為什麼這篇已經離婚英文鄉民發文收入到精華區：因為在已經離婚英文這個討論話題中，有許多相關的文章在討論，這篇最有參考價值！作者ralftalent (Sebastian Chen)看板Examination標題[課業] 1...
已經離婚英文 在 Drama Note 靠看劇續命的社畜 Instagram 的精選貼文
2021-08-18 12:53:39
#DramaNote片單 無雷 7月上旬有點影劇疲乏，什麼都不想看也很多不好看 還好下旬的奧運解救一切，很多比賽都超級好看🤩 但還是介紹一下7月份看的戲劇🥺 #日劇 ◾️#離婚活動 棄劇 #北川景子 與 #瑛太 兩大卡司共演的日劇，搭配上#米津玄師 的主題曲 Pale Blue，怎麼說都讓人期待...
請依下文回答第21題至第25題
The National Immigration Agency (NIA) in Taiwan announced that new immigrant
mothers who are divorced with children born in Taiwan are allowed to continue
staying in Taiwan despite that they lose the custody of their children. The
NIA's decision to amend the law is invariably linked with the protection of
the children's rights and interests. The NIA restated that Article 31 of the
Immigration Act in 2007 was modified to safeguard the rights and interests of
foreign spouses after a divorce. The amendment contains enabling them to have
the custody of children after a divorce and get divorced with their Taiwanese
spouses if they are victims of domestic violence.
移民署（NIA）宣布，離異的新移民母親，具有在台灣出生的孩子，即使失去孩
子的撫養權，也可以繼續留在台灣。NIA的修法決定不約而同地與保護兒童權益聯繫在一
起。NIA重申，2007年修改了移民法第31條，以保障外國配偶離婚後的權益。修正案包括
讓他們在離婚後擁有孩子的撫養權，如果他們是家庭暴力的受害者，可以與台灣配偶離婚
。
22 Which of the following statements is NOT true about the NIA's reform of
the Immirgration Act?
(A) It grants the separations between new immigrant mothers and their
children in the case of a divorce.
(B) It protects the rights and interests of the children if they are victims
of domestic violence.
22 以下哪項關於 NIA 對移民法的改革的陳述是不正確的？
(A) 在離婚的情況下，准許新移民母親與其子女分居。
(B) 保障家庭暴力受害子女的權益。
考選部答案是(A) 但第一句The National Immigration Agency (NIA) in Taiwan
announced that new immigrant mothers who are divorced with children born in
Taiwan are allowed to continue staying in Taiwan despite that they lose the
custody of their children.(移民署（NIA）宣布，離異的新移民母親，具有在
台灣出生的孩子，即使失去孩子的撫養權，也可以繼續留在台灣。)不就是在描述選項
(A)It grants the separations between new immigrant mothers and their children
in the case of a divorce.(在離婚的情況下，准許新移民母親與其子女分居。)的情形
嗎?
另外 The amendment contains enabling them to have the custody of children
after a divorce and get divorced with their Taiwanese spouses if they are
victims of domestic violence.(修正案包括讓他們在離婚後擁有孩子的撫養權，如果他
們是家庭暴力的受害者，可以與台灣配偶離婚。)句中的他們如果是指新移民母親們，那
受家暴的僅有新移民母親們，選項(B)It protects the rights and interests of the
children if they are victims of domestic violence.(保障家庭暴力受害子女的權益
。)就是不正確的，這題答案有可能是選項(B)嗎?
，
Once granted, a new immigrant mother in such a circu,stance will be
authorized to continue dwelling iin this country. In the case of a new
immigrant mother who has already gone back to her country of origin after a
divorce, the NIA claimed that she can still come back to Taiwan with a
visitor visa provided that she used to be a legal resident in Taiwan who was
the primary caretaker of her child/children or kept in full contact with them.
一旦獲得批准，在這種情況下的新移民母親將被授權繼續居住在這個國家。對於離婚後已
經返回原籍國的新移民母親，NIA聲稱她仍然可以持訪問簽證返回台灣，前提是她曾經是
台灣的合法居民，她是她的孩子的主要看護人或與他們保持充分聯繫。
24 What is the criterion that a new immigrant mother must fulfill in order to
benefit from this amendment in law?
(C) She needs to be a legat immigrant who has stayed continually in Taiwan.
(D) She has to be a lawful resident who has already obtained the citizenship
in Taiwan.
24 新移民母親必須滿足什麼標準才能從這項法律修正案中受益？
(C) 她必須是在台灣長期居留的合法移民。
(D) 必須是已取得台灣國籍的合法居民。
考選部答案是(C)她必須是在台灣長期居留的合法移民。請問文中she used to be a
legal resident in Taiwan(她曾經是台灣的合法居民)可以解釋成選項(D) She has to
be a lawful resident who has already obtained the citizenship in Taiwan.(必須
是已取得台灣國籍的合法居民。)嗎?
[課業] 國考課業相關問題，歷屆考題的討論，如學理觀念的釐清。
===========================板規宣導，ctrl+y可刪除 ============================
(三)課業文規範：
1.課業文不以標題和分類為標準，以文章內容為實質課業文審查。
2.禁止課業文問得答案後刪除，除無人回應外，不論答案正確與否，均禁止刪除。
3.發表課業文應附上來源、題目、自己解題想法，違者刪除。
4.國考歷屆考題與考題觀念討論(書裡看到的選這個)請附上想法、出處。
==============================================================================
備註：刪除文章會進入垃圾桶並不會消失，所以自刪課業文絕對能查的到！！
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 219.85.168.221 (臺灣)
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Examination/M.1682346330.A.67E.html
→ kaky: D是不必要的因為入籍是不會被遣送的跟修法無關 04/25 01:51
→ kaky: 說起來23其實可以任意離婚才是實際的好處，許多外配不離就是 04/25 01:53
→ kaky: 因為過去外配就是怕喪失居留權所以才隱忍不離 04/25 01:55
→ ralftalent: 感謝解惑 04/25 02:04
推 dadiv: 臺灣國家移民局是???NIA指的不就是移民署嗎? 04/25 08:17
推 danlin1231: 23 04/25 10:37
→ danlin1231: 擁有保留台灣國籍的權利->代表可以留台灣 04/25 10:37
→ danlin1231: 也就是說nia的改革是外籍母親即便失去撫養權也可以續 04/25 10:37
→ danlin1231: 留台灣 04/25 10:37
→ danlin1231: 但失去撫養權代表無法與兒女同居照顧 04/25 10:37
→ danlin1231: 能續留台灣只是如果要探視子女可以比較方便 04/25 10:37
推 danlin1231: 不對 抱歉搞錯 04/25 10:43
→ danlin1231: 應該 a只有是在被家暴而離婚的狀況下 而不是所有的媽 04/25 10:43
→ danlin1231: 媽 04/25 10:43
→ kaky: 有國籍就不會被要求離境了,都是只有依親(配偶)居留權才發生 04/25 13:24
※ 編輯: ralftalent (219.85.168.221 臺灣), 04/25/2023 21:39:47推 sonymanhi: 第22題的選項B 04/26 13:37
→ sonymanhi: 是第一段第三行的換句話說 04/26 13:37
→ sonymanhi: The 04/26 13:37
→ sonymanhi: NIA's decision to amend the law is invariably link 04/26 13:37
→ sonymanhi: ed with the protection of 04/26 13:37
→ sonymanhi: the children's rights and interests 04/26 13:37
→ sonymanhi: 整段文章也沒有提到母親與子女分居 04/26 13:37
推 sonymanhi: 選項c She has to be a lawful resident 04/26 13:47
→ sonymanhi: 即倒數第二行she can still come back to Taiwan with 04/26 13:47
→ sonymanhi: a 04/26 13:47
→ sonymanhi: visitor visa provided that she used to be a legal 04/26 13:47
→ sonymanhi: resident in Taiwan 的換句話說，這句只提及她必須是 04/26 13:47
→ sonymanhi: 合法居留在台灣，不代表她已經取得台灣國籍，（D)選項 04/26 13:47
→ sonymanhi: 不能選 04/26 13:47
→ kaky: 新法是沒拿到監護也可以留下來，所以在跟子女分開下還是可以 04/27 01:58
→ kaky: 不過已經是延伸解釋了 04/27 01:59
→ kaky: 取得國籍跟居留就無關了，國民沒有喪失居留權的問題 04/27 02:00