下：
--
#以下為譯文

帕列托法則（Pareto’s Principle），是一項著名的經濟學法則，又稱為「80/20法則」，它也適用於力量訓練動作的選擇。它所要表達的意思很簡單：把80%資源花在能產出最大效益的20%關鍵事情上，而這20%的關鍵又將為你帶來80%的效益。從訓練的目的來看，我們可以把這個法則的內容改寫成：從所有的力量動作中選出最關鍵的20%，而這關鍵的20%訓練動作將為運動員的力量與爆發力帶來80%的訓練效果。

這關鍵的20%訓練動作，作者選列如下：
●蹲舉及其變化式：背蹲舉、前蹲舉、單腿蹲
●爆發力動作：上膊、抓舉、挺舉、推舉
●推與拉：臥推、肩推、上膊與抓舉的拉槓動作、划船及其變化式
●下背與後側動力鏈：羅馬尼亞式硬舉 (RDL)、背挺舉、反向背挺舉、早安動作

以上這份清單很短，但這些動作就是我們認為基礎力量動作中關鍵的20%。雖然我們所設計的力量課表中，不會只有這些動作，但80%的訓練效果無疑都是由它們產生，在跟我們合作過的運動員中只要是認真熟練這幾個動作，進步的效果都很明顯。

簡而言之，把你的重心放在學習與優化這幾種動作的教學上，會比學習眾多「複雜的」和「全面式的」課表，更能有效幫助運動員提升力量和爆發力。

除了上述20%關鍵動作之外，任何其他的舉重與訓練動作都應當作輔助、平衡弱點或滿足專項運動需求的訓練手段。這些動作應只占總體訓練的一小段時間，只是在填補訓練空隙，換句話說，它們只是輔助。有很多教練在動作選擇上太過追求創造力，不斷地學習與搜集那些無法顯著提升力量的訓練動作。

運動的基礎元素是蹲、跳、跑、彎(腰)/屈(膝)、(旋)轉、推、拉。只要你在這些基礎元素中奠定良好的基礎，練就更好的動作品質、穩定度與力量，並逐步提升動作的速度，我們幾乎就能為每一種運動提供所需的專項力量。重要的事先做，把大量的時間反覆花在關鍵動作的技術優化與力量強化上。

#原文如下
We ascribe to the 80/20 rule—attributed as Pareto’s Principle, an economic principle. It states that for many events, 20 percent of the work yields 80 percent of the effects. Adapted for our purposes, 20 percent of all the exercise and movement choices yield 80 percent of the gains in strength and power development.

●SQUAT VARIATIONS—back squat, front squat, single-leg squat
●EXPLOSIVE MOVEMENTS—clean, snatch, jerk, push-press
●PUSHING AND PULLING—bench press, military press, pulls (clean and snatch), row variants
●LOW BACK AND POSTERIOR CHAIN—Romanian deadlift (RDL), hyperextension and reverse hyperextension, good morning

That very short list of fundamental lifts compromises our particular 20 percent. Although we dedicate much more than 20 percent of our programming to these basic lifts, there is no doubt that well over 80 percent of the results we have seen in our athletes can be attributed to mastering this handful of movements and lifts.

Made even simpler, placing the primary focus of your coaching on learning and refining your teaching of the fundamental lifts will yield far greater and more sustained gains in your athletes’ strength and power than many more complex and “comprehensive” programs.

Any additional lifts or movements should be considered assistance or accessory work, which serve to address specific needs or deficits. Those exercises make up just a fraction of our time, as they fill gaps, rather than form the base of training—in other words, to provide assistance. Too many coaches try to be creative in exercise selection and end up with a collection of movements and lifts that improve nothing to any significant level.

The fundamental movements of sport are squatting, jumping, running, bending, twisting, pushing, and pulling. By building proficiency in the quality, the stability and strength, and then the speed of those movements, we provide almost all of the sport specificity we need. This is how we put first things first, and spend the greatest amount of time and repetition on refining and strengthening movements.
(以上原文出自《The System》第34頁)
--
若有發現翻譯不到位或有問題的地方，非常歡迎也希望各界指正！

🌻另一個Zoom會議(第二次貼......有補上一些內容)
繼上次的年報導讀會議後, 讓我們再做另一個會議! 這次很榮幸邀請到一位對估值很有見解的股友前輩來帶大家了解估值(恩, 這次我會是主持人, 不是主講人).
主題: 估值(valuation)分享會(Cat: 這不算基礎的估值會議)
主講人: 小揚(from安泰價值投資)
https://www.facebook.com/antaiinvestment　(此為小揚的粉絲頁)
參與者: 具基本估值能力. 若打算參加者, 請事先跟我(請私訊)提出一個關於估值的case study, 到時候可在會議中分享(最好是以投影片形式呈現, 這樣到時候好跟大家分享). 若有估值的問題, 也可以提出.
Case study可以是美股, 也可以是台股.
時間: 台灣時間07/10 (周六)晚間９點.
預計一個小時(不會像上次那樣冗長了😅): 前30分鐘由小揚做分享, 後30分鐘大家分享估值案例&提問
進行方式: 以Zoom進行(之後會私訊會議資訊給參與者)

🌻Morgan Stanley Mid-year Investor Outlook: A tricky transition

https://www.morganstanley.com/ideas/midyear-2021-global-markets-outlook

🌻在您投資生涯中, 有沒有一些觀念讓您受用很多?
下面這位投資名人的好觀念影響我很深. 他的意思是, 一般投資人, 只要能説出三個買一家公司的理由, 就很夠了. 這也迫使我, 每次在買股票時, 問自己對這家公司的了解有多少. 也會去衡量公司的優點與缺點在哪裡.

"It is vital (重要的) that you know what you own, that if I asked you on the street why you like a certain stock, you can give me three reasons. If you don't know how they make their money, who their key clients are and what they make if, then I will tell you that you are over your head and should not own individual stocks."

全文在此:
Jim Cramer: In Times Like This, Go for the Easy Money
Look at the stocks you own. Can you tell me why you've got them? If you can't answer the following three questions, then have a look at several I like right now.

We've endured the meme stock craziness, with all of its love for heavily shorted stocks. We have watched the collapse of bitcoin to levels viewed as shocking, even if they are still more than double where they were not that long ago. We've dealt with Fed officials making it clear that they are no longer on the side of the bulls or the bears. They are on the side of job growth, but are wary of inflation. We've seen the end of the rush to get vaccines, which means that millions of people are going to get the new COVID variant, because there is no natural immunity to it. We've watched as the hopes for an infrastructure bill have collapsed. We've endured shortages of everything from chips to plastic to imported goods and labor.

And we're still standing, yeah, yeah, yeah.

Yep, we are in one of those halcyon moments, where the masks are off -- even if they shouldn't be -- and Americans are back doing what they do best: consume, spend, go out to eat and then consume and spend some more.

There are times in the stock market where the collective mindset is revealed. This is one of those times: Things are cool, it's not a big moment, there's no real news for a bit, it's the historically strong period and we can reach some conclusions about where we are.

When things are like this, it is important to remember that buyers like to revert to tried-and-true companies that thrive no matter what. These are companies that have an edge and are better at what they do than other companies.

You know that I am a great believer in index funds, that the average person doesn't have the time or the inclination to research individual stocks. It's a difficult barrier. I think you need to make time to read the quarterly report and listen to the conference call, to Google articles and, if possible, get some research about the companies you own. It is vital that you know what you own, that if I asked you on the street why you like a certain stock, you can give me three reasons. If you don't know how they make their money, who their key clients are and what they make if, then I will tell you that you are over your head and should not own individual stocks. I am reminded by this, because, once again, without a mask, I can be recognized and if I am not holding "Nvidia the Second," I can carry on a conversation.

I have had many in the last two weeks and when I have asked this litany of questions, I find myself at a loss as to why almost no one knew what they owned. But they thirsted for individual stocks, because they, like me, think things are better post pandemic. No, that's not a facetious comment. Many, many stocks did better with a stay-at-home economy. A huge number.

So what do I do? I revert to what others do when you are stumped about how to stay in touch with stocks, but want to do less homework. That means buying stocks that are accessible, not stocks like Unity (U) or Snowflake (SNOW) or Twilio (TWLO) or Okta (OKTA) .

I revert to normal businesses people know and I suggest they Google some articles, peruse the conference call, but, above all, like the company's products so you can buy more if it goes down.

Here's some that I have been telling people I like:

First is Ford (F) . I think the Ford lineup is amazing. The electric F-150 series will be incredible. I am eager to get a Maverick for my family, because it is a smaller pickup that will get the job done for the myriad little things I need to do with this farm I bought from that crazy bitcoin foray. I like the competitive edge of the CEO, who says he is going to bury Elon Musk when the Lightning comes out. I even think the Bronco is cool as all get out. Most important, though? I think the chip shortage is ending. My semiconductor friends are telling me the foundries are producing more feature-rich chips and that means Ford can pump out the trucks small business people love and need. Plus, the used car prices at last have plateaued, according to their most important pricing index. Halcyon times.

Second, Costco (COST) : The samples are coming back. Tell me you don't love the samples. You need things in bulk. You want low prices. You want to get all of the things that people don't think of with Costco, like insurance, hearing-aids -- hey, they are a fortune -- jewelry, things around the house. You go and you will buy far more than you first came for. My kind of store.

The kids love this American Eagle Outfitters (AEO) , which we just bought for my charitable trust, which you can follow along by joining the Action Alerts PLUS club. Jay Schottenstein, the CEO, came on "Mad Money" recently and it's clear that his Aerie model has real staying power: 26 consecutive quarters of double digit growth. No flash in the pan, that one. Number one brand in jeans for the 15 to 25 year old group. The best in the mall. How did I know this? I see the credit card bills.

I got up this morning to do my physical therapy. I have been doing it ever since I hurt my back in February. I have this really cool pair of sneakers that fit me perfectly and I love them, but I am fortunate enough to have a vacation house and I am always taking those shoes with me.

So I went on Amazon (AMZN) this morning and lo and behold I saw them for half price. I bought two pairs. Then I went over everything I have bought in the last year and got a bunch of those things. Then I bought a pair of binoculars, because mine were stolen. I paid half price.

Yep, Amazon's universal. I was talking to Alexa, while I was ordering, getting some new music on, asking questions. I saw that despite all of the Sturm und Drang of Amazon being late with things, all the delivery dates were within range. I didn't click on any ads, and I didn't need the speed of Web Services, but the whole thing reminded me about how special the darned company is. I don't care if it's ahead or behind plan for the moment. I would just buy some more when it goes down.

Finally, Apple (AAPL) . I think people who don't own Apple should look what they are holding at this very moment. Yes, right now. Or look at what's in your lap or on the table besides your fork. And then think about the bill you paid last night without knowing it. Think about what you bought in the App store yesterday. Think about what would happen if it would break or get stolen or, left in the Uber (UBER) , or heaven forbid, be dropped into the pool or in the, yes, toilet.

There, that's what you buy in halcyon times. Stocks of companies you know that if they go lower, because things get less halcyon, you are fine with it and buy more. If things go up, believe me, you will participate.

So accept the moment. Don't try for the hard money. Go for the easy kind. That's the best kind.

https://realmoney.thestreet.com/jim-cramer/jim-cramer--15692051

Picture: 牡丹(peony)花開. 恨不得院子裡有一塊地是牡丹園.

本輯[粵語郭文貴28A]的資料來源﹕ 以下整體「2019文贵看春晚」之２ ............. 情、理、爆料、和反共計劃並重的(五小時)除夕晚會 (普通話、英語原聲帶視頻 + 中英文字幕) 2019文贵看春晚1 杨澜找钥匙，凯琳谈人生观，班农先生在推广平民主义运动 https://youtu.be/XqmFL9B6gZg (39分鐘) 2019文贵看春晚2 香港已经被沦陷 https://youtu.be/lUDy9a9BUag (21分鐘) 2019文贵看春晚3 采访达赖喇嘛 https://youtu.be/kL3EPM9-6WQ (59分鐘) 2019文贵看春晚4 孟建柱要干掉达赖喇嘛，共产党信奉马列邪教抢夺百姓财产及的宗教信仰及人权的自由 https://youtu.be/kL3EPM9-6WQ (44分鐘) 2019文贵看春晚5 香港台湾被威胁被蓝金黄 https://youtu.be/tm2fQoYM1Xo (29分鐘) 2019文贵看春晚6 金正恩被共产党当作筹码，JHO LOW在马来西亚拥有大量资产和势力，背后有孟建柱亲爹的支持 https://youtu.be/2o_7DjeNxik (26分鐘) 2019文贵看春晚7 凯琳，班农展望未来，央视春晚是对14亿百姓的洗脑犯罪，共产党是制造仇恨的源泉 https://youtu.be/rVttfQq9GSU (18分鐘) 2019文贵看春晚8 郭文贵：只有灭掉共产党中国才会有自由，公平，法治，14亿人民不应该成为几个人的奴隶 https://youtu.be/YLKZU7ewJ90 (11分鐘) 2019文贵看春晚9 在中国消失的五百人上千万亿的财产都哪去了，班农说王岐山就是个魔鬼。 https://youtu.be/lB486iub-9c (24分鐘) 2019文贵看春晚10 人民群众是不是我们的敌人呢？现在这个国家就是被几个大流氓给绑架了。 https://youtu.be/HtZSbF9HaBc (19分鐘) 2019文贵看春晚11 法治基金的启动是灭共的倒计时，用法治基金依法灭共！文贵，班农，凯琳为中国人民祈祷祝福！ https://youtu.be/He36JRbhVts (18分鐘) ................ 閱讀材料﹕ 台灣記者鄭國強報導 ------- 達賴喇嘛遭騙以「不獨立」與中共談 郭文貴爆北京回應是「殺掉這個禿驢」 https://www.cmmedia.com.tw/home/artic... (附圖) 郭文貴爆料的訪談影片中，鳳凰衛視方代表告訴達賴喇嘛北京有興趣聽他的立場，事後看來是一場騙局。（圖片來源 / 翻攝自《路德社》） 一段機密訪談影片，一封給中國國家主席習近平的信，郭文貴在今年農曆年除夕春晚直播時，揭露了西藏精神領袖達賴喇嘛與中國共產黨之間的談判，或稱交易，但後果正如一般預料的，共產黨不但不守信，還下令殺掉達賴喇嘛。 中國政府通緝在案、除之而後快的郭文貴，在2月4日晚間長達5個小時的直播當中，重頭戲就是播放了近1小時的達賴喇嘛與中國安全部代表在東京的秘密會面全影像，負責攝影的人就是郭文貴，「大家看到這在日本的東京，根據習近平要求，在政法委書記孟建柱、安全部副部長馬建的要求下，我來安排的，在東京一間飯店內的採訪，外面都是持槍警衛，戒備森嚴。」 達賴喇嘛秘密訪談，單方向北京表明立場 拍攝時間約5年前，2012年中國共產黨舉行十八大之後，影片一開始出現的是達賴喇嘛最信任的人，達賴喇嘛宗教基金會前董事長才嘉，他也負責翻譯達賴喇嘛給習近平的一封信中文譯本，接著還有鳳凰衛視的王紀言、鳳凰衛視東京特派鄭浩，郭文貴補充說「尊者對面所有人，全部都是情報人員，安全部百分之百擁有的鳳凰衛視。」 為了取信達賴喇嘛，負責採訪的鄭浩一開始就表達自己的身分，「國家派我們去哪裡我們就去哪」，並開宗明義的說，有什麼想要向北京當局喊話的，表明立場的，他們（安全部）會忠實表達，當然，鄭浩所提出採訪達賴喇嘛的問題，當然就是北京想探詢達賴喇嘛立場的問題。 整個採訪歷經一個小時結束，內容談及中國十八大，西藏獨立、自治、大藏區、轉世的問題，郭文貴指著影片說，「這是五年前發生的事情，可看做是達賴喇嘛和共產黨之間一個正常的合同和交易…你看從訪談開始到結束，王紀言、鄭浩做為間諜、情報頭子，這些間諜對尊者都是畢恭畢敬。」訪談影片最後鄭浩問他「你想回中國嗎？」達賴喇嘛毫不猶豫的說「當然我要回去！」 令人震驚的是，這個訪談中，達賴喇嘛明確向中共表示，「西藏並沒有要追求獨立。」郭文貴還說，達賴喇嘛給習近平的親筆信中也證明他的立場「西藏完全沒有尋求獨立」，但共產黨整天在全世界打壓西藏的宣傳「西藏想獨立！」 不追求西藏獨立，在轉世上願與北京合作 訪談的內容，與達賴喇嘛給習近平的親筆信是一致的，主要有幾個重點，最重要的是，郭文貴說，達賴喇嘛以這麼洪量的聲音宣示「西藏不追求獨立」，「西藏是在你中國的憲法範圍內尋求自治，西藏也沒有要尋求特別的自治，所有的自治，都是在共產黨憲法範圍內的自治，共產黨的宣傳說達賴喇嘛追求事實上的獨立，要特別的自治。」 (附圖) 郭文貴展示的達賴喇嘛給習近平的一封信中，針對西藏獨立、大藏區、轉世問題等都有表示立場。（圖片來源 / 翻攝自《路德社》） 再者，中國指控達賴喇嘛一心一意的堅守中間道路的立場是「搞獨立」，以及訴求大藏區的概念，達賴喇嘛都予以否認。 至於「那些指責西藏驅逐漢人」的指控，郭文貴解讀達賴喇嘛回應的意思是「我根本沒有這個能力，也不可能、也不想驅逐漢人，但要保持西藏文化和環境的獨立是對世界負責，這是共產黨決定的，這難道有問題嗎？」 關於轉世，郭文貴說「人家講的很清楚，你要是解決了西藏問題，很簡單嘛，我只要符合轉世的條件，你就讓我轉世，你覺得我不符合，就不讓我轉世。」達賴喇嘛表態，轉世與共產黨合作，按照西藏禮儀來進行。再來，共產黨說達賴鼓勵自焚，達賴喇嘛表態堅持反對藏人自焚。 這封給習近平的一封信由藏文寫成，再翻譯成中文，為了磋商正確的內容，郭文貴說「從東歐、瑞士、日本，我和達賴喇嘛尊者至少見面五次以上。」但他替達賴喇嘛感到不平的說「大家看到了尊者的誠意，你說達賴都跪下了，他親筆信證明西藏完全沒有尋求獨立，但你能相信共產黨嗎？共產黨耍流氓耍了幾十年。」 中國確認達賴喇嘛立場後，下令要除掉他 更令人震驚的是，郭文貴把親筆信交回給政法委書記孟建柱之後，得到的指示要殺掉達賴喇嘛。郭文貴大爆內幕說「孟建柱當時說過什麼話，尊者達賴喇嘛從來不知道，這話我必須在這裡說。」 孟建柱跟郭文貴說「現在我們拿到了他寫這些信，達賴喇嘛不追求獨立，不追求大藏區，不鼓勵自焚，未來可以向西藏人展示他不求獨立，這是法寶，永遠管用。」接下來竟然說「現在，讓這個禿爐（死）， 我們幹掉他…如果你能幫助我們幹掉他，你就成為最大的功臣。」 這表示，中國當局根本沒打算讓達賴喇嘛回西藏，郭文貴說，「把人家騙到後說把這個禿爐幹掉，這是什麼情況？就像西方人要殺掉梵諦岡的教宗一樣，而且用最髒的詞。」 郭文貴表示，衷心希望達賴喇嘛能回到中國，實現中國的宗教自由，反觀現在中國四處打壓基督教，習近平卻計畫三月去訪梵蒂岡，「梵諦岡要和中國和好了，這是對宗教最大的汙辱。」 (鄭國強 前壹週刊、今周刊等媒體記者，世家望族、家族交班、調查報導、大數據、金融犯罪、無人機都是熱愛主題。)

Crescent Lament 2012新創作曲「尪仔面」，預計收錄在我們下一張以臺灣早年藝妲生活為藍本的概念專輯中。本曲內容描述日治時代到國民政府來台初期，臺灣藝妲面對賣藝賣笑、送往迎來的人生，有著萬般不由自己的感慨。「尪仔面」是臺灣閩南語用詞，含有兩種意義：用來指稱長得很好看的年輕男女，或者，也有「面具」的意思。「尪仔面」這首歌之歌名，即含有這兩種意義：藝妲們每天化妝將自己打扮的漂漂亮亮，也像頂著這張漂亮的「面具」，面對每個來往的客人。

--------------------------------------------------------

After releasing the debut album "Behind the Lethal Deceit" in 2011, Crescent Lament keeps on digging out the dark side of Taiwanese history, and integrates those miserable stories into our music. "Taiwan geisha" becomes the theme of our next project. The story of our next conceptual album occurs in the mid-20th century, when Taiwan was in an era of turmoil. Because of low social status, Taiwanese geishas endured much more suffering than ordinary people.
This live MV -- "尪仔面(Masked Doll)", is the latest release of Crescent Lament. Written in Taiwanese, the lyrics describe that how a Taiwanese geisha hides tears under the invisible mask , and shows her smiles all the time emotionlessly.

【尪仔面 / Masked Doll】
詞/Lyrics：周慕姿 Muer Chou、陳宗緯 Warose Chen (黑腔/grunts)
曲/Music：周岳弘 Komet Chou
英譯/English translation：周岳弘 Komet Chou
收錄專輯/Album：花殤 Elegy for the Blossoms (2015)

歌曲錄製/Recording & remixing：Warose Chen 陳宗緯
影片剪輯/Video editing：Warose Chen 陳宗緯
* 影片素材由 Ekim Lu、Taur Yang、Anzio Chou、Sashiba Chou 提供。

追蹤我們的最新消息 / Stay up to date on Crescent Lament
Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/crescentlament
Website - http://crescentlament.site44.com/